by Bud. . .
SWARMING…as happened on Black Friday in 2012, when 100’s swarmed a Wal-Mart and rendered helpless the Wal-Mart staff, the Swarmers stole what they wished and left before the police arrived, is on again, internationally.
It looks like the Wal-Mart Swarming has been good training for: 160,000+ illegals who [-‘Swarmed’ our U.S. Southern Border, throughout 2012 and 2013-]. I S I L who [-‘Swarmed’ into Iraq from Syria 2+ months ago-], Omar Gonzales who [-‘Swarmed’ alone this last Friday right through the White House front door-] and the Iranian Shi’a Militia who [-‘Swarmed’ all last week into the Yemeni Capitol, Sana, Yemen, and have a pretty firm grip on the deposed government, so far today-].
So,
-160,000+ illegals [-mostly youngsters-] have Swarmed our southern border since the Wal-Mart ‘Swarms’ were broadcast around the world in 2012. They continue Swarming today and current estimates are that another 30-60,000+ have been successful so far in 2014.
–I S I L Forces Swarmed a vast region of Northern Iraq from/in Eastern Syria. They were successful in overwhelming any opposition and now control vast swaths of those 2 countries territories and they are setting up a new country/nation state.
—Omar Gonzales [-a demented, Iraq war vet-] jumped the White House fence and succeeded Swarming across the WH lawns [-alone-] and got inside the White House before the U.S. Secret Service finally apprehended him. He should have been killed on the spot by U.S. Secret Service Agents before he reached the WH front doors.
—-An Iran backed, Shiite Militia Swarmed the capitol of Yemen and are trying to take over the entire country today. The Yemeni Prime Minister has resigned. Yemen is being taken over as I write this.
[AP]…9/21-2014, SANA, Yemen — An assault on Yemen’s capital rocked the transitional government on Sunday as fighters from a Shiite rebel group seized official buildings, and in the face of the violence, the military showed signs of splitting apart and the prime minister abruptly resigned. The rebels, known as the Houthis and armed with automatic rifles and artillery mounted on trucks, battled security forces in the streets, with shells exploding around contested military facilities in the center of Sana, the capital. News reports said at least 140 had died in the past four days of fighting.
This new WAL-MART SWARMING tactic has proven very successful. It is defeating the U.S. Border Patrol as I write this. It has already defeated Wal-Marts, the Iraqi Army, the U.S. Secret Service and the Yemeni Security Services.
Now, let’s see….
-Our President has tabled his planned, Executive mandating for Immigration Reform blaming the U.S. Congress for inaction. The House has brought forward many Bills but they’ve all died in the Senate ‘he’ controls.? And he’s tabled his Executive Order, nonsensical plans until after the mid-term elections, fearing a political backlash. All while 1000’s of illegal’s continue to pour into the U.S. over our southern border. Perhaps some terrorists among them.
–Our President is seemingly trying to deal with I S I L…but his plans seem severely muddied by his muddling. The bad guys are growing ever more emboldened by the hour while Obama vacations again in Camp David this weekend after a long vacation at Martha’s Vineyard, MA.
—Our President issued a statement from Camp David yesterday, where he and his family are vacationing this weekend. He talked about Mr. Gonzales jumping the fence and illegally entering the White House stating, “I have the utmost confidence in the Secret Service”.
NOTE: Obama should have fired the Secret Service Director, Julia Pierson, instantly as this absurd data unfolded, after Gonzales got into the White House. Again, no action by Mr. Obama…even on this severe security breach.?
—-Our President has yet to talk [-today-] to the American people about potentially, the most SERIOUS international security crisis of his Presidency. That being the invasion/Swarming of Yemen and the ongoing attempts to overthrow of the Yemeni Government. Iran could now control the Suez Canal if this overthrow, that has been ongoing for days, is successful. Shiite’s vs Sunni’s vs the world…et al..?
[AP]…9/21-2014, SANA, Yemen, The Iran backed, Shiite rebels, known as the Houthis and armed with automatic rifles and artillery mounted on trucks, battled Yemen security forces in the streets, with shells exploding around contested military facilities in the center of Sana, the capital. News reports said at least 140 had died in the past four days of fighting. A cease fire has been hastily arranged for today.
Illegal’s, I S I L, Mr. Gonzales and Iran must be laughing their asses off at U.S. ineptitude and lack of resolve to just talk and stop nothing. Ignorance and surly ineptitude, coupled with arrogance and egomaniacal behavior rules our White House now. Messiah Obama has lost his luster and is in a state of panic, hunkered down inside Camp David with his family.
Rumor [-only-] has it….that….WAL-MART SWARMING…will be incorporated in all gang and terror training throughout the world now. This will assure the bad guys of being able to overwhelm all police and military defense forces. The 2012, Wal-Mart Swarm security tapes are being sold by the hundreds. That even street gangs are using them for training purposes..?
‘`Swarm City`’…so says Social Media, the modern `weapon` of mass destruction.
