POST SCRIPTS

Dark sucker my fanny! I think the so-called scientist who came up with this one is the sucker. lol

Light bulbs create light waves and this is proved by the spectrum of light they produce and it can be both felt (heat exchange) and measured (spectrometer). The same goes for light that is passing through water. The deeper you go the more bands of lights that are filtered.

Combustion that produces a flame has nothing to do with sucking darkness and the heat created from a flame has nothing to do with mass traveling through a solid wick! It's all about energy produced from combustion. Combustion is in a sense how a light bulb works only the filament doesn't burn out quickly because of it's special tungsten filament and the vaccum it is in.

I think the so-called scientist who came up with this one is the sucker

Never ceases to amaze me how every year, some bright and eager young physic student is misled by so called "scientific" dogma conspirators who claim that light, not darkness, is the stuff that moves through the universe carrying energy. There is ample evidence from many brave scientists who know the deeper truth and aren't ashamed to admit it. These men have proved that the so-called "light sources" are really "Dark Suckers" and that ","light" is nothing more than the absence of darkness. They have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that darkness, not light, is the fundamental radiative transport mechanism of the universe.

It is a matter of public record that many of these scientists are involved with the tests being set up for the "Superconductor" that was recently completed in Europe. When all the bugs have been eradicated from the "Superconductor", it will just be a matter of time before we can prove the "Dark Sucker" theory and put to rest the lie that Light is the source of energy in the universe.

There is also growing evidence that the individuals who sent death threats to the scientists involved with the "Superconductor", may actually be connected to a yet undisclosed corporate leader of a company involved in the production of compact florescent lights. Interpol is working closely with the FBI to ascertain whether or not the death threats are linked to an ongoing dispute between the lighting industry and a group of scientists who have been making waves in the scientific community over their growing evidence that it is actually "Dark Energy" that creates light by sucking the darkness out of any spaces. This theory has the lighting industry worried that their new compact florescent lights will eventually be proved not to be as energy efficient at sucking light as the old filament type bulbs were.

Don't fall for the lies my friends, they only want us to use their inefficient fluorescent lights because they cost more to use, and thus they make more profit off the unsuspecting public. When these tests are completed, and the truth about “Dark Matter” is revealed, then everyone will learn the truth that scientists like my friend Roger Cox has been trying to tell the world for over 10 years.

This is Jack speaking now, I hope everyone understands the article about dark suckers is just a joke created by some egg head years ago and has been floating around the internet ever since. And no I didn't post it, but it is funny! (Makes you think too)

I hope everyone understands the article about dark suckers is just a joke

And that sir is what people will soon realize has been done to them over the years as they have bought into the lie the established scientists have shoved down their throats.

I guess maybe I should help all you ignoramuses who think I am joking just exactly how how dark transfers energy. Well, I hope you can follow my train of thought here.

Experimentally, we know that "shining" a "light source" onto any surface will cause that surface to get warmer.  This is called radiative heat transfer.  D.S.T. must be able to explain these observations, as well as the theories of the Photon Conspiracy explain them, in order to be a useful theory.
Space around us is naturally dark.  Free darkness exists everywhere. Only through the actions of Dark Suckers (such as light bulbs, stars, fireflies, etc.) can this natural state be changed, and Dark Suckers have to expend energy continuously in order to operate.
The reason for all this darkness is: All objects have darkness embedded within them.  Every time a dark sucker operates, it pulls This intrinsic darkness is bound into the electrons of the surface material.  We might even call a surface a "host material" for darkness. The more dulled ("darker" looking) the host material is, the more readily it gives up darkness in response to a dark sucker.  (A perfectly reflective material, if such a thing existed, would give off no darkness at all.)  The reason host materials get warmer as they release their intrinsic darkness is that there is a binding energy between darkness and its host material.  Sucking out darkness releases that binding energy in the form of heat.  The stronger the dark sucker and the duller the surface, the more darkness gets divested from the host surface and the hotter the surface becomes.  (Incidentally, the retinas of your eyes contain special pigments that send signals to your optic nerves when dark is sucked out of them — sucking out yellow-frequency darkness is experienced as seeing yellow light.)
Eventually, the surface can become so hot that it glows with incandescence, and becomes a dark sucker itself.  It should be noted that objects which glow due to their own heat, called "blackbody radiation", always cool off as a result of this radiation.  This cooling off is merely the darkness being sucked into the blackbody radiator (hot dark sucker) and making the dark sucker itself into the darkness's new host material. The darkness-to-new-host binding process consumes heat to form its new bonds, each of which has its own binding energy, and the blackbody gets colder as a result.

Next time I stop by, maybe i will enlighten you upon the history of the "Dark Sucker Theory", also known as the "D.S.T."

