Extreme Terrorist Group, "Sea Shepherd" Takes Financial Hit with the Sinking of their Batmobile Boat

| 78 Comments

Whaling_Ship_Colides_with_Protest_Boat.jpgby OneVike

There is a war going on in the Antarctic, a war over the whales. This fish war has become increasingly dangerous for those involved, as more then just nasty words during a protest are being exchanged lately. This war has tempers flaring, nations accusing each other of malfeasance, and boats crashing into each other like what happened when the Yushin Maru 3 crashed into the more aggressive Bob Barker this past Sunday on February 7th. This on the heels of the activist group's pride speed boat the Ady Gil being sunk just last month on its maiden voyage. In that mishap the angry meddlesome activists found out what it's like to swim in the frigid waters of the Antarctica. The Activist group's spokesperson admits in a phone interview:

"It handicaps us, it's a two million dollar hit on our organization, plus it takes away our fast interceptor vessel but this is a war, and we have many wealthy benefactors who will gladly pony up more money to support our war effort against these murderers."

Yes it is a war, one that features the controversial, and violent environmental and animal rights activist group called "The Sea Shepherd Conservation Group" as the aggressor. This is an organization, by the way, that many have rightfully classified as a terrorist organization. After all it is the navy arm of the extremist group, "Earth First", a claim that was made by Sea Shepherd's founder, director, and still current member of Earth First, Paul Watson himself.

On the other side of this war we have the age old traditional Japanese whaling industry that just wants to do what it is legally doing. However, the violent Sea Shepherds are vowing to do all they can to stop the Japanese whaling fleet from fishing for whales. In their arsenal are such tools as the multimillion dollar ship named after its benefactor, Bob Barker, and up until last month the 1.5 million dollar, bullet proof, Batmobile speed boat, named Ady Gil, after the Hollywood activist who donated a large portion of the funds for it's purchase and retrofitting.

What these activists do is interrupt the whaling fleet by using an arsenal of weapons that sound timid but can actually cause bodily harm and even death, like the "prop foulers" that can destroy the propellers leaving the ship dead in the water and at the mercy of the ever changing weather patterns of the Antarctic Ocean. There are the harmless sounding, methocel (slippery bombs), that can actually cause bodily harm and death if a fisherman slips and hit his head, or falls over board in the frigid waters of the Antarctic. They also like to hurl packets of smelly foods such as rancid butter and other food items at the fishermen. The spoiled food is thrown in the hopes that they will get lucky and hit a fisherman in the mouth and make him sick from food poisoning. (By the way, the last time I checked that is what the left call biological warfare) If a crew members are too sick to work it makes it more difficult to get the job done. The terrorists have even adopted the whalers only tool of defense up 'til now, the water cannon.

This terrorist group has a history of violence that has left a path of destruction and it continues to intimidate those they have declared their enemies. Their violent history even includes, illegally pirating and scuttling two whaling vessels in the Icelandic harbor. All this, and more, in an attempt stop the Japanese fishermen from doing what is legal. Their founder Paul Watson, is a long time socialist, and extreme environmental and animal rights activist. He was a member of Greenpeace and also involved with and still coordinates activities with such extreme groups as PETA, the Seirra Club and "Earth First". He has even dubbed his group the navy for Earth First, and has vowed to continue his illegal harassment of whaling:

"It does not matter where they go, east or west along the Antarctic Coast, we intend to stick to their rear like glue and we will not allow a single whale to be loaded onto the decks of that foul floating abattoir. We intend to turn these three whaling-free days into three whaling-free weeks. We are confident that once again we will severely cut their kill quotas and we will once again negate their profits."

Back on the other side of this war we have the last fleet in the world that is still hunting whales, a Japanese whaling fleet of six ships. This fleet is allowed to hunt the whales in the Antarctic, because they are listed under the International Whaling Commission as part of a scientific whaling program. However, just to defend themselves against the more aggressive activists, they find themselves forced to use water cannons and sonar devices to disorient the aggressive activists. They even need a separate ship just to defend the less protected whaling ships from the attacks of the terrorists, a costly safety measure that should be unnecessary.

There have been many confrontations over the years in this ongoing war over the big fish. This terrorist group has been able to tap the pockets of the many wealthy backers from Hollywood actors, musicians, socialist philanthropists like George Soros and many other social activists from around the world. This money enables the radical anti human group to spend millions of dollars on boats that can run circles around the larger and slower whaling ships, with the purpose of inflicting crippling and permanent damage to them. They will even proudly admit that the lives of humans are expendable in their battle to save any and all animals from harm. Watson himself coined the term "AIDS of the Earth" as a reference to humans and what he thinks of us. Through the years these and other groups have pushed the Japanese whalers to the point of extinction. However, as you will see in this video they lost a battle and it cost them dearly. While collisions were anticipated, the Sea Shepherds never expected to lose their 1.5 million dollar prize possession, the Ady Gil, in its first battle.

In this video you will see what happened when the aggressive activists attempted to stop the whalers from doing their job, and the Shonan Maru No.2 clipped the nose of the record setting speed boat. The way I see it, the Japanese are just trying to continue doing what their ancestors have done for generations. It's the animal rights activists that are in the wrong, and if they get hurt or killed while protesting in such a dangerous way, it is their own fault. I do find it quite humorous that the activists only have enough fuel to continue their protest for another month before the tanks in their boats go dry. Unfortunately for theses environmental friendly hypocrites, the Bob Barker and Steve Irwin are not like the Ady Gil was. See, the Ady Gil ran on 100 per cent renewable biodiesel fuel, and left a net zero carbon footprint, when it was alive that is. Gee, what kind of foot print do you think it's putting on the bottom of the Ocean?

I have spliced together video taken by the terrorists on the Bob Barker, and video filmed by the Japanese fisherman on the Shonan Maru No.2, to show how the Ady Gil became nothing more than human junk on the Ocean floor. Follow the link to view:

The Sinking of the Ady Gil from both sides of the battle"

78 Comments

You are a real jerk, you know that? You don't have a clue about the long history of illegal Japanese whaling industry.

This is a flagrant violation of internal law. Its not about some misguided liberals trying to stop capitolism! If it was, then why did George Bush and the Republicans tried to pressure Japan into stopping the whaling back in 200-2004?

The Japanese are slaughtering whales in the name of research,when it is really just over money and their cultural addiction to whale products.

If this is the kind of irresponisble journalism this site produces I won't both reading you anymore. You are too dumb.

This apparently coming out of OneVike's favorite tenet of Protestantism: The planet is mine to plunder! ... godlike male that I am!

Sigh.

Have you heard about how those Somali pirates have driven those other pirate trawlers out of the region ... and now the locals can make a living fishing again?

Global ironies abound.

"Stopping whalers from doing their job" and what job would that be? Killing whales for fun and profit? You are sick. Then you say "On the other side of this war we have the age old traditional Japanese whaling industry that just wants to do what it is legally doing." Oh this real fair reporting. I can't believe you would be this foolish.

I agree with Withheld, even though he spelled it wrong. Just because their Japanese ancestors have been slaughtering whales for generations does not make it right. The pretense of allowing them to do it as "research" is as transparently false as Iran's claim to be refining uranium for their non-existent nuclear power plants.

One of my oceanography students asked me to read this article, I did and I was greatly offended. I hope you will do some more research before publishing false information.

The harvesting of hundreds of whales each year is depleting the whale population to dangerous levels. Do not be fooled, this harvest serves no scientific purpose at all.

Dr. Kaur

They are following internat6ional law. They are in their right to do what they do. I posted a link to the International law you say they are in violation of. Read it, they are well within their rights to do what they are doing.

I have posted every link to back up every statement I made in the article. If you don't like it then change the regulations, but do not support groups that are just plain and simple terrorists.

Too many people just want to support things they know nothing about. get educated in what this terrorist group is doing. They are not helping the cause of saving the whales, they are turning international opinion away from their cause.

What is the difference between engaging in terrorism because you don't agree with someone's heritage, ethnicity, nationality, etc. and terrorism because you disagree with people exercising their legal rights?

Answer is NONE!

Yet the Sea Shepherd terrorist group gets away without even a slap on the wrist. These eco-terrorists should be treated like the TERRORISTS they are. Even their own footage (thanks to "Whale Wars"), millions have seen their actions.

The Steve Irwin rammed (can't deny it - from watching both the Japanese footage (they document EVERY encounter - good idea), and the Sea Shepherd's footage - there is no denying it. They regularly attack with everything from ship-crippling prop fowlers, to butyric acid (if you have ever come in contact with it- you never forget it), and other stuff to disable, harm, or otherwise inflict damage. Their "home" registration country (Netherlands?) have warned them repeatedly about throwing or launching anything from the Steve Irwin - or they would revoke their license to fly under their flag. But that nation doesn't have a backbone - and still hasn't enforced this threat.

Regardless of one's beliefs regarding whales (I'm not real comfortable with the whale hunting), the Japanese fleet is operating within INTERNATIONAL law. In that regard, the Sea Shepherd organization is clearly violating international laws against terrorism. Thus anyone supporting this organization (particularly financially) is a supporter of terrorism and should be prosecuted as such. There are some very high-profile supporters - including George Soros (imagine that).

Let me just say to some of our angry commenters, we don't always agree on issues here and this is one of them. So if you are upset because OV posted this article, then I would ask you to consider that I disagree with it. But, in fairness to free speech he has his right to say. Now here is something I dug up after reading this:

This is taken from a Japanese site and it's worth the read, "Commercial enterprises must pursue profit. This threatens the future of whales; these species have a long gestation period and usually give birth only every one or two years to single calf that requires more than a year of maternal care before it can survive on its own. In fact, whale species targeted for commercial whaling have been depleted without exception and some have even been listed as endangered or vulnerable or low risk species in the red list of IUCN (International Union of Conservation for the Nature). There is a danger of poaching for these whale species that may have a serious impact on recovery of their populations. The result that commercial whaling causes is engraved on the history of mankind. Commercial whaling has never been carried out in a manner that is sustainable for whale populations and ocean ecosystem.

Japan's "research" whaling is to fill up time until the memorandum can be lifted, and it is commercial whaling in disguise. Byproducts produced by this "research" whaling are used to keep the industry alive, hoping for a return of profit oriented commercial whaling.

Research should be done by non-lethal means."

Another news article from 2007 said, "The United States is initiating a closed-door negotiation that could open up new areas to whale hunting for the first time in decades, part of an attempt to end a long-standing impasse over whaling limits with Japan, the world's most avid whaling nation.

The Whale Hunt Continues. . . The tentative plan seeks to achieve a breakthrough in the dispute that has raged since the International Whaling Commission voted in 1986 to ban commercial whaling. Faced with the reality that Japan and its allies have continued to hunt whales and have succeeded in blocking new conservation efforts, commission Chairman William Hogarth -- an appointee of President George W. Bush -- has been trying this weekend in Hawaii to craft a pact that would permit a new type of "coastal whaling" in exchange for a commitment by Japan to scale back its "scientific" whale hunts.

The proposal is running into stiff opposition from whaling opponents, however.

In recent years, the whaling commission, which requires a supermajority vote to take action, has been deadlocked between the anti- and pro-whaling camps. Rather than setting a clear direction for conserving and managing whale populations worldwide, its meetings have become contentious donnybrooks in which the two sides have competed for influence while little changed.

Worldwide, three countries -- Japan, Iceland and Norway -- continue to hunt whales, either in the name of research or, in Norway's case, under a commercial exception established more than 20 years ago.

Scientists and environmentalists questioned the proposal, noting that it could increase pressure on small coastal whale stocks without ending the whaling Japan has conducted for years. Japan has begun taking more whales in recent years under the science designation, killing 872 in 2007, compared with 540 in 1997. In addition, Japan reported that in 2007 it accidentally killed 156 minke whales off its coast as bycatch. Korea -- which no longer intentionally hunts whales -- caught 80 coastal minkes as bycatch and identified 14 others as illegally killed.

Norway caught 597 whales in commercial hunts in 2007. Iceland, which conducts scientific and commercial whaling, killed 45 that year.

First off, I never once in the story offered my opinion of whether whaling should continue or not. I defended the whalers rights and attacked the terrorists for using dangerous and illegal tactics to stop a practice that is by international law allowed.

Let us say for instance that instead of spending countless of millions of dollars in illegal activity to stop someone from doing legal activity, the backers of this terrorist group, spent their their millions in designing hatcheries that would then be able to replenish the whales. I never see leftist do anything that is productive, everything they do is designed to stop humans from doing things, and thus humans all over the world starve because leftist want to force their opinions of about eating habits upon them.

If we instead treated them like salmon, we would have plenty for the wackos to watch and take pictures of and plenty for the hunters to hunt. That is what is called proper conservation. You do not save a species by illegally trying to stop legal behavior. Just imagine if California condors, eagles, and other endangered species were a part of our normal diet like chickens, cows, and pigs? There would be many people who would raise them for food, then those animals would not be almost extinct. Same goes for the whales.

God told us to manage the earth, not worship it. Managing the planet can be done through proper conservationism, not by worshiping animals because you can't stomach the idea that someone might find it tasty to eat.

Again, no where in the article did I even give a hint of what I personally think of the practice of hunting whales. As I said I wrote what I thought about the combatants in the Whale War, and the tactics of the terrorist group Sea Shepherd.

On a trip to Japan last year I finally made it to the enormous Tsukiji fish market in Tokyo and there were a few locations where whale meat was displayed and sold at wholesale. It looked like a cross between large wild game (moose, for example) i.e. very dark red with white layers of fat or blubber. Later on we were at a tempura restaurant and one of the things they brought out turned out to be deep fried whale.

Tradition may be one reason why the Japanese still hunt whales, but nutritional value and amazingly delicious rich taste are another two. Like you, I would not personally ever want to harm a whale, dolphin, seal, or any other aquatic mammal. I wouldn't kill and eat a dog either, all are too intelligent for ME to knowingly put them on MY menu.

But, if an activity is legal, does not push a species to extinction (6 ships aren't going to decimate any whale species), creates something actually useful (high caloric value food) and those who oppose it do everything and more under the accepted definitions of sabotage, terrorism, and piracy, the former have IMHO every right in international waters to sink the bastards and hang any they catch from a handy yard arm.

Jim as I understand it only about 1% of the Japanese eat whale meat. But, I agree with you. I wouldn't want to eat whale either.

Rightly or wrongly, I think your opinion was inferred by the strong article against the people trying to stop the whaling. My personal opinion is we shouldn't be hunting these mammals, they are highly intelligent creatures and the numbers being killed are not sustainable, but even if they were, we should leave them alone.

To all you sap happy tree hugging animal worshipping wackos. There is a difference between hunting and killing animals and not hunting and killing animals. There is no relevant difference between hunting and killing whales and hunting and killing deer.

Unless of course you want your sister to marry one. There is no reason not to hunt whales that does not also apply equally to hunting deer or to killing beef. When you pansy white men and women realize this, then you will truly be one with nature, because nature could care less if there is one animal left of a species or a million. As far as Gods animals are concerned it is all food, and when the food is gone, then animals in the wild will find tree bark tasteful.

So if you really wish to think and live like animals, then accept the nature of the animal and quit trying to control what others can do. Otherwise start thinking and living like the human God made you to be and stop worshipping nature.

My strong opinion against those involved in trying to stop the whalers is because they are an arm of Earth First.

Jack, please tell me you know who these guys are? These are the same ones who spike trees and burn down auto dealerships and vandalize SUV's. These are the same people who vandalized Bruce Sessions car. These are the same people who burned down to the ground the ski resort in Colorado a few years ago.

