Main | February 2008 »

January 31, 2008

Obama Bandwagon

I've been following the Chico Obama movement pretty closely for the last couple of weeks and I can't begin to tell you how impressed I am with the great energy and hard work that these folks are putting in. Making phone calls and waving signs on corners, driven by hopeful enthusiasm...impressive! With Obama's win in South Carolina and Edwards dropping out things seem to be moving for Barack. I lifted this from one of their communications:

Word is there will be a MAJOR endorsement for Barack on Friday morning. No one's telling who, but there's a couple of big ones out there (FYI: Barack is doing a Santa Fe New Mexico rally Friday morning...I'm just sayin....)

Polls show that Barack is up in Colorado, up in Kansas, up in Georgia. He's now tied in Connecticut (after being 24 points down 14 days ago) and down by only 6 in Massachusetts (after being down 37 points one month ago!)

The latest Gallup national poll has Obama closing to within 6 nationally -- an 8 point movement in 10 days.

And in New York State? Tonight's newest poll shows Barack down by 12 in Clinton's "home" state -- a 21 point movement in two weeks. And today the New York Post endorses Obama.

I'm thinking that something might be going on here.

Feel like getting on the Obama Bandwagon? Contact Obama's CD2 coordinator, Kimberly Durso at (530) 521-2948 or via email: kimberlydursok@yahoo.com They've got a ton of stuff going on between now and Super Duper Tuesday!

January 27, 2008

How To Ruin a Perfectly Good Country

Sometime I get the biggest kick out of Jamie O'Neill's writing. Please allow me to share below.


Published on Chico Beat (http://www.chicobeat.com)
How To Ruin a Perfectly Good Country by Jamie O'Neill

Created Jan 25 2008 - 4:23am

To get started, enshrine ignorance and elevate folly. Elect people to high office who don’t know much about history, for instance, and then let them have pretty much unfettered powers free from the checks and balances that were originally concocted in order to keep things from getting ruined.

Be sure that your children graduate from school and enter adulthood even more ignorant of their history than their leaders are, and be sure that they are equally clueless about their system of government.

Undermine confidence in the significance of voting by clouding election results.

Elect people to govern who don’t believe government is a good thing. Such elected representatives will, then, ensure that government fails to fulfill its functions because when government does exhibit such failures, those elected representatives have proven their point.

Instill passivity in the populace. In a democracy, for instance, a passive electorate will accept the subversion of the government bureaus instituted to serve the people’s interests. When, for example, functionaries are put in charge of the Environmental Protection Agency who are actively hostile to the environment, a passive nation will countenance such an egregious betrayal of public trust.

But, if you are intent on ruining your nation, don’t stop at one or two such agencies. Be sure that the Department of Justice is run by people who are fuzzy on the concept of justice, and that the people named to be in charge of guarding the nation’s public airways and media outlets are actively working for media monopolists who restrict the public uses of those airways and outlets.

Be sure that your intelligence-gathering agencies spend much of their time spying on the citizenry, and that any foreign intelligence they turn up is first weighed and evaluated for possible political consequences to those in power. Intelligence inimical to the interests of those in power shall be excised or redrafted accordingly.

This same approach should also be applied to the findings of scientists. When and if scientific evidence reveals data injurious to political or pecuniary interests of the nation’s rulers, then that science will be identified as junk and will, accordingly, be junked in favor of science purchasable from science vendors already in corporate employ.

Trivialize news and information until reporting about the activities of minor entertainment figures is equal to reporting about the decisions that are affecting the lives of the citizenry.

Employ a network of disinformation specialists on radio and TV whose role it is to simplify all matters of national consequence, and to turn global disputes into clashes of good and evil, with all acts of your government cast as good, and all contrary acts portrayed as evil. If you have created a sufficiently ignorant populace through the work of your schools and your media, such a rendering of reality will be readily accepted by the governed.

If possible—and it is always possible—create an external threat, and use that threat to sow a permeating atmosphere of fear. Tweak this fear whenever it is necessary to distract the public from anything you want to escape their attention.

And keep that public attention scattered and antic. Manipulating the various media will make this easy, as will the endemic obsession with celebrities and trendiness fostered and fed by those media.

Intrude religion into all public discourse as often as possible, and blur the distinctions between church and state. This has multiple advantages. Religion can be used to bathe the most venal acts in heaven-sanctioned righteousness. Religious zealots can be counted upon to respond to the code phrases that indicate that the nation’s leaders share their zealotry, and religious disputes can also serve as a distraction from the things that put the aims and desires of the powerful ahead of the interests of the country.

