« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »

December 31, 2005

California 5th dumbest State in the Union

California now ranks among the dumbest states in the union according to latest study.

  • Below is an excerpt of the results, not shown is Vermont which was number 1:

    41. Tennessee
    42. Hawaii
    43. Alabama
    44. Alaska
    45. Louisiana
    46. California
    47. Nevada
    48. New Mexico
    49. Mississippi
    50. Arizona

    "These are the 2005-2006 findings of the Education State Rankings, a survey by Morgan Quitno Press of hundreds of public school systems in all 50 states. States were graded on 21 factors, including student achievement and attendance, positive outcomes, strong student-teacher relationships and school district efficiency. Other factors are the number of high school graduates, reading, writing and math proficiency, percent of school-age kids in public schools, high school drop out rates, student-teacher ratios and class size.

    The Smartest State Award recognizes those states that are committed to students and teachers, emphasize excellence in the classroom and ensure that public elementary and secondary schools are efficiently-run," said Scott Morgan, president of Morgan Quitno Press. "Vermont shines in many key areas of education. A high percentage of its students excel in reading, writing and math. In addition, schools in Vermont have smaller class sizes and lower pupil-teacher ratios than in most other states."

    Posted by Post Scripts at 09:03 AM | Comments (4)

    December 30, 2005

    Severe Storm Information - Update

    Our thanks to "Cris" for these severe storm information websites shown below:

    http://www.buttecounty.net/publicworks/publicservices.html

    CA DOT (enter the hwy # to get the info)
    http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/hi.htm

    CalTrans Interactive Road Map
    http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/do3map.htm

    CHP Hourly Road Conditions
    http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/Hourly

    CHP Traffic Incident Site
    http://cad.chp.ca.gov/

    Anyone wishing to provide storm information will get a priority here. We will be posting new information whenever possible through Saturday afternoon, after most rivers affecting Butte, Glenn and Tehema will have crested.

    I'm currently writing you from Butte City. About a mile to the east of us at Hwy. 162 and Road Y it's flooded and the road is closed. Beyond that, 7 mile lane, Agua Frias Rd. closed due to flooding.

    Needless to say we're keeping a close eye on the Sacramento river which is about a 1/2 mile west of us. Winds out here are really strong at the moment, looks like gusts well over 40 mph.

    TIP: People coming the Butte City area to Chico should use Hwy 45 to Hamilton City, it is open, but high winds and heavy rain will make night driving dangerous.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 09:58 PM | Comments (2)

    I Need Your Help

    The Libertarian Party of Butte County lined up the first debate between the Supervisorial candidates. I'll be there and I'll bring you the results! Details of the who, what and when will be made known as soon as the debate is finalized.

    Please send me your questions and I'll try to get them in the debate!

    Posted by Post Scripts at 10:12 AM | Comments (0)

    December 28, 2005

    US News Fails Coverage of Terrorist Release

    Terrorist Released...non-event for US news:

    Only last month, Germany freed Mohammed Ali Hamadi, convicted of murdering U.S. Navy diver, Petty Officer, Robert Stethem. Oddly, little coverage of Hamadi's unexpected release appeared in U.S. news.


    Hezbollah hijackers (including Hamadi who was 21 at the time) hijacked a TWA flight from Athens to Rome and forced it to land in Beirut. During the siege the hijackers beat and stomped Stethem for over 3 hours, repeatedly trying to get him to speak into a tape recorder.

    According to witnesses, the Islamic hijackers were trying to force him to denounce his country and to make a plea for fuel. Stethem refused these demands and remained stoically silent during his beatings. This frustrated the plans of the hijackers and kept the plane grounded saving the passengers and crew. After 17 hours a deal was struck and the hijackers left the plane escorted by Hamas terrorists to a safe location somewhere in Lebanon where they disappeared into the population.

    About 3 years later hijacker Mohammed Ali Hamadi was captured while attempting to smuggle a liquid explosive into Germany. The explosive liquid was of the same type used in several European bombings previously, but for reasons never disclosed, Germany nearly released him without filing charges, that is until the United States intervened and demanded his extradition on hijacking and murder charges.

    Germany refused extradition citing Hamadi could be sentenced to death in the U.S., and German law forbade extradition to countries with a death penalty unless assurances were made it would not be imposed. According to a Harvard study investigating this incident a top US official did just that and gave the assurance, but Germany still refused to extradite Hamadi.

    Hamadi was tried in a German court and sentenced to life without parole. Since his conviction Hamadi has had 3 parole hearings to moderate his sentence, although in each hearing there was strong opposition from the U.S. government. In his 3rd and last parole hearing Hamadi's sentence was commuted to life with the possibility of parole, despite U.S. objections.

    Hamadi was secretly released from custody on Nov. 25th, 2005, without notifying U.S. officials, as is customary in such international criminal cases. His release comes amid a disturbing speculation that the German government exchanged him for a Susanne Osthoff, a German archaeologist taken hostage in Iraq. She was released just 3 days after Hamadi's release.

    German officials said they offered no ransom for her release, but they did admit they made a "diplomatic gesture". The nature or terms of that gesture was not revealed, but it was almost certainly related to Susanne Osthoff release.

    Upon his release, Hamadi flew immediately back to his home in Lebanon. Lebanon does not have an extradition treaty with the U.S., and Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora has denied formal requests that Hamadi be handed over to U.S. Officials.