My strong language is proper and needed so that we can distinguish these criminals from the peaceful protesters. Those involved with Watson are nothing but human trash. Make no mistake, as far as Watson is concerned humans are a disease that is killing the planet. Reread my article again and replace the whalers with America, and the activist with islamic terrorists. They are one in the same. Whalers may be doing something you dislike, but they are NOT BREAKING THE LAW! America may be doing something muslim terrorists and liberals dislike, but we are not breaking the law by being American.

So no my opinion was not too strong by inference. But next time I read an article you write about islamic terrorists, I will remember to check the way your opinion might infer by the strong wording used in the article against the people who just want to stop us from being free.

Yes I do equate them with terrorists because the US government has even listed Earth First as an eco-terrorist group, and Sea Shepherd is Earth Firsts navy. Not my words, that is what their leader Paul Watson said.

Again, I do not worship the animals, I worship God. I love animals, especially when they are surrounded by potatoes and vegetables on my plate. If you want whaling outlawed then do it through the law, not through terrorists acts that can get people killed. In this video we can see that Watson could have gotten some people who followed his orders killed. That is because as far as he is concerned humans are lower then the animals.

I don't support their tactics, but I sympathize with the desire to stop whaling, using legal and non-destructive means.

Jack, like it or not, under current LAW what the Japanese are doing is 100% LEGAL. Change the LAW if that is the way you feel, don't murder and maim, (or support those who do), people who are just doing what is LEGAL and what their ancestors have been doing for a thousand years.

These PIRATES are putting HUMAN LIVES in very real danger and THAT is completely inexcusable, and against all traditions and LAWS of the high seas.

These are the same people btw that have absolutely no problem at all with the slaughter of HUMAN infants.

I assure you that your stated affection towards these animals is in no way deeper or more sincere than my own or most conservatives I know. Me I personally love the whales and find them magnificent, but I would never step in the way of someone not breaking the law. If I want things change i do it the right way. That is what conservatives believe.

I must say that I am deeply disappointed with you that you would support the terrorist acts of these pirates. You of all people who has written many good articles about your feelings for terrorists. A number of years ago I and my husband had the misfortune of meeting Paul Watson and some of his crew. They’re nut’s and absolute jerks.

As for the lovable whales, I gladly KILL the very last of these animals if it meant that even just one human would NOT die or be crippled for life.

I'm a CONSERVATIVE ALL of the time, not just when it is convenient to me.

Nancy, I never said it was illegal, that must have been somebody else. I just said I didn't like them killing whales and I gave my reasons and then gave you some quotes from others. Although it could be argued it is illegal because some nations have claimed this practice to be in violation of internation treaties and then there is the poaching...it's sad, very sad.

These [pirates] as you call them, are putting their own lives in danger first in order to stop the killing of these creatures. They are acting out of a love for these mammals, the Japanese are acting out of a love for money and for the taste of whale blubber.

So, who's the real pirates here?

Regarding the Japanese being legal..." The Sea Shepherd ships Steve Irwin and the Bob Barker have successfully escorted the Japanese whaling fleet out of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.

After repeated orders from Sea Shepherd to desist their illegal activities and remove themselves from the Southern Ocean Whaling fleet, the Nisshin Maru, Yushin Maru, Yushin Maru #2 and Shonan Maru #2 have crossed north of sixty degrees and continue to head North by Northwest.

“We did not actually expect them to follow our orders to quit the Whale Sanctuary but they have indeed exited and are now running outside the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.” Said Captain Paul Watson. “They have not killed a single whale since February 5th. We intend to turn four whaling free days into weeks.”

At 0500 Hours on February 7th the Nisshin Maru was intercepted by the Steve Irwin at 64 Degrees 2 Minutes South and 80 Degrees 11 Minutes East. The whaling fleet then ran Northeast for 95 miles on a course of 060 Degrees and then changed course at 1600 Hours on February 7th to 260 Degrees began to run Northwest for 260 miles. The whaling fleet left the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary at 1830 Hours (Sydney Time) at 60 Degrees South and 77 Degrees East. (February 9th, 2010)

"There is no relevant difference between hunting and killing whales and hunting and killing deer."

Whales have demonstrated much greater problem-solving skills, communication abilities, and other intelligent capacities than deer ever have. We as human beings have always discriminated on which animals are food and which should be protected. By your logic, we should be able to hunt dogs and cats too. Clearly you have not thought through this shallow and unintelligent viewpoint.

OneVike: "Reread my article again and replace the whalers with America, and the activist with islamic terrorists. They are one in the same."

Um, NO. Causing damage to property =/= intentionally killing human beings. Both are terrorist acts, yes, and both are wrong. But the two are simply NOT morally equivalent.

These [pirates] as you call them, are putting their own lives in danger first in order to stop the killing of these creatures. They are acting out of a love for these mammals, the Japanese are acting out of a love for money and for the taste of whale blubber.

Oh give me a break. They care only about their ability to put animals above all humans Jack. Your very statement means you sympathize with the methods of eco-terrorists because the end justifies the means. I'll tell you what, this is a good practice in seeing what you believe.

As for you using media reports that are friendly to the eco-terrorist, I can only say it makes sense by all the other sources you use on other left leaning things you agree with. I'll tell you what, I'll give you a list of the many illegal activities of your beloved eco-terrorist group the Sea Shepherd at the end of my rant. That should counter any more MSM friendly reports you can find that makes these terrorist seem tame and lovable.

First I want you to understand how I feel about your stance on things. I for one will make sure I ask all candidates what their feelings towards the terrorists are compared to yours if you ever run for office around Butte County. Because the last thing we need in any office anywhere is another limp wristed Republican in office who will not take a stand for the law over the touchy-feely lawbreakers who only care about the poor little animals.

As for acting out of love for the animals over money, I'll tell you one thing, Watson and his environmental friends have made a lot more money that they have socked away in the bank then these fishermen and the owners of the whaling fleet have. Next time they get together for a party check out their menu items and where they stay while in town. It ain't Motel Six I'll tell you that much.

Your whole statement sounds like something Obama would say as he is chastising capitalism for being greedy. Maybe you should take a break and think twice about what it is your are claiming to believe. Because you are sounding more and more like a liberal every time I read the things you write. One day you claim to be a proud capitalist Republican, the next day you attack Republicans for the money they collected in fund raising. Not to mention you even attacked the Supreme Court for overturning a campaign finance limitation law on corporations that was wrong when it was made 70 years ago.

Maybe you should throw your hat in the ring as a moderate Democrat the way you have come across lately. I have been a long time Butte County resident and it is weak-kneed Republicans like you that have made a mockery of our party and allowed Democrats to win so many elections. When a Republican acts like a liberal, why not just go with the liberal, and you sir have way too many tendencies that lean to the left for this old war horse.

Now, true to my word here is a list of the Sea Shepherd's Record of Violence dating back to 1977 and up to 1993. I grabbed it from this web page http://www.highnorth.no/library/movements/Sea_Shepherd/se-sh-re.htm I am sure there is a lot more that I could find if I had more time.

But I need to end this because I have a trip I need to make to Denver early in the morning to see my new great grandson. Someday I hope to take him hunting with me, and I will if the good Lord lets me live long enough, and we can get rid of the Democrats while keeping Rino's like you from ever assuming power again.

  • 1977: Paul Watson, one of the founder members of Greenpeace, was expelled from the organisation after a campaign against sealing during which he threw the sealers’ clubs and skins into the sea. His actions temporarily cost Greenpeace their tax-exemption status in the US.


  • 1977: Paul Watson establishes the “Sea Shepherd” organisation.

  • 1979: A Sea Shepherd vessel rams the whaler “Sierra”.

  • 1980: The “Sierra” is sunk in Lisbon harbour with the help of limpet mines. Sea Shepherd claims responsibility.


  • 1981: Sea Shepherd sinks the two whaling vessels, Ibsa I and Ibsa II, in the Spanish harbour of Viga (Sole source Sea Shepherd. This has not been confirmed by any other source).


  • 1986: Sea Shepherd activists shoot at Faroese police with a line rifle and try to sink their rubber dinghies.


    The vessel “Sea Shepherd” was ordered to leave Faroese territorial waters after attempting to obstruct the Faroese pilot whale harvest. The vessel ignored the order, and Faroese police tried unsuccessfully to board the ship. In the police report of Oct. 7,1986, it says: “One of the rubber dinghies was attacked directly by a so called “Speed Line” line rifle. The attack is considered to have endangered the lives of the police crew members seriously ... also, signal flares containing phosphorous (a substance which both burns and cauterizes) was thrown at the police. At a later stage the Sea Shepherd used so called “toads” (i.e. rotating iron spikes, pointed and sharp at both ends), against the rubber dinghies .. petrol was poured over the side of the ship ... whereupon signal flares were thrown from the “Sea Shepherd” in a miscarried attempt to set the petrol on fire.” Sea Shepherd accused the Faroese police of having shot at them with rifles. The police emphasize in their report that they only used tear gas and gas cartridges from shotguns.


  • 1986: Sea Shepherd claims responsibility for the sinking of two whaling vessels in Reykjavik, Iceland, and for malicious damage to the whaling station not far from the town. The act was carried out by two US citizens, one of them, Rodney Corronado, is now wanted in the US for several incidents of serious animal rights terrorism.


  • 1988: Paul Watson arrives in Iceland demanding to be held responsible for the sinking of the whaling vessels in Reykjavik in 1986. He is arrested and held for questioning. He realizes that he can risk facing several years imprisonment. In a press release from the Icelandic Ministry of Justice it says: “At questioning Paul Watson has admitted that he has given some remarks that connect him with the sabotage, but in spite of this he now claims that he neither took part in the planning nor the execution of the sabotage.” There was no evidence incriminating Watson. He was ordered to leave the country and declared persona non grata in Iceland


  • 1991: Mr A. Ferreira, A US crew member on a Mexican fishing vessel, reports to his senator that Sea Shepherd rammed his vessel causing considerable damage. Some of Sea Shepherd’s crew were armed with rifles. Senator John Seymour replies: “Your situation does not fall under my jurisdiction. I have therefore forwarded your letter to the American Tunaboat Association.”


  • 1991: Scott Trimmingham, president of Sea Shepherd quits in protest. “We had rules about not hurting anyone, about not using weapons. I left because those rules and that philosophy seems to be changing,” he said to “Outside” magazine (Sept. 1991).


    Paul Watson admits that there are arms on board “Sea Shepherd”. “We confront dangerous people. As the captain, it is my responsibility to protect the lives of my crew ... Therefore, I have prepared myself for the possibility of defending my crew in a situation that could go never occur, but if it does I will use firearms to first intimidate and then to defend,” said Watson to the Los Angeles Free Weekly (April 24, 1992).


    Seattle Times columnist Alston Chase comments thus on Sea Shepherds relationship to weapons: “The business of Sea Shepherd is confrontation, whereby these sailor activists try to provoke others to attack. Crying self-defence in these circumstances is like the gunfighter who starts a quarrel to justify duelling his enemy.” (The Seattle Times, July 1, 1991).


  • 1992: Sea Shepherd makes unsuccessful attempts at ramming three Costa Rican fishing vessels. In a written complaint to the local authorities the fishermen report that the Sea Shepherd crew shot at them with bullets containing a red substance, hitting two of them and causing them great pain.


  • 1992: Sea Shepherd makes unsuccessful attempt at scuttling the combined minke whaling and fishing vessel "Nybræna" at her moorings in the Lofoten Islands. The vessel was salvaged, but the water had caused considerable damage.


  • 1993: Paul Watson orders the crew on board the Sea Shepherd vessel “Edward Abbey” (formerly US Navy) to open cannon fire at a Japanese fishing vessel.


    The following transcript stems from the 1993 Yorkshire Television documentary “Defenders of the Wild - Ocean Rider”

    Paul Watson (over the radio): We are going to ram you!
    Stand clear!

    A Taiwanese drift-netter (over the radio): “Why are you
    crushing our ship?”

    Paul Watson: “You are killing too many dolphins ..
    and you insulted us by calling us creeps.”

    From another confrontation with a Japanese fishing vessel:


    Narrator: Sea Shepherd is ready to ram again.
    Now Paul Watson wants the Edward Abbey to fire directly
    at the drift-netters.

    Watson: “Fire a couple in the stern right at the water line.
    Nobody’s there.”

    Narrator: “To the relief of many of the crew members the
    order is not carried out. The Edward Abbey fires a cannon
    shot across its bow. Still the Japanese ship does not stop."

  • 1993: Sea Shepherd makes an unsuccesful attempt at scuttling the combined minke whaling and fishing vessel "Senet" at her moorings in Gressvik. The vessel was salvaged, but the water had caused some damage.


  • 1993: Sea Shepherd concludes that the organisation has sunk 8 ships and rammed and damaged a further 6.

  • Dismissed from the IWC

    After the sinking of the Icelandic whaling vessels in 1986, Sea Shepherd lost its status as observer at the IWC. The organization claims that it is merely enforcing IWC rules. In February 1994, IWC Secretary, Ray Gambell, declared to NTB (the Norwegian Telegram Agency) that the IWC and all its member states ardently condemn Sea Shepherd’s acts of terrorism.

    Next time do some research before you claim these idiots only care about the environment and animals. They are terrorist, and your attempt to normalize their behavior makes me sick. Sorry to be so harsh, but I have put up with your kind my whole life and I am too old and too damn tired to put up with it anymore.

    Both are terrorist acts, yes, and both are wrong. But the two are simply NOT morally equivalent.

    To you they are not, to me they are very morally equivalent.

    Read this about Watson and you will see that he is no different then the Islamic terrorists. A very important thing to understand K, is that Watson takes credit for inventing the way environmentalists spike trees that has actually killed and maimed loggers through out the years. So yes he does kill humans and he is proud of it while making no apologies for it. You may still disagree with me, but at least you will have a better understanding of my point of view on this man.

    By the way, I have a friend in Montana whose cousin lost his hand to tree spiking when he was a logger in the "80"s. His chain saw snapped when it hit the spike and the chain took his hand right off. He almost died because they were so far out in the backwoods. So I can somewhat say I have been effected, in a second hand way sort of, even if I never met him I knew his cousin.

    This is from an old article written about Watson 2004, but it is very informative, and when finished you will understand why I equate him with Islamic terrorists.

    The Greens' Favorite Terrorist
    By: Thomas Ryan

    The guise of modern-day terrorism is no longer limited to Palestinian suicide-bombers or the visceral images of the tragedy of 9/11. In a world of ever-increasing ideological disharmony, a new, equally violent terrorist has emerged – the eco-terrorist. Like the purveyors of radical Islamic terrorism, the eco-terrorist uses fear, intimidation, and violence in attainment of its goal, which for the eco-terrorist is simply the reclamation of the Earth to its pre-humanity condition, no matter what the cost. Heading-up this domestic terrorist offensive of radical animal-rights and extreme environmentalism is Paul Watson, who, even amidst the nation’s grief over 9/11, made the audacious and frightening statement, “There's nothing wrong with being a terrorist, as long as you win.”


    Paul Watson is considered by many to be the originator of environmental terrorism; what he refers to as “passionate activism.” Watson was one of the founders of Greenpeace, the largest environmental rights organization in the world, with over 5 million members claiming allegiance in over twenty countries. Watson left Greenpeace, which originated as a splinter faction of the 1960’s anti-war group, “Don’t Make a Wave Committee,” due to the passivity of the group. Of Greenpeace’s objection to the use of excessive violence in their protests, Watson declared his former group the “Avon ladies of the environmental movement.”


    In 1977, Watson founded the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS), which Watson describes as a “policing organization,” but which is in fact a radical terrorist outfit the travels the oceans of the world enacting violence against the world’s fishing industry. Watson oversees a small fleet of ships outfitted with cement-filled bows built for the sole purpose of violently ramming and sinking ships they deem as enemies of the environment; this could take on the shape of everything from large whaling ships to small commercial fishing vessels. Each boat of Watson’s is armed with high-powered water cannons and is protected by electrical barbed wire. They have used acid, explosives, and a host of other means to disable and sink “enemy” ships. Watson himself has been known to brandish an AK-47 that he has used to fire on targeted fishing vessels. And painted on the sides of his ships are the names of those boats he has sunk.


