« Now that's what I call leadership! | Main | Love for Lori »

State of the City Lovefest

You'd probably guess that I am not a member of the Chico Chamber of Commerce. As to why...well, other than the fact that they take money from the city (your and my tax dollars) then engage in political activity targeting city government, a grievous and unethical conflict of interest in my book, I think they're a swell bunch of folks with whom I seldom really see eye to eye. I'd go so far as to say that, for the most part, they do good and important work for Chico.

Anyway, I coughed up the $20 non-member fee to attend their State of the City, Eggs and Issues event last Friday, both out of curiosity and to show my support for the five council members to whom I have contributed time and money to occupy those seats on the dais. I think this was the first time I've seen all of them together in this sort of public speech environment.

I preface my observations by saying that I was very proud of my five dogs in the fight, if you will, and I was very pleased with overall respectful tone of the Chamber of Commerce audience. The biggest frustration of the morning was with the PA system that was lacking some technical adjustment for optimum operation.

Public speaking ability and comfort with the audience varied from speaker to speaker, but I was overall impressed with the ideas that were expressed and even felt entertained from time to time. Everyone spoke glowingly of the performances of city staff, the police and fire departments and even PG&E during the recent storms. Scott Greundl was particularly powerful in relating his personal experience and had me riveted during the whole of his speech. Tom Nickell’s caution about upcoming water issues showed great vision. Ann Schwab spoke passionately about sustainability in Chico. Mary Flynn gave an upbeat assessment of economic develop and Andy Holcomb spoke most sincerely about the merits of good planning. Like I said, I was very proud of them all.

On the conservative side, Steve Bertagna waxed eloquent about the necessity of simplifying the process people have to go through to execute plans through the Planning Commission. He saddled up an analogy comparing Chico’s economic future to a vehicle coming to an intersection with a yellow light, rode it hard and put it up wet. It was amusing and everyone got his point, I think, but he seemed to overlook the fact that a yellow light commonly means, “proceed with caution” not, “put your pedal to the metal.” Steve seems like a nice guy and a great conversationalist. I am not surprised that he gets reelected.

Then there was Larry Wahl. Larry looked great, he had one of the best ties in the whole room and he was one of the best speakers of the morning. He commended city workers about the storm and had some very positive statistics about the library. I was just about to start liking him when he took a low shot at Mayor Andy Holcomb over his decision to revisit the Disorderly Events Ordinance. I’m sure his fellow wing nuts in the audience were also very amused by his disparaging reference to the ACLU.

Now, in any “patriotism-off” you could conceive, Larry Wahl would probably even kick Chuck Norris’ muscular posterior, but I can’t believe he would be so hostile and intransigent about Andy’s effort to improve something as obviously flawed and unconstitutional as the Disorderly Events Ordinance. I’m sorry Larry, 9/11 may have “changed everything” but the last time I heard the Bill of Rights is still in effect in Chico.

Comments

Dan,
I hope you have a lot of readers, because this piece you wrote needs wide-spread exposure to public view. Awareness of the full implications the Disorderly Events Ordinance has on future Civil Rights must be raised. This is not something to take lightly. A Police Force being used to further political agendas is scary. They already have and will most assuredly continue to do so with greater boldness.
In an email to Scott Gruendal, mid-October 2007, I brought to his attention that in my researching Agenda Minutes of 2005, Larry Wahl may have been the one who initiated Chico Police Department's usurping the power of The People in the lawmaking process. I continued to attend Council meetings until the Ordinance was passed, then worked day and night for three weeks collecting signatures on the referendum. The stress of prolonged exposure to the cold weather and physical exertion precipitated illness that lasted three weeks. I am a 56 year-old grandmother who believes that all laws are to be obeyed, am against drugs, and have an impeccable record. The Disorderly Events Ordinance is a shameful curtain, stated to handle out-of-control crowds.
My viewpoint is our Police Department has been misappropriated for IMAGE BUILDING by both Chico State University and Chico City Council, and this needs to be looked into and handled before it becomes more convoluted than it already is. WHEN DID THE IMAGE-BUILDING START? It had obviously culminated full-force (pun?)at the time of the RIOTS.
WHAT DIRECTION IS THE IMAGE-BUILDING TAKEING, WHEN WILL IT STOP, AND IS IT ETHICAL?
Perhaps the public can get a good preview into the future to have those questions answered by looking at where Chico City Council and the Chico Police Department are currently sticking their noses, then asking oneself, "DO THEY REALLY BELONG THERE?".

Ann

Dan:

The disorderly events ordinance,
AKA the 2 Bottle Ordinance.

In 2005, the city manager was upset about two bottles allegedly being thrown at police. He ordered staff and Police to do something.

So, public meetings were held, until Chief Hagerty decided he was not getting his way.

Then, the Police and City Attorney come up with the debacle we now know as the Disorderly Events Ordinance.

Drafted in a near vacuum, no constitutional compliance review, no relationship between the ordinance's stated need and the list of offenses used as a trigger, clearly written in violation of the California and U.S. Constitution, the problems abound.

But, your group of 5, sans Gruendl, supported it. The problem is blind faith to a staff and a Chief of Police who do not measure up.

Our Council must avoid just taking the staff at their word and begin to listen to the people so there is some balance in our government.

Bill Sheridan
Chico, CA

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)