    Saniora said to reporters, "They could have asked Germany to hand him over to the United States, why are they asking us?"

    10 answers for Saniora: 1. The hijacking happened on Lebanese soil. 2. Hamadi was a Lebanese citizen (#1 and #2 makes it their problem). 3. Aside from the hijacking and murder conviction, Hamadi was linked to other acts of terror across Europe. 4. Hamadi was caught transporting explosives for a known terrorist group in violation of international law. 5. The United States had made numerous requests for his extradition from German officials and now it was making another request from Saniora. 6. Saniora currently receives over $20,000,000 per year from the United States in foreign aide. 7. By harboring this fugitive from justice the new Lebanese government risks not only the loss of aide, but direct military action from the U.S. #8. Because it can now be viewed as a rogue nation supportive of terrorists groups, number 9. This is in violation of international law and makes it eligible for UN sanctions and or military action, and that would be #10!

    U.S. authorities say fanatical Islamic Lebanese group's contributions to international terrorism are hardly new. “We've never retaliated for the Beirut barracks bombing done by Hezbollah. More recently we have traced the manufacturing of improvised explosives used in Iraq to kill and maim hundreds of U.S. soldiers back to Lebanon and Hezbollah sites.� Said one U.S. Army source.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 05:37 PM | Comments (0)

    More on Wire Taps

    From "Special Agent" who writes us, ....."The abuse is all on the other side and more to come. Already, attorneys for various in-custody and some already-convicted terrorists are demanding that information so they can challenge the evidence used against their clients -- not the direct evidence, since the wiretaps were not used in court and were never intended to be.

    What they are claiming is the old "fruit of the poisoned tree" argument, that some information from the NSA interceptions put the law enforment people on to their clients as suspects. Then the cops built their case from there, collecting only "clean" evidence, with regular search warrants, wiretaps, and all the usual stuff. The worst thing is that these terrorist attorneys (pun intended) have no real...

    that information so they can challenge the evidence used against their clients -- not the direct evidence, since the wiretaps were not used in court and were never intended to be.

    What they are claiming is the old "fruit of the poisoned tree" argument, that some information from the NSA interceptions put the law enforment people on to their clients as suspects. Then the cops built their case from there, collecting only "clean" evidence, with regular search warrants, wiretaps, and all the usual stuff. The worst thing is that these terrorist attorneys (pun intended) have no real expectation that the NSA taps did lead to cases against their clients, and they really don't care.

    They only hope that by challenging the Justice Department, they can win their cases or their appeals when the government cannot divulge the secret information they demand." END

    Jack's PS: We're engaged in a fight to the death with Islamic terrorists who have repeatedly vowed to kill us and have killed thousands of us. Given this fact and what is at stake for our future, why would anyone with a shred of a brain cell be demanding constitutional rights and access to our court system for terrorists? It's beyond beyond any stretch of sanity!

    Posted by Post Scripts at 12:43 PM | Comments (1)

    Hollywood Portray's Evil America...again - Syriana

    VIEWER COMMENTS: "Syriana, yeah sure it's fiction, but we know it probably happens all the time" Nancy P. "I saw it and I loved it, makes America look rotten!" Teddy K. "This is all about George Bush's oil company, I've seen it 10 times, can't get enough!" Howard D.
    sidepix3_22103.jpg


    You know what...

    Arab's need more reasons to hate us; especially the radicals, they just don't hate us enough. I got an idea, lets make up some really horrible conspiracy stuff involving America, the CIA and big oil, lets put it into a movie and make a fortune by spreading hate amongst our global enemies that will flock to see it! Great idea, huh? (Yes, I am saying this tongue in cheek) Unfortunately, it's already been done. Well, actually its been a lot over the years, but not quite as well as the latest "hate America cause we're greedy and evil" movie called Syriana. It stars one of my favorite liberals, George Clooney, an aging CIA agent.

    Clooney is cast as a dupe of this mega-rich U.S. Oil Corporation with tentacles that spread around the world. A big, fat, rich oil company based in the heart of Texas, presumably next to Bush's ranch, what could be more hateable than that? lol Anyway, this evil oil company is so powerful it is above the law and pulls the strings of the American government. This plot plays perfectly to all the global conspiracy nuts, which must include Islamic jihadist.

    There's this great line at a secret meeting where the board is joking about the U.S. law forbidding bribery and one of them quips with a chuckle, "This is the awl business we're talkin about isn't it?" The message comes through loud and clear, corruption and "awl" is just business as usual.

    In this plot, the "awl" company is after the oily assets of a small Arab kingdom, soon to be exploited by Imperial America. The corporation is prepared to do anything to get the oil, including murdering it's next-in-line to the throne. This person is portrayed as a warm, caring, intelligent and visionary Arab Prince of unusually high ethics. His death will keep fat greedy Americans driving gas guzzling road hogs a few years longer. Well that part is not directly said, but it sure is implied.

    Who better to serve the needs of this evil corporation, but our own cold blooded CIA and its running dog lackey's, like Special Agent Bob Barnes, played by George Clooney. Clooney had to gain 35 pounds to play the role of an American, we're all fat you know.