    The method of operation of Paul Watson isn’t all that different from the nineteen suicide highjackers of 9/11. Instead of airplanes, Watson uses his boats to ram and sink the objects of his disdain. Of his 1979 sinking of a commercial whaling vessel, Watson stated, “I set out from Boston in the Sea Shepherd with a crew of 19 volunteers…I hunted down, rammed, and disabled the pirate whaling ship Sierra…(We) fired up the engine and made for the Sierra, which was in the middle of the harbor. I hit her at full speed….” Although this attack failed to sink the Sierra, Watson and his crew returned for a second attack on the vessel and “blew the bottom out of her and permanently ended her career.”


    Although there is no definitive count, Watson is responsible for ramming, scuttling, and sinking a slew of boats across the world’s waterways, all in an attempt to bring about the cessation of the fishing industry in its entirety. Watson has also used the mere threat of force in pursuit of other activist causes, including socio-political causes. In 1992, despite his animals-first/humanity-last stance, he threatened to sink a fleet of ships reenacting Columbus’ voyage of the discovery of America on its 500th anniversary if the re-enactors didn’t sign an apology for Columbus’ mistreatment of American Indians.


    Watson’s dogmatic and authoritarian love of animals and nature, and hatred for all of humanity en toto, has found him making such absurd statements as “earthworms are far more valuable than people.” Watson has gone so far as to preach a blasphemous set of “ten commandments” that he authored, with the goal of elevating animals and nature above people. Watson’s commandments are bookended with his apparent loathing of humanity: his first commandment reads “Don’t bring any more humans into being;” and his tenth reads, “Don’t get caught by the forces of anthropocentrism.”


    Watson’s continual disregard for the value of human life is clearly discerned from his terrorist actions. When a former Greenpeace colleague criticized his sinking of half of a fleet of Icelandic whaling boats in 1986 as being a “cowardly, despicable, criminal, and (an) unforgivable action,” Watson barked in retort, “So what? We did not sink those ships for you or for any of the six billion hominid a--holes on this planet…we could not give a damn what human beings have to say about the actions.” Demonstrating the true extent of Watson’s distaste for humanity, he has said, “The world will be a much nicer place without us,” and that he “owed no allegiance to humanity.” This message is in stark contrast to his attesting to using the SSCS “as a vehicle to empower people.”


    Aside from jeopardizing the lives of seamen in the world’s fishing industries, Watson has also taken his terroistic crusade to land. Watson oversees the radical activist group, Coeur du Bois (Heart of the Wood), which spikes trees targeted for cutting by the logging industry. Watson himself has claimed to have created “tree spiking,” which consists of driving large nails into trees in attempt to hurt lumberjacks upon their felling or milling. His plan succeeded, and in 1987, a mill worker in California received a broken jaw when his band saw struck spikes in a tree, causing the blade to splinter in an explosion of shrapnel. Of the use of tree-spiking and its possible deadly consequences, Watson said, without a shred of remorse, “Those loggers don’t give a damn for future generations… And if they don’t have any compassion for the future, I don’t have any compassion for them.”


    For his crimes against both people and property, Watson has spent much time in the jails, and before the judges, of numerous countries, from Canada to Costa Rica. In 1997, Watson was imprisoned in a maximum-security prison in the Netherlands, where he was picked up for the scuttling of a whaling ship at dock, and the intentional ramming of a Norwegian coast guard vessel. Most recently, Watson was investigated by a Costa Rican court for the attempted murder of a Costa Rican fisherman. In 2002, when he came across a shark fisherman in a 13-foot vessel, Watson attempted to ram the small boat with his SSCS mammoth flagship “The Farley Mowat,” originally named “The Ocean Warrior.” When the cameras are on, Watson pretends to accept incarceration as the price for saving the planet from the scourge of humanity. “Going to jail is simply the price of doing business as an activist,” he has said. However, after posting bail in the Costa Rican case 2 years ago, Watson fled the country.


    In April of 2003, Watson was elected to the board of directors of the Sierra Club, “America’s most influential environmental organization.” Watson’s goal for the Sierra Club is to alter the club’s founding philosophy to include his own brand of radical eco-terrorism. At an “animal rights” demonstration, Watson declared, “One of the reasons I'm on the Sierra Club board of directors right now is to try and change it...we're only three directors away from controlling that board...Once we get three more directors elected, the Sierra Club will no longer be pro-hunting and pro-trapping and we can use the resources of the $95-million-a-year budget to address some of these issues."


    What can an eco-terrorist like Paul Watson do with $95 million of the Sierra Club’s funds? Most likely, more ship-ramming and tree-spiking, in what Watson describes as an “open war.” At the same animal-rights demonstration, Watson continued, “we should never feel like we’re going too far in breaking the law.” He has also shockingly said, “If you do not intend to kill anybody, if you make every effort to not kill and injure anybody, that’s all you really can do. You can’t stop somebody from walking into a situation, and we really can’t be too overly preoccupied with this.”


    In a recent interview, when asked if he viewed violence as a “legitimate means of social change,” Watson replied, “We are a violent species, and we always solve our problems with violence. There have been no exceptions. Nonviolent victories are a myth. Force has always prevailed…One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter.” While Watson continues to roam the seas with aspirations of violently sinking the world’s fish suppliers, somewhere in the world, Islamic terrorists – Watson’s idea of “freedom fighters” – are seeking the complete destruction of the United States, regardless of our policies on the environment. Politically, they differ. In terms of their tactics, they are Watson’s soulmates.

    Anyone who thinks it is wrong to hunt whales better wake up to reality. Then let me know how you feel when some terrorist yahoo decides that he/she doesn’t like some legal activity you engage in - especially if it is your livelyhood. When that terrorist throws Butyric acid on you, tries to run you off the road by ramming into you, and tries to otherwise disable your transportation while you are working...

    Or maybe if someone is a trackhoe owner/operator and some enviro-crazy decides that they don’t want the particular project completed - so rams a tractor into the trackhoe, throws caustic or sickening chemicals on the operator and equipment, and does everything they can to wreck your work...

    That is a very small, but similar situation to what the Sea Shepherd terrorists are engaged in. Don’t like whaling - then that is your call. But is it fair to engage in terrorist activities to stop LEGAL activity? Don’t think the whalers have families they are supporting? Home payments to make?

    Would you feel the same way if eco-terrorists decided to do the same to US beef producers? Chicken plants? OR how about if this was done to your local deer hunters?

    I don’t like the thought of eating dogs - but if that is what folks in Korea want to do - and it is legal - then who am I to commit terrorism to “save the dogs”?

    How is this any different than what the whalers are experiencing? Just because eating (and studying) whales isn’t our culture - what right do we to say otherwise? Are they hurting us? No. They are allowed a quota as determined by the international whaling commission that falls well below doing any damage whatsoever to the whale population.

    Remember your view when members of ELF (Earth Liberation Front) run you off the road to stop your perfectly legal SUV from “hurting mother earth”. Then again - you sure you are not a Prius snob?

    Sorry... you just hit a very sore spot for me. And no, killing whales is not exactly my cup of tea - and I take no pleasure in said killing.

    YES, THE JAPANESE WHALERS ARE EXTREME TERRORISTS. THIS IS CONFIRMED, YOU ARE CORRECT.



    You realize that the actions of the Japanese Whalers have already killed 3 human lives.



    Whereas Sea Shepherd has never killed anyone (in their entire 30+ year long history), the Japanese whalers have killed 3 people.



    The actopms of the illegal Japanese whalers have even resulted in the Deaths of Japanese nationals. In 2006, the actions of the Japanese Whaling fleet burned a man to death.



    In 2007, the Japanese whalers (who harbor explosives, weapons, and grenades onboard their ships) set off an explosion, killing another man.



    And in 2008, a Japanese citizen was killed due to negligence due to the Japanese illegal whalers, as he was swept off the ship and his body was lost when no one of the inept Japanese whaling fleet was on proper watch.



    Sea Shepherd has No guns, no grenades, no explosives, and no military weapons. However it is the Whalers who are loaded with explosives (which is a hallmark weapon of terrorists), and the whalers are illegally transporting weapons against the Antarctic Treaty. The Japanese whalers also violated international law by harboring military grade LRAD weapons onboard. This is a direct violation of Article 1. It is against the law to bring military class weapons into that area, and it is the Japanese Whalers who broke it, not Sea Shepherd. This makes the Japanese whalers the terrorist group. Not Sea Shepherd.



    In addition, it is the Japanese Whalers who have uniformed Japanese Coast Guard military personnel onboard (They are not in Japanese territory, they have No jurisdition), this makes the Japanese Whale Killers a MILITANT ORGANIZATION.



    The Japanese Whalers currently are wanted for breaking Federal Law. If any Japanese Whaler sets foot in Australia, they can be arrested by Federal Authorities, including the Australian Federal Police, and it's the Japanese illegal whale killers who broke the law and would be brought up on charges. Sea Shepherd on the other hand docks freely in Australia, and could travel to Japan too for that matter.



    It is the Japanese Whaling Fleet who has charges pending over their heads for Attempted Murder.



    In addition, the Japanese Whale killers are hurting Japanese people.



    WHALE MEAT CONTAINS METHYL MERCURIC POISON:



    Whale meat has been confirmed to contain MeHg (methyl mercury). Whale meat, if eaten, causes poisoning. Eating whale meat infected with methy mercury causes your children to be born with birth defects. It damages children's brains, causes organ damage, and LOW I.Q.



    Therefore, anyone who eats whale meat, is not only damaging themselves, but also damaging their own children.



    Japanese Whalers hurt Japan, and damage and harm Japanese citizens. By obtaining whale meat, and then pushing it, to be ingested, by Japanese people, the Japanese whalers are poisoning Japanese citizens by the thousands and hundreds of thousands.



    In addition, the Japanese Whaling Fleet attempted to lure organizations into serving whale meat in child's school lunches. Therefore the Japanese illegal whalers are poisoning thousands of Japanese children.



    Japan's OWN government Health Department has confirmed that whale meat is contaminated with Mercury. And they have found levels ranging from 12 times to over 9,000 times the human limit of contaminants in the meat. Human subjects have tested positive, and it is known to cause brain abnormalities, stunted brain growth, and chemical poisoning.



    Thus, the Japanese Whalers are hurting and damaging thousands of Japanese children. This makes the Japanese whalers akin to poisoning thousands of their own citizens with what is essentially a Chemical weapon. Thus it is the Japanese Whalers who are Extremist terrorists (wanted for attempted murder, militant, carry explosives, their actions have directly resulted in human death, they are armed with guns, and are conducting human poisoning). Sea Shepherd on the other hand has No guns, only video cameras, No explosives, and by Sea Shepherd STOPPING the whalers, Sea Shepherd is actually saving lives, and saving hundreds of thousands of Japanese people.



    96% of Japanese people DO NOT or HAVE NEVER EATEN WHALE MEAT:



    A recent report, coducted IN Japan, BY Japanese research teams, and published IN Tokyo, by Japanese news, showed that 96% of Japanes people DO NOT EAT whale meat. This shows that not only is it NOT a Japanese tradition, but whalers are actually AGAINST 96% of their own people. Whalers are actually only "for" 4% of Japanese people ("for" is in quotes because the Whalers are actually hurting, damaging and poisoning that 4% of Japanese people whom they've duped or forced into ingesting their whale meat). A child, when it's put in his or her school lunch, has little choice but to ingest it. Either that or go hungry that day. So that 4% is not even people who are ingesting it by choice.



    Eating whale meat is AGAINST Japanese culture and tradition:



    Japanese people DO NOT tend toward eating meat! Eating meat is actually Against Japanese culture. In the year 676 A.D. the Japanese emperor Tenmu in fact BANNED meat! This ban on meat in Japan went on for over 1,200 years!



    Yes, you read that right. The eating of meat in Japan was banned. And this has gone on for 1,200 years. This became interwoven in Japanese culture, and something that has been enforced for over 1,000 years is japanese tradition, not something that a group of whale killers decided to do, against their own people, only a few years ago, under the false ruse of fake "scientific research".



    Eating whale meat is actually a FOREIGN WESTERN idea. Eating whale meat was pushed on the Japanese people by MacArthur, after the Japanese bombed and performed a sneak attack on the Americans at pearl harbor in the United States, and then tortured and killed thousands of prisoners in the Philippines and whatnot, and japan became part of the axis with the Nazis and then got their own country bombed in return and lost the war. As part of the rebuilding and reconstruction, MacArthur (foreign military) is the one who introduced the eating of whale meat to Japan merely in 1946, as something for assuaging starvation, and Japanese recovering from the war. THAT does not constitute Japanese culture and tradtion. Whale meat eating was pushed on Japanese people by foreigners, and they no longer eat it. And remember, at that time it wasn't as heavily poisoned. Today it is poisoned. It is no longer recommended by westerners, nor Japanese people, nor the Japanese government. Only illegal whalers push it, exploit it by telling uninformed people that its Japanese tradition, and poison their own japanese people today, simply in order to obtain money.



    In addition, the predominant religion of Japan is Buddhism/Shinto. This presupposes that all life be treated with respect. And shinto belives that every thing has a spirit, the rivers, the trees, the wind, and animals. In fact, NOT eating meat is practiced by more Buddhists than perhaps any other group in the world. Asian cultures contain the most vegetarians of nearly all cultures. Therefore killing animals and eating animal flesh is not "for" Japanese culture and religion, it is AGAINST it.



    Any person who is FOR whalers is AGAINST Japanese people.



    Any person who is AGAINST illegal whalers is the FRIEND of 96% of the Japanese people.



    Any person who touts the whalers, is rooting for an illegal criminal poaching operation which is violating other nations sovereign territorial waters, conducting killings, and any person supporting whalers is cheering for child poisoning.



    Any person who is on the side of Sea Shepherd is helping to save Japanese citizens, helping Japanese children, and preventing illegal whalers from causing more Human Death.



    In addition, anyone against whalers and for Sea Shepherd, is a patriot. Any australian citizen against whalers is upholding their own rights against a fleet of foreign interlopers who are not even in their own waters, from exploiting australian resources. Any Japanese citizen who is against whalers is a great Japanese patriot. By removing the stink, and infected stain of embarassment that Japanese Whalers cast upon the great flag of Japan, all great Japanese citizens who are against a tiny sect of whalers are the ones who restore pride and honor back to the Japanese flag. Japanese whalers poison Japanese children, whalers bring shame on Japan, whalers make Japanese scientists look like the laughing stock of the world by feigning that they are doing concocted "whale research". Whalers make Japan's scientific achievements appear to be a global embarassment. Any citizen against whalers restores honor back to Japan's scientific and intellectual and technological contributions to the world. All Americans who support Sea Shepherd are patriots. Any American who supports a pack of extremist killers, backed by a foreign entity, who are conducting illegal poaching, poisoning children, and attacking AMERICAN CITIZENS aboard Sea Shepherd ships, is not a patriot. The U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT is against the Japanese Whaling fleet. Not FOR it. So any american For the whalers is going against their own people, and against their own American government, and is therefore not a U.S. patriot.



    Sea Shepherd is Law enforcement. Sea Shepherd crew contains ex-Police Officers. Sea Shepherd staff also contains officers from the Dutch International Anti-Organized Crime Unit. It is Sea Shepherd who is WITH the LAW. And it is the whalers who are conducting illegal acts. The Whalers have known involvement with illegal japanese organized crime ("Yakuza"). So anyone supporting the Whalers, is against U.S. Law Enforcement. U.S. trained American police officers are ON Sea Shepherd staff. As well as the Vice Chairman of the International Whaling Commission, and also Australian government officials. Sitting SENATORS back Sea Shepherd, not the whalers. U.S. has banned commercial whaling, and is against the whalers.



