Stay off my Butte!!
I decided to take my dogs up to table top mountain this morning, and what a great decision that was! I was surprised at how few people were up there today, considering how beautiful the weather was. There were a few people flying kites near the entrance, but out on the open plateau, it was just me and the boys. The valley was crystal clear all the way from the Sutter Buttes in the south to the fringes of Los Molinos in the north and across the valley to the snow capped mountains that etched a perfect skyline in the west. Patches of early spring wild flowers as well as frisbee like cow patties dotted the land scape. I tried to avoid stepping on either of them. There was a nice breeze blowing from the north with just enough chill to keep me cool. It was a great time and place to wonder and ponder.
But here's what I really want to talk about....As I was driving out to table top, in the area of Butte College, I had a strange realization. As I drove by the beautiful Buttes I was thinking that this is the time of year when they look their best, covered in a green blanket of spring grasses. And then it dawned on me that I had never actually been on a Butte (except once in the seventies when we snuck onto private property and climbed one). I've lived here 36 years and never legally climbed a Butte. How many times have you driven to Butte College or out on Neil Road by the landfill and gazed at the beautiful rising Buttes with their rocky edges around the top and the gently sloping valleys in between and wished you could just....go there?
When I moved up here from Southern California in 1972, I had this illusion that Northern California was somewhat wild and open country. Compared to what you see from Palm Springs all the way to Santa Barbara, it pretty much is, but still, I was disappointed to find that all of the natural areas, the beautiful country sides were all fenced in private property. I remember talking to a fellow back then who had spent time in Mexico and telling him about how this no trespassing thing really bothered me. It's like we can go on sidewalks, parks, roads, and stores. The rest of the world is off limits. He mentioned that in Mexico, it's understood that fences were just to keep cattle in, not to keep people out. He said you could go anywhere you wanted to down there! And America is the land of the free? Certainly not in all respects.
It just seems wrong to me that we call this county Butte County, and yet, I don't know of one Butte that anybody can walk on unless you own the property! Can you imagine going to Minnesota, the land of 10,000 lakes and not having access to one lake? Why can't it be that people who just want to hike, why can't we the public have free access to our beautiful country sides that seem to be reserved only for cattle? I think the law should state that anybody who owns anything over 100 acres, has to let the public have access, for walking purposes only. The entrances would be gates that cattle cannot escape from, like the ones at table top mountain. There would be laws against littering or going within a certain distance of anybodies private residence. Also, we could not sue the property owners over anything that happened to us on their property (assuming it's an act of nature, not aggression by the property owner). Is this idea ridiculous? Maybe, but wouldn't it be a better world if we could actually enjoy the beautiful areas by walking on them and not just watching them breeze by from our car windows?
Comments
Joe, I like that idea. This reminds me of something and I have to confess. Back in the 1970's, I was hiking in Point Reyes National Seashore in Marin County. I was lost as far as where I wanted to hike. I wanted to hike to a certain destination where I previously hiked with the Sierra Club, but couldn't find the right trail. I came across some property owned by the Nature Conservancy. They had a "No Trespassing" sign explaining why and there was a fence. Obviously, it wasn't barbed wire as I simply climbed over it and found where I wanted to go. There wasn't a soul around to stop me, and I also did no harm as there was a trail that I stayed on.
Joe's reply....It does make sense, doesn't it? I mean you can't own beach front property in California, so why should you be able to own all the buttes? Seems to me that if it is a geographical phenomena, only in one area of the state...like volcano's, buttes, beaches, giant redwood trees, etc. there should be at least a few of them that are open to hiking by the public.
Posted by: Walter Ballin | March 3, 2008 12:29 PM
Walter's reply...It sure doesn't make sense that one can own a whole mountain range and prevent the public from hiking there. I thought that I saw in the Sierra Club's Yahi Chapter newsletter before, which I pick up sometimes, that they had a hike in the Sutter Buttes. If they did, perhaps they got permission?
The Sierra Club in the Bay Area used to do this back in the 1960's. My stepfather used to lead hikes where they got permission from property owners who owned land in the hills between the Napa and Sonoma Valleys. At the last piece of property where we ended up, the owners would let us swim in their pool. It was an annual hike that the Bay Area Chapter of the Sierra Club had. I know that this is digressing a bit from what you wrote, but this came to mind.
Posted by: Walter Ballin | March 3, 2008 02:47 PM