    And that my friends is how Hollywood helps build the American image. They have successfully instilled yet more hate in those already predisposed to hate us while furthering the fanatic's belief that this work of fiction represents the true America.

    It is a convincing and compelling work, heck, after watching it I had the urge to strap on a suicide vest and run screaming into the theater's projection room.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 11:40 AM | Comments (2)

    December 27, 2005

    FISA Wire Taps - Things You Should Know

    FISA aka the Foreign intelligence Surveillance Act, allows warrantless searches (wire taps) of domestic calls made to suspected terrorists beyond....

    our national borders. It does not allow for eavesdropping on calls entirely within the USA. This is an important distinction to make, because FISA is designed for the collection of foreign intelligence by surveillance and it is set apart by Congress (in law) from the usual "probable cause" warrants that law enforcement must obtain.

    osama.jpg


    Why not use the courts and get a warrant? Why does it have to be done in such secrecy?

    When a warrant is obtained, the details of the warrant, i.e. the reason for surveillance that must contain the, who, what, when, how and why. The law says a warrant is only for a very specific period of time. Once the warrant time has expired the person/s being surveilled must be notified and many details of the warrant can then become known to them. This is their legal right. For an enemy combatant of the USA, this is an intelligence bonanza. It doesn't take a great leap of logic to see that such information will be used to defeat future wire taps and improve terrorist's stealthy tactics. It is just as probable that more innocent lives will be lost when the terrorists have such helpful information.

    In 1978 Congress gave the President the authority for warrantless searches in section III of FISA when they said and I quote, "nothing in Title III shall be deemed to limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the United States against the overthrow of the Government by force or other unlawful means, or against any other clear and present danger to the structure or existence of the Government."

    We have had three successive Presidents that invoked the powers of FISA and there's not been one case of abuse brought before the courts, let alone a case sustaining an abuse! Not one! And that is incredibly significant when you compare what has happen to us since Al Queda declared war on America. There's the real threat and there have been zero cases of abuse by FISA, yet we're dwelling on that and not the terrorists?

    Fisa is limited in its focus to gather of overseas intelligence and those very same people we were spying on have done us substantial domestic harm, in 93 and 2001. They are a real and ver visible threat, on the other hand libs make up some hypothetical story showing how FISA “might� be abused! That's a far cry from the reality we've seen on 9/11.

    I suspect those people are obstructing FISA for reasons that are more political than patriotic. They have attacked President Bush for using FISA exactly as his predecessors did and claim criminal wrongdoing! Several radical members in Congress have said what President Bush is doing (protecting the United States) is an impeachable offense.

    Imagine if the President had information that foreign nationals inside the United States were conversing with terrorist contacts in Iran and he did nothing and as a result we were attacked and lives were lost. Now that would be an impeachable offense! Or imagine that he sought out the blessings of a federal judge who then denied the warrant to use a wiretap and the President did nothing and we were attacked. Again, one could argue that too would be an impeachable offense. Congress said in FISA, he is lawfully authorized "...to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the United States", how much more clear could it be?

    When it comes to life and death issues in national security, the buck stops with the President, not a federal judge or a member of Congress. Yet, there are some groups like the ACLU and even a few members of Congress like Nancy Pelosi, that would willingly risk another 9/11 attack by forcing this President to abandon FISA and meet the heavy burden of proof required in a court ordered wire tap. And lets not forget that by obtaining that warrant the information in it will eventually become public knowledge. It makes no sense to me that we should surrender our intel gathering tactics to Al Queda.

    Since no other President was so challenged or threatened with impeachment for using FISA, one might suspect there is a hidden agenda behind all this ballyhoo, an agenda that has nothing to do with protecting your civil rights, but everything to do with gaining political advantage. An advantage I might ad, that comes at the cost of risking American lives and empowering our enemies here and abroad. Now that my friends is what I call a impeachable offense.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 12:16 PM | Comments (1)

    December 11, 2005

    ALL TOPICS ARE FAIR GAME

    Most blog sites are built upon one theme, but not here. We're a little different. I said from the begining "all topics are fair game" and true to that, uh... warning, well, you get some pretty diverse things here from smart dogs to Howard Dean in a British Red-Coat! lol

    If you have been reading this column for any length of time, you've probably also noticed that I encourage you to send in your comments and even start a new thread, so don't be bashful. I like to publishing your thoughts and frequently do as main topics. This column was designed to be interactive and I can't do that without your help, so pulleeeeese feel free to write whatever is on your mind! Just keep it clean because we may have a few younger types reading your work. I know my grandson stops by once in awhile and he said some of his 8th grade friends do too. So don't try to teach my G-son any creative 4 letter words, he's doing just great on his own thank you.

    On last thing, just because your work gets published here doesn't mean the Enterprise-Record or even I, (your humble blog writer) agree, support or endorse your work, but we DO respect your right to express your opinion!

    Looking forward to your thoughts....

    Posted by Post Scripts at 10:45 AM | Comments (1)

    Season for Anger Management

    Are you one of those people who think, "I'm better off to have an angry outburst because holding it in is worse." You therefore rationalize your anger as acceptable, but is it really? 
     
    Medical science says no. Failure to control a "hot temper" will eventually affect your health, often in dramatic ways and it will isolate you from your friends and family members. Lets face it, when you don't have your health and you don't have friends or loved ones, you've lost almost everything that makes life worth living.