    Therefore:



    The Japanese Whalers have caused Human Death, are extremist killers, and anyone supporting whalers is helping to poison thousands of human children.



    Any person supporting Sea Shepherd is a patriot, and is a FRIEND of the Japanese people, protecting Japanese children against the whalers, saving Japanese citizens lives, helping not only the whales, but also human lives, protecting the environment, and is ON the side of the Law, along with U.S. police officers, Coast Guard, Senators, the U.S. State Department, the Japanese Ministry of Heath, 96% of Japanese citizens, and all good people who are all against the malicious illegal whalers who are in breach of international law.



    NO ONE KNOWS EXACTLY WHY THE JAPANESE WHALERS ARE SUCH EXTREMIST TERRORISTS, BUT THEY ARE CURRENTLY WANTED ON FEDERAL CHARGES.

    LEGAL NOTICE: INTL LAW EXPERTS & FEDERAL COURTS HAVE NOW RULED JAPANESE WHALING ILLEGAL

    QUOTE "Japans assertion that its whaling activities are legal is incorrect and misleading. Scientific whaling as conducted by Japan violates international law"
    Alberto Szekely, Expert in International Law
    -Intl Law Professor
    -Center for Intl Law
    -Legal Advisor to the UN Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
    -Mbr Intl Court of Arbitration at THE HAGUE
    -Member of the UN International Law Commission

    THE JAPANESE WHALERS HAVE BEEN RULED IN BREACH OF INT'L LAW.

    PRESS RELEASE:
    "US State Department Forcibly Opposes Japanese Whaling"

    "The US has forcefully expressed opposition to Japans scientific whaling program. The US supports the moratorium banning commercial whaling adopted by the IWC in effect since 1986 and opposes Japanese whaling"

    -Richard Boucher
    Spokesperson
    Undersecretary for Public Affairs
    WASHINGTON DC
    UNITED STATES DEPT of STATE

    [American citizens, including US officials, law enforcement, and even honored Iraq war veterans are on the staff of Sea Shepherd, including aboard Sea Shepherd vessels.

    Any US citizen siding with Foreign whalers (such as the user "One Vike" above, and anyone else whose name you see above, who posted supporting harm to American citizens by extremist Japanese whale killers who are supported by a Foreign power, are AGAINST America, and betray American people. (OneVike is an example of an ANTI-AMERICAN, and is not an American patriot, supporting foreign entities hurting American citizens lives.)

    Anyone FOR Sea Shepherd and against the whalers is along with America and with the U.S. Department of State. Anyone cheering the whalers is in direct contravention to the U.S. Dept of State.]

    PRESS RELEASE:
    "US State Department Forcibly Opposes Japanese Whaling"

    "The US has forcefully expressed opposition to Japans scientific whaling program. The US supports the moratorium banning commercial whaling adopted by the IWC in effect since 1986 and opposes Japanese whaling"

    -Richard Boucher
    Spokesperson
    Undersecretary for Public Affairs
    WASHINGTON DC
    UNITED STATES DEPT of STATE


    [American citizens, including US officials, law enforcement, and even honored Iraq war veterans are on the staff of Sea Shepherd, including aboard Sea Shepherd vessels.

    - Any US citizen siding with Foreign whalers (such as the user "One Vike" above, and anyone else whose name you see above, who posted supporting harm to American citizens by extremist Japanese whale killers who are supported by a Foreign power, are AGAINST America, and betray American people. (OneVike is an example of an ANTI-AMERICAN, and is not an American patriot, supporting foreign entities hurting American citizens lives.)]

    NEWS: WHALERS POISON JAPANESE CHILDREN.

    "Japanese officials announced laboratory test of cetacean meat at a press conference. "We tested meat samples bought at supermarkets in Japan, the Japan Times said. Whale & Dolphin meat had mercury content 10 TIMES above Japan Health Ministry's advisory limit, while the methylmercury content was 10.3 TIMES over the Japanese human limit. Other samples found 16x & 12x above Human safety."

    JAPANESE WHALERS POISON THOUSANDS OF JAPANESE PEOPLE & CHILDREN.


    RESEARCH: "The effect of eating mercury-tainted meat on people in Japan is now being studied, but a 1997 survey in the Faroe Islands ....revealed neurological problems in children whose mothers ate whale meat.... frequently. Mercury levels in most of the whale samples from the current study are higher than levels in pilot whales from the Faroe Islands, according to the researchers."

    IN RESPONSE TO THE Comment from geronimos descendant, Broken Feather | February 10, 2010 7:12 PM | Reply
    "There is no relevant difference between hunting and killing whales and hunting and killing deer."=FALSE!!

    ANSWER:
    Whale meat contains methyl-mercuric poison. Therefore geronimos descendant's comment is now debunked and proven false.

    Pushing whale meat for human ingestion is causes abnormal grain growth, tissue damage, and cognitive degeneration. "geronimos descendant", and anyone else who was just caught supporting whalers has just advocated the poisoning of human children.


    =======
    NEWS: "WHALERS PUSH CONTAMINATED WHALE MEAT INTO CHILDREN'S LUNCH PROGRAM"

    by Hiroshi Oosedo, Tokyo bureau, JAPAN


    "WHALE meat has been sold as dog food in Japan and there is a push now to encourage children to consume it to help reduce the whalers un-wanted Japanese whale meat stockpile."

    Whalers are now desperately trying to reduce the en-eaten stockpile by encouraging public schools, nursery schools, hospitals, elderly homes, and the food industry to "increase its whale meat consumption."

    "Serving whale meat for school lunch had almost been suspended after the International Whaling Commission imposed a ban on commercial whaling in 1986."


    IN RESPONSE TO THE Comment from Amigraf: "some legal activity..." -FALSE.

    ANSWER: Amigraf's post is false. The activities of the Japanese whalers have now been ruled illegal. And this includes by experts in international law. UNCLOS is one of the pertinent documents codifying the Law of the Sea, and those that have now ruled the Japanese in violation include those that actually AUTHORED portions of UNCLOS. In addition, the whalers are wanted by Federal Authorities for breach of the EPBC Act. In addition, the Whalers illegally entered French sovereign territorial waters and are being investigated by authorities. And in addition, the Japanese killers broke Article 1 of the Antarctic Treaty and are in violation. Australia, New Zealand, and the U.S. are all considering international legal action against the Japanese Whalers in International Court.

    The IWC has now issued FORMAL CONDEMNATIONS against the Japanese Whaling Fleet. The International Whaling Commission issued a sweeping 40 to 2 condemnation of the Japanese Whalers, not sea shepherd, in an Official Resolution exposing breaches and flaws in Japan's JARPA II whaling programme document. In other words, the IWC has issued an official condemnation of the Japanese Whale killers, Not sea shepherd.

    Amigraf has just supported the whalers whose activities have been condemned by the International Whaling Commission, against Americans and for the Japanese whalers whose activities have resulted in multiple human deaths.

    Amigraf wrote: "Don’t think the whalers have families they are supporting? Home payments to make?" AMIGRAF=TERRORIST SYMPATHISER.

    As shown in the NEWS story above, whale meat is infected with Methyl Mercuric poison, and is damaging the human brain tissue.

    So, the Japanese whalers are actually poisoning the families, and their children. Amigraf just supported the mass-child poisoning of potentially hundreds of thousands of childrens lives.

    So Amigraf wishes to cheer on a tiny sect of criminal killers, involved with organized crime divisions of the Japanese Yakuza, and who number 0.000001 of Japan's underworld criminal population, whose actions have already caused 3 human deaths, and Amigraf is AGAINST 96% of the GOOD Japanese people, Amigraf is against Federal Authorities, Amigraf is against the majority of families, and has advocated the mass-human poisoning of thousands of people.

    "NEWS: "Whale Meat found to cause deformed children"

    Clinical Toxicology Dept at Hokkaido University has released findings that reveal whale meat is contaminated with high levels of Mercury poisoning.

    Ingestion of Mercury causes people who have eaten it to have stunted brain growth, low IQ, reduced intelligence and give birth to future children with deformities & birth defects."


    To all who supported SeaShepherd, supported America, helped all the good people of Japan, against the whalers, and did great work to stop whaling and distribution of whale meat, congratulations, you've helped save human lives.

    Then take a look at all the names of any commenters above, and note down any of the usernames who advocated the Whalers and their actions. All of those usernames have facilitated the furthering of ingestion of whalemeat which results in Japanese and even American families giving birth to deformed babies, as the Japanese Whalers continue to entice the poisoning of human children.

    IN RESPONSE TO USER "Bean" on February 10, 2010 8:11 PM: "As for you using media reports that are friendly to the eco-terrorist, I can only say it makes sense by all the other sources you use on other left leaning things you agree with."-bean

    The User named Bean seems to be yet-another left-leaning liberal anti-american, sympathising with terrorists, and blaming Americans 1st. Very unfortunate for Bean.


    NEWS:
    JAPAN LONG RULED BY INCUMBENT LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PARTY

    Japan's long time incumbent LDP Party announced new reforms last month.

    "Japan, a Whaling nation, has long been ruled by the LDP party, which stands for the LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PARTY."

    - Bean stumped for the eco-terrorist whalers. As you see, the major ruling party in Japan which is fostering the Japanese whalers is the LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PARTY.

    Once again, the Japanese Whaling Fleet has been long operated by the ruling govt of Japan which is the "L.D.P.". The whalers are supported by the LDP, in Japan. The LDP stands for the "LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PARTY". Bean supported the whalers. And thus "Bean" just sided with the Liberal Democrat party.

    Not only that, but the current regime in Japan which funds the Japanese Whaling fleet is even more lax, and liberal. I guess no one will know why users like "Bean" swing to the far left like he does, but anyone who posts supporting whalers is supporting the Liberal Democrat Party, and also Japan's new even more left-leaning govt.

    Bean is perhaps just one of those "blame America 1st" socialists.

    Americans are onboard Sea Shepherd vessels. Sea Shepherd has offices in WASHINGTON. In the United States. However Bean and other pro-whalers often simply jump by reflex to rise up against Americans. Not only that, but Bean has just supported a FOREIGN power. Bean would rather blame Americans 1st, and side with a small sect of anti-Japanese, Anti-American whale killers. He'd rather see a foreign faction of extremist killers, armed with grenades, explosives, and guns, put American's lives in harm's way, and rise to support a tiny pack of foreign eco-terrorist poachers which are terrorizing the ecosystem and environment (the Japanese whalers).

    Sea Shepherd (and Paul Watson) are conservatives. Conservatives conserve. That's where the word comes from. The act of being conservative is Conservation. That is even in the very name of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. And in fact, Sea Shepherd uses the same type of principles used by the fore-fathers of America in the Boston Tea Party. (As you will recall, american patriots boarded a foreign vessel, and interfered with their "tea" business). Thus, Sea Shepherd is using the exact same principles followed by the founding fathers of the great United States of America, upon which America is based. Watch out for anyone who decries the acts of the fore-fathers of America in the tea party who did the exact same thing, boarded foreign vessels, and beware of any pro-whaler anti-americans who go around against the founding fathers who interfered with that ship's business, which was the act upon which the whole American revolution was based. Anyone FOR sea shepherd is following the principles of the founding fathers. Anyone who sides with foreign whalers against americans, and against the methods used by the founding fathers who interfered with that ships cargo, is not a patriot.


    Bean also went in contravention to the U.S. State Department too. Typical for a socialist anti-american like Bean I guess. Whaling in the United States of America is criminalized. So not only did Bean go on a diatribe against Americans, and go against the U.S. State Department who is against the Japanese Whaling Fleet (including Bush, and just about every president in the past by the way), but Bean also is cheering contrary to the American Rule of Law. Whaling in the U.S. is a Federal Crime. And here Bean is, cheering for it.

    Also, Japanese Whaling is SOCIALIZED. Whaling in Japan is subsidized by the government, it is not private. In other words, WHALING IS A FINANCIAL LOSS in Japan, and it has to be shored-up, by government funds. So money is taken out of the pay-checks of every deserving hard-working Japanese citizen and family, and taken away from them, by the Japanese Liberal Democrats, and then simply "given" to the whalers to fuel their untoward activities, meanwhile the Japanese Whalers cause shame, stink, and embarassment onto the entire nation of Japan in front of the world. Whaling is not capitalized, it's subsidized. So "BEAN" and any person you see who supported Whalers, cheer-leads for a SOCIALIZED big-government-run whaling programme. Against hard-working families and citizens.

    Bean just touted a tiny fanatic foreign pack of extremist killers (Japanese Whalers), who terrorize the environment (eco-terrorist whalers), and cheered for a Socialist tax -and- spen whaling program, which is causing an economic loss to the nation, and he sided with Liberal Democrats against the United States and American citizens.

    Watch, because anyone you see cheering the whalers is anti-american, promoting socializm, cheering harm to american citizens, including honored military service personnel and US war veterans, and against the United States of America.

    And on top of it all, pro-whalers facilitate the poisoning of human children. Extremists.

    Thankfully, the majority of Japan (96%) are against the whalers, and the majority of Americans are against the act of Whaling (Whaling is a Federal Crime in the U.S.), and most all of you great people out there are against these criminal whalers and the majority are on the side of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Allies, and on the side of putting a halt to whaling. But watch out, there's always a tiny sect of abnormal pro-whaling anti-american wing nuts out there who would like to see America go down. Like Bean.


    All deaths caused by the whalers throughout the years have been in self defense and provoked like a man committing suicide via police officers by charging them with a machete.

    Did the officer kill the man, yes. But self defense is justified and so were any deaths of any terrorists by the Japanese whalers.

    Any one who supports a terrorist and claims that the end justifies the means is a terrorist at heart themselves. Don't like something, then change the law, but liberals don't like changing laws because they know a majority of people do not agree with them. That is why they liberals judges to make laws from the bench, and all you who support these terrorists activities are no nothing better then accomplices to the illegal activity yourself.

    The James gang said they only cared about getting back at the Rail Road and bankers for stealing, and the people supported them, that made the citizens just as guilty as the James gang.

    At the heart of the author's article is legalism, not morality. Everytime he gets backed into a corner he resorts to the "legal" argument and he also tries to convict the people defending the whales based upon past actions not current actions. In one response the person showed that Japanese whalers has tresspassed into a marine sanctuary and this was illegal in other comments it was shown how the whalers were acting illegally. Apparently the author only wants to hear what he wants and is ignoring everything else. By the way I am a conservative and I find this article offensive, ignorant and lacking in intellectual honesty.

    IN RESPONSE TO Bookworm | February 11, 2010 6:21 AM | Reply

    Bookworm Wrote: "All deaths caused by the whalers throughout the years have been in self defense"=FALSE.

    ANSWER:
    The actions of the Japanese Whalers actually killed members of THEIR OWN crew. The DEATHS were other Japanese citizens. So what "Bookworm" (who obviously needs to spend more time reading and is not getting very far calling himself bookworm) has failed to read the Death Reports. Sea Shepherd has killed no one. Ever. The Japanese whalers acts have resulted in multiple human deaths. And the deaths included their own crew-members, and Japanese citizens.


    Booworm writes: "... and provoked like a man committing suicide via police officers by charging them with a machete. " =FALSE.

    Bookworm is insinuating that the Japanese Whalers were justified in killing other Japanese Whalers who ran toward other Japanese Whalers and charged at their own crew members with a machete. This is completely fabricated by this user Bookworm, who has just posted falsified and made-up information.