Always manipulate the language, affixing labels to those who oppose your policies, repeating those labels in negative contexts until each of them retains the power to convey evil or harm simply by invoking them.

Positive connotations are as useful as negative connotations, so select words that associate policies with generally cherished values and attitudes. If you wish to strengthen domestic spying, for instance, push your objectives by lumping such activities under rubrics like “homeland” or “security,” the kinds of words no one is ever against.

Waste is profit. Maintaining power—and ruining a perfectly good nation—is dependent upon waste because government waste generates the profits that line the pockets of those whose largesse keeps you in power.

The biggest bull in the herd of sacred cows is the military. Bolster that bull land gild that sacred cow. The gilding of the military begins and ends with the image of the foot soldier, the grunt, the G.I. Once “our boys,” or “our brave men and women in uniform” have been properly gilded and enshrined, it is imperative that you associate yourself with those soldiers in every way you can, always taking pains to blur the distinction between the soldiers and the politicians who have put them at risk. One way to accomplish this blurring is by highly publicized behind-the-lines visits to media-friendly sites where you can be photographed sharing a safe meal with soldiers before hastening back to the nation’s capital.

Always amplify division between people and contending interests, driving wedges between races and ethnic groups, remembering to pit working people against one another whenever possible—and it’s always possible. Xenophobia will trump self-interest if you have been successful at maintaining the level of ignorance necessary to ruining the country for the benefit of yourself and your powerful associates.

Provide no models for emulation. Turn athletes into overpaid hucksters and drug abusers, and turn youth culture into a megaphone for the disaffected and the defeated, make everything venal and ripe for cynicism, turn the anger of the dispossessed back in on themselves in ways that market self destruction and self-punishing rebellion for the profit of media moguls. Make idealism uncool and unpopular. Channel the resulting spiritual hunger into illegal but readily available drugs, or into the evangelical religiosity that preys on the desire to have prayers heard for profit, or the aggrandizement of the merchants of messianic mercies.

Pump the people full of high fructose corn syrup, injecting the stuff into nearly everything they eat until they are as swollen as ticks, barely able to squeeze themselves into oversized gas-swilling SUVs for their pilgrimages to the big box stores that sell them all their overworked hearts desire.

Export jobs; import goods; borrow heavily from unreliable allies and trading partners. Ensure the indebtedness of future generations. Balance no budgets, but pass on the costs of war profiteering and government contracted waste to the children and grandchildren of the taxpaying classes. Spend taxpayer money as if there’s no tomorrow, and live accordingly, indifferent to any concept of a healthy heritage that would mark your time here, guaranteeing that your memory will occupy a bleak and resentful place in the hearts of those who come after you, left with the debt and the mess you’ve bequeathed to them.

January 25, 2008

Why do conservatives hate our freedom? (Part One)

I'm no historian but it seems to me that this country was founded on some pretty liberal notions. The better part of those liberal notions are embodied in the Bill of Rights. My personal favorites are freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to privacy. These things were defined as "rights" specifically so that no one, including the government, whether federal, state or local, can usurp, override, remove or impinge those rights. These are things to which we are all entitled by virtue of our residence within the borders of this nation, irrespective of race, creed, color, religion or national origin because they are guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. I am unambiguous in this belief and it serves for me personally as a default perspective when I look at the mess that conservatives have made of this country over the last seven years.

As prescribed in the Constitution, the following is the oath of office to which George W. Bush and every president before him swore, with their right hand on a bible and the left raised in promise and commitment:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

At 35 words it is elegant in its simplicity and unwavering in its intent, "...preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." There is no reference to a political party, a religion, a social group, an economic system, a national border or anything else, just the Constitution.

I appreciate that being the President of the United States is probably the hardest job in all of creation. In order to get to the point that one is taking the Oath of Office, one must swim in perilous political waters and each day presents another opportunity to make a fatal error. Our political system has proven many times, and especially in recent years, that leadership qualities, good character and unwavering honesty are not the qualities that will have you striking that classic pose with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court on a certain January day in Washington D.C. Still, I am mortified when I see an example of what has been perpetrated upon our great nation. The following took place in November 2005 in the Oval Office, was reported in the media and below, recounted in the Daily Kos:

GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.
"I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."

"Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."

"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"

In this brief episode of "W Gone Wild," we are treated to a frightening look at a sorry excuse of a leader and a man of so little character that he should be ashamed to occupy the same position as even the least of the greatest people who preceded him...although Nixon is a close exception.

Not surprisingly, throughout his tenure Bush has continued to attack the "goddamned piece of paper" often for political gain and frequently in the guise of action in the "war on terror." Recently Bush's attacks on our rights have come in the form of illegal wiretapping and the justification of such activities. Adding insult to this injury, Bush is working to grant "retroactive immunity" to the large communication companies who acted outside the law and were willing accomplices in these illegal acts. However unsurprised I am, I can't see this as being anything but dangerous and wrong.

During the "Republican Revolution" of the 1990s, while identifying themselves as, "the party of accountability," they impeached Bill Clinton with the battle cry, "we are a nation of laws, not men!" One might have believed that they did indeed stand on some higher moral ground. Alas, these high minded ideas became as hollow as jack-o-lanterns after the theft of the 2000 election and the installation of Bush and his mob of exceptionalist hypocrites and white collar criminals. Then the literary phrase that became most apt, a famous one from Lord Acton, "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely."

So there's my take on it. Why do conservatives hate our freedom? Simply stated, they just love power, money and elitism more. Next time I'll get into what makes a conservative a conservative.

January 23, 2008

Only 935 lies?

I can't say I ever believed the SOBs anyway. While it is some consolation to have been right ALL ALONG, the part that burns is the sad fact that none of the criminals named in this article will ever be held accountable or feel the sting of true justice for what they have wrought.

From DOUGLASS K. DANIEL, Associated Press Writer:

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al-Qaida," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members, writing an overview of the study. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

Read the whole article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080123/ap_on_go_pr_wh/misinformation_study

January 21, 2008

Obama Curious

I'm not sure if you would characterize me as a "political junkie" but I do like to read about, talk about, listen to, watch and experience the political environment in our community. With Super Duper Tuesday only a couple of weeks away there are certainly plenty of opportunities in this realm.

One such opportunity came my way last Sunday morning as I learned of a Barack Obama house meet-up taking place in town. This grass roots gathering took place in a very nice home on the northwest side of town and was attended by folks representing a wide range of ages. In the group of 25 to 30 crowding the living room, there were a few young people but mostly forty, fifty and sixty-somethings and with the exceptions of one Arabic American and one African American man, all caucasians and mostly women.

What I observed there was similar to what I have experienced in other venues when the discussion turns to the Democrat contenders for the presidential nomination. There was a palpable distaste and distrust for the candidacy of Hillary Clinton.

Once the choir finished with this opening formality, an excellent point was made that with the primary coming so quickly, they need to increase the awareness of Obama here in the 2nd Congressional District in order to get some local delegates to the national convention. With time running short and no money from the campaign to help in the effort, they have their work cut out for them.

The perception among this group, and it may well be true, is that the local Democrat organization is entrenched behind Hillary, and that efforts for Obama are an, "insurgent campaign." As someone who is still undecided about this, I'm not ready to go all in for Obama, but if someone reading this is so motivated, you can find out more information by calling Obama's CD2 coordinator, Kimberly Durso at (530) 521-2948 or via email: kimberlydursok@yahoo.com

MLK Anthem

For me there is an anthem for Martin Luther King. That song is "Shed a Little Light" by James Taylor and it is one of several excellent numbers on his 1991 New Moon Shine album. Below I've pasted the beginning verses.

Let us turn our thoughts today
To martin luther king
And recognize that there are ties between us
All men and women
Living on the earth
Ties of hope and love
Sister and brotherhood
That we are bound together
In our desire to see the world become
A place in which our children
Can grow free and strong
We are bound together
By the task that stands before us
And the road that lies ahead
We are bound and we are bound

"Shed a Little Light" is performed in the vein of a spiritual and it never fails to uplift my spirits whenever I hear it. I've included a link where you may be able to hear the song

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1001533

Have a great day!

January 15, 2008

Love for Lori

As evidenced by the Ed McLaughlin saga, these have been tough times for bicyclists in Chico. Another special member of our community, Lori Niles, had a bicycle mishap as well, late last year. Lori's accident isn't as simple to explain as Ed's and her injuries, although very serious, are not as severe. Lori's circumstance is a bittersweet example of why this community is so wonderful as well as another instance wherein our system of healthcare and insurance falls short in serving people when they need it most.