    Lets take a look at some of the common physical effects from anger and see if they apply to you:

    Headache
    Digestion problems, such as abdominal pain
    Insomnia
    Increased anxiety
    Depression
    High blood pressure
    Skin problems, such as eczema
    Heart attack
    Stroke
    Respitory problems.

    Anger always works against your body. Every anger event causes blood platelets to attach themselves to the walls of your heart and blood vessels temporarily raises your blood pressure and skin temperature. Adrenaline and other stress hormones flood into your body. In some cases, the adrenaline causes dangerous hearet arrhythmias, leading to a sudden and often fatal heart attack.
     
    Here are some tips to managing anger:

    Try to see the situation in the best possible light. 

    Step away from the situation until you have a chance to cool down.  

    Try to pinpoint the exact reasons why you feel angry; is it logical or is it something you've projected?

    Once you have identified the problem, consider coming up with different strategies on how to remedy the situation.

    Remember, a good deal of anger is generated by your own thoughts. People who quickly snap at others tend to think in the negative. It follows then, the first step to diffusing your anger is to learn to see things differently and using your brain instead of your emotions.  "While angry feelings frequently surprise us and come upon us automatically, it is our “self-talk� that makes us more angry. Change what you tell yourself about what is going on, and you can drastically change your feelings about it." Betterhealth.vic.gov.au   

    One of the reasons I choose to write this article is this winter/holiday season. Thanks to the short days and long nights people tend to suffer more from depression, we call this "seasonal affective disorder." Then there is the pressure from the holidays and all the expectations and disappointments that it may bring.

    Families are probably never more challenged than this time of year and the suicide and physical abuse rates, confirm it. So, if you feel you have an anger problem, I urge you to get some help. There is a plethora of great articles about managing anger on this net, but if that's not enough then for your sake and those you love, please seek out professional help. You might just have a better life if you do.

    I suggest the following reading for more information....


    http://www.urbanext.uiuc.edu/familyworks/anger-01.html

    http://mentalhelp.net/psyhelp/chap7/chap7b.htm

    http://coolnurse.healthology.com/webcast_transcript.asp?f=mentalhealth&c=mentalhealth_anger2&spg=FIP

    Posted by Post Scripts at 07:54 AM | Comments (0)

    December 10, 2005

    Need More Gas Mileage?

    We're all feeling the pinch with high fuel prices, but there is something we can do to fight back. Here's 10 good tips how you can reduce your vehicle's operating costs by as much as 35%. That's like paying $1.50 a gallon instead of $2.30, sound good?

    1. All your engine's air is sucked through an air filter. If the filter element is dirty the flow of clean air is impeded, making your engine work harder. A dirty filter is the most common cause of bad mileage, thus it's number 1 on my list of tips! Most filters can be replaced for less than $10.

    A high performance filter allows clean air to flow into your engine with less resistance, thus improving mileage. One of the most popular high flow filters on the market is the K&N filter which sells for around $40, but it's a lifetime filter, you need only wash it out with soap and water periodically to maintain it's performance.

    2. Properly inflate your tires, typically this is anywhere from 28-35 lbs, but it depends on the tire. The suggested tire pressure is printed on the side wall.

    I like to run about 3-5 lbs. more pressure than the advertised range because this reduces the sidewall flex, it corners slightly better and it makes the tires roll with less resistance while not noticeably reducing your tire mileage and this definitely adds to your fuel economy! If you want to try this, check with your tire dealer first and see what he says.

    3. When starting from a stop, let your vehicle roll forward slightly before applying the gas, then accelerate slowly and smoothly. Try this exercise to see if you are accelerating properly, but don't do it in traffic, please! Hang a tea bag from your rear view mirror with a 12-15" string. Now practice accelerating without noticeably jerking the teabag more than a few inches off center.

    4. For those determined to drive even more efficiently, I suggest using a vacuum gauge. The gauge will usually have a "green" zone that shows you are driving with the optimum peddle pressure for your vehicle. A vacuum gauge costs about $15 and can be self installed with a minimum of mechanical experience or a shop can do it for about $45-$65. It's a good investment if you are really serious about your mileage!

    5. On the other end of the spectrum from a clean, free flowing air filter is a free flowing exhaust system. Obviously, a car without any mufflers will be the most free flowing and efficient, but for all practical purposes we can't do that! However, low back pressure mufflers can greatly help improve mileage. In most cases you will have to consult a muffler shop for this and it could cost you around $100 for a single muffler, but it will help definitely your mileage.

    While you are under there, don't forget about the "catalytic converter." This looks like a small muffler, but in fact it is part of your cars emission control system. The catalytic converter can begin to fail early on poorly tuned cars almost anytime or they can begin to fail at about 90,000 miles on up. Gas mileage and performance can be severely impacted if your catalytic converter becomes clogged! Check with a certified smog shop if you suspect this might be a problem.

    6. Don't waste your money on buying premium fuel if your car manufacturer doesn't call for it. It is a myth that your car will run better and last longer if you burn premium gas. However, using a premium motor oil is a good thing and its money well spent. Just make sure it is the right grade. Oil grades may vary according to type of driving and climate, consult a professional for what works best for your driving and yes, using the right oil can improve your gas mileage because your engine is running more efficiently with less drag.