Remember to turn off the dark when you wake up tomorrow or you will never be able to see your way through the day.

Ok, this has got to be one of the best jokes I have heard in a long time. Dark sucker huh?

Well, let me try my hand at this.

In a tv commercial spotlighting some sort of do-everthing home exercise thingy (Soloflex, I believe) it shows fairly normal guys with hair on their chest workin' out. 6 weeks later (or was it 2 weeks ?) the chest hair was gone AND he was a bit more in shape. Is there a correlation? Do guys shed chest hair while working out? Does it gum up the excercise machine? What if you'd like to keep your chest hair when you work out? Could Rogaine help? Should the FDA look into this?

Just wondering...

Ok, you may wonder why I posted a comment that has nothing to do with dark sucker energy devices right? Think about it, it makes perfect sense. At least as much sense as the whole idea of energy coming from the dark.

Tim just buzzed me and said I might be able to post a comment here. Try this for size. Every one know that classes are over at Chico State until the fall, right? Well, not exactly, because there are Summer classes, but who in their right mind would take classes in the Summer, right? Maybe those hardcore students working on there PhD's. Confused? Follow me here.

This is what my professor emailed me when I asked how I could best get my PHD sooner than I have planned.

Betty;
You asked me for advise as to how you could possibly complete all the requirements needed to get you PhD. This is the advise I would like to offer you. To start with, you need to divide the world into two categories,
1.) Things that would help finishing your PhD earlier
2.) Things that would cause you to take longer to get your PhD

Now list all the items in there proper list. To get you started,I have listed some items that belong in both lists;

THINGS THAT MAKE FINISHING YOUR PHD EARLIER AND EASIER
* Your advisor -- for advice
* Your spouse if married -- for support
* Your home computer – all the new software that makes studying easier
* Weekends and breaks -- fewer distractions at school

NOW THE THINGS THAT MAKE FINISHING YOUR PHD LATER AND MORE DIFFICULT
* Your advisor -- for interruptions
* Your spouse if married -- for wanting you to spend time doing non-research things
* Your pc – too many distraction in all that software you own, games etc...
* Weekends and breaks – Who has time for fun in the sun?
* Your office-mates -- for wanting to talk
* Other grad students -- for wanting advice, etc
* Your job -- need I say more
* Students in your class -- for asking non-research questions
* Other PhD students -- because they want to talk about _their_ research, besides it will only make you sleepy lisytening and who has time to sleep)
* Your belly -- hard to research while eating
* Sleep -- what a waste!
* Emotions -- they take time to deal with
* Emotional needs -- talking, taking breaks, helping other for your gratification......these do not enhance research ... and are weaknesses
* Friends -- they want to talk about other things besides your research
* Your body -- nobody ever got a good result while exercising
* Visiting family at home -- nobody ever got a good result while driving home
* Your car -- pumping gas is so time-comsuming
* ALL CLASSES -- homework, exams, studying!?
* Seminars -- other people want to talk about _their_ research
* Parents -- nobody ever wrote a dissertation on Mommy's lap
* Haircuts -- *boring*
* Christmas -- shopping is definitely _not_ research
* TV -- brain-candy
* Phones -- people want to talk, and that ties up way too much time

Ok, my turn, I can prove Heaven is hotter than hell.

Proof That Heaven Is Hotter Than Hell
The temperature of Heaven can be rather accurately computed. Our authority is Isaiah 30:26,

"Moreover, the light of the Moon shall be as the light of the Sun and the light of the Sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days."

Thus Heaven receives from the Moon as much radiation as we do from the Sun, and in addition 7x7 (49) times as much as the Earth does from the Sun, or 50 times in all. The light we receive from the Moon is one 1/10,000 of the light we receive from the Sun, so we can ignore that ... The radiation falling on Heaven will heat it to the point where the heat lost by radiation is just equal to the heat received by radiation, i.e., Heaven loses 50 times as much heat as the Earth by radiation. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law for radiation, (H/E)^4 = 50, where E is the absolute temperature of the earth (300K), gives H as 798K (525C).

Now the exact temperature of Hell cannot be computed, however in Revelations 21:8 it says,

"But the fearful, and unbelieving ... shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone."

Now a lake of molten brimstone means that its temperature must be at or below the boiling point, 444.6C. What we end up with is the fact that Heaven, is now 525C which makes it hotter than Hell which is only 445C.

The moral of the story is, next time you want to scare your child into heaven, don't use the old story that hell is going to be hot, because heaven is even hotter.

OK, My name is not timmy 3 by the way, just in case whoever owns this blog wants to know. I mean some people care about who it is they are talking to, and in today's world chatting online or blogging is talking. We just do it without being forced to smell each others bad breath. Ok, my little addition to this experiment in fun, or what ever it is my feather brained friends have talked me into doing is supposed be called. Oh yea, I'm a techno nerd and I hate having to read, but I must or I might as well find a new career, So that brings me to my little rant.

