« Government Schools Flunking By Comparison | Main | »

January 29, 2007

She’s Got ‘Em

But Can She Keep Them in the Air?

by Tina Grazier

A tidbit out of Davenport, Iowa portrays Hillary Clinton just the way she wants…as a bare knuckled politician:

Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday that President Bush should withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq before he leaves office, asserting it would be "the height of irresponsibility" to pass the war along to the next commander in chief. This was his decision to go to war with an ill-conceived plan and an incompetently executed strategy," the Democratic senator from New York said her in initial presidential campaign swing through Iowa.

It takes a certain amount of cheek, as the Brits say, to make a statement like that, especially when you have personal first hand knowledge of the mess your husband passed along to George W. Bush. Bill Clinton’s “not my problem� policy emboldened our enemies and resulted in 911, and that’s as irresponsible as it gets.

This “lady� isn’t about to be stopped from achieving her life’s dream…to be the first woman in America to win the White House. She say’s she’s ready to

"When you are attacked, you have to deck your opponent," she told Democratic state committee members earlier in the day. "I have been through the political wars longer than some of you have been alive. We've got to be prepared to hold our ground and fight back."

Something tells me this gal would deck her opponent even before she’s attacked. But putting all the macho stuff aside the real question is, now that she’s playing for the lead roll, will she be able to stand up under media scrutiny? When (if?) the pointed questions come, will she be able to keep her cool or will she just get angry and show herself to be a natural born *itch? Will she successfully walk the tightrope or will her games and posturing trip her and cause her to fall? Either way it’s bound to be a fun show.

Kick off your foray into the political drama and circus that is Hillary Clinton with a fun and informative column out of the United Kingdom’s Times Online titled “The vaulting ambition of America’s Lady Macbeth� by Gerard Baker:

There are many reasons people think Mrs. Clinton will not be elected president. She lacks warmth; she is too polarising a figure; the American people don’t want to relive the psychodrama of the eight years of the Clinton presidency.

But they all miss this essential counterpoint. As you consider her career this past 15 years or so in the public spotlight, it is impossible not to be struck, and even impressed, by the sheer ruthless, unapologetic, unshameable way in which she has pursued this ambition, and confirmed that there is literally nothing she will not do, say, think or feel to achieve it. Here, finally, is someone who has taken the black arts of the politician’s trade, the dissembling, the trimming, the pandering, all the way to their logical conclusion.

Fifteen years ago there was once a principled, if somewhat rebarbative and unelectable politician called Hillary Rodham Clinton. A woman who aggressively preached abortion on demand and the right of children to sue their own parents, a committed believer in the power of government who tried to create a healthcare system of such bureaucratic complexity it would have made the Soviets blush; a militant feminist who scorned mothers who take time out from work to rear their children as “women who stay home and bake cookies�.

Today we have a different Hillary Rodham Clinton, all soft focus and expensively coiffed, exuding moderation and tolerance….. But the Clinton candidacy is a Grand Deceit, an entirely artificial construct built around a person who, stripped bare of the cynicism, manipulation and calculation, is nothing more than an enormous, overpowering and rather terrifying ego.

Mr. Baker’s final words describe the ugly juggling act Hillary will be forced to perform over the next couple of years…God save us from another crop of clowns.

Posted by Post Scripts at January 29, 2007 09:09 AM

Comments

Gerard and the NYT ... all peas in a pod ... what on earth has the woman's hairdo got to do with anything ?

Libby

Posted by: Libby at January 29, 2007 09:17 AM

Libby...You're back...for however long or often, just like Kotter...welcome back!

In answer to your question...not much of anything...but that's the point isn't it? Image and pretense. Substance and an authentic position for all to see isn't possible with Hillary.

Posted by: Tina at January 30, 2007 09:30 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)