    7. Use your cruise control at highway speed. Generally, if you run just 5 mph. under the posted limit you are not going to noticeably add to your trip time, but you can increase fuel economy as much as 3-5 mpg! For every 5 mph above 60 mph, it's like paying an additional 17 cents per gallon, because your vehicle's mileage is falling off. Note: In California if 5 or more vehicles collect behind you, you must yield or you could be cited regardless of your speed.

    8. Make sure your vehicle is properly tuned!

    9. Keep windows rolled up at highway speed, this reduces drag. At slower speeds turn off the AC and roll down windows instead. Using the AC tends to reduce mileage by 2-3 mpg.

    10. Avoid excessive idling at the drive up windows. Turn it off and go inside instead. Also, instead of starting up your vehicle for a very short errand, try walking. Short hauls are the hardest on your engine and walking is good for you, but you know that.

    For more information may I suggest the following sites....

    http://www.knfilters.com/

    http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/list/top10/103164/article.html

    http://www.sdt.com.au/FUELECONOMY.htm

    http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/9912scc_ssbbpart2/

    Posted by Post Scripts at 05:15 PM | Comments (1)

    December 09, 2005

    DOGS GETTING SMARTER

    Hub.jpg
    Are dogs getting smarter? Some studies suggest they are. Which raises the question will we some day be sharing the planet with other animals? Canadian scientists recently proved that old dogs can learn new tricks, at least their cognitive functions can resist declines in age related functioning, if vitamins E and C were added to their diet through certain vegitables. "Dr. Milgram's year-long study involved the testing of 48 beagles, ages 9 to 14, owned by the military."

    Other studies have shown dogs can be taught to count and they can learn up 700 or more words, including several hundred commands. Will this increased brain activity and better diets lead to a new breed of smart dog? Well, scientists believe something triggered higher brain functions in humans some 6 million years ago and so began our long journey. What exactly transformed the earliest humans known as Hominidae, is uncertain, but it is believed diet played a major role. Hominidea... "were not like apes; they had bigger brains, different teeth, and walked upright." Based on this theoretical time line, don't expect Rover to be asking to borrow the car anytime soon.

    For more information on this subject may I suggest....

    http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0769752.html
    http://www.twis.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=Neuro-sci;action=display;num=1025056632

    The featured dog is our boy "Hub." And he is way too smart for his own good.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 08:47 AM | Comments (0)

    December 08, 2005

    Dec. 7th, 1941 - Pearl Harbor

    g474789t.jpg
    On Dec. 7th, 1941 almost 3000 Americans died in the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese. On Dec. the 8th, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan and Germany.

    Over 600,000 Americans were killed or wounded during the following 3 1/2 years of war. It was a fight to the bitter end; there was no time limit, there were no politicians saying we can't win, we just saw what had to be done and did it until it the war was over.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 03:35 PM | Comments (3)

    December 07, 2005

    Howard Dean Responds!

    dean.jpg
    HOWARD DEAN...appeared at a small rally of democratic supporters to denounce those who called him "a Benedict Arnold" The insult came after Dean said, "the idea that we're going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong!" during an on air interview at San Antonio radio station, WOIA.

    Dean quipped to his dozens of supporters...

    "Oh, c'mon, do I look like a "Benedict Arnold" to you?"

    Meanwhile, many well known Republicans have called on Dean to step down from his position of Leader of the DNC over his what critics term was an outrageous, almost treasonous comment done at the worst possible time to undermine our military moral.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 06:34 PM | Comments (4)

    Doug LaMalfa Sets Example for Political Integrity

    Our political hero of the month is Assemblyman Doug LaMalfa-R, from Butte County. He refused to accept the 12% pay raise that goes into effect January. LaMalfa says he is going to donate the raise to local charity.

    That gesture says a lot about the farmer from Richvale and the 16 others who also refused the raise. So far, 103 Senators and Assembly members accepted the raise, including our own Assemblyman Rick Keene-R from Chico and Sen. Sam Aanestead-R from Grass Valley.

    Our lawmakers were already the highest paid in the nation and this latest raise extends their lead by more than $30,000. In addition to their lavish pay they also receive about $27,000 in cushy benefits.

    What do we (the voters) get in return? Not much. It seems that every attempt by the republicans and independants to fix problems, from fiscal responsibility to improving our failing educational system, has been met by incredibly stiff resistance by democratic partisans who would rather complain than compromise. The performance of this democratic controlled legislature has been the worst in decades, with zero fixes and zero cooperation with the minority party. And for those zero's they all get a 12% raise? That's like saying my kid got all F's and now he's on the honor roll.

    Our elected government was never designed to be a career move, rather it was designed for citizens to step forward, do their patriotic duty in public service and leave. Thanks in part to the high cost of running for office and political opportunists seeking a lucrative career, we've slowly devolved our [electorial system] into a [special club for the rich and powerful], and a whole new class of professional politicians has emerged; albeit for a very few, like Doug LaMalfa, who have choosen a different path.

    I suppose we can take some consolation that at least one local lawmaker has taken a stand for personal ethics, even though it's going to cost him a fat 12% raise. Kudos' to Asssemblyman Doug LaMalfa!

    Those other lawmakers have until Dec. 16th to follow Doug's lead.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 10:06 AM | Comments (4)

    More on Tookie Williams....