A local for decades, Lori's roots run deep in Chico. She's a leader in the Slow Food movement, a volunteer programmer at KZFR Community Radio, and one of the brightest, most compassionate and giving humans you'd ever want to meet. Since she has no private health insurance her accident has left her with some serious medical bills, as well as a long rehabilitation road ahead.

Last Sunday evening (1/13) there was a fundraiser to benefit Lori at ARC's Park Tower Pavilion. The place overflowed with three of the best things in this community, great food, great music and great people there to show their love for Lori.

Lori works as a waitress at Red Tavern. When she stood at the microphone to address the gathering, she shared with us her experience on the job when people come from out of town, often to check out Chico State as a potential academic destination. "What's so great about this place?" they ask. In describing how she answers the question, Lori recited the usual litany of things with which we are so richly blessed, then after a pause to hold back tears, she said simply, "the community."

Her words, spoken with such heart and sincerity on this evening, settled over the room and filled our hearts. I could think of no better place to call home, nor a more worthy place to define as "community." Thank you Lori.

January 12, 2008

State of the City Lovefest

You'd probably guess that I am not a member of the Chico Chamber of Commerce. As to why...well, other than the fact that they take money from the city (your and my tax dollars) then engage in political activity targeting city government, a grievous and unethical conflict of interest in my book, I think they're a swell bunch of folks with whom I seldom really see eye to eye. I'd go so far as to say that, for the most part, they do good and important work for Chico.

Anyway, I coughed up the $20 non-member fee to attend their State of the City, Eggs and Issues event last Friday, both out of curiosity and to show my support for the five council members to whom I have contributed time and money to occupy those seats on the dais. I think this was the first time I've seen all of them together in this sort of public speech environment.

I preface my observations by saying that I was very proud of my five dogs in the fight, if you will, and I was very pleased with overall respectful tone of the Chamber of Commerce audience. The biggest frustration of the morning was with the PA system that was lacking some technical adjustment for optimum operation.

Public speaking ability and comfort with the audience varied from speaker to speaker, but I was overall impressed with the ideas that were expressed and even felt entertained from time to time. Everyone spoke glowingly of the performances of city staff, the police and fire departments and even PG&E during the recent storms. Scott Greundl was particularly powerful in relating his personal experience and had me riveted during the whole of his speech. Tom Nickell’s caution about upcoming water issues showed great vision. Ann Schwab spoke passionately about sustainability in Chico. Mary Flynn gave an upbeat assessment of economic develop and Andy Holcomb spoke most sincerely about the merits of good planning. Like I said, I was very proud of them all.

On the conservative side, Steve Bertagna waxed eloquent about the necessity of simplifying the process people have to go through to execute plans through the Planning Commission. He saddled up an analogy comparing Chico’s economic future to a vehicle coming to an intersection with a yellow light, rode it hard and put it up wet. It was amusing and everyone got his point, I think, but he seemed to overlook the fact that a yellow light commonly means, “proceed with caution” not, “put your pedal to the metal.” Steve seems like a nice guy and a great conversationalist. I am not surprised that he gets reelected.

Then there was Larry Wahl. Larry looked great, he had one of the best ties in the whole room and he was one of the best speakers of the morning. He commended city workers about the storm and had some very positive statistics about the library. I was just about to start liking him when he took a low shot at Mayor Andy Holcomb over his decision to revisit the Disorderly Events Ordinance. I’m sure his fellow wing nuts in the audience were also very amused by his disparaging reference to the ACLU.

Now, in any “patriotism-off” you could conceive, Larry Wahl would probably even kick Chuck Norris’ muscular posterior, but I can’t believe he would be so hostile and intransigent about Andy’s effort to improve something as obviously flawed and unconstitutional as the Disorderly Events Ordinance. I’m sorry Larry, 9/11 may have “changed everything” but the last time I heard the Bill of Rights is still in effect in Chico.

January 10, 2008

Now that's what I call leadership!

Faced with an unnecessarily broad ordinance and a disgruntled constituency Mayor Holcomb is doing the right thing in asking the City Council to reconsider the Disorderly Events Ordinance. I predict that he'll easily get the votes on the Council and the ordinance and our town will be better because of it.