Have you ever wondered why technical manuals always have blank pages at the back of their books? Then either at the top of the page or in the very middle is this writing,

"This page intentionally left blank"

Think about it, the very fact that they wrote "This page intentionally left blank" on an otherwise blank page results in the page being no longer blank. I suppose, technically, it should read:

"This page intentionally left ALMOST blank, if you don't count this sentence.”

But what I'm wondering is why on earth they bother to inform the reader that the near-blankness of the page is not an error on the publishers part, but is, in fact, a wholly decided upon event. The fact that they tell us that they meant for the page to be blank, (which actually violates the purity of the page's blankness) implies to me that they have a reason for leaving the page blank. But then, if the page was left blank for a reason, I mean if the page were destined to have some ultimate value as a result of it's blankness, I suppose they wouldn't be inclined to spoil the virgin blankness of the page by printing, "This page intentionally left blank" right smack in the middle, thereby rendering the entire page useless. Fact is, the whole pages usefulness is measured by it's being blank, (which it isn't), due to the words which state that it is, and, in fact, was meant to be. This my friends is called a paradox (quack quack).

Clearly, the statement "This page intentionally left blank", can never be literally correct if it appears on "this page" at all. I would compare the act of writing "This page intentionally left blank"to the act of saying the words: "I'm not talking." yet you are talking by saying it. Perhaps publishers should write "This page intentionally left blank" on another page and draw an arrow to the real blank page. Or perhaps they could index all the intentionally blank pages in the front of the manual.

Oh well, I hope I have really confused you completely. Now, I am going to the bar for a drink and in the hopes of finding MR. right nerd, who is cute and can help take my mind off all this crap. Sheesh, my friends, I'm telling yea.

Well Have a fun summer timmy, and I'll see you in the fall when you get back.

What's the history of Dark Sucker Theory?

Dark Sucker Theory, or "D.S.T." as we like to call it around here, has a long and sordid past.  Throughout most of recorded history, the myth that "light" is some kind of magical substance (and that darkness is the absence of light) has permeated human thinking.
Why has this myth been perpetuated, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary?  It may have something to do with various Biblical passages that go like this:

"O Lord, shine thy light upon us."

The Bible has been used by the Establishment to insist that the Earth is flat, that pi is exactly 3, and that the universe is only some 6000 years old — and now they're turning the Bible against Dark Sucker Theory.

Just a bit more about this "Dark Creation" theory I've heard about?

Mainstream Dark Sucker Theory sure does attract a lot of crackpots with their own "alternative" theories!  A guy-or-gal by the name of Bladud, with the help of a few online contributors, has concocted the cockamame pseudoscientific hypothesis that dark is created spontaneously at all points in the universe.  He-or-she believes that this "dark creation energy" is behind the virtual particles which, as predicted by quantum electrodynamic theory, are constantly coming into and going out of existence. 

There are many things wrong with this hair-brained theory.  For one, I didn't come up with it.  For another, it completely ignores the established action of darkons being sucked out of their host material.  For a third, it makes the outrageous claim that the universal redshift is caused by the dark suction force getting tired after travelling for millions of light-years — excuse me, dark-years.  This so-called "tired dark" hypothesis is merely an ad hoc conjecture used by those closed-minded physicists who hate the idea of the Big Bang for personal reasons and will thus grasp at any straws they can to explain away the evidence.  Often times, this emotionally-based rejection of Big Bang cosmology is for religious reasons rather than rational reasons.  I'll bet it's no coincidence that this Bladud person chose the phrase "dark creation energy" when concocting his crackpot hypothesis — don't let him/her anywhere near the Kansas school board!

I hope this cleared up any of the confusion out there about the "Dark Sucker Theory".

For those who have trouble with authority:

Once upon a time . . .
The different body parts started an argument over who should be the boss of the body.
The heart said, "I pump all of the blood, so I should be the boss."
The legs said, "We move the body everywhere, so we should be the boss."
The lungs said, "We supply the oxygen, so we should be the boss."
The eyes joined in, "We see everything; we should be the boss."
The brain chimed, "I control all of those functions, I should be the boss."
And finally the rectum said, "I should be the boss!"
All of the other body parts broke out in hysterical laughter and said, "Why would we ever choose you as the boss?" The rectum did not respond and just closed up.

About three days later, The heart was having trouble pumping, the legs were very wobbly, the lungs could hardly move, the eyes were blurry and the brain was cloudy. Hence, they all decided to let the rectum be the boss.

The moral of the story: You don't have to be a brain to be a boss, just an a**hole.