    (Special thanks to our poster "HC" who started this thread)
    tookie.jpg

    The evidence against Stanley "Tookie" Williams is conclusive and beyond a shadow of a doubt, so said the jury, just before he threatened to kill them.

    Williams Escape Plan: In a response to the current clemency appeal, the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office has revealed that in 1979 while Williams was in county jail awaiting trial he plotted a detailed escape that involved the murder of several jail guards by armed accomplices, the dynamiting of a prison bus, as well as the murder of several inmates on the bus who were potential witnesses. Williams assigned himself the task of murdering the inmate witnesses and the guard on the bus.

    A female accomplice was said to have obtained the necessary dynamite and a new pump shotgun for Williams, similar to the one used in the Motel robbery. The plot was foiled only because the escape plans were discovered just prior to his transport date to court. The plans gave the date, time, bus route and court location, number of guards involved and even the bus number.

    William's made death threats to jury: According to evidence presented at his clemency hearing, The foreperson confirmed the defendant mouthed the words "I'm going to get each and every one of you mother f******." (TT 3078). The foreperson further confirmed that this threat did not play any part in the deliberations and was, in fact, not discussed during the penalty phase of the trial. (TT 3078).

    Prison officials noted that although Williams claims to be a reformed man and now against gang's, he still maintains his same old association with gang members in prison. Despite this fact and the evidence of four cold blooded murders and the plot to murder more innocent people in his escape attempt, many Hollywood celebrities champion Williams appeal for clemency, saying they believe in him.

    For more on this story may I suggest you read:

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47647

    Posted by Post Scripts at 09:01 AM | Comments (1)

    Tookie Williams Fraud

    From Letters to Jack, "Humble Correspondent" writes:

    "Lately, I've been overwhelmed with all the news reports about Tookie Williams and how he has transformed himself from a quadruple murderer and gang leader into a gentleman who writes children's books, so therefore he should receive clemency from Arnold.

    I did some research about the nomination process. Guess what? All it takes is for someone, anyone for any reason, to send a letter to the Nobel Committee in Sweden. That's right. Anyone can nominate anyone for a Nobel, no qualifications needed. Then the "nominee" can go around being identified as "Nominated for the Nobel Prize."

    We, dear readers, could send a letter nominating Jack. Then he could identify himself on this blog as "Jack, nominated for the Nobel Prize." END

    NOTE: Ironic that the Nobel Peace Prize originated from a patent on an explosive.

    Library reference on Nobel:

    Alfred Nobel, Swedish Industrialist, 1833-1896, "My dynamite will sooner lead to peace than a thousand world conventions. As soon as men will find that in one instant, whole armies can be utterly destroyed, they surely will abide by golden peace."—Alfred Nobel

    "Alfred (Bernhard) Nobel was born October 21, 1833 in Stockholm Sweden. Nobel, who invented dynamite, endowed a $9 million fund in his will. The interest on this endowment was to be used as awards for people whose work most benefited humanity. He wanted the profit from his invention to be used to reward human ingenuity. First awarded in 1901, the Nobel Prize is still the most honored in the world.

    In 1842 Nobel's family moved to St. Petersburg, Russia where he obtained his education. He traveled widely as a young man, becoming fluent in five languages. Nobel was interested in literature and wrote novels, poetry and plays in his spare time. In the 1860s he began experiments with nitroglycerin in his father's factory. He tried many ways to stabilize this highly volatile material. Nobel discovered that a mix of nitroglycerin and a fine porous powder called kieselguhr was most effective. He named this mixture dynamite, and received a patent in 1867."

    Posted by Post Scripts at 07:59 AM | Comments (2)

    December 06, 2005

    Saddam Hussein's Trial

    Is the trial of Saddam Hussein hurting us?

    There was a time when an unruly defendant in an Iraqi court would have been beaten into submission and the reporters would praise the judge for silencing him! But, this is the new kinder, gentler Iraq and the court seems wholly unprepared to handled the frequent outbursts by Hussein. I wonder if Hussein isn't taking his cue from his American defense counselor, Ramsey Clark?

    He frequently yells, he's not afraid to die, "If you want my neck you can have it!" His grandstanding is defiant and unrepentant. The court is often brought to a halt as Saddam shouts out, "Long Live Iraq!" Hussein challenges the judge, saying, "How can you allow this?" He screams out, "I will not be in a court without justice, go to Hell!" As a result, Saddam comes off looking like more like a victim than a murderous defendant, which might be the defense plan.

    The trial news naturally follows Saddam's every word and portrays him as a sympathetic victim. This overshadows the statements of witnesses telling horrible tales of torture and murder by his regime. The sort of openness we witness now is virtually unknown in the Arab world and it is inciting the emotions of those who already have a disapproving view of the US.