At this time in our country examples of our leaders being intransigently attached to paths and ideologies that trample our freedom and undermine our democracy are all too common. From our lowly 2nd Congressional District all the way to Washington there is rampant amnesia when it comes to the spirit upon which this nation was founded. That is why I am heartened by Andy Holcomb's positive action and exemplary leadership on this issue.

In yesterday's editorial the ER opined that many people who signed the anti ordinance petition hadn't read the ordinance. This is likely true, but after reading the ordinance myself, I was left wondering if the ER editorial board and the other powers that be have ever read the Bill of Rights.

January 08, 2008

Top Story Number 10

I was delighted to see the "Disorderly Events
Ordinance" story included in the ER's recap of 2007's top
stories. I was much less enthused with the dismissive
tone of the write up in the ER.

This is an excellent example of why many consider the ER
little more than a mouthpiece for the
Chamber of Commerce and other conservative interests.
What bothers me more is the absence of journalistic
balance in the article.

Although the number of valid signatures fell short,
the efforts of two individuals in particular were
herculean. Jessica Allen and Justin Vodden sacrificed
hundreds of hours in the trenches doing Democracy's
hard work because they see the ordinance as the sham
attack on our freedom that it is.

The fact that they and their cohorts were able to
gather nearly 5,000 signatures and register over 1,000
new voters makes them a couple of Chico's finest
citizens in my book.

Many of our personal freedoms have taken a beating under the current regime in Washington. I am hopeful that when the City Council resolves to take another look at the Disorderly Events Ordinance that they can see it in the broader context it deserves, regardless of the convenience it provides for law enforcement.

January 07, 2008

Re: "So Long Tweeko"

A letter in the ER on Sunday 12/23 “So Long Tweeko” caught my attention. It was a nasty little expression of sour grapes by soon to be former Chico resident Mike Dace. I only know of Mike by this one letter and if he is true to his word, he has left Chico for some unnamed greener pasture by now.

In his letter, Mike expresses his extreme disappointment at Chico’s failing to rise to his expectations as a place to “buy a house and raise my family.” He then proceeds to make numerous cruel accusations about our town that seem to reflect a series of bad personal experiences and troubling observations.

What pierced me was how he blamed it all on how “This town’s liberal politics and soft approach to crime have destroyed the future of this town.” As an unapologetic liberal who believes that “liberal politics” has, and will continue to, actually save this town’s future, all I can say is, “ouch!” As far as any alleged “soft approach to crime” goes I couldn’t disagree more. Short of the police state that Mike Dace might choose, one that criminalizes everything outside upper class moralistic culture and rides roughshod over everyone’s Constitutional Rights, I think law enforcement has an imperative to walk a thin line.

Lacking any reference to where he came from or to the place he might call home in the future, the cruelty and bitterness permeating Mike’s letter does not indicate a person who will easily find happiness anywhere. That he has left our town is likely better for everyone involved. Still, in my admittedly prejudiced positive view of Chico and this community, I am saddened that someone would perceive such a negative experience here.

Be Careful What You Ask For

Here I sit hours before sunrise, the sound and smell of coffee brewing fills the room and the chilly air tells me I should put on a sweatshirt. This day will be Christmas Day 2007. I’ve given a lot of thought to what I am doing and finally resolved to try my hand at blogging. If you are reading this online then the powers that be have given me my chance to share myself with you and the rest of the www. As the saying goes, “Be careful what you ask for, because you just might get it.”

Last night my wife and I attended the healing ceremony for Ed McLaughlin at the city plaza. It looked like about three hundred people, gathered together in the cold Christmas Eve air. There were enough of Ed’s friends and well wishers to ring the plaza interior as we joined hands, hoping to combine our healing energy and spirituality on Ed’s behalf.

We were encouraged to learn that Ed had shown improvement since his accident and was able to be removed from his bed and to sit in a wheel chair. Cries of “Ed will be back!” rang through the plaza as we stood, marveling at this assembly of people who share Ed McLaughlin’s love of this community and cared enough to leave the warmth and comfort of their homes to gather together for him.

For anyone who is familiar with my public expressions about Chico, it is no secret that I am passionate and I am not shy when it comes to giving voice to my opinions and observations. The ambience of last night’s gathering in Ed McLaughlin’s behalf crystallized for me some motivations I’ve held for some time to be more demonstrative in expressing myself and to seek this forum as an outlet.

Here you read my first blog entry, the first of many I hope, because right or wrong, for better or worse, I see this as an opportunity to exercise a small part of my responsibility as an unabashedly proud member of this Chico community.