


CalPERS pension administrators, among other pension administrators, were grossly inaccurate in recent decades about what they forecasted they would be able to deliver in benefits with given levels of employer and employee contributions. City, County and State agencies bought the sales pitch, and, as is now obvious, CalPERS grossly understated the true ultimate costs of their pensions. Managers, elected officials, unions, and employees should have questioned the math. State and Local governments have been hit hard by rising pension costs, made worse by rising health care benefits costs, and the falling tax revenues of a weaker economy.
According to one Stanford study, CalPERS pensions alone are underfunded by $290.6 billion, or about $24,000 per California household. Many want to argue about how to calculate the exact number (San Jose Example here), when the exact number cannot be known because it depends upon assumptions (AKA: scientific wild guesses) about future investment earnings of the retirement funds. We humans have always been notoriously imperfect at foretelling the future. Unforecasted economic downturns, such as our current situation, can wreak havoc on the actuarial math. This is exactly why Defined Benefit Retirement plans (such as the common CalPERS plans) have been widely replaced by Defined Contribution plans, except in the public sector. Neither CalPERS nor the public labor unions are enamored with the idea of increased disclosure of underfunded plans such as this GASB plan.

The nation's two largest public pension funds last week reported slim annual investment earnings, CalPERS 1.1 percent and CalSTRS 2.3 percent, as experts continue to say hitting their long-term earnings target, 7.75 percent, will be difficult.
While CalPERS reported weak earnings in 2011, a prominent private-sector investment manager, Robert Arnott of Research Affiliates, told the board last week he thinks the most they can expect from stocks and bonds next decade is 4 percent.
Another major investor, Laurence Fink of BlackRock, told the
CalPERS board during a similar educational session in 2009 that during
the next 15 years: "You'll be lucky to get 6 percent on your portfolios, maybe 5
percent."....
Even a small drop in the earnings forecast could boost the annual employer payment to the pension fund. CalPERS, which may revisit the forecast in March, is not turning a deaf ear to the experts....
... A Stanford professor, former Assemblyman Joe Nation, D-San Rafael, issued a report last month showing what happens if the three state pension funds (CalPERS, CalSTRS and UC Retirement) earn the long-term historical average, 6.2 percent a year.
Nation said in a Sacramento Bee op-ed article the long-term "shortfall is $290.6 billion, or about $24,000 per California household. Like a mortgage accruing interest that's not being paid, that shortfall grows every day the problem is not addressed."...
See the full story at PublicCEO.com


http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php
HEAVY HITTERS
Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2012
LEGEND: Republican Democrat On the fence | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | = Between 40% and 59% to both parties = Leans Dem/Repub (60%-69%) = Strongly Dem/Repub (70%-89%) = Solidly Dem/Repub (over 90%) |


Republican
Democrat
On the fence
Recent Comments