    Meanwhile back in America, the ACLU is suing to get open trials with full constitutional rights for the non-citizen terrorist detainees at Gitmo. How this will all play out is yet to be seen, but I fear if those public trials go forward, we're just giving the terrorists a big global podium for their Islamofacist message or worse, we will be disclosing informants and methods that we collect information that thwarts terrorism. That would be a big mistake, but the ACLU doesn't seem to care about our safety...they're pushing for the trials.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 09:07 AM | Comments (0)

    Media and - Bird Flu

    From poster Toby S....Toby says, "The media are in overdrive to keep people either misinformed or just uninformed. If it isn't fake news stories it's overblown and exaggerated news stories. They range from terrorism to the economy to religion. The newest is the "bird flu". How the US isn't ready for it! It's just a matter of time! It's going to be a pandemic, millions and millions will die! Maybe they will maybe they wont. I am not all that worried about it. Seems to me, as usual the problem has started in and is largely contained to Countries who's people wouldn't know a bathtub from a Buick. They live in the same filth as the birds.

    Until the ACLU says we can't wash our hands or take showers because it offends someone, I think we are ok. Until the USDA gives up doing its job, I think we are ok. Until people stop getting shots and doing whatever it is that keeps them relatively healthy, we are going to be ok. The flu, one kind or another knocks off tens of thousands of people every year and we do not think about it. Have you not learned anything yet? Just because some media hack says it, doesn't mean it's true. Hey, look at that, the sky is still in the sky. cough, cough. lol" END

    NOTE: If you have a new thread to start, please send me your comments and your post could be featured here. This is an interactive site, so don't be shy, send it in!

    Posted by Post Scripts at 08:11 AM | Comments (1)

    December 05, 2005

    Clean Elections come from Clean Money

    gwn4.jpg

    Thinking about running for a state office? According to the campaign data from the 1998 Calif. election, it's going to cost you about $471,000 to run for a legislative seat.

    Not many of us can afford even a fraction of that cost. So the field of candidates is definately tilted towards the rich and the list of potential candidates is narrowed considerably, that's not good for the voter. Raising money to run isn't too bad as a rule, unless you have to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars, then a candidate suddenly finds himself beholding to certain interests and thats not good for voters either!

    The orignal concept of government by the people, for people, has devolved into something else. It's become a system where money talks! Actually, it buys elections. The FPPC says candidates who spent the most, won over 92% of the time. That's precisely why we see so many political ads run by slick advertising professionals; it's become a whole new industry designed to elect candidates to high office by manipulating the voter.

    For the ad pro's it's just another product they are hired to sell. Thanks to these spinmasters who paint up their candidates, the average voter can't be sure what they see is what they will get...need I mention all those broken campaign promises?

    It's often said almost anyone can get elected to anything, given enough money. However, there are a number of creative ways we can change the system to restore confidence in our elected officials. One method is called, "The Clean Money, Clean Elections." It's purely voluntary. If a candidate wishes to take part, they can retain their independance because they don't have to raise big money to run for the state legislature. They still have to qualify for the ballot by a signature campaign and only then are they entitled to a share of money from the clean election campaign fund. Additionally, "...to cover minor costs during the qualifying period, candidates are permitted to raise a limited amount of seed money from private sources in amounts not exceeding $100 per contributor."

    Sound interesting? For more information on this topic may I suggest....
    http://www.publicampaign.org/congress/howitworks.htm

    Posted by Post Scripts at 02:57 PM | Comments (0)

    Good Pay for Bad Legislators

    The California legislature will move their base salary from $99,000 to $110,880 next year. The California Citizens Compensation Commission, which was created by a voter-approved proposition in 1990, voted to give a 12% pay raise to legislators making them the highest paid lawmakers in the United States.

    In addition to the high salaries lawmakers receive about $1040 per month for a new leased car and car expenses, plus $138 per diem while in session. Despite being the highest paid in the nation, lawmakers still argued that this is the first pay raise they've had in the past 7 years and if they had maintained a simple cost of living adjustment, their salary would now be over $121,000 per year.

    (Then again, if their salary was tied to performance - they would owe us money!)

    However, if you are one of those that believe without [good pay] we're not going to attract to [good legislators] then California ought to be the best run state in the country! Certainly it ought to be better run than Massachusetts where legislators earn a mere $53,380 per year. However, Massachusetts outperforms California in almost every category, especially in quality education, California's largest expenditure.

    Our legislature receives annually about 100 billion in revenues, yet they still manage to spend more than they take in. 39.9% of the budget goes to K-12 education, yet California schools rank in the bottom 1/3 of nation. Next in line is the 32.3% of the pie that goes to health and human services (welfare) and Dems say we need to increase spending for schools and welfare???

    Here's an idea: Why don't we reduced the number of legislators by 12% to offset their 12% raise? That would save us some money.

    Note: A recent field poll showed 64% of Californians felt the legislators were doing a poor job.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 11:11 AM | Comments (0)

    December 03, 2005

    Four Hostages in Iraq

    I'm sure I can't be the only one thinking there's something very odd about this latest kidnapping in Iraq.

    First, the four were allegedly taken hostage by the "Swords of Righteousness Brigade," a group nobody in Iraq has ever heard of before. That's suspicious, but not impossible to imagine. Next, despite the recent and gruesome beheadings of other western hostages, these four westerners went into dangerous areas without any escort? Why would they do that when they were almost certain to be taken hostage and killed? My possible theories about this situation work out like this:

    1. They felt their pro-terrorist mission and their mutual hatred of the west would somehow make them allies with any terrorist element, but they seriously misjudged the situation.
    2. They had certain assurances from the terrorists they could go about their business peacefully, but for whatever reasons, this agreement went bad.
    3. This was a staged kidnapping to grab global headlines.
    4. Other, unknown reasons.

