« Taking One For The Team | Main | The Other Chico DNA »

September 14, 2007

MOU For Me and You?

high_schhol_graduation.gif
The Chico Unified School District (CUSD) and Butte College (BC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 9/12/07 to pursue the concept of an Early College High School, here is the MOU. Actually BC signed it in August and CUSD gave it the stamp of approval on Tuesday. The MOU allows the two organizations to receive $400K from the Microsoft Vista Sucks, But the CEO's a Nice Guy Foundation, often referred to as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

The $400K is for planning only and the actual construction of a campus is not funded. It will be interesting to see if $400K is enough to plan a college-high school program. It would only cover 2/3 of the cost to plan a disc golf course.

The Early-College concept allows students to attend the campus from 9th grade on. In 5 years they can earn a high school diploma and an Associate Degree. Students can accelerate the time frame to do it in 4 years. The campus would be limited to 400 students (I don't know why that is). A previous concept like this was floated to use unallocated school bond money to build the campus in Chico. This idea puts the campus at BC. The school would start with only a 9th grade and each year would add a grade. As far as student's costs go the high school portion of the school would be paid through regular public school funding. The college portion would probably be paid for through a college enrollment fee.

This campus is supposed to address enrollment issues and attempt to retain at-risk students. The idea is that a lot of students are not interested in standard high school curriculum, and don't intend to go to college. These kids tend to drop out. If they can be interested in vocational training and retained through this program it's better for their future income, and for our community. One number thrown out was that a high school diploma results in an average annual income of $25K, while a junior college degree bumps that up to $49K.

But there are lots of questions. Why would at risk students want to take a high school curriculum that would be harder than a standard high school? Why is CUSD pursuing a campus so far out of its district? Assuming at risk kids are not all well-to-do, how will they afford the college fees? Where will the funding come from?

The presentation I heard, which was made by the leaders of CUSD and BC, was full of marketing terms. It was very business oriented and maybe that's because it was given to a business group. But They expressed concerns over competition, meeting the needs of the market, and targeting certain customers to shore up enrollment losses. Another business concept that was missing from the discussion was that of focusing on your core expertise. I wonder if this isn't a plan to shake loose bond money.

Vocational training is a good option, I think. It's too bad it can't happen on existing campuses. I also wonder if our good high school students are being challenged, or if the curriculum is dumbed down. I honestly don't really know how our local schools stack up to competition, private or otherwise. I get most of my scholastic news from the Wooly Weekly (the news source for all things Emma Wilson), and I'm happy with that school so far.

I think the Early College High School is a good idea, but it deserves watching since there are many hurdles it has to clear to be successful.
I sent an email to Mark Sorensen to ask his thoughts on the Early College High School Program. He sent me back a great detailed opinion. Mark went through the local education system, and I assume his three daughters did the same more recently. With Mark's approval I'd like to post his email. So let me know Mark, can I?

But this brings up a good subtopic for this post. I've found it useful to maintain a stable of people whose opinions I can tap on serious subjects. This keeps me from having to form my own opinions . I've found my own opinion to often be bland, uninformed, and sometimes completely wrong. For example I once thought the $2 bill would really catch on. So here's who I keep on my list and what their expertise is.

Mark Sorensen - trade schools / raising twins
Larry Wahl - things that hover
Mary Flynn - trigonometry / how to best use red felt pens
Tom Nickell - things the police can do when they retire
Anthony Watts - things to do to piss off the Beat
Tom Gasgoyne - things to do to piss off Anthony Watts
Gregg Payne - poles of destruction
Tempra Board - european cars and airplanes
Steve Bertagna - Fords from the 1960's
Alan Chamberlain - words I've never used in conversation
My Wife - how absolutely great I am, or am not
David Little - funny ways to work "Little" into a sentence
Dave Burkland - making sense out of Greg Jones' obscure filing system
Evan Tcklinsgiy - memorizing hard to spell words
Dave Brobst - how often I screw up its versus it's (pretty often)

And that's just my short list.
bhs_lola_090707.gif
cichallange_38.gif
CI Challenge: Can you guess what it is? Winner: Susan B. Anthony, who apparently posted a comment from the afterlife. That's the first time that's happened.

Posted by Lon at September 14, 2007 07:33 AM

Comments

whistlers mother

Posted by: mark bohn at September 14, 2007 08:30 AM

Lon -

You wrote: "how often I screw up its versus it's (pretty often)."

I think it should be "how often I screw up it's versus its (pretty often)."

Dave

Posted by: Dave Brobst at September 14, 2007 08:50 AM

That's not Anne Bidwell is it?

