Important Film: “The THIRD Jihad- Radical Islam’s Vision for America”

Posted by Tina

A new film “narrated by devout Muslim American Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser” “explores the dangers that radical Islam represent to our nation. Rudi Giuliani calls this film a “Wake-UP Call” for America. I call it a the most important film any American will see this year:

The Third Jihad, the newest offering from the producers of the captivating documentary film, Obsession, explores the existence of radical Islam in America and the emerging risk that this “homegrown jihad” poses to national security, western liberties and the “American way of life.”

The film, which is narrated by devout Muslim American Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, opens with the following statement: “This is not a film about Islam. It is about the threat of radical Islam. Only a small percentage of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims are radical. This film is about them.”

In 72 minutes, the film reveals that radical Islamists driven by a religiously motivated rejection of western values cultures and religion are engaging in a multifaceted strategy to overcome the western world. In contrast to the use of “violent jihad” and terror to instill fear in “non-believers,” The Third Jihad introduces the concept of “cultural jihad” as a means to infiltrate and undermine our society from within.

Dr. Jasser is a brave man. We’ve heard about that amateur video that was said to be responsible for a protest that got out of hand in Benghazi. The guy that made that video, a Coptic Christian, was thrown in jail by our government. Rudy Jasser, a devout loyal American Muslim, has placed his life on the line in creating this video. He and his family are now a target for death by jihadist. Sadly, it also makes him a target from the wrath of the current administration.

The film can be purchased here.

Zuhdi Jasser is the president of an American Muslim organization dedicated to freedom:

The American Islamic Forum for Democracy’s (AIFD) mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of the United States Constitution, liberty and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state.

AIFD is the most prominent American Muslim organization directly confronting the ideologies of political Islam and openly countering the common belief that the Muslim faith is inextricably rooted to the concept of the Islamic State (Islamism). Founded by Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, AIFD looks to build the future of Islam through the concepts of liberty and freedom.

AIFD’s mission is derived from a love for America and a love of our faith of Islam. Dr. Jasser and the board of AIFD believe that Muslims can better practice Islam in an environment that protects the rights of an individual to practice their faith as they choose. The theocratic “Islamic” regimes of the Middle East and some Muslim majority nations use Islam as a way to control Muslim populations, not to glorify God as they portend. The purest practice of Islam is one in which Muslims have complete freedom to accept or reject any of the tenants or laws of the faith no different than we enjoy as Americans in this Constitutional republic.(continues)

Jasser has also brought leaders from the American Muslim community together to work toward reforms in the religion and root out radical elements. A wonderful man and a loyal, brave American.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Important Film: “The THIRD Jihad- Radical Islam’s Vision for America”

  1. Pie Guevara says:

    Thank you Post Scripts.

  2. Chris says:

    Tina: ” The guy that made that video, a Coptic Christian, was thrown in jail by our government.”

    Why wouldn’t you tell your readers what he was thrown in jail for? He violated his probation.

    “Sadly, it also makes [Rudy Jasser] a target from the wrath of the current administration.”

    Do you have any evidence for this at all?

  3. Libby says:

    “The Third Jihad introduces the concept of “cultural jihad” as a means to infiltrate and undermine our society from within.”

    So what? ARE you going to be culturally infiltrated?

    I’m not. Why do you get so bent over this sort of thing?

    • Tina says:

      Because, your party leadership doesn’t! Instead they try to convince us that they can love their way out of this mess. And if you’re not the you are one self centered individual…hey as long as your life for the next 20 years or so isn’t affected too much….

      I thought you had some nieces and nephews…you want them living under Sharia, cause that’s the plan, and you folks don’t show much inclination to put a stop to it?

      • Chris says:

        Tina: “Because, your party leadership doesn’t! Instead they try to convince us that they can love their way out of this mess.”

        You think drone strikes on terrorists are a show of “love?”

        “I thought you had some nieces and nephews…you want them living under Sharia, cause that’s the plan, and you folks don’t show much inclination to put a stop to it?”

        Oh, brother. You are like the people in the 50s terrified that their children would live under Communism. It’s not gonna happen, Tina. Calm down.

        • Tina says:

          Drone strikes alone don’t get the job done…and they have been reluctantly and slowly carried out. While Obama diddles around with personally killing a few bad guys, others are trained to take their places and the weak horse, us, becomes a laughable recruiting tool…how the he77 do you think their great expansion of power, their base of operation in three or four nations, their increasing attacks in several countries has happened? Obama is what? A bystander?

          What the heck is wrong with you…it’s all right in front of your eyes!

          “Oh, brother. You are like the people in the 50s terrified that their children would live under Communism. It’s not gonna happen, Tina. Calm down.”