    ARTICLE:
    NEWS: "JAPANESE WHALERS ACTIONS RESULT IN HUMAN DEATH"

    ENS - Japanese Sailors set off an explosion on their own Whaling vessel, blowing up part of their own ship.

    The Japanese Whalers acknowledged possession of Explosives. The Japanese whaling crew detonated an explosive device onboard Thursday, the government run Institute of Cetacean Research said.

    The United States Coast Guard had been monitoring the activities of the Whalers in the area, and the Japanese denied assistance to help the man, despite radio inquiries from the US Coast Guard fleet.

    The body of Kazutaka Makita, 27, a Japanese citizen, was found on the ship's deck, killed by the Japanese in the mishap."


    This is what happened. However typical pro-terrorist-whaler sympathisers such as "Bookworm", took that and concocted a false story about people coming at them with machetes out of this, in order to dupe all of you out there who are reading this. Probably no one will ever understand why people like Bookworm sympathize with terrorist killers and against Americans and against Law enforcement, but all of you Good people reading this now know, that there are the kind of pro-whaler extremists like "Bookworm" that exist out there in the world who will do just about anything to justify whalers attempts at killing good Japanese people, and hurting American citizens.


    Bookworm burped: "[If you...] Don't like something, then change the law, but liberals don't like changing laws because they know a majority of people do not agree with them." -- THE JAPANESE WHALERS ARE MEMBERS OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Anyone siding with the whalers is supporting the Liberal Party, and supporting Liberals of a foreign government AGAINST the United States as a matter of fact. So "bookworm" just revealed that he sides with the Liberals. And "bookworm" is against American citizens. Bookworm is exposed. And now we know.


    U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT DEMANDS JAPAN CEASE WHALE HUNT:

    BRIEFING:

    US: "We call on Japan to refrain from conducting this year's hunt." demanded U.S. STATE Department Spokesperson SEAN McCORMACK, "especially with respect to humpback, and fin whales."

    The US has now demanded Japan halt their entire lethal whale hunt, stating Japan's acts were a ruse for avoiding non-lethal techniques, and that Japan's targeting of endangered species has especially angered America and top US Officials.

    Sean McCormack
    U.S. State Department Spokesperson
    WASHINGTON, D.C.
    UNITED STATES of AMERICA

    The U.S. is against the Japanese whalers. Anyone caught siding WITH the whalers, like "bookworm" is against the US, Anti-American. (Note that anyone supporting whalers is also ANTI-JAPANESE as well, because 96% of Japanese people DO NOT eat whale meat, so any pro-whaler is only "rooting" for 4% minority of Japan. In addition, a major portion of that 4% eating it are children, who are compelled to eat it because Japanese whalers have put it into the school lunch program to get rid of the un-eaten meat. And recall that whale meat contains methyl mercuric poison which causes brain damage. So pro-whalers are against 96% of the good Japanese people, and pro-whalers cheer damage and harm to the remaining 4% of Japanese citizens, including pro-whalers supporting the poisoning of Japan's children.



    Bookworm regurgitated: "...and all you who support these terrorists activities are no nothing better then accomplices to the illegal activity yourself."


    Bookworm has just jumped from talking about Japan, to talking about the U.S, and ranting against the US again.

    Ok, let's once again view the policy of HIS OWN United States and people:


    WHALING RULED AS A FEDERAL CRIME:

    U.S. GPO Access [CITATION: 50CF-R230.3]
    CHAPTER II--NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMS), NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (DOC)

    "It is unlawful for a person to: engage in whaling in violation of the US Convention, IWC regulations, commit an Act or breach US Commerce regulations; to ship, transport, purchase, sell, offer for sale, import, export or possess a whale or whale meat products."

    So what Bookworm, and any other U.S. citizen who are supporting the whalers have just done, is pro-whalers have just advocated and cheered for a practice that is a CRIMINAL OFFENSE in their own country. Whaling is a Federal Offense in the U.S. "Bookworm" just went against his own country. And he and any other pro-whaler is cheering a tiny faction of armed terrorist whale-killers attacking American citizens (including U.S. veterans, and U.S. police officers aboard Sea Shepherd ships.)


    - Anyone siding with Sea Shepherd is supporting the U.S. Anyone supporting whalers is going against the U.S. State Department (including under Bush, this spans administrations).

    - Japanese Whalers are Liberals. Sea Shepherd is conservative. "To conserve" is even the function of SSCS, Conserve is even printed right in the very name of TheSea Shepherd Conservation Society. That's what the "C" stands for. Paul Watson is a conservative. The Japanese whalers are LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, supported by socialized subsidies by big government including the LDP Liberal Democrat Party of Japan.

    - Sea Shepherd is the one which includes officers of LAW ENFORCEMENT onboard. Sea Shepherd ships are authorized for Law Enforcment. Under UNWCfN SECTION 21, sub-paragraphs (a)(b) and (e) of International Law. Sea Shepherd is the one that has U.S. trained Police Officers on board. In addition, Sea Shepherd has officials trained by the International Anti-Organized Crime Unit, of The HAGUE, Netherlands onboard SeaShepherd ships. It is the Japanese Whalers who have been now found in violation of International Law under UNCLOS, and the Japanese whalers are not in their own Japanese waters, they are caught poaching and entering the sovereign territorial EEZ Zones of OTHER NATIONS, in violation of international law. So wheras Sea Shepherd staff contains U.S. Federal Agents, it is the Whalers who are in violation of International Law, the Japanese Whalers who have been convicted on Federal charges, violation of the EPBC Act, breach of the Antarctic Treaty, invaded foreign territorial waters, are being charged with attempted murder, and the Japanese whalers who commit acts of Eco-Terrorism, and it is the Japanese Fishing Fleet which even the U.S. Coast Guard has had to chase out of U.S. territorial waters, for violations against American fishermen as well.

    Bookworm, and pro-whalers of his ilk, sided with Foreign liberal criminal killers, against US citizens, including against U.S. Federal agents, he went against Law Enforcement, and advocated acts which are considered a Federal Crime even in his own country. Pro-whalers and "Bookworm" are simply another one of the "blame America 1st" crowd. Bookworm (and anyone caught posting pro-whaler material) is a betrayor against his own citizens and country.

    Ladeeeeess and gentlemen. It has been one heckuva battle and both sides fought with great courage and spilled lots of blood in this arena. It was a close call, but the decision goes to...
    Authority.

    "no one on Earth has the right to tell another not to kill an animal and eat it. "

    Robin, what you are saying is the same as, we should do away with limits on hunting and just take whatever we want whenever we want. I can't agree with your logic, it's too extreme and not well thought out when you consider what the end result would be for the planet and us.

    Jack

    I see where you are coming from now, OneVike. I did not know they were associated with tree spiking, and I am sorry about your cousin. In that case, I have no problem with the equivalence.

    Authority: I am asking for your understanding. We may not agree with One Vike's article (and I don't) I know this man and he is not anti-American. And to say he is not a patriot is equally unfair.

    He is generally right in step with all conservative issues and he was a great supporter of George W. Bush. The fact he has taken this one position that runs against the Bush administration whaling policy does not reflect his overall support. One Vike deserves the right to express his opinion here and while we may disagree, we should respect his right to say it.

    I'm not sure there is much left to be said on this subject, so maybe it's time we move on? I know this topic a lot of controversy and anger, but thats not our objective here at PS and I'm sure that was not One Vike's intention.

    The people who oppose commercial whaling have made their case loud and clear and I believe they have also won this debate, so maybe we should let it go at that? Thank you all for posting and thank you One Vike for be patient and suffering through all the criticism.

    Jack Lee (Post Scripts Founder)

    "And in fact, Sea Shepherd uses the same type of principles used by the fore-fathers of America in the Boston Tea Party. (As you will recall, american patriots boarded a foreign vessel, and interfered with their "tea" business)."

    Authority, while he comes on very strong, makes a very good point here. Under the law of their time and place, the American patriots who fought and died in our revolution were terrorists. They did not use the law to achieve their goals, because the law that was imposed on them was flawed and quite possibly would never let them have a say.

    Now you all know I am the last person to support violence of any kind. I have gotten angry and offended many times because of implications that our own government may soon be so corrupt that people will have to resort to violence to change it. I see no evidence whatsoever for this position and I think it is a dangerous one to promote. We still have the ability to vote and to make our voices heard. That is the system our founders set up, and it still stands today. I do not see any clear and present threat to that system.

    However, I am not sure what it is like in Japan. Do the Japanese people have a say in whether the practice of whaling continues? If Authority's sources are accurate, and this practice really is endangering the population, then I can maybe--just maybe-- understand why some would resort to terrorist tactics in order to save lives. Especially if they do go out of their way to avoid injuring anyone.

    I am not ready to fully make up my mind yet, because OneVike has presented evidence that the people behind the terrorist organization have not always acted out of humanity's best interest, and that their leader has caused injury and death to people before. But the articles posted by Authority show that there may be another side to this story that I am not fully aware of. I would be interested to see how OV responds to his accusations.

    I need to amend a part of my article. Not because I was wrong, but because I was more right then I thought I was. In my article I wrote;

    "They also like to hurl packets of smelly foods such as rancid butter and other food items at the fishermen. The spoiled food is thrown in the hopes that they will get lucky and hit a fisherman in the mouth and make him sick from food poisoning. (By the way, the last time I checked that is what the left call biological warfare) If a crew members are too sick to work it makes it more difficult to get the job done."

    Well, I did some more research and as it turns out, the actual contents of the smelly bombs is butyric acid, as stated here in this Animal Planet video. Butyric acid actually does have effects that can effect humans in a dangerous way. This from sciencelab.com.

    Hazards Identification

    Potential Acute Health Effects:

    Very hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of ingestion. Hazardous in case of eye contact (irritant), of
    inhalation. Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (corrosive, permeator). Liquid or spray mist may produce
    tissue damage particularly on mucous membranes of eyes, mouth and respiratory tract. Skin contact may
    produce burns. Inhalation of the spray mist may produce severe irritation of respiratory tract, characterized by
    coughing, choking, or shortness of breath.

    Potential Chronic Health Effects:
    CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available. The substance is toxic to lungs, the nervous system, mucous membranes. Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated or prolonged contact with spray mist may produce chronic eye irritation and severe skin irritation.

    Now if you are hit in the mouth and accidentally digest this substance, this is what they advise;

    First Aid Measures

    Eye Contact: Check for and remove any contact lenses. In case of contact, immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Cold water may be used. Get medical attention.

    Skin Contact: In case of contact, immediately flush skin with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes while removing contaminated clothing and shoes. Cover the irritated skin with an emollient. Cold water may be used.Wash clothing before reuse. Thoroughly clean shoes before reuse. Get medical attention immediately.

    Serious Skin Contact: Wash with a disinfectant soap and cover the contaminated skin with an anti-bacterial cream. Seek immediate medical attention.

    Inhalation: If inhaled, remove to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Get medical attention.

    Serious Inhalation: Evacuate the victim to a safe area as soon as possible. Loosen tight clothing such as a collar, tie, belt or waistband. If breathing is difficult, administer oxygen. If the victim is not breathing, perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

    WARNING: It may be hazardous to the person providing aid to give mouth-to-mouth resuscitation when the inhaled material is toxic, infectious or corrosive. Seek immediate medical attention.

    Ingestion: Do NOT induce vomiting unless directed to do so by medical personnel. Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. If large quantities of this material are swallowed, call a physician immediately. Loosen tight clothing such as a collar, tie, belt or waistband.

    So I guess in my attempt to show the Sea Shepherd terrorists as being extreme by using extreme descriptions for the smelly bombs effects on humans, was actually a lot closer to the truth then I thought. Amazing ain't it? Even when I think I am just being extreme I am right, the Sea Shepherd terrorists are using biological warfare in their attempt the whalers doing what is legal. ....LOL

    (hey Mark, did you hear that? More white guys trying to kill orientals, after all that is what the Indians are in effect. They just migrated here a long time ago.)

    One Vike with all due repsect, I can't believe you're saying that someone standing on the rocking and pitching deck of a small vessel in the open ocean is going to hurl soft spoiled food (rancid butter) 150 to 200 feet, with the intended target being the small mouth of a Japanese seaman who is standing on another rocking deck of a vessel higher up, perhaps two to three stories higher, and all in the hopes the Japanese man will injest said spoiled food and this will eventually make him sick? Then we have, "More white guys trying to kill orientals, after all that is what the Indians are in effect." One Vike.

    Alright, this is just getting plain silly now. I think we need to take a "time out" here and I need to take an asprin, maybe two, I'm getting a head ache. I see our Post Scripts credibility sinking faster than the Andy Gib.

    We really need to move on. Pulleeeeese.

    I am sorry k, I will not get into much more then a few of his accusations because 99% if them are fabricated and the whole idea of people like them is to muck up the works by making their opponents so busy answering stupid charges that we can never get anything else done. So I will stick with just a few charges.

    Mr. or Mrs self proclaimed AUTHORITY is using articles and studies that have been proven to be inaccurate and wrong time and time again. To say they are breaking the law in several countries I would agree, but then again the Sea Shepherd must register their ships in different countries because each has violated laws that would land the crew and Watson in prison with their ships impounded never to be returned. So that accusation means nothing when we are talking about international waters controlled by the UN.

    He goes on to accuse the Japanese Whalers of many things, but I give evidence and web sites that I glean my information from and all he does is offer quotes and accusations from the obvious places that are not just friendly to the terrorists but even harbor them.

    Personally I don't eat whale meats, but I don't eat liver neither. However others do ,and it is their right to eat bad tasting food if they want. Who cares what some scientist thinks about the health effects of whale meat. AUTHORITY is just throwing anything and everything that has nothing to do with my point about these guys being proven and admitted terrorists.

    You want something outlawed then do it the right way. When a ship carries the Jolly Roger as their flag, what does that tell you? All I defend is the law, and no one can deny that the whalers are well within their rights. You don't like the way the UN Charter is written, then get the language changed. Liberals are always looking for loopholes to get what they want, but when someone they disagree does the same thing they yell foul. Another thing, I love it when a liberal animal rights wackos accuses conservatives of being liberal. That is so stupid the argument does not even deserve a reply.

    Paul Watson is a very dangerous man, by his own admission he is a terrorist. And the idea of trying to put him in the same company with the founding fathers because some liberals like to say that the founding fathers were terrorist for fighting for freedom of representation is another idiotic claim. The founding fathers fought against the government that controlled their lives. They never fought against individuals trying to make a living that they disagreed with.

    The evidence is overwhelming that (Again by their own admission) the Sea Shepherd is a terrorist organization that even Green Peace would have nothing to do with.

    One last thing.

    You AUTHORITY should get back to your buddy Mr Watson and tell him that I do not and will not back down. I say that because the vast number of websites that you have hit with your lies and accusations is quite impressive. All that to say that you must be one of his henchmen that have been put to the task of putting out fires that are in the process of burning down his criminal house of cards. Those who agree with me are much more prepared to battle the likes of you then you could ever imagine. I am only one of millions that are going to bring you down. And guess what, your greed will help us, because you people have already turned the public against greedy wealthy people who think they are better then anyone else, and that would be you guys.

    Legalism and morality in this case are the same. And please do not attempt to use the conservative word with me, because I find that the only conservatives who support terrorism are usually RINO's and not truly conservative. When the facts are presented as they are here, you must realize that the activists in this case are terrorists.

    Again, I did not state my opinion of the hunting of whales in the article, my point was the war and the tactics used. I did point out who the illegal terrorists are and gave evidence to prove it. However, if you must know, I do not and never have supported the ongoing practice of illegal whaling. However, as long as it is legal then you must use ethical and moral standards in protesting it. Not terrorist acts of aggression that are dangerous to all involved.

