by Chuck Wolk
Acting as if they are Tea Party members of Butte County, Democrats have been going around posting fliers with racists images on them. It seems that those who are comfortable with national unemployment at double digits, Chico unemployment at 12.3%, unemployment for 18 & 19-year old's above 25%, inflation nearing double digit annually, and $5 gasoline prices that have made most families cancel summer vacation plans, are so afraid of the Tea Party that they want to disrupt it's rally being held in Chico's Downtown Plaza on Monday April 18th. It's the same old tactics being used by the same old lefty loonies who cannot stand the fact that America is tired of the Socialist policies of the left that have destroyed America's prosperity to the point that even Blacks are turning against Obama and the Democrats.
Do I have proof that Democrats are posting the fliers? No more than the media and the left has proof that it was a member of the local Tea Party. I do believe that it is these kinds of tactics that have been used by the left in the past. When you take into consideration that even Democrats in Washington have been accusing the Tea Party of having racist elements to it, and the way the Democrat party gets their cohorts in the MSM to promote their lies while covering up the evil they do, I am convinced that these fliers were posted by a Democrat supporter.
We should have seen this recent attack coming after what Obama said when he officially announced his plans to run for re-election. During his announcement he made sure the country knew that he believes "race is a key component in the tea party protests". With that statement, Obama and the Democrats told their lefty loonies to start attacking any American citizen who may be practicing their right to disagree with him, by calling them a racist. It looks like the that includes posting racists fliers to make everyone believe the lie. Oh I know that the media is reporting Obama thanked the Tea party for getting Americans involved in politics, but that's just because of what he said about the Tea party having a racists component to it. Mark my words, before the 2012 election is over, Obama and his wife will have accused both the Tea Party and Republicans of having many supporters who are racists, just as he has in the past.
I would suggest that every person who disagrees with the Democrats to be ready for a fight. The media will carry the water for the left as they call us every name in the book, and being called a racist is something we need to get used to as we go forward in the next year and a half to remove them from power. You should also be ready for some of Obama's supporters on the left to bring their thuggish attitude with them as they did during the many Tea Party rallies last year. That includes the possibility of some elements of the Democrat Party which could be packing heat. Yes, I mean guns. I only offer that warning because of what Obama said back on June 14, 2008 when he was still fighting Hillary for the Democrat nomination. Obama told supporters at a town hall meeting at the Radnor Middle School in Wayne, Pa.
"Mobster wisdom tells us never to bring a knife to a gun fight, but what does political wisdom say about bringing a gun to a knife fight? If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun, because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I've seen Eagles fans."
He says this at a place that normally teaches children, a middle school. We are talking about school in a city near Philadelphia. We all know of the reputation Philadelphia has for teenage gang members shooting each. Children learn at an early age what gun violence is, yet Obama dared to use such language in a speech to supporters there. So even though Obama's has admitted that he would like to ban all hand guns in America, he had no problem telling a bunch of supporters to bring a gun to a political fight. Many of the supporters probably had children attending this school. Children who could be old enough to vote this year. Do you think they will remember what he told their parents? If they do, considering Philadelphia is but a few miles away, do you think they may take aim at the Tea party members who Obama and the Democrats have been calling racists? I only ask because it was in Philadelphia where some "New Black Panther" (NBP) brothers (video below) were violating the civil rights of voters by wielding clubs as they intimidated them outside a polling station in Philadelphia.
|
In the video below you will see MBP president, Malik Zulu Shabazz, bragging "As soon as a black man took over the |
What the NBP did was violate of two things Martin Luther King personally fought for, the Voting Right Act and the Civil Rights Amendment. However, Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, refused to prosecute those who were caught on video violating both. Allow me to remind you of what the attorney General said when he was accused of failing to cooperate with a Civil Rights Commission investigation into the way he handled the incident.
"Think about that, when you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened in Philadelphia--which was inappropriate, certainly that...to describe it in those terms I think it does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked all, for my people. To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, and to say that the Black Panther incident, wrong thought it might be, somehow is greater in magnitude or is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history and the facts."