          Chris you are an a$$. Do you think “it didn’t happen” because we embraced communism and imported them by the thousands or because we fought communism and stood for freedom? You guys are embracing multiculturalism to the point of inviting an obvious evil into our midst. Does history mean nothing to you. The German people didn’t believe Hitler and his ugly ideology posed a threat…they thought he was wonderful. Even when he started rounding up Jews they remained in denial. As he marched through France and Italy some of the people in those countries welcomed the takeover. What is it? Do you imagine your ideals will protect you from monsters, or is it that you think you’re somehow that one generation of folks who is special?

          Calm down? How about you start acting like something other than a numb, unconscious, dolt. How about you start telling the truth about the mess we’re in. How about you start noticing the leadership of your party are phony opportunists.

          Calm down? I am calm. Steely calm. Calm enough to know you’re playing a misdirection game. Let’s make this about crazy irrational Tina.

          This is not rage. It is deep, determined compassion and resolve to right this nation and put it back on track. It is impassioned resolve to wake people up to real concerns and situations we don’t have to live with or accept as “the new normal.” This is determined strong push back to Obama progressivism and “fundamental transformation.” I’m contributing my little part to the work that our so-called media will not do.

          • Chris says:

            Tina: “Drone strikes alone don’t get the job done…”

            I didn’t say they would. But drone strikes are not “loving their way out of this.”

            “and they have been reluctantly and slowly carried out.”

            OK, but that’s still not “loving their way out of this.”

            “While Obama diddles around with personally killing a few bad guys, others are trained to take their places and the weak horse, us, becomes a laughable recruiting tool…”

            And none of that is “loving their way out of this.”

            You can criticize Obama’s strategies (or lack thereof) but when you say ridiculous things like “Instead they try to convince us that they can love their way out of this mess,” you undercut your valid claims and make yourself look ridiculous.

            “Do you think “it didn’t happen” because we embraced communism and imported them by the thousands or because we fought communism and stood for freedom?”

            We are importing refugees from radical Islam, not radical Islamists. Or at least, that’s the intention. We are trying to weed out the radicals who are trying to slip through the cracks. I can’t say this will be totally successful. I can say it’s worth trying.

            ” You guys are embracing multiculturalism to the point of inviting an obvious evil into our midst. Does history mean nothing to you. The German people didn’t believe Hitler and his ugly ideology posed a threat…they thought he was wonderful. Even when he started rounding up Jews they remained in denial.”

            And even then, we refused to allow Jewish refugees into this country, due to a combination of anti-Semitism and reasonable concerns that there would be German spies in their ranks. The result was that many who could have been saved weren’t.

            We should not make the same mistake with Muslim refugees who are fleeing the evil of ISIS.

  4. Tina says:

    He violated his probation and the full power of the US government came down on his head. It would never have happened had Obama not needed an excuse to save his bid for the presidency…and Hillary her opportunity in four.

    WOULD YOU PLEASE GET REAL!!!!!

    “Do you have any evidence for this at all?”

    Are you kidding me?

    The President takes every opportunity to scold anyone who dares name the enemy. Do you think Dr. Jasser would be a special case?

    The President chooses not to recognize the distinction made by his opponents. It would get in the way of his plan to divide the country and paint his political opponents the racist, xenophobic “other.”

    • Chris says:

      Tina: “He violated his probation and the full power of the US government came down on his head. It would never have happened had Obama not needed an excuse to save his bid for the presidency…and Hillary her opportunity in four.

      WOULD YOU PLEASE GET REAL!!!!!”

      How can I “get real” about something that is only speculation on your part? Why do you expect me to believe your theories without evidence?

      “The President takes every opportunity to scold anyone who dares name the enemy.”

      This statement is so vague as to be meaningless. Obama “names the enemy;” he simply uses the term ISIL, which is recognized around the world as another name for ISIS. How much more specific do you want him to be?

      I know what you’re talking about, though; you want him to say “radical Islam.” Ok. When has Obama ever “scolded” anyone for using that term? Show me where he has done this. The article you linked to did *not* show Obama scolding anyone for pointing out the problem of radical Islam, it showed him warning Americans of the danger of generalizing all Muslims and of saying “we are at war with Islam.” This is not a strawman; Pie has said as much here, if I recall correctly. If Rudy Jasser isn’t engaging in bigotry, generalizing about Muslims or saying “we are at war with Islam”–and it doesn’t seem like he is–then Obama’s remarks don’t apply to him.

      I’m curious as to why you think they apply to you. Guilt over supporting the bigoted “no new Muslims” policy?

      • Tina says:

        The evidence has been put forth; you choose to believe it’s just stuff we make up even though we have proof in Hillary’s emails.

        “…he simply uses the term ISIL, which is recognized around the world as another name for ISIS.”

