By Ryan Olson - Enterprise-Record
CHICO — The disc-golf supporters’ current petition challenging the Chico City Council’s decision on the Bidwell Park Master Management Plan is the fourth such challenge since 2000.
A review of the three most-recent petitions in response to Chico City Council decisions reveals that the efforts have impacted city policy.
Two petitions were successful — one regarding purchasing land to extend Otterson Drive and the other regarding increasing parking meter enforcement hours, according to a review of the Enterprise-Record archives. One failed effort — over the disorderly events ordinance — may have ultimately contributed to the council later passing a revised version.
2000 - Otterson Drive extension — Only the Otterson Drive petition made it to a referendum where voters overturned the City Council’s decision. In 2000, a group called the Neighbors for Fiscal and Environmental Responsibility gathered signatures to overturn the council’s decision to build a $1.5 million bridge over Comanche Creek to connect the Hegan Lane Business Park to Park Avenue.
A divided council scheduled a June 2001 election. After a contentious campaign, voters rejected the proposal, redubbed Measure A, 55 percent to 45 percent.
2005 - Parking fees — The petition led by the group called Friends of the Downtown challenged the City Council’s decision to extend enforcement hours of parking meters to include weekday evenings and Saturdays. One of the underlying issues was that the new funds may have potentially paid for a new downtown parking structure.
When considering the referendum in August 2005, the council opted to backtrack on extending the enforcement hours instead of potentially spending $100,000 to hold an election. A separate proposal to increase hourly parking rates to 50 cents an hour went into effect.
2007 - Disorderly events - College students and others were concerned when the City Council adopted a disorderly events ordinance. The measure was intended to give police officers the authority to shut down events deemed to be out of control, but opponents viewed it as a possible infringement of First Amendment rights to assemble and peacefully protest.
A group called Chico Citizens for Civil Rights collected signatures, but the effort fell short of the minimum 10 percent of registered Chico voters. Shortly after the petition failed, then-Mayor Andy Holcombe asked the council to reconsider the ordinance which led to a revised ordinance passing in April 2008.
Recent Comments