So when it comes to being racists with proof to back it up, I think we can safely say that it is not being practiced by those of the Te Party. It is Obama's people who are being racists, and his Attorney General is at the top of the list because he refused to enforce a law that was specifically put in place to stop such blatant crimes against humanity as the NBP are guilty of. It should really give you pause to think that Eric Holder refused to prosecute a group that not only refuses to defend what MLK fought and died for, but have also defended the gang rape of an 11 year old girl by 18 to 30 black men and boys. So how long will it be before Obama stands on the stage with these guys? After all, he is already cuddling up to Al Sharpton, one of the most divisive racists poverty pimps in America. In my opinion only Farrakhan and these NBPs are more racists and divisive than Sharpton.
When I see fliers like the one in the image above posted around Chico and Butte county, I know who did it, and it was not the Tea Party. It was members of the Democrat party who are attempting to make the Tea Party members look racists. After all, I cannot think of one Tea Party Republican who has ever even threatened a black politician with bodily harm anywhere in America. I do know that a Black Congresswoman who suggested that she might blow the brains out of a White Republican Congressman. I guess we can say by the left's standard that she is a racist, but there are no racist Tea Party Republicans. I do agree that racists exist in America I just disagree that they are Republicans, and the videos I offer above prove that the racism is coming from those who support Obama, not those who disagree with him.
If I wanted to, I could put a good case together that would prove "race is a key component" of the circle of friends Obama has always associated with. One name that comes to mind when I think of racism and Obama, is "Jeremiah Wright". Most Americans know about Rev Wright's hate speech against whites, Jews, Israel, his desire to see America crumble, and his love for Louis Farrakhan are not new. That is unless you are the MSM who refuses to report how racist the Rev who prayed with Bill Clinton after he admitted having an affair with his intern is. Need I say more?
Because I have found my material posted in full without due credit to me nor my blog on several sites, I am forced to post a copyright disclaimer with some of my material. That being said, I do give my permission to FreeRepublic.com to post any and all material in full on their site, as long as credit is given to me for said material. All others are allowed to post only an excerpt with a link.
This website and the related materials it contains is copyright free - the files and relevant content are permissible under Sec 17 USC 107 and are of FAIR USE (section 512 of the DMCA) they consist of materials that either are for personal use, and/or they are not for profit nor cause any market harm to any copyright owners, go here for more information concerning intellectual property protection.
About Me: I am a born again Christian who enjoys talking religion and politics. I have always believed that it is the Christian's obligation to understand the workings of our government as well as they do the precepts of God. Jesus tells us to be "wise as serpents and harmless as doves". (Mark 10:16) So it is with this understanding that I approach life. I was born in the Midwest, and while I may have grown up in Northern Minnesota, I have earned my degree in knowledge and understanding from the many regions of America and Europe that I have either lived in or visited as an adult.
You should not title your post as if it's factual. It's not. You said as such in your post. Try using a question mark.
Because of this, you are not credible.
I learned how to write headlines by reading the headlines written by the main stream media for the last 50 years. I could care less about being regarded as credible by the left. At least my story has enough information to truly give my headline credibility.
I would say that the seriousness of the charge is what matters most, at least that is what we have been told by the very media and leftists you claim I should be worried about getting credibility from. Have you written these kind of comments to the Washington Post who owned Slate.com when it used used a headline that called Sarah Palin a c*** in a headline? I know that is just name calling, but what about the headline that ran on the vaunted Huffington Post wich was then picked up by such MSM outlets as CNN, ABC, NY TIMES, which said "NRA and Palin; Let Those On No-Fly List Buy Guns". Then there was the story that the AP carried with the headline, "U.S., Iraq troops clash in Baghdad". Just one problem it was a fabricated lie, just as the headline, and story that Dan Rather ran with about George Bush being AWOL while in the service. I guess it is OK for the MSM to post headlines that are wrong, misleading and downright scandalous as long as they are about those they do not like. I could give you hundreds of examples, but I will not waste my time. Besides, I gave plenty of reasons to make my point that the Democrats did what they did.
Also, we have proof that Obama's mentor Saul Alinsky told students of his that they should pretend they were Republicans, and protest in the streets while wearing sheets and hoods as if they were the KKK. So knowing that he taught students to do such a thing, why is it so far fetched to believe that Democrats are the guilty ones who posted the racists fliers. Do you really think Republicans or Tea Party members are stupid enough to post them? You probably do, because you are part of the problem on America in that you cannot see the evil on the left, nor do you want to see the evil mindset that has infected the MSM.