    Just like I am against abortion, but I also am against those who would use violence to stop it. Killing doctors is not the way to stop the practice. You work in the confines of the law and legislation to stop abortion, not violence. I am very consistent in my stance.

    Don't believe me, ask K who may disagree with me 99% of the time but does agree that I am consistently conservative. And in this I take the conservative stance as I should.

    You who support the terrorist need to educate yourselves and watch the Whale War shows. The Sea Shepherd terrorists routinly attempt to foul props...always trying to invent a better tactic to foul the props and ALWAYS seeking a better "rope" in which to do it...and

    Secondly...if you have a problem with international law, well my friends international law allows them to harvest the animals for research and then sell the meat. THAT is the LAW. They are abiding by the LAW and doing NOTHING illegal. Is it unethical? In your eyes...yes. So...you should have an issue with the law. The LAW says they can sell and eat that meat. If the law were changed to be less idiotic...to allow a culture that eats whale meat to harvest some for consumption...then they wouldn't have to use the loophole.

    But more to the point...and I've asked this before...why do you people have a right to say that a culture cannot eat whale? What's stopping them (or someone else in the future) from telling you not to eat pork. Why do whales get to be placed beyond the food chain? Just because you say not to?

    Not good enough. If you eat meat...you are just as guilty as the Japanese. Stop trying to find some moral high-ground that isn't there.

    IN RESPONSE TO "Post Scripts" comment February 11, 2010 11:49 AM | Reply which postscript wrote: "We may not agree with One Vike's article (and I don't) I know this man and he is not anti-American...."

    - OneVike has posted cheering a group of extremist killers, backed by a foreign government harming Americans. The Japanese Whalers are backed by a foreign power. Sea Shepherd contains American citizens. Sea Shepherd crew and staff contain honored American Veterans, U.S. marines, United States Federal Agents, U.S. Police Officers, U.S. Military Service Personnel who are honored iraq war veterans. OneVike [and all others posting cheering Japanese whalers attacks and calling Americans terrorists] has posted in SUPPORT of a foreign entity attacking and harming the lives of American citizens. OneVike has sided with the government of a foreign power against the rule of law and against the State Department of the United States of America. (And mind you, this particular foreign power he is cheerleading for, although it was in the past, and much different now, is 1 of the only foreign entities to launch an attack against America on U.S. Soil. (Pearl Harbor) And mind you, although most (good) Japanese people are now friendly with the U.S. and that is all fine, Japanese Whalers are the very faction which still comprises many of these Nationalists in Japan who still harbour bellicose feelings toward America, and it is a high proportion of these whalers and pro-whalers in Japan who still hold the contention that they are superior and that the Japanese were right to attack Pearl Harbour and the U.S. They believe it is their "divine right". Japanese Whalers and pro whalers consist of a high proportion of the minority sect in Japan who are fanatic nationalists. 96% of 128 million people in Japan (good Japanese) DO NOT agree with these whale killers and Nationalistic extremistss. OneVike has come out as a supporter of the very faction that still harbors the idea that Japan was right to conduct the attacks on the United States that resulted in the deaths of untold numbers of American citizens. OneVike is supporting them. And OneVike is against the U.S. Coast Guard (which is against the illegal whalers), against U.S. Federal Law, OneVike is against the president of the United States of America, including Bush, he is against the principles used by the founding fathers of the U.S. Constitution. THAT is an Anti-American. Even so far as promoting further attacks by a foreign power against American citizens.

    Now, whether he KNOWS it or not, that is another question. OneVike is definitely Anti-American it's just a matter of whether he is so unwitting, and uninformed on the illegal whaling subject that he mistakenly *thinks* he is sticking up for America by supporting this faction of Japanese Whalers. This is more likely the problem. OneVike is so quick to "judge" people, and so venomous against the 1st thing he sees that appear to be activists, that he unwittingly has ended up siding with a foreign faction attacking U.S. citizens.


    PostScripts writes: "(OneVike) is generally right [sic] in step with all conservative issues [definitely not, especially on this subject] and he [OneVike] was a great supporter of George W. Bush."

    ANSWER:
    PAUL WATSON and SEA SHPERD were Awarded the prestigious "Thousand Points of Light Award"---by GEORGE W. BUSH!


    LOOK:

    "NEWS: Paul Watson of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society Awarded Points of Light Award by President of the United States"

    WASHINGTON, D.C. -- "Paul Watson, head of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has been awarded a "Point of Light" award by President George W. Bush. The award is given to those who have made exemplary contributions to America and the American People..."


    K, sorry I missed that.

    It was cousin of a good friend, not my cousin.

    I apologize for the mix up.

    Personally, I like the Cousteau Society.

    Maybe we can get them to loan us the Calypso to rescue PS's sinking credibility.

    Mark

    Jack, now you are being ridiculous. If you disagree that the Indians came over the Baring Straight thousands of years ago then I would agree that they are not related to the orientals, but fact remains they did and they are. My point was to Mark as to a discussion from another and YOU KNOW IT!

    Now You think I am wrong about the food. Well here again is the comment I made about that statement in my article, and here is two videos of Sea Shepherd activists throwing BOTTLES Containing BUTYRIC ACID(
    No. 2 videos No. 2)

    the website that talks about it at animal planet web site here....Whale Wars: Butyric Acid (Stink Bombs), because you obviously failed to read what I wrote.

    As I said, I did some more research and as it turns out, the actual contents of the smelly bombs is butyric acid, as stated in the program Whale Wars on the Discovery Channel. follow this link and you can watch them throw the bottles of Butyric acid at the whalers.

    And actually as i said butryic acid can and does have an effect on humans as stated at sciencelab.com.

    Hazards Identification

    Potential Acute Health Effects:

    Very hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of ingestion. Hazardous in case of eye contact (irritant), of
    inhalation. Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (corrosive, permeator). Liquid or spray mist may produce
    tissue damage particularly on mucous membranes of eyes, mouth and respiratory tract. Skin contact may
    produce burns. Inhalation of the spray mist may produce severe irritation of respiratory tract, characterized by
    coughing, choking, or shortness of breath.

    Potential Chronic Health Effects:
    CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available. The substance is toxic to lungs, the nervous system, mucous membranes. Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated or prolonged contact with spray mist may produce chronic eye irritation and severe skin irritation.

    Now if you are hit in the mouth and accidentally digest this substance, this is what they advise;

    First Aid Measures

    Eye Contact: Check for and remove any contact lenses. In case of contact, immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Cold water may be used. Get medical attention.

    Skin Contact: In case of contact, immediately flush skin with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes while removing contaminated clothing and shoes. Cover the irritated skin with an emollient. Cold water may be used.Wash clothing before reuse. Thoroughly clean shoes before reuse. Get medical attention immediately.

    Serious Skin Contact: Wash with a disinfectant soap and cover the contaminated skin with an anti-bacterial cream. Seek immediate medical attention.

    Inhalation: If inhaled, remove to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Get medical attention.

    Serious Inhalation: Evacuate the victim to a safe area as soon as possible. Loosen tight clothing such as a collar, tie, belt or waistband. If breathing is difficult, administer oxygen. If the victim is not breathing, perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

    WARNING: It may be hazardous to the person providing aid to give mouth-to-mouth resuscitation when the inhaled material is toxic, infectious or corrosive. Seek immediate medical attention.

    Ingestion: Do NOT induce vomiting unless directed to do so by medical personnel. Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. If large quantities of this material are swallowed, call a physician immediately. Loosen tight clothing such as a collar, tie, belt or waistband.

    So maybe this time you will read it and take it to heart, and no I am not joking. Your insulting comment, "this is just getting plain silly now" is not called for, because I am right.

    OneVike writes: "All I defend is the law, and no one can deny that the whalers are well within their rights. You don't like the way the UN Charter is written, then get the language changed." -FALSE.

    The UN Charter doesn't need to be re-written--It is ALREADY on the side of Sea Shepherd. And against the whalers.

    One more time, in case you didn't get it: The U.N. Charter is on the side of Sea Shepherd. The LAW is already on the side of Sea Shepherd. This includes the UN Charter, sub paragraphs (a),(b), and (e), Sections 21 through 24, which grant authority AGAINST the Japanese whalers, and FOR Sea Shepherd.

    The Japanese have been ruled to be the ones in violation of international law. Not Sea Shepherd. The Japanese Whalers have already been CONVICTED of Federal Crimes. The Japanese Whalers are in violation of Article 1 of the Antarctic Treaty. The Japanese whalers violated the EPBC Act. AND the Japanese Whalers have official resolutions of condemnation against them by a whole multitude of countries including the United States.

    The LAW is not the problem it has already been proven that the Japanese have breached the law. They have even been convicted in court, and ruled illegal according to International Law, that includes the UN, and that includes "international waters". We're talking UNCLOS here, and the AT, section 1.

    The problem is enforcement. This what Sea Shepherd has been saying (and doing) this entire time. Once again, the LAW need not be altered, the Law already comes down on the side against the whalers, the problem is simply that the Japanese Whalers go and travel 9,000 miles out of their own territorial waters, down into the EEZ zone in Australian, New Zealand, French, and Antarctic waters, and commit these acts and attempt to get away with it. Because no one is enforcing it! (Except Sea Shepherd).

    Next thing you'll see, is someone piping in with "oh, well, they shouldn't be down there, they should leave it to "the authorities" to enforce it." -- Well, that is the very thing that Sea Shepherd has been saying! WE shouldn't have to be down here, the authorities should be doing this! SeaShepherd clearly and on every occasion possible states that same thing! Nothing would make SeaShepherd happier than to NOT have to go down there, and have Australian Courts capture and imprison the whalers who have already been convicted in court, or have New Zealand's Naval fleet go down there and takeover the task. But this is the problem that SSCS has stated the entire time: It's not the LAW that is the problem, enough Laws already exist against the illegal whalers, they are already convicted and have been found operating illegally. It's the lack of proper enforcement. And this is not due to the law, it's due to paybacks. (example, Australia needs to buy "stuff" from Japan, Japan needs to obtain trees, lumber, metal ore, etc from Australia. So they are so timid and afraid that if they convict whalers, that corrupt politicians in Japan will start seeking revenge on trade and jeopardize their money.)

    Sea Shepherd is Enforcement. Sea Shepherd is Authorized, by the U.N. Charter for Enforcement. Sea Shepherd is not "activists". SSCS is not a "protest" organization. Sea Shepherd does not sob and hang a sign and fly a banner. SEA SHEPHERD IS A LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATION

    SSCS is authorized under Section 21 through 24 of the UNWCfN sub paragraphs (a), (b), and (e) to intercept, enforce, and take action against the Japanese illegal activities.

    -

    In correlation to this, Sea Shepherd contains Law Enforcement personnel. This includes U.S. trained Police Officers on board Sea Shepherd ships. This includes U.S. marines, U.S. Naval Surface Warfare experts, U.S. Federal Agents, as well as officials who served in the Internatinal Anti-Organized Crime Unit of THE HAGUE, the Netherlands.

    Much ado with plenty of fluff is inevitably brought up by Pro-Whalers like OneVike and "Billy" who blame Americans, side with the Criminal Japanese whale killers, and call anyone and everyone, including americans "terrorists".

    OneVike went and copied and pasted the line-sheet off a pro-whaler post site attempting to detail all kinds of things that butyric acid is, and can do. This has all been debunked. Everything that OneVike wrote has already been debunked and is thrown out. The typical ruse, is to toss around the word "acid", in butyric acid, in a false attempt to make it sound like it is something bad (example, "oh, no, they are throwing "acid!"). Here's some information to anyone trying that one:

    Oh, no! Billy drank acid! = Guess what, soda pop contains phosphoric, and carbonic acid. Coke, Pepsi, Ginger Ale, these are all ACID! Did you ever by chance spill some on someone? Oh, no! According to OneVike and people siding with Japanese pro-whalers, YOU are a "terrorist"! Did you ever give a can or glass of soda to someone? Oh, no! YOU are a terrorist! You attempted to induce carbonic acid into someone's mouth!!! - NOT.

    Oh, no! It's Folic Acid! OMG! It says acid, so that must mean that it burns someone alive! -- No. That is vitamin B. It's good for you.

    Yikes! Acetic "acid!!" oh, no run for your lives! don't get any in your mouth!-- that's Vitamin C. According to OneVike, pro-whalers, maybe even "Billy" up here, and other reactionaries, you, by giving someone orange juice for breakfast would be arrested as being a terrorist with a chemical weapon.

    Oh, no, someone just hit me in the mouth with OMEGA 3 Essential Fatty Acid!! --According to uppity Billy and "drama generators" like OneVike here, if a restaurant served you some bread that had some healthy anti-oxidants and Omega3 fatty acids in it (which are in fact essential for good health, its good for you), that restauraunt would likely be a terrorist organization.

    These people who bandy about the term "acid" having not even a clue about elementary school science level education, and copying inapplicable datasheets off the web, well, they would probably go crazy if and when they found out that their OWN bodies are made up of Deoxy-ribonucleic acid. Must be a horribly corrosive acid used by terrorists, right? And omg, look at that word "nucleic" in there! That must mean it came from an iranian nuclear facility! Either that or it could be your body is made up of acid, otherwise known as DNA.


    Now, to those who now go, oh, uhm, yeah, well, ok, just cuz it says acid, or butyric acid, well, yeah, I guess that doesn't mean it's bad...

    But! But! (Onevike will chime in) I just looked up and pasted a whole sheet on how bad, and caustic, and horrible butyric acid is, corrosove, eats your skin! etc etc---NEWS FOR YOU: Go obtain the chemical data sheet on Acetic Acid! It will say the same exact thing! Acetic acid is in apple juice.

    Those data sheets are for fully concentrated 100% re-agent Lab-grade chemicals! If you look up Citric acid, it will also say that burns flesh! I can paste you a whole data sheet on how Citric Acid (according to that same data sheet you pasted, which has already been debunked) can suffocate, asphyxiate you, has harmful fumes, is harmful of inhaled, is corrosive, caustic to the skin, and can cause harm to the human eye, and hazardous to the lung, and should be handled as a HazMat substance. -- GUESS WHAT: Citric acid is in your Sunny Delight fruit drink. So according to OneVike, and a lot of these other pro-whaler extremist reactionaries that you'll see on the net, Sunny-D would be a WM-D. Elementary school child terrorists slinging their fruit juice box at eachother! Oh, no! Must be child-terrorists! (according to mis-informed OneVike and such pro-whalers).

    And as far as that goes, butyric acid is actually a HEALTH FOOD! Yes, that's right. Butyric Acid, especially in its form known as Gamma Amino Butyric Acid, also known as GABA, improves your health! Butyric Acid is buffered, it is gentle, it is bio-degradable, none of it that SSCS has comes from any animal sources, and is akin to a glop of old butter. The only thing butyric acid does, aside from actuall IMPROVING your health, is it smells bad. This is similar to how people take "garlic" supplements. Good for you, but it doesn't smell that great.

    Japanese Pro Whalers cry that butyric acid is some kind of terrorist weapon--So who says butyric acid is a health food? = You know who? Japan is who says it is a health food! In fact, Japanese drink companies, one of which is Morinaga Drink company of Japan (its like Coca Cola in the US), actually manufactures a Butyric Acid drink!

    That's right, Japanese companies actually SELL BUTYRIC ACID drinks! So any Japanese pro-whaler, or a cling-on like OneVike, would be implicating that the entire country of Japan are "terrorists" namely due to the fact that they promote direct ingestion of butyric acid, the chemical that he just tried to post his little data-sheet on attempting to say that it is caustic to human flesh and shouldn't get into someone's mouth. Sorry charlie, you thought you had something there with the little datasheet, but the pro-whalers did a good dupe job on you again, making you think that datasheet on Lab-Grade 100% concentrated BA applied to anything. The ol' "its acid!" ruse, and that entire DataSheet thing has all been already debunked.