Mr. Obama is strangely silent again. Not even a Tweet or Text..!
Presidential leadership is dead in America. D E A D…!
Tweet-tweet..~ !
Del W. ‘Bud’ Biddle
Chief of Police, CA-r
Bull Lake, Montana
Bees Swarm Here Is All
Stink Bugs Have Hatched
Clear, Sunny, 72F, Ahhh…!
Three Afghan Soldiers in U.S. for Training Reported Missing From Cape Cod Base:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/09/21/three-afghan-soldiers-in-u-s-for-training-reported-missing-from-cape-cod-base/
Woman Brutally Breaks Up With a Man We’re All Familiar With, And She’s Not the Only One Who Wants To:
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/09/179982-brutal-break-video-might-make-wonder-really-launched-war-women/
The term “illegals” is dehumanizing. The term “illegal’s,” used as a pluralization, is just illiterate.
Chris, is using the term “criminal” and “felon” for individuals who have broken our laws “dehumanizing?”
Would you prefer those who cross our borders the first time be called criminals and those who are deported and return be called felons, as defined by our laws?
Using the word “Illegal/s” defines individuals who have broken our laws before charges have been filled or verdicts rendered. I see no problems with it and see it as just more PC push to not call things as they are in order to gain political advantage.
Tina: “Chris, is using the term “criminal” and “felon” for individuals who have broken our laws “dehumanizing?””
No. Someone who has committed a crime is a criminal. That is well understood and applies to violators of all laws. The term “illegals” singles out one group of lawbreakers in a dehumanizing way–their illegal action is portrayed as who they are, not what they’ve done.
“Would you prefer those who cross our borders the first time be called criminals and those who are deported and return be called felons, as defined by our laws?”
I actually would! Except that, technically, illegal immigration is a civil offense or misdemeanor, not a crime/felony. So this would be inaccurate, but it wouldn’t be dehumanizing. The term “illegal,” used as a noun, sounds as if one is calling a person’s existence illegal.
Bud must own Wal-Mart stock. But this …
“Rumor [-only-] has it….that….WAL-MART SWARMING…will be incorporated in all gang and terror training throughout the world now.”
… is just silly.
Chris, it was me and not Tina who wrote the above.
So, you’re saying those who came across our borders illegally didn’t break our laws? Is that right?
Oh, but then you say what they did was illegal. “their illegal action is portrayed as who they” An upstanding business man who breaks our laws is called a criminal or felon whether he has a white collar or not. Is this dehumanizing to him?
Your argument makes no sense. Most of us are good people to some extent. Those of us who break the law carry the name for the criminal act we committed whether it’s dehumanizing or not. That’s just life.
For the record, an illegal immigrant who is caught in the US is classified a “criminal” for the civil offence and deported. If they return it is a federal offence and classified a felon.
Chris that was Peggy but since she has already weighed in I will respond to your PC complaint. The term is nothing more than a more humane short hand for discussion purposes than others that were used through the years that were much more derogatory in nature. It refers to people that have not used the legal means to enter the country.
Insisting that this short hand is dehumanizing represents a political ploy meant to demonize anyone who objects (Republicans mostly) to illegal-entry-law-breakers as uncaring insensitive racist.
It matters not what words are used, progressives will find a way to fabricate an offense.
“The term “illegal,” used as a noun, sounds as if one is calling a person’s existence illegal.”
Sure…lots of people think that when they hear it…don’t they?
No! Even people who are here illegally had to have it explained to them so they would know to be offended.
No one has offered an alternative to this word. In conversation, Chris, what word would you use to describe people who have come into our country illegally?
Peggy, my apologies; I knew it was you, but for some reason typed the name wrong.
“So, you’re saying those who came across our borders illegally didn’t break our laws? Is that right?”
No, I am saying that not all lawbreakers are classified as criminals.
“Oh, but then you say what they did was illegal.”
Yes, but not technically criminal. Again, this is merely a technical distinction, and like I said I don’t have much of a problem with people calling undocumented immigrants criminals. It’s at least better than “illegals.”
“An upstanding business man who breaks our laws is called a criminal or felon whether he has a white collar or not. Is this dehumanizing to him?”
No. I just said the term criminal is not dehumanizing.
“For the record, an illegal immigrant who is caught in the US is classified a “criminal” for the civil offence and deported.”
Can you back up this claim? PJ Media says otherwise:
“And who better to set me straight than someone who would have to be considered an expert on the enforcement of immigration law? Assistant Homeland Security Secretary John Morton is currently head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. A former federal prosecutor, Morton is no squishy liberal and he doesn’t take lawbreakers lightly. Yet, when I asked him during a recent interview whether illegal immigrants are de facto criminals, he answered: “Not necessarily.” It all depends, he said, on the specific circumstances of any one case. The thing to keep in mind is that the laws governing who is allowed to enter the country and under what circumstances aren’t criminal statutes.
