Why Hillary Should Fold Up Her Campaign Tent

When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.

Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a little probing led to the discovered of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

Many younger votes will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.

Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense. Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle was:

She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.

She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.

Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for ‘lying under oath’ to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.

After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.

What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type low-life mess?

Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next. But to her loyal fans – “what difference does it make?”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Why Hillary Should Fold Up Her Campaign Tent

  1. Peggy says:

    The Last Days of Hillary:

    “Hillary Clinton’s worst punishment will be her failure.”

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/259944/last-days-hillary-daniel-greenfield#.VeCXpLXp-Xs.facebook

  2. Tina says:

    A good accounting of Hillary’s “resume.”

    The word used most to describe her in that Quinnipiac poll, liar, only scratches the surface. Some of the other negative responses include: sneaky, conniving, unqualified, deceitful, phony, crooked, manipulative, and slimy. There are some positive words. Words, which of course I scoff at, like brilliant, competent and dependable. But Jacks article, and her record since she became Secretary of State, pretty much blasts those descriptors out of the water.

  3. Tina says:

    Considering they are all radical socialists it’s not surprising, Jack.

    Hillary’s baggage is obvious. Biden’s past plagiarism and foot in mouth disease would follow him into the race. According to VoteSmart the current views of the third candidate, Sanders, are not forthcoming at the present. But his record on immigration alone spell out immigration policy disaster. He is also a staunch greenie and big government guy.
    Elizabeth Warren is about as deceitful and radical left as any of the others.

    Democrats don’t have much of a choice.

  4. J. Soden says:

    $hrilLIARy was famous for her legendary tantrums in the white house during Bubba’s reign. Just ask the Secret Service folks . . .
    Can you just imagine the kind of tantrums she must be throwing now that her expected coronation is swirling down the drain???

  5. Peggy says:

    And Martin O’Malley just pissed off Miss Debbie and took out any chance he had of being their candidate.

    Martin O’Malley declares war on Debbie Wasserman-Schultz:

    “After Martin O’Malley’s speech in Minneapolis at the DNC’s summer meeting, it’s safe to say that he’s declared war against the DNC and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. Though it’s likely that O’Malley will walk the statement back, the opening shot will have been sent across Ms. Wasserman-Schultz’s bow. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz responded in kind. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz “spent most of the speech looking down at a table just feet from the governor.” As if that wasn’t icy enough, Ms. Wasserman-Schultz “rarely engaged with the speech or clapped for O’Malley.”

    Unfortunately for Gov. O’Malley, that isn’t the iciest it got. When Gov. O’Malley finished his speech, “he turned away from the podium and seemed to lean in to give a kiss on her cheek to Wasserman-Schultz, who was assuming the lectern. Wasserman-Schultz just looked at him, shook his hand and continued walking to the podium.”

    Ms. Wasserman-Schultz’s response was predictable considering the fact that Gov. O’Malley “charged that the DNC is “circling the wagons” around Hillary Clinton” before saying that “We are the Democratic Party, not the Undemocratic Party.”

    http://www.examiner.com/article/martin-o-malley-declares-war-on-debbie-wasserman-schultz

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.