Great Blunders in the News!

| 3 Comments

by Jack Lee

Janet Napolitano was instructed to report before a Congressional Committee reviewing the attempted airliner bombing on Christmas day. But, her assistant showed up instead. He said the Homeland boss was out of the country. Only problem was she was not out of the country, she was around but ducked out because she did not want to subject herself to the probing questions surrounding her mishandling of the incident where she said, "The system worked." Napolitano is known for not doing well before people questioning her. Just wait till they get their hands on her now, is she in for it! The women needs to resign, if not, she should be fired.

Next, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs recently said, "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is going to meet justice and he'll meet his maker!" and "He's going to be found guilty and executed." This prejudicial comment will surely come up during the trial when they move for dismissal. Why would he say that? They're (B.O. Adminsistration) the ones so concerned about fairness and justice, right? So they closed down Gitmo and forced us to hold expensive civilian trials and now Gibbs is saying the verdict is a forgone conclusion. Wow, during the show trials of the Vietnam war even the commies we're that obvious. As you might expect, the Arab world has not been please by this proclamation of guilt before trial. Our avowed enemies are sure to make the most of it. (Dumb.)

oag2.jpgThe President of the United States and his Attorney General, Eric Holder, (shown left) both thought the people of New York would love to have the 9/11 plotters tried in their fair city at a cost of many tens of millions.

They were stunned when they learned that not only did New Yorkers not want the 9/11 trial in their city, they were mad as Hell at them for even suggesting it! The flak over this has been overwhelming and Holder was forced into a change of venue, thus proving once again that this administration is out of touch with the mainstream.

The citizens of NY feared the trial would attract another terrorist event (highly reasonable thinking), but they also didn't want it because it dredged up painful memories and it was also seen as a big drain on their rescources during very tough economic times.

Holder is now shopping around for another city and is offering cash incentives for the taker. Obama said his critics over holding a civilian trial as opposed to a military tribunal would be singing a different tune once these men were found guilty. (Dumber)


3 Comments

i thought this was really good. i voted for obama but he is not doing right by the people. won't vote for him again.

Even though they are offering a host city 200 million, there havent been any takers. Obviously when Holder came up with the idea to give the terrorists a civilian trial, he was trying to appease the progressives. I really dont think the current administration cares what the majority of Americans think or feel. If they want to send the detainees to the US for trial,I suggest they put them on a ferry with a slow leak. No trial, deficit reduction millions.

One issue regarding the prejudicial remarks is that they fly in the face of the American justice system, you know, that thing this bunch claims is soooooooooo sacred it applies to everyone on earth! If we have to give Miranda rights and provide a lawyer to enemy combatants and confessed terrorists then we should also honor "innocent until proven guilty to be consitent. The president's mouthpiece said:

"Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is going to meet justice and he'll meet his maker!" and "He's going to be found guilty and executed."

That means the President has proclaimed guilt and a death sentence prior to trial and in the process given grounds for dismissal.

Who are these people?!!!!!

Leave a comment