Besides, you complain about misleading headlines, yet your site, Freak Out Nation, has misleading headlines like, "Sarah Palin and Andrew Breitbart Booed Relentlessly in Wisconsin". You could barely hear the Union Thugs booing. Talk about having no credibility. You even use a story from a lame site claiming the people supporting Sarah were bused in. Yes some were, but from other cities around Wisconsin. They were all citizens from Wisconsin, unlike the tens of thousands of Union members bussed in from all over the country to disrupt the Wisconsin's Governor and Legislature from doing their work? I personally know many of those who were present when Sarah spoke, and they were all from Wisconsin. Next time you leave a comment, don't be so stupid as to leave your blogs link in your name for me to track you down.
A few more outright false headlines you have while I am on a roll. You carry a headline that is wrong that say's, "Analysis Shows Gov Walker’s Budget Only Raises Taxes On the Poor". That is so wrong it's criminal. Here is another one that makes you look so ignorant you that you should seriously consider shutting down your site because you obviously lack the ability to comprehend what you read. You write the headline to say, "Public Outraged Over FOX Paralleling a Tragic Suicide With President Obama’s Speech". The public is not outraged, where is your proof other than you are? Not even a quote from anyone who was outraged, none noda, zip! They reported that it happened at the same time Obama was speaking at the University. So what, it was relevant, because gun violence happened while POTUS was near. I could go on and on about your misleading outright false headlines. Yet you complain about mine?
Consider the following which I was written for mind numb leftists like yourself a few years ago when the MSM was writing lies about Carl Rove with headlines that were out and out lies. Heck, the stories that followed were also full of fabricated lies that were proved to be lies before they even ran the stories.
You have the mitigate gall to tell me I have lost all credibility with individuals like you who still think George Bush stole the election in 2000, when it was Al Gore's people who tried to steal it by having the military vote thrown out. The headlines at the time which the MSM ran even carried the lie about who was stealing the election. Just remember, your side started this war, I am just a good warrior who is not going to back down to those of you on the left.
You even said in your essay that you have no proof that Democrats did it.
As the first poster said, you're not credible. I'll add that you never have been credible.
Michael Bertsch
So I expect to read a similar comment by you in any MSM newspaper that prints false leading headlines for stories that are hit pieces on conservatives, along with their internet sites that carry the articles.
I make no apology for my posts, because we know that Democrats do what I accuse them of. I even pointed out in the prior comment to Anomaly100, how Obama's mentor, Alinsky, told students in his classroom they should pretend to be Republicans by dressing in white sheets while carrying crosses to protest against blacks and the left to make it look as if Republicans are racists. You tell me the difference with what he told them to do, and the fliers that were posted around Butte County.
By the way, every time an incident like the one with the flier happens, I will write another article that will go around the world blaming Democrats of doing it. I will do so, because the MSM does it. As a student of marketing I learned that 80% of people who see a news headline, never read the article. So taking in consideration just those who come across the headline for my article, 20% of those who will actually bother to read the article, 95% are conservative because they know me personally or they like the articles posted on GATE. Of the 5% like you who disagree, 30% will at least agree with my reasoning and never be offended by my headline. So that leaves 70% of 5% who will take offense like you do. Then when I consider that, counting your comment and Anomaly100's here at GATE, I had a total of 95 comments left to my article where ever it was posted. Of those only 8 were negative comments, and only 4 were negative because of the headline I used. The bottom line is, 4 out of about 5000 people admittedly took offense with the way I wrote the headline. That makes .08% of the people are mad at me for my headline. However, the 95% who saw the headline but never read the article have now got the news in their head that Democrats are guilty of posting racists fliers around Butte County. ( update, over 8000 have now read this article so far, so that makes less than .05% who are upset with my take on the story) To which I say, Job well done. I am just using the same tactics Obama and the Democrats swear by, and use every day.
I have a very long reach, and I plan on using it to do as much damage to the left as I am able to. A reach I had long before I started blogging at Norcal by the way.
All that being said, you know as well as i do that the culprits were those who are sympathetic with the Democrats and Obama who posted the fliers. You are just angry because someone had the guts to post an article with a headline like I did.