        No Nimrod, the term ISIL, as you’ve been told numerous times on PS is a specific area. Wikipedia:

        The Levant (/ləˈvænt/; Arabic: المشرق /ʔal-maʃriq/[1][5][6][7][8][9][10]) is an approximate historical geographical term referring to a large area in the eastern Mediterranean. In its widest historical sense, the Levant included all of the eastern Mediterranean with its islands,[3] that is, it included all of the countries along the eastern Mediterranean shores, extending from Greece to Cyrenaica…

        …The term is also occasionally employed to refer to modern events, peoples, states or parts of states in the same region, namely Cyprus, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, and Turkey are sometimes considered Levant countries (compare with Near East, Middle East, Eastern Mediterranean and Western Asia)

        The use of the term ISIL, rather than ISIS, is our presidents acknowledgement of Islamic terrorist authority over these lands…which include Israel.

        I do not speculate. I connect the da%# dots! You might try it sometime.

        • Chris says:

          Tina: “The evidence has been put forth; you choose to believe it’s just stuff we make up even though we have proof in Hillary’s emails.”

          Now I don’t know what you’re talking about. Hillary’s emails prove that the video maker was unfairly targeted by the administration, and that Rudy Jasser will be too? No, they don’t.

          “No Nimrod, the term ISIL, as you’ve been told numerous times on PS is a specific area. Wikipedia:”

          That is a Wikipedia page for the Levant, not the term ISIL.

          “The use of the term ISIL, rather than ISIS, is our presidents acknowledgement of Islamic terrorist authority over these lands…which include Israel.”

          No. It is acknowledgment that they are in this territory and pose a threat to it:

          “The reason the Obama administration, and some others, have opted to call the group “ISIL” is partly geographical, partly grammatical. Whereas ISIS stands for “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria,” ISIL stands for “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant,” meaning the whole eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea. It includes Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Israel and Jordan, and so is thought to more accurately describe the large region threatened by the group’s activities, the Washington Post wrote earlier this year.”

          http://www.ibtimes.com/what-isil-why-president-obama-wont-call-islamic-state-isis-2213476

          You’ve said before that you want Obama to “name the enemy” and “recognize the threat” but you complain when he does exactly that! You are a pedantic nitpicker whining about semantics because you have nothing better to do.

  5. Libby says:

    Tina, you are being incoherent. What was he on probation for?

    People who violate their probation generally do get jailed. But I’m tellin’ ya, the President of the United States rarely, in fact I would say never, has a hand in the thing.

    I wasn’t kidding, what I said about sending the paramedics to your house. If you don’t get a grip, “Obamanoia” is going into the next edition of the DSM.

  6. Peggy says:

    DR. SEBASTIAN GORKA FULL INTERVIEW WITH SEAN HANNITY FOX NEWS (6/29/2016)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7ierkcoC3o

  7. Tina says:

    “OK, but that’s still not ‘loving their way out of this.’”

    National Review:

    Are compassion, unity, and love really America’s ‘most effective response to terror’? After meeting in Orlando, Fla., with law-enforcement officials investigating ISIS terrorist Omar Saddique Mateen’s June 12 massacre, Attorney General Loretta Lynch told journalists, “Our most effective response to terror and hatred is compassion, unity and love.”

    After an interval of astonishment, Representative Jeff Duncan (R., S.C.) expressed his dismay at Lynch’s words. “‘All you need is love’ may be a great Beatles song, but it’s a terrible foreign policy,” Duncan declared. “She further proves that this Administration has no idea what it takes to fight Islamic terrorism. She should resign immediately.”

    Now that she’s discredited herself by meeting privately with Bill Clinton for thirty minutes I agree with Jeff Ducan, she should resign.

    Instead she had a fun interview today, yucking it up in a light as air interview to explain herself and admit she’d been silly.

    • Chris says:

      “Our most effective response to terror and hatred is compassion, unity and love.”

      This simply means that we need to show compassion, unity and love to *each other* in response to a terrorist attack. This is not controversial; it echoes similar statements made by Bush calling for unity, calmness, and going about our business after 9/11.

      You are hyper-sensitive and are engaging in your own version of political correctness. You are looking for trivial crap to be offended by and are twisting innocuous statements to make them seem sinister.

  8. Tina says:

    “That is a Wikipedia page for the Levant, not the term ISIL”

    The “L” in ISIL stands for “Levant”

    ISIS stands for Islamic State in Iraq and Syria

    ISIL stands for Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant

    • Chris says:

      Yes, I know. As I explained, calling it ISIL is *not*”our presidents acknowledgement of Islamic terrorist authority over these lands…which include Israel,” but simply an acknowledgment that they are a threat in this area.

      Should Obama not acknowledge that they are a threat in this area?

  9. Pie Guevara says:

    Do pin-headed Islam suck ups like Chris think they actually make a difference?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.