    I can't help but wonder why a genuine terrorist group would knowingly hold productive "allies" for their cause, unless, there was a hidden agenda? The demands made by the alleged kidnappers are wildly impossible to meet, which is also suspicious. It makes me think they never expected their demands to be met. Of course it could be just what it appears! A random kidnapping event by elements trying to exploit the hostages for whatever they can. Time will tell.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 11:02 AM | Comments (1)

    The New Western Jihadist

    Author, Walid Fares book about the future of terrorism, "Terrorism Unveiled" forecast that westerners, including women, will be used for suicide attacks. Last month his prediction came true when a young Belgium female died in an attempted suicide attack, killing only herself.

    According to those who knew her best, Murielle Degauque was a normal child growing up, "very average" said her neighbors. There was nothing in her background to indicate she would become the [first] western woman to die as a suicide bomber. Her parents said she had a tendency to hang around with the rougher kids when growing up, she dabbled a little in drugs and she went through a period of teenage rebellion. They recalled she had many boyfriends and once they had to drive about 120 miles to bring her home after she ran off. But, on the whole, she not unlike most teens.

    Murielle worked as a baker's assistant and had two serious relationships with Islamic men. She married and divorced a Turkish man and met and then left an Algerian prior to meeting Issam Grois. And this is when her life began to change. Grois, a Belgian of Moroccan extraction, dated her and eventually persuaded Murielle to go to Morocco where he had certain assests and where he helped her convert to Islam. What happened after that is sketchy, but her parents said she visited them several times over a period of about a year, during that time they observed a transformation take place. Murielle became subdued, she changed her name to Myriam and began wearing a veil. At Issam's request her father and Issam would eat alone in one room, while the women ate in another room. Murielle became quiet and withdrawn, her neighbors said she rarely spoke beyond a simple bonjour. At the time Murielle didn't know it, but she was being drawn in to a radical Muslim lifestyle, driven by her emotional attachment to Issam and her religious indoctrination to a form of Islam that supported jihad.

    It is believed that Murielle and Issam traveled to Turkey and then by car to Iraq in September. Issam was killed in fighting with Coalition forces and shortly after that Murielle became a willing suicide bomber targeting American soldiers, but fortunately her mission failed. She was 36.

    The story of Murielle Degauque has troubled people throughout Europe who fear a new wave of homegrown suicide bombers. They worry that young people, caught up in the events following 9/11 may be candidates for Islamofacism like university student Zacarias Moussaoui, a Muslim of French citizenship with Moroccan heritage. He was the 20th hijacker on 9/11. Moussaoui was radicalized by leftist hate speech common among his fellow students and was urged on by the radical Islamic jihadist message of hate and domination.

    Recently, Nicolas Sarkozy, the Interior Minister for France said, at least seven people from France have been killed in Iraq and elsewhere fighting for al-Qa'ida. Another 10 are known to be working for al-Qa'ida in Iraq, Pakistan, Syria and Afghanistan.

    Walid Fares also warned of future targeted assassinations, such as the murder of Theo van Gogh, a renowned Dutch filmmaker killed in 2004. Van Gogh became an outspoken critic of Islamic terrorism following 9/11. He was shot dead by a Muslim Jihadist from Morocco living in Holland. A year earlier Dutch politician, Pim Fortuyn, who favored restricted immigration and was murdered by extremists. However, Fares points out that even Muslim moderates are targets for assassination, virtually anyone who is an obstruction to extremism is a target.

    Fares says the idea of using women in war is not very appealing to most Muslim clerics, however there have been a few that have sanctioned it. According to Fares there is a growing divide in the Arab world between the moderates who strongly oppose the killing and radicals who support it.

    For additional information on this subject may I suggest the following sources:

    http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article330688.ece

    Book, Terrorism Unveiled, by Walid Fares

    http://goodnewsfromthefront.com/

    Posted by Post Scripts at 09:19 AM | Comments (0)

    December 02, 2005

    California Energy Company in Big Trouble

    Did you hear about CalPine? They were one of the largest electrical generators in the U.S. and California and they also have the largest number of natural gas fired generators. CalPine uses a modern triple recovery turbine which makes the process very clean and efficient. That's the good part. The bad part is these generators are not efficient enough to be cost effective at today's spot price on natural gas.

    Two years ago the stock was trading around $80, today it hit .30 cents. Ouch!

    CPN was beset by a lot of problems, but the biggest flaw was it's business model, that demanded the continued low cost of natural gas in order to be competitive. That theory almost bankrupted the State of California two years ago when the state's big energy plan did not allow Pacific Gas and Electric (PCG) to pass along increased wholesale prices for energy to consumers, thus defying one of the most basic laws of economics. CPN was similarly unprepared to meet today's high wholesale cost for natural gas. This has made their fleet of gas fired generators cost inefficient when compared to all other forms of energy generation.

    CPN announced today they will not be able to meet their debt obligations and reiterated they may be seeking bankruptcy protection. How this will affect electrical rates in California remains to be seen, but I would think it won't be good. We may see a government bailout to keep these costly (but clean) natural gas generators going or we could see rate increases in line with NG price hikes, or they could head straight into bankruptsy, among a number of choices now on the table.

    Posted by Post Scripts at 12:12 PM | Comments (1)