Anyway, you would be saying the same about me regardless of what my headlines say. Thanks for taking time to read my article though, it just goes to show that lefty loonies like you are still paying attention to what I write. It also shows me how much you are worried about my influence.
Thanks for the continued support.
Right, the posters were put up by Democrats because...well, because it fits your narrative. No need for pesky facts.
And there is double digit employment! Except there isn't, the national rate is 8.9% by the most widely accepted measure. But again, no need for pesky facts.
And then deny that there are plenty of racists that have flocked to the tea party. Note I'm not saying the tea party is about race, nor do I think that most tea party activists are racist (the ones I've met aren't). But there are racists, they do hate Obama, and they do show up at tea party events, there are huge numbers of photos of people carrying racist signs, at least one tea party leader has been booted out for writing racist stuff, its sheer fantasy to deny that there are racist elements in the tea party, just as its sheer fantasy for Democrats to deny that there are radical leftist elements among their supporters (eco-terrorists, for example). Pesky facts.
Now as to these flyers. Since we're speculating, I'd say this is the work of some bored teenagers. It isn't a Democratic or Republican thing, its just kids stirring up trouble. Don't you think if some adults were doing this, they'd be a tad more subtle than the Klansman/burning cross photo, to make it credible?
Oh, right, pesky facts, you don't deal in those.
You deny that there are more white Democrats that are racists then white Republicans?
History proves the Democrat party is the party of the racists. Facts and history proves I am right. Just look at what party the members who stonewalled and stood in the way of allowing the civil rights amendment to pass. It was Republicans who overwhelmingly voted top pass it. Take a look at what party the Governors, Senators and House Representatives of the Deep South belonged to when they were standing in the way of blacks having rights, and turned blind eyes to the hanging of blacks, and burning crosses and churches. Gee, I really hate having to be the one who bursts your historically ignorant propaganda filled air head.
I do think it was Democrats, because the true racists are Democrats who use blacks for pawns while willingly setting policies in place that have destroyed the black communities. By the way, it is not racists to point out that Obama is a Kenyan, because all his relatives are and he has yet to produce a birth certificate to prove he is an American citizen. Get educated and quit following the propaganda lies being told by the MSM, academia, and the Democrat party that it is Republicans who are the racists.
Another fact is that there is a larger % of blacks who are racists than there are whites. Case in point, 45% of whites voted for the black candidate while only 5% of blacks voted for the white candidate in the presidential election. If those numbers were reversed the whole world would have accused white Americans of being racists for voting in such large numbers against the black candidate.
Don't believe me? Watch what happens after the 2012 election when white voters abandon Obama in droves and he loses in a landslide. They will talk about the way white America is racists. Just wait and see, it will happen, because the only ones who always play the race card is the left, and the MSM. Believe me, it WAS a Democrats who posted the fliers.
No grow up, get educated and quit trying to make a fool out of yourself.
Unemployment at 8.9% Are you trying out for Saturday Night Live? Try Unemployment shoots to 15.7% when you take into all categories of those looking, stopped looking, etc. Check it out from the Bureau of Labor: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
Yet under the previous Administration it averaged under 6% for the eight years and those like yourself and the media went apoplectic. The same goes with fuel prices; nary a peep now from lefties when it's now going over $4 and may be as high as $6 by Summer. All the while Obama is gutting our oil producers by stopping offshore drilling, etc. all contributing to higher costs in fuel, food and services. It's the teleprompter in chief that is selling out America and its fools like yourself that can't see the handwriting on the wall.
As for the racist postings; heck the KKK was formed as a wing of the DEMOCRAT party. The democrats want to enslave people under the heavy hand of government and take away their freedoms so they will demonize anyone that dares to have an affect upon their plantation masters by offering them real hope and not just pocket change.
Actually Ronbo, you are wrong on the unemployment figures. The "credible" source that lists 9.8 is the government itself. Yeah, that's credible. If you read most any other source, (I tend to use investor related places because they don't fudge or have an agenda, it can cost somebody a lot of cash) the real number is more like 16 to 21 percent as the people who have stopped looking or are over 99 weeks aren't counted. The government only counts those that are getting checks. From Daily Finance: "When unemployed people stop looking for jobs at their local unemployment office, the government no longer counts them as unemployed." To put a little sharper point on it, as a percentage, this is the worst job loss since World War II and that's significant because the population is much bigger now than in 1946.