    Next, regarding the other elements utilized by SSCS for enforcement, I'll go over them here and save you from listing the other enforcement methods used by SeaShepherd:

    Remember: Sea Shepherd (known as SSCS) is Authorized for Law Enforcement at Sea under U.N.WCFN Sec (e) et Seq. Intl Law.

    So, to anyone attempting to rampantly claim that SSCS can't employ prop-fouler: Yes, they can. In fact, this is regularly imployed by Law Enforcement!

    Law Enforcement, including police officers, regularly utilize things such as "Stop-Sticks" to disable a vehicle on land! This is akin to using a Prop Fouler at sea. In fact, a prop-fouler (essentially nothing but a rope) is even lesser than deployment of things such as Spike Strips, by police. Once again, Sea Shepherd is authorized for enforcement, SSCS is an anti-poaching organization, with trained officers on board. The Japanese whalers have already been found to be operating illegally. Spike Strips are employed by Law enforcement on land. Prop fouler is the same thing, for use by among other things, Law Enforcement, at sea. Any individual claiming that a prop fouler is some kind of terrorist weapon or pirate device can now no longer state such, or risk insinuating that U.S. Law Enforcement, including Police Officers are terrorists. Remember, SSCS is authorized for Enforcement, against the CITES treaty, EPBC Act, UNCLOS, and under UNWCfN.

    OH! But SSCS rammed ships! Oh, that must mean that is a terrorist technique! They are terrorists--WRONG:

    Law Enforcement regularly employs the same techniques. In fact, they do it all the time. So much there's even a name for it: It's called the P.I.T. Maneuver! Law Enforcement, in order to stop an illegally operating vehicle *rams* it, in the rear quarter-panel, denting the vehicle, throwing it off the road, and stopping the flight of the criminal. Ramming is used by Law enforcement. In fact, they even train for it. But according to OneVike, and pro-whalers, the American Police Force Academy would be a 'terrorist training camp'. False.

    Oh, but these "pirates" boarded another vessel! That must mean they are...pirates! = WRONG!

    Law Enforcement on probable cause, and when an individual is suspected of being engaged in the commission of a crime regularly enters vehicles. And premises too, for that matter. And this also in the case of Law enforcement during the commission of a crime, can include breaking down the door if they want. In addition, officials are also authorized to issue the service of a WARRANT. It's called "getting served."

    Federal Court issued a ruling and found the Japanese Whalers guilty of violating Federal Law. Sea Shepherd transported the court documents, on-board, to the location where the illegal whalers could be found. SSCS then attempted to inform the Whalers that they were found to be in violation of Federal Law. First by Radio. The Japanese Whaling fleet then ignored the notification. At this point, the onus became on the criminal whalers, who were just witnessed in the commission of a crime (violation of the EPBC Act, illegal whaling.) Therefore, after communication was ignored by the Japanese Whalers using radio contact, SSCS was therefore authorized to BOARD, and serve the Court documents to the Captain of the Japanese Whaling ship.

    Police and Law Enforcement Service of a Subpoena, or Service of a Warrant is equivalent to SSCS authorized Boarding to deliver the Document of Legal Notice to the captain of the Japanese Whaling vessel.

    Thus, boarding the Japanese ship by SSCS was fully authorized, indeed commanded. It is neer an act of piracy, and you can look it up in the UNCLOS documents regarding the Law of the Sea.

    SSCS is Authorized for Law Enforcement at Sea under U.N.WCFN Sec (e) et Seq. Intl Law.

    1 thing is piracy though: "attempt to kidnap, or hold as hostage" a member of any crew. THAT is precisely listed as an act of piracy. Stated clearly in the Law of the Sea documents according to international law.

    Who did it? --- The Japanese whalers did it. The moment that the Japanese Whaling Fleet crew tied the members of SSCS crew to the rail, and held them against their will, and further tied them to a mast atop ship, the Japanese Whalers committed an Act of Piracy, as defined right in the rules of the Law of the Sea.

    So whereas SSCS is found to be exempt, not pirates, and clear of anything, the Japanese Whalers did in fact commit an act defined clearly under UNCLOS as Piracy.

    The Japanese Whalers are the entity that committed acts of piracy, under the Law.


    Yea Right!

    Jack you and this so called AUTHORITY are both out of whack!

    Give me a break, neither of you would know a true conservative if ypu ran into them at the Ronald Reagen library, because any one who stands behind these terrorists is not a person I would trust in the same boat with me.

    Anti-American, good grief.

    OneVike gurgles: "and I've asked this before...why do you people have a right to say that a culture cannot eat whale?" = THIS REMARK HAS BEEN PROVEN BOGUS:

    Who is it that is indicating that the Japanese cannot eat wwhale?=THE JAPANESE! The majority of Japanese people are the ones saying that they don't want whale meat, they don't eat whale meat, and whale meat is NOT part of Japanese culture!

    Japanese people themselves conducted a survey of Japanese citizens, and the results were that 96% of Japanese people DO NOT or HAVE NEVER eaten whale meat. They don't like it. And they don't want it. And this report was done BY japanese people, about japanese people, FOR japanese people, and published right in the Japanese media.

    So, it's actually ONEVIKE who is trying to force HIS view about pro-eating whale meat ONTO Japanese people.

    Once again, Japan is largely buddhist and shinto. Which regard all life as sacred. In fact, many buddhists, and asians overall, are even vegetarian. The highest percentage perhaps in the world. So eating whale meat is AGAINST Japanese culture. OneVike and pro-whalers are actually against Japan's culture, and forcing their views onto the Japanese people, the majority of whom DO NOT want to have anything to do with whalemeat.

    -

    In fact, eating meat was BANNED for over 1,200 years by emporial decree in Japan. So that is actual Japanese culture. (Sorry, but Japanese criminal whalers didn't have ddiesel powered 700-ton ships and sail 9-thousand miles all the way down to Ant-arctica 10 thousand years ago and llope whale carcasses 9,000 miles back to Japan in them. The Japanese Whaling Fleet started only AFTER world war 2, and it is a foreign western idea forced upon Japan after they were forced to surrender after World War 2.)

    In fact, if OneVike says 1 more time for meat to be eaten by the people of Japan, then OneVike is actually going AGAINST the will of multiple successions of ruling emperors of Japan. In Japan, the emperor was/is regarded as being divine. So OneVike is actually not only against Japan's religion, and against the will of the people of Japan, he has just defied the Emporial decree of Japan and gone against the will of what Japanese culture considers a deity. This is typical of a pro-whaler like OneVike imposing his foreign western culture onto other people. One more time, the majority of Japan does NOT want or eat whale meat. And encouraging it is facilitating human poisoning of Japanese people.

    OneVike gropes: "Why do whales get to be placed beyond the food chain? Just because you say not to? Not good enough. If you eat meat...you are just as guilty as the Japanese. Stop trying to find some moral high-ground that isn't there. " = WRONG!

    First, I don't eat meat, nor do a lot of Japanese, so any and all bits about saying someone is guilty of it is now obsolete and your claim is now rendered unusable. And once again, the eating of meat was BANNED (by them! not anyone else. Their own culture chose to do that, and you are imposing your will onto their people.) So if you now go and try to bad-mouth not eating meat, you will be actually once again be bad-mouthing Japanese people as well, since they followed a tradition of NOT eating meat for over a thousand years.


    One more time: WHALE MEAT IS POISONED.

    Whale meat is NOT equivalent to pork!

    It further is not even applicable toward those that DO eat meat, because Whale meat is NOT the same as deer, meat loaf, or your hamburger-gristle with the things that feel like a toe-nail in it.

    Once again, whale meat has been found to contain Methyl-Mercuric poison. Ingesting whale meat causes brain tissue damage. It causes organ damage.

    WHO SAYS SO?: Harvard.
    WHO ELSE SAYS SO?: The Japanese Ministry of Health!

    Yes, that's right, Japanese Scientists, and Japanese people, and Japanese citizens, IN JAPAN, including Japanese University research scientists, have ALL found dangerous level of toxic contaminants in whale meat! It has been declared un-fit for human consumption.

    NEWS: EATING WHALE MEAT FOUND TO CAUSE IRREVERSIBLE BRAIN DAMAGE

    "Mercury, a potent neuro-toxin, has been proven to cause irreversible neurological damage with severe cases resulting in coma or death. Even in low concentrations, scientists have found that mercury can cause damage to nervous systems, with developing fetuses and children especially at risk. Recent scientific data have indicated that damage caused by pre-natal exposure to methylmercury may be irreversible and post-natal exposure to methylmercury could cause further developmental problems. The overwhelming evidence of high pollution levels in Japanese whale and dolphin products provides a compelling argument to end the hunts.


    Yet Whalers (being already criminals in the first place) still obtain it, even though 96% of Japanese people DO NOT want to eat it, and the whalers have attempted to sell it into the child's school lunch program.

    What this does, is, now you have whalers pushing contaminated whale meat, to be eaten by children. The methyl mercury, heavy metals, cadmium, selenium, Dioxin compounds, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls then seep into the child's tissues, including into the human brain. Wherein, it stunts human brain growth, causes liver and organ damage, and birth defects.

    NEWS: Whale meat in Japan's child's school lunches found Toxic

    "Samples, bought from Japanese supermarkets had 10-12 times more methyl mercury than allowable human levels.

    "We were shocked that it continued to be served in school lunches," Japanese officials said.

    "Other types of whalemeat are already served in school lunches NATIONWIDE, including in Tokyo."

    Japanese Whalers continue to push the poisoned whale meat to children, the elderly, to the ill in Japan's hospitals, and as Dog food."


    -- Ok. Any Pro-Whaler is essentially ANTI-JAPANESE. A pro-whaler is actually advocating an act that damages Japanese people, including children.


    [And by the way, this is not limited to whale meat in Japan, this applies to whale meat around the globe too. Including Norway, Faroe islands, etc. Eating whale meat at all, can result in human damage.]

    NEWS: Nordic Whaling Panel rules Whale meat unfit for human consumption"

    "A Norsk Scientific panel has ruled that meat from minke whales contained dangerous levels of chemicals & PCBs 10-1000 x higher than even fish, Monday."

    "Our advice is not to eat whale meat," due to the impact on child's brains, said Janneche Utne Skaare, deputy director of the Nordic Natl Institute.

    "Japan, Norway, & Denmark have issued advisories against eating whale meat because of brain damage due to toxic mercury."

    NEWS: JAPANESE OFFICIALS CONFIRM WHALE MEAT TO BE TOXIC

    "Japanese officials announced laboratory test of cetacean meat at a press conference. "We tested meat samples bought at supermarkets in Japan, the Japan Times said. Whale & Dolphin meat had mercury content 10 TIMES above Japan Health Ministry's advisory limit, while the methylmercury content was 10.3 TIMES over the Japanese human limit. Other samples found 16x & 12x above Human safety."

    - That is straight out of the Japan Times. Japanese News. So any pro-whaler who attempts to downplay, deny, ridicule, or otherwise mock the results and confirmation that whale meat contains toxins, has just ridiculed Japan, Japanese people, and Japanese scientists as well. (University caliber scientists, not debunked whale scientists)

    (And Remember, the very whalers that pro-whalers like OneVike are sticking up for, are also supposed-whale-scientists. So when OneVike pooh-pooh'd "scientists" above, he unwittingly mocked the "profession" of the same people he thinks he was sticking up for. Not the most perceptive move. But then pro-whalers are not that bright-especially if they've eaten whale meat, too (which actually does damage the brain and eat away at the brain's cognitive capacity.)


    Any Pro-Whaler, siding with a tiny minority sect of fanatic Japanese whale killers, who number merely a handful, and whom the majority of the 128 million citizens of japan are against, is simply rooting for a small bit of criminals, against the Majority of Japan and its people.

    Pro-Whalers force their unwanted righteous ideology onto Japan and other cultures, and Pro-Whalers hurt Japanese people, their families, and children. Anyone advocating whale meat, nay, anyone even negligent and neglecting to do EVERYTHING in their power to STOP human ingestion of whale meat is aiding the poisoning of thousands and thousands of human lives, including Japan's children:

    MEWS ARTICLE: "SALE OF CONTAMINATED WHALE PRODUCTS PUTS JAPANESE CONSUMERS AT RISK"

    Press Release: 24 June

    Washington, DC: "Japanese company Ito-Yokado is putting Japan’s health at risk selling contaminated whale & dolphin meat (all cetacean products) found containing high levels of mercury and methylmercury in their stores"

    "Chemical analysis showed levels of methyl-mercury that far exceeded the Japanese Govt’s Legal limits, exceeding by nearly 15x the fish, seafood & allowable levels."

    --- This is what OneVike, Bean, "billy", and all other pro-whalers are cheering for and promoting. Forcing their ideology and consumption of meat, including that which has been found to be toxic, onto Asian Japanese culture, and hurting their loved ones. Even the Japanese Health ministry has declared it unfit. Yet whalers continue to attempt to entice children to eat it.


    NEWS: "Faroese Chief Health Officials tell public: "stop eating whale meat."

    "Chief national medical officers today said Whales should be considered unfit for human consumption. Research showed humans who have eaten whale meat developed severe Neurological (brain) damage.

    The data revealed damage to the human brain, impaired brain function, Parkinson's disease, & penile dysfunction & infertility in adults. The new data also includes data from residents of the Faroe islands, near Norway."


    And just when you think that the extremist Japanese Whalers and their cronies couldn't sink to any lower level, Japanese Whalers are now attempting to push piles of contaminated whale meat to hospitals, for ingestion by citizens who are already in a weakened state of health, potentially sickening them and bodily poisoning them even worse, and as if infecting children's school lunches wasn't enough, Japanese whalers are now pushing to unload their stockpiles of massive mounds of un-eaten whale meat off not only as dogfood, but feeding that same tainted meat to elderyly care facilities, hurting old people in Japan.


    Again, and for the last time.

    Paul Watson and the Sea Shepherd are terrorists, AUTHOROTY may not like it, but facts are facts. I do not more then he does by finding information to support myt side as he does. The problem is he is attempting to rationalize evil and outlawed behavior

    The fact remains that Paul Watson is a criminal and even Paul Watson admits it. What the whalers are doing is legal, you may not like it, but do not attempt equalize your rants with that of God fearing conservatives. You do not even know what a conservative is. You are a tree hugging liberal who wants to make a terrorist seem like a normal American loving person. The guy hates America and he hates all things about America.

    I will not get in a tit for tat with a radical who thinks breaking the law and endangering lives is what good old American conservatism is. Plus, anyone who supports the antics of Watson and his group are no better then he is, a terrorist or at least a supporter of terrorism. that includes both you Jack and Saops, sorry but of the shoe fits then wear it.

    The problem AUTHORITY and his eco-terrorists friends are going to come face to face with the video evidence that their lasers attempting to keep from being documented. If you don't like the truth then just watch the Whale Wars on the Discovery channel, it really does show who the aggressor in this war is, and it is not the Whalers.

    By the way, both the whalers and the terrorists group, the Sea Shepherd, are both getting royalty checks from the Discovery Channel that is documenting the aggression by the Terrorists. You will plainly see who the real culprits are.

    Jack, you need to lay aside your heart, because mans heart is notoriously wrong most of the time. You need to get back to using your brain instead when looking at this whole situation. You are beginning to come off like a environmental, animal hugging, terrorist loving individual who is way too emotional to be rational. Why else would you support a group that is banned from setting foot in almost 60 countries around the world because they Are classified as a terrorist group like "ELF" and "Earth First"?