“The immigration laws are civil in nature,” Morton said. “There are criminal immigration offenses but mainly they are misdemeanors in most instances, although a lot are serious felonies. For example, if you enter the country on a visa and you overstay your visa, that is a civil but not a criminal offense. There is some overlap. Sometimes you are here unlawfully and you’re also guilty of a crime. But it is not one to one.”
http://pjmedia.com/blog/illegal-aliens-are-not-criminals/
Tina: “No one has offered an alternative to this word.”
Why do you say things which you and I both know are not true? You can’t possible be unfamiliar with the term “undocumented immigrant.”
Undocumented immigrant is fine but not useful as short hand which is the reason people used illegals in the first place. Maybe we could shorten it to UI…will it catch on? (Shrug)
Tell you what, you go ahead and keep track of all the PC rules and infractions and the rest of us will continue to look at what it takes to get border control working.
When Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi is still languishing in a Mexican jail I have to say whether we call them illegals or UI’s is of little consequence or importance. There are bigger issues to address.
When is the last time you have been on the Border? ya know I own a Border patrol Shirt for a reason even though I do not use it now.
We have been beefing up the Border for a long time and continue. But why do they come here? What impact did NAFTA have on Mexico?
What effect are Corporate rules and austerity having on south America?
Look at the problem and solutions, to be honest, Chris made a point. That’s All
#8 Chris: “Can you back up this claim? PJ Media says otherwise:”
Sure. Here’s what I found.
Re-entry after Deportation:
“Illegal re-entry is a felony.
After an alien has been removed from the US, and that alien re-enters (or is found in) the country without approval of the government, it is a felony under federal criminal law.”
http://www.alipac.us/f9/re-entry-after-deportation-207555/
Illegal Reentry into the U.S. After Removal: Crime and Punishment:
“After an alien has been legally “removed” from the United States, federal criminal law makes it a felony for that alien to reenter (or be found in) the country without approval of the government. What Constitutes “Illegal Reentry”? Under the applicable federal criminal statute, the Immigration and Nationality Act, it is not merely illegal reentry after removal that constitutes the crime. Rather, the law applies to any alien who reenters the U.S. or is found within the country, without government approval, after having been: Denied admission to the U.S.; Excluded from the U.S.; Deported from the U.S.; Removed from the U.S.; or Departed from the U.S. while an order of exclusion, deportation, or removal is outstanding. Penalties for Illegal Reentry Under relevant federal statutes, an alien who commits illegal reentry as described above will be punished with: A fine; or Imprisonment for not more than two years; or Both fine and imprisonment. Penalty Enhancements for Prior Criminal Convictions If the alien reenters or is found in the U.S. without government approval, after a criminal felony conviction for a non-aggravated felony, or after three or more misdemeanor convictions for drug-related crimes or crimes against persons, he or she is subject punishment by: A fine; or Imprisonment for not more than 10 years; or Both fine and imprisonment For aliens reentering or found in the U.S. without government approval, after a criminal conviction for an aggravated felony, the statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 20 years. Other criminal penalty increases may be imposed for aliens who have been removed after certain kinds of incarceration, and aliens deemed to be associated with terrorism.”
See more at: http://immigration.findlaw.com/deportation-removal/illegal-reentry-into-the-u-s-after-removal-crime-and-punishment.html#sthash.ZE9lkaU0.dpuf
1912 8 U.S.C. § 1326—Reentry After Deportation (Removal):
http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01912.htm
What affect did NAFTA have on Mexico?
What corporate rules…what austerity?
Dewey you list problems but you do not define them or explain what you think would be better. Try to focus on one issue and give a little detail.
Peggy, that’s re-entry, which isn’t what you originally said:
“For the record, an illegal immigrant who is caught in the US is classified a “criminal” for the civil offence and deported.”
Sorry Chris, I thought you were questioning the “felony” charge if they reentered after being deported.
I wrote, “For the record, an illegal immigrant who is caught in the US is classified a “criminal” for the civil offence and deported. If they return it is a federal offence and classified a felon.”
I was using “criminal” by definition, not legal language.
Definition of Criminal:
1 – crim·i·nal adjective \ˈkri-mə-nəl, ˈkrim-nəl\
: involving illegal activity : relating to crime
: relating to laws that describe crimes rather than to laws about a person’s rights
: morally wrong
Full Definition of CRIMINAL:
1: relating to, involving, or being a crime
2: relating to crime or to the prosecution of suspects in a crime
3: guilty of crime; also : of or befitting a criminal
4: disgraceful
I did clearly refer to the illegal immigrant as a individual who committed a “civil” crime which by Webster’s definition would make them a “criminal” for the first offense.
Legal definitions may differ from Webster’s, but since I’m not an attorney I would not attempt to define the difference. Instead I will try to express my opinions and thoughts from a lay-person’s point of view and leave the legal language to the experts.
Oops, forgot the Webster link.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/criminal