Posted by: TrevHastings at September 14, 2007 09:17 AM

Dave,

Its difficult to keep up with all the new-age grammar rules being produced these day. But I try to keep up on the rules by following the guidelines established by the Good Grammer Society. Those rules can be found on it's web site www.goodgrammer.org.

Lon

Posted by: Lon at September 14, 2007 09:18 AM

Trevor-Mark,

Not Annie B. nor whistler's mom.

Lon

Posted by: Lon at September 14, 2007 09:22 AM

Lon,

There is a great way for high school students to start college early and it wouldn't cost the school district a dime... except for all the ADA money they would lose. It's called "testing out". Our daughter did it and she started a year early at Butte College. She is now getting ready to move on to a four year college up in Oregon with most of her GE out of the way. Any high school student can take the California High School Proficiency Exam at the age of 17 1/2. After passing the exam, the student receives a certificate equal to a high school diploma.

It in no way hinders the young scholars ability to get into college. As a matter of fact, the academic counselor at my daughter's future school was quite impressed by the initiative she had shown.

The district does not want parents to know about testing out and goes to great lengths to discourage students from pursuing it once they do discover the option. In fact, it seems the district goes to great lengths to see that any alternative programs are swept under the rug.

No cost of building an additional campus... no headache of trying to decide who gets to go to the new campus. Test out, go straight to junior college.

Posted by: Eleanor at September 14, 2007 09:28 AM

Its me! Now take down my picture you young whippersnapper!

Posted by: Susan B. Anthony at September 14, 2007 09:38 AM

Suzy B.

It is you. I wonder how to post the winner though? I'll have to think about this one.

Lon

Posted by: Lon at September 14, 2007 09:44 AM

Well, whippersnapper, there's a bit of a CI challenge in the submitter.

Posted by: Susan B. Anthony at September 14, 2007 09:50 AM

Lon,

Thanks so much for your inclusive CI challenge, featuring an important woman in American history who worked for women's education and the right to vote. Thanks, also, for your careful attention to grammar. As an English major, I am proud, and I think we can say that Susan B. would be, too.

Another interesting woman I just saw a documentary on, but who many people don't know, is Madalyn Murray O'Hair. She single handedly took the issue of prayer in school to the Supreme Court, which found it unconstitutional. O'Hair was an interesting woman who met a sad ending. Some people might not appreciate her, but here's some more information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madalyn_Murray_O'Hair

OK, enough on our spunky American women lecture for today.

Tempra

Posted by: Tempra at September 14, 2007 10:11 AM

Suzy B.

From your IP address I have to assume you're actually Susan B. Anthony Watts. But since I can't really prove that I'll keep the credit listed for Suzy.

Lon

Posted by: Lon at September 14, 2007 12:27 PM

Tempra,

Yikes, that's an awful way to go. Stay spunky yourself, it's tough to fight the good fight. In fact it's tough to fight at all. But someone's got to do it.

Lon

Posted by: Lon at September 14, 2007 12:31 PM

Eleanor,

That's a good point. There are other options, and I think those options are putting pressure on the public school system. That's true of private schools that seem to operate with less overhead.

While I don't think it's entirely common I do know of a couple of public school teachers whose kids are homeschooled or in a private school. That's a pretty bold statement. But to be fair I also know that some teachers at my kid's school have their kids enrolled there.

Lon

Posted by: Lon at September 14, 2007 01:13 PM

"...who apparently posted a comment from the afterlife."

Just so you know; In heaven we have Free High Speed DSL and WiFi that connects to the octa-core Pentium 7 laptops Saint Peter issues at the gate. In Hell they use TTY's on dialup and have cassette tapes for data storage.

Posted by: Susan B. Anthony at September 14, 2007 02:06 PM

Susan B. Anthony Watts:

Wow cassette tapes for storage! I remember using that method with my TRS-80 Model III... that wasn't so bad.

I was thinking they'd be using paper tape...

Which I did use along with the KSR-35 & accoustically coupled modem me and two other local Chico kids bought around 1974 to access the Huntsinger Computer Timesharing BTI-3000 machine that used to live on the NE corner of East Avenue and Pillsbury... Those other two kids now make their living in the computer industry.

I can remember carrying programs from point A to point B on paper tape...with a read/write speed at a blazing 110 baud (with the rotor stop bit, that is about 0.1 K in today’s terms)… Now THAT was Hell.


Lon:

I don’t care about posting that email…just keep in mind that I typed that in about 5-minutes during yesterday’s morning email 50 WPM response blitz, and were initial impressions from the very brief 30 minute presentation Lon and I heard the previous day at Chico Rotary.…definately un-refined thoughts on the matter... I hope that they’re successful…..