    Again, what would you do if you were in the middle of the ocean enjoying a nice fishing outing (regardless of what you were fishing for) and a ship flying the Jolly Roger's Cross and Bones flag came upon you? Think about it, any ship in the ocean that sees another ship flying the Jolly Roger, will automatically have the same reaction as an African American might have to a pick-up truck that os carrying the confederate flag. Why would an innocent peaceful loving group even have such a flag, except to put fear into a shop they are coming upon.

    Do you people not have a brain? Naw, I really don't think you do, because you keep supporting behavior that you normally would condemn, but that is ok to you, because the ends justifies the means with you.

    And that my friend is the way a true socialist thinks. As I said if the shoe fits.

    I think the following article sums up my feelings and I will not say anymore on this subject.

    This was written by someone on another blog, but I can relate to most of it: "I am thoroughly against whaling for the sheer beauty, preciousness and level of consciousness (my opinion) of whales, and that certainly includes Inuit slowly killing a 150 year old bowhead in the name of tradition, or Færøerne islanders ritually slaughtering a pod of pilots on an annual basis. I was impressed with Greenpeace in the 70's, but I am no longer, although I sometimes appreciate them; it is now an institutionalised hierarchy, more than a group of defiant idealists. This is the reason that Sea Shephard branched off, but I fear it was the too millitant fraction. They were not so much distrought by the relative demise of idealism within the organisation, but moreover by the organisation coming to terms (like a child growing up) with the fact that working from within the system they wish to change (influencing legisation etc.) gives a much greater result than alienating the moderate middle ground masses. The latter wish the best for their kids and such, and are easily mongered into fear. They should, however, fear the results of the mindless exploitation of our homeworld, not the extreme actions that in practical terms could threaten human life, which is where Sea Shepherd probably misses the point." I like this thought and I also like very much what K had to say.

    "I do not more then he does by finding information to support myt side as he does."

    Well, assuming what you meant in this broken sentence is you feel you bring more to the argument than authority has, that's pretty funny. Any rational person, liberal or conservative, reading this thread knows who made the better argument. One of you actually addressed the issue, the other just seemed to want to pick a fight between "God fearing conservatives" and "tree-hugging liberals." You should have just stopped at Paul Watson is a criminal and I don't like criminals. Then your complete lack of depth of knowledge of the issue wouldn't have been such an issue.

    The fact that the original post was so full of misinformation and the fact that you admit your own lies when you say things like, "So I guess in my attempt to show the Sea Shepherd terrorists as being extreme by using extreme descriptions for the smelly bombs effects on humans, was actually a lot closer to the truth then I thought." makes me surprised AUTHORITY even bothered with you or why anyone would care about what you have to say about anything.

    Now that the tsunami has passed, it seems the disagreement revolves around whether there exists a higher law than human law.

    I believe almost everyone on Post Scripts agrees on the concept, just not on who or what exactly that higher authority is.

    Mark

    Well said Mark.

    "angry meddlesome activists"

    No reason to read beyond this ass bite statement.

    "Think about it, any ship in the ocean that sees another ship flying the Jolly Roger, will automatically have the same reaction as an African American might have to a pick-up truck that os carrying the confederate flag."

    Good point, OV. Symbols have enormous power.

    It's too bad that Authority is relying on the old "Why do you HATE! AMERICA!" tactic, because otherwise his argument might be stronger. As it is, he is making a lot of wild leaps of logic, which weakens his points.

    After reading the evidence from both sides, I have decided that I don't like the whalers or the extremists of the Sea Shepherd very much. Hopefully more moderate and sane groups can help raise awareness of the many problems that whaling results in, and hopefully it will be outlawed in Japan soon. But until then, I do not support the tactics of the Sea Shepherd or of anyone else who uses such extreme measures.

    Hopefully more moderate and sane groups can help raise awareness of the many problems that whaling results in, and hopefully it will be outlawed in Japan soon. But until then, I do not support the tactics of the Sea Shepherd or of anyone else who uses such extreme measures.

    I agree. As I have stated, I do not agree with the whalers, but I really dislike those who would use tactics that put any humans in danger of bodily harm or death. Look at this video and you will see that the Sea Shepherd is attempting to sink the whaling ship which most likely will end up killing humans. And under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (CLOS) of December 10, 1982 Article 101 that is clearly defined as an act of aggression and piracy.

    Those who support the Sea Shepherd group, regardless of the reason, is then in my opinion no better then those who support the pro-life abortion protester who shoot and kill abortion doctors. In my opinion Paul Watson belongs in prison, right next to the murderous anti abortion slayers, and you know how regardless for the reason I am anti-abortion.

    If people do not like something then change it within the confines of the law. When society fails to condemn terrorist acts that are tantamount to declaring war on the high seas, well then our society will inevitably fall into anarchy and no one will win.

    Accusing me of making up all the comments up is ridiculous because they do not all follow the same type of syntax in their use use of words, phrases, clauses, and sentences. The the very idea that they support one individuals side is obvious from the same mindset of the people where the source of the readers are coming from. For quite some time I have been asked to take posted comments made to another blog to this one. I began getting requests a long time ago when you first changed software and had all the problems with users getting through. Well they just continued asking me to do so and I have.

    As to email addresses I can tell you for a fact that most people do not give their real email address just as I don't when I post comments to many places because I do not want everyone to be loading my box with emails. I guess you will now try to say I am using a fake email address so I am not real also, well sorry but I prefer to use anonymous@yahoo.com in this case to prove. And as I said I do this to many many sites I post comments to because I don't want to be flooded with any emails, but spam guard security requires an email address. So I use what ever will get me past the security as I and billions of users all over the world do when surfing.

    Guess what, I have also submitted articles by various individuals who did not want to be involved in the process but asked that I edit their work for consideration of your front page policy. Maybe you should now go back and delete the articles that have been submitted and published by PS. Next time ask someone why they are doing what they are doing before you go off and accusing. You might find a reasonable answer, but you never once inquired, you just assumed.


    By the way, I am submitting this by the same pc I have submitted earlier comments with. I would bet your statistical tracking software does not match it to any others. That would be because I have forgotten more about programming and pc's then you know. If I wanted to hide the fact that I was posting comments for others I would have succeeded. But I was not trying to pull a fast one.

    I don't know why you are assuming I am talking about you, whoever you are, I never mentioned a name and I will never mention a name. In fact I have removed my previous posts on this subject as they no longer serve any purpose except to possibly embarrass the offender and that was not my objective. My objective was merely to ask politely that the fake posts stop.

    Next, and since you brought it up, people who dogmatically think they are NEVER wrong, who are highly defensive and highly critical of others and think they are smarter than ever one else in the room are either a dangerous narcissist or they are covering up for their own insecurities. That is an observation from my considerable life experience, you don't have to take it personal.

    In closing (and I really hope we can close) I only ask that we move on and remember to treat fellow commenters with respect for their opinions. Feel free to disagree, just be respectful. That is the highest and most productive form of dialog and it speaks better of you as a person than if you resort to name calling and personal attacks.

    "Accusing me of making up all the comments up is ridiculous because they do not all follow the same type of syntax in their use use of words, phrases, clauses, and sentences." Not to you perhaps, but to one who has been schooled in such things they do. Don't forget I am a retired criminal investigator. ; )

    Do you really want me to prove that I did not come up with all those comments? Because if you really want to go there I will.

    I can prove beyond a shadow of any doubt that I did NOT write those comments. They are all from separate individuals.

    Your Call.

    Anonymous, you can do whatever you want, but as far as I am concerned this case is closed.

    While I agree with Post Scrips for the most part, it would have behooved him to do a little more research. Japan is NOT the only country currently whaling...Norway, Iceland and a few others, if I am not mistaken..

    That being said, Sea Shepherd is most definately a TERRORIST organization, and we are working to get their U.S. tax exempt status pulled.

    Carry on ...

    whale meat is poisoned... sorry pookie, wrong whales...you really shouldn't cherry pick your news,toothed whales, and other TOP OF THE CHAIN animals provide the wells for metyl-mercury content, not the baleens.
    whaling ruled a federal crime... it sure is, in the US and its possessions. NOT in international waters, nor in territorial waters of those that decline to be members of the VOLUNTARY organization called IWC, the same IWC that the UN defers to for all matters whaling. Australia also ruled it illegal to whale in Aus waters. but since the Antarctic waters are international, that law has as much effect as the US laws..
    Whalers wanted on Federal charges... really ? what country has warrants out for them?
    Japan whales in australian waters... you mean the EEZ that aus tries to claim in violation of the ATS ? the zone that is only recognized by 4 countries (the other 4 making claims in antactica BTW) try again...
    let us now just put some of his words on here verbatim...

    Any person who is FOR whalers is AGAINST Japanese people.
    Any person who is AGAINST illegal whalers is the FRIEND of 96% of the Japanese people.
    Any person who touts the whalers, is rooting for an illegal criminal poaching operation which is violating other nations sovereign territorial waters, conducting killings, and any person supporting whalers is cheering for child poisoning.
    Any person who is on the side of Sea Shepherd is helping to save Japanese citizens, helping Japanese children, and preventing illegal whalers from causing more Human Death.

    he goes on to spew more sewage, but I'll stop now.

    It is my OPINION he pasted such long winded diatribes to deflect most from responding to his idiocy.
    He did not post any links to validate his posts, as I havent either. Except for this one. It's the Animal Planet pages for the controversy. From there, those that are truly interested in the TRUTH will manage, those that are already addicted to watsons koolaid will neither go, nor pursue anything other than what they already believe, so wat would be the point.I'm not doing this to change their minds, I'm merely putting up the truth for those that really DO want to know.
    http://animal.discovery.com/tv/whale-wars/legal-debate/

    The Sea Shepherd is most definitely a terriorist organization. They shuld be stopped! I do Not understand how any country would allow this terriorist organization to fly their flag.

    The Sea Shepherds are terrorist. It does not matter if the Japanese are illegally whaling; that does not give the Sea Shepherds the right to illegally board Japanese vessels and to assault Japanese crew members. The Sea Shepherds are trying to elevate the importance of organization to a quasi law enforcement organization. If anyone can board the vessel of any organization you disagree with does that mean that I can round up a crew and attack and board the Sea Shepherd vessels. I do not support whaling but I also do not support the criminal activities of the Sea Shepherds. It is disgraceful that the United States has not taken steps to end this terrorist organization. Bob Barker and everyone else that donates to this terrorist organization are grossly misguided.

    I agree, there should generally be no boarding and no assaults, just video time and location and report it to the proper authorities, like the UN and Japanese government.

    However, that being said, there is a point of law that says if you catch someone in the midst of committing a major crime, you as a citizen, have the right and a duty to stop said crime using the minimum of force necessary.

    What if it were a bank robbery or the theft of your neighbors car, would intervening by force be a terroristic act?

    If you saw an innocent woman being attacked by a thug and you took a baseball bat to him and chased him away, the law is quite clear that you can't be sued and you acted appropriately.

    Exactly what the crime of illegal whaling allows one to do as a good citizen is unclear at least in my mind, but if a ship were caught within a whale sanctuary killing whales right and left, a person of good conscience might be inclined to both report it and take some intervention action to stop it. I'm sure you can understand that, right?

    Your analogy of an innocent woman being attacked demonstrates one reason why the Sea Shepherds are so polarizing. Comparing whaling to an attack on woman is not an apples to apples comparison but I believe the Sea Shepherds would see it as a fair comparison. If it were a similar comparison then the international community would immediately end all whaling. The debate could go on from now until the end of time and those that believe that the Japanese are committing a crime will likely always believe so. I do not believe the Japanese are committing a crime and the "law" that people refer to as justification for the Sea Shepherd attacks is not as cogent as Sea Shepherd supporters would have you believe. The Japanese whalers are working. They have families to feed. If what they are doing is a crime then actions should be taken through the appropriate legislation to stop what they are doing. But, stopping the Japanese should not be left to a group like the Sea Shepherds. I was initially strongly opposed to the Japanese whalers; however, the more I view the illegal tactics of the Sea Shepherds the more I support the Japanese (although not their whaling) when they are confronted by the Sea Shepherds.

    This "Sea Shepherd" group is very interesting...It's odd how they are able to get away with damaging other peoples property without have actions taken against them. I would love to watch an episode where the U.S. or Japaneese Navy go at and destroy the Sea Shepherds Pirate Fleet...that would be true T.V. entertainment... Good luck Capt.

    Thank you "other guy" for your clever comments, but didn't you leave out something? How about the reason there is a ship called the Sea Shepherd? Taking a wild guess, would that be because the Japanese whaling fleet are themselves behaving as pirates? Would it be because the Japanes whalters are raiding marine sanctuaries for booty? Would it be because the Japanese are violating international law, breaking treaties and threatening a protected species of highly intelligent mamals?

    You're not very balanced in your opinion, is that because you,are not very well informed?

    Sink the sea shepard and all the rich supporters with it..

    What gives you or anyone else the right to say that the whale should just be killed but the safety of humans is a TOP issue
    what makes people think that animals are better then people? the fact we are smarter? you are a retard if you think intelligence gives us the right to live but kill other animals. we need to hunt to live, but that gives us no right to say we'ere smarter so our lives are more important, Lets stab you in the back with a harpoon i wonder't if it will hurt any more that if we did it to a whale because we are smarter. Humans are animals to the only difference is we are smarter, but we are animals all the same, so get your head out of your ass and stop saying because we know how to make tools we are smarter

    Thank you for sharing your opinion here on Post Scripts, Sebastian. Those who hunt the animal for food and oils are following an ancient tradition of doing what is necessary for survival. Whales are hunters too. Those who believe in God have respect for the animal that feeds and clothes them and take authority from their maker. Others respect the laws of man that give them the right to hunt the whale. Humans are smarter than other animals, that doesn't mean we always behave wisely. We are also beings; we have a soul.

    We support and believe in the rule of law, which includes protecting the rights of those who hunt lawfully and which should punish those who destroy the property of others through activities that run outside the law.

    Tina for the editors

    oneVake or whatever your name is, you're the most ignorant and pathetic excuse for a human being I've seen in quite some time now! Calling those protecting the innocent 'terrorists' lol? Killing a whale take from 25 to 45mins. of unbearable suffering. Scum like you deserve same fate. I hope you and all your miserable lowlife supporters here face same end as poor whales.

    Paul Watson is on interpols wanted list. I seriously doubt he has the authority to participate in any kind of law enforcement. Furthermore, I seriously doubt authority has done little more than lie and produce radically biased and possibly fake articles to support an obviously terrorist organization. D montgomery, you don't sound like a very high quality human being yourself, I hope no one wishes the same fate on you.

    Forgive, my poor grammar/spelling. I'm not quite used to this iPad.

    Thanks for that BK. You know PS is the perfect place to practice with your ipad! So send us more of your thoughts.

    I just came across this stupid website and article and i am amazed by the comments from both sides. Speacilly this "One Vike" person ( perhaps a Japanese d-bag.
    So first of all, are you saying (February 10/10, 3:31pm), that the japs are hunting and killing whales so they won't starve or do they give the meat to "Humans all over the world " from the goodness of their hearts? Do you have any idea how much they charge for 1kg of whale meat?
    Second, when was the last time you used your divine powers and talked to God?did he personally tell you that we are here to "manage the earth"? Who the hell do you think we are and what qualifies us to manage the earth and its creatures?
    Remember this, just be cause something istradition or legal or normal, doesn't mean it is right.

    Titan, I'm afraid OneVike is 100% American-made. I doubt the Japanese could ever produce such a model. Take that as you may.

    Leave a comment

    Advertisement


    Categories

    More NorCalBlog Entries

    About this Entry

    This page contains a single entry by Post Scripts published on February 10, 2010 9:52 AM.

    Health Care - Go or No? was the previous entry in this blog.

    Jobs? President Loves Hoops - Congress, Bets on the Game is the next entry in this blog.

    Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.