That “testing-out” idea is a good one, too….

Posted by: Mark Sorensen at September 14, 2007 04:51 PM

Here's what Mark sent to me.

The MOU is vague in many respects… Though it is an interesting concept.

As someone who benefited from CUSD’s once FANTASTIC vocational training, I was upset and dismayed when I came back to town and found those programs long gone…. Electronics drove me to get my Ham license when I was 16 and significantly drove my interest in chemistry, physics and math at the time…I am that way – I need to have a practical application to make me interested in taking in information…. Otherwise, I don’t have a need to know….

In my years at RCA, at one time responsible for over 350 technicians in 4 states, I spent LOTS of time trying to recruit technicians from colleges, trade schools and the military who had the same level of PRACTICAL knowledge that I gained at Chico High! Lots of people had the degree or the certificates but could not live it, breathe it and apply it beyond text book applications…. I’m sure you know what I mean….

Back then we not only had a high school electronics program, but Butte County sponsored a 3 hour per day Electronics ROP course 2-5 pm Monday-Friday at Chico High; and Bill Pope was one hell of a knowledgeable, talented teacher (and college professor), plus Butte College had a great electronics program ……. Shoot… I still use many of the skills that I received from metal shop, wood shop, auto shop, mechanical drawing, etc…Now, all those programs are virtually – gone... But, I digress…

I was listening for some reference to the CUSD Bruce Road property… I heard no reference to that property. Instead, it sounds like the program would be housed at the BC main campus. What they heck are they planning for that Bruce Road property?

I can see that they’re looking for operational synergy with the existing BC programs, facilities and particularly the vocational programs & facilities… that makes perfect sense.

But, if CUSD is contributing to facilities (I have not yet seen or heard any specific reference to this), it seems odd that CUSD would be spending facilities dollars so far from their borders….

If I remember correctly, Butte College (Butte Valley) has Chico phone numbers (mostly), an Oroville Zip Code (95965), is in the Paradise Irrigation District, and is in the Durham Unified School District…. Not exactly what I would call “Chico”.

Some number of high school kids ride a bus from Chico to Red Bluff to attend Mercy High each day, but it would seem that the BC location would be something of a deterrent….

Interesting reading: The yearly per student operational costs for private/parochial high schools vs public high schools (they’re at about half the cost). Which is particularly interesting when taken with the apparently higher “success rate” of those private schools (vastly higher)… Yes, public schools are saddled with significant obligations and red tape, but It would seem that the CUSD/BC program would be saddled with similar if not identical operating restrictions (red tape & bureaucracy) and operational costs as other CUSD schools for the High School portion of the program…..

In the “vague” category is also their long term plans to fund the operation. They were surprisingly ill prepared to comment on that question yesterday. Though, the MOU clearly says that the usual public school ADA would fund the high school portion of the program, while the applicable BC Community College revenue streams (including student fees) would fund the Community College portions of the program.

One of the major “problems” with the delivery of vocational training in public high schools is the notion (and apparently the legal requirement) that everything be free to the student. You can not charge extra for any supplies. So, it would seem that they plan to shift the actual “vocational training” over to BC so that they can treat those as a college activity.

They talked about trying to attract students who might not be doing the best in today’s traditional High Schools, but you’d have to wonder how some of those students will be able to afford to pay the college fees… even though Community College fees are quite low… but vocational training classes typically have higher fees than purely academic classes.

Overall, an interesting concept…. Glad to see them trying to reinvent themselves and to creatively work around some of the operational obstacles that they face…. I certainly look forward to hearing more of the details….

Posted by: Lon at September 14, 2007 05:39 PM

Lon - Sorry for the late post, I was out of town.

This program/MOU sounds a lot like the one from my high school, it was partnered with Sonoma State. The program was called 3-1-3, 3yrs High School, 1 year High School/Sonoma State 3yrs Sonoma State (with the option to transfer within the system). Good program designed for 1st generation college students. As you can see from doing the math 3+1+3, it equals only 7 years, so where did that one year go? While in the program you have to spend every Saturday in a class of all 3-1-3 students.

I did not take the program. I did end up at Sonoma, and was only about 1 year behind all the 3-1-3 kids, but once college hits, they quickly don't finish within that 3 years.

Duke

Posted by: D.Erickson at September 15, 2007 07:55 PM

Duke,

Wow! Every Saturday would be a hurdle I wouldn't have tried clearing when in high school, or college for that matter.

That would impede a lot of part time work opportunities. It would also have hampered social gatherings, which I'm pretty sure is the primary reason for higher education (for me anyway).

Lon

Posted by: Lon at September 16, 2007 05:39 AM