Milo Yiannopoulos Responds to Rioting at UC Berkeley

Posted by Jack

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Milo Yiannopoulos Responds to Rioting at UC Berkeley

  1. Pie Guevara says:

    Funny how the left is so fascistic and violent. The left does EXACTLY what the left falsely accuses the right of doing. Accuses conservatives of. Accuses anyone who does not goose step to their narrative.

    Remember the anti-Trump demonstrations? Remember Occupy Wall Street? Remember when Quentin Colgan said he wished to beat me with a bullwhip?

    Was there EVER a Tea Party event like this? (I was never a member but attended a few rallies.) Remember Chicago and Berkeley in the 60’s?

    Democrats encouraged this. Free speech my ass, Berkeley. Free speech my ass Rats and “progressives.”

    Open question (rhetorical) — Is there any substantial philosophical difference between Elizabeth Warren and Bernardine Dohrn?

    • Peggy says:

      The Tea Party didn’t behave like this because they didn’t have George Soros’ organizations funding the paid rioters.

      The original reports said there were about a hundred student protestors outside of the building Milo was to speak at when a bus pulled up and unloaded the rioters who broke the windows and started the fires. Just look at the videos of the students standing around using their cell phones. They aren’t dressed in black with their faces covered up as they break the windows with the barriers they tore down.

      These are the same paid rioters who were hauled in on busses during the election rallies, Baltimore, Ferguson type situations Soros could send his thugs to.

    • J. Soden says:

      Only difference is who they married. Everything else is the same.

    • Bryan H. says:

      The left definitely engages in violent protest more often than the right. You are absolutely correct about that. However, it’s worth noting that a Milo fan did shoot a protester last week at a Milo event, and this has gotten far less coverage than the Berkeley riots.

      http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/26/gunman-who-seriously-injured-man-outside-milo-yiannopulos-event-is-strong-trump-supporter/

      Of course this does not excuse the lefty riots or change the fact that we liberals need to be better about preventing those types of violent protest.

  2. Dewey says:

    First off “The Left” is not one organized group. With that analogy then All conservatives are represented by Dylan Roof and the council of conservatives.

    Next up the groups doing the violence at e events are acting solely on their own. No one knows if they are a paid RW group or some anarchist group.

    next Up are you a fan of Milo and carry his beliefs? It is time to claim your place.

    progressives, republican, and Democrats protesting are peaceful.

    Any violence is not part of it.

    So keep it Real

    This Old GOP Playbook is not working. hate is dead to most people

    Next Up?

    How about that Bowling Green massacre? #ConwayLIES

  3. Joe says:

    Mr. Jack, can you explain why the police did nothing why the criminal thugs at Bizerkeley attacked people and destroyed property? Were they ordered by the corrupt Janet Crapitano and state and local politicians and bureaucrats to stand by and let all this happen?

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/police-just-stood-around-watched/

    What allegiance should we have to a state government that allows this?

    How much more of this tyranny will be tolerated?

    • Post Scripts says:

      Joe, my guess is the cops didn’t make any arrests because the police leadership serves at the whim of the university or the liberal city council, so they are beholding to the liberals. The rank and file cops are a mix of liberal and conservative, so i don’t blame them, it’s the leadership who should be held accountable. Too bad the rioters didn’t burn down Berkeley…would have served them right.

      • Dewster says:

        Jack ya notice these people looked almost paramilitary. They were not from the campus.
        They are investigating if there was a relationship between these people and the right-wing movement that is affiliated with Breitbart News.

        Come on now be real. Those were not students.

        • Post Scripts says:

          Dewey, I guess we will never know who they were because the liberal campus cops didn’t make any arrests, right? Wonder why? Did the Dean ask them not too? Seems more probable than anything else. Perhaps you know somebody on campus who knows who these people? Have you checked around to see? As for the paramilitary, c’mon do you really believe that? Organized yes, but far right, no way, I ain’t buying that one.

          • Post Scripts says:

            Dewey, I went searching for more information on the people at the center of the violence in Berkeley. Here’s what I found, see if this sounds like conservative rightwingers…”The protests turned into full blown riots after “Antifa” rioters shot fireworks at the building in which the event was set to take place, smashing windows with police barricades and destroyed several large light fixtures. The Antifa members dressed in all black and wore gas masks and face coverings to hide their identity. These rioters led the most aggressive elements of the demonstration.

            Police and campus administrators repeatedly ordered the mob to disperse, to which rioters responded with chants of “F–k you! F–k you!” and “F–k Trump!”

            Several people wearing “Make America Great Again” hats were singled out in the crowd and violently attacked by the masked rioters, who snatched their hats and stomped on them. On BuzzFeed’s livestream, one of the men could be seen bleeding from his face.

            Riot police attempting to quell the situation deployed teargas, pepper spray and shot rubber bullets at the mob, and at one point moved into the mob to rescue the bleeding man to take him into the UC Berkeley campus auditorium.”

            There was a puddle of blood on the ground where a Trump supporter was stomped. Does this sound like rightwingers to you Dewey?

        • Tina says:

          Dewey: “They are investigating if there was a relationship between these people and the right-wing movement…”

          But you keep saying there is no right (or left) wing.

          So which is it? do they exist or not and do you have any idea what the differences are?

          • Tina says:

            Searched for Antifa and found the following:

            Many of these groups refer to themselves as “Anti-Fascist Action” in the respective language of the countries they operate in. They usually claim to be social anarchists or Trotskyists. The social anarchist variants are usually loosely organized networks of largely independent groups.

            More covert motivations may include thrill-seeking from committing crimes and non-Whites supporting their own perceived group interests by trying to prevent Whites from supporting White interests.

            Their criminal activities are very often misrepresented by and covered-up by politically correct mainstream mass media which often ignore that the groups often even openly (but anonymously) state their criminal intentions and brag about committed crimes.

            There are often associations with other forms of far left criminality such as criminal pro-illegal immigration activism, criminal animal rights activism, criminal environmental activism, criminal squatting activism, criminal pro-abortion activism, and other variants (similarly often misrepresented and covered-up by the mainstream media).

            Another association is with various “anti-racist” surveillance organizations/papers where criminal antifa activists may work, gain surveillance information needed for crimes, and/or receive other forms of support.

            Non-White participants may have associations with organizations supporting the interests of non-Whites and which would be labelled as “White supremacist” if instead being pro-White organizations.

            Hmmm…if this information is accurate this is a bunch of criminal activists who hate whites and show up at left oriented social/environmental justice protests. The rabid wing of the radical left.

          • Bryan H. says:

            If you ask me, Jack and Tina, the “Anti-fascists” or “Antifa” are ironically named as they have become their own enemy. Burning and breaking sh** because you don’t want someone to be heard is as fascist as it gets.

  4. Harold says:

    This should give Milo’s book one heck of a publicity boost.

    Also where only a small number of people would have heard his message at Berkley, now most all of America is aware, and a lot more people will look for it.

    A Win,Win for Milo and just another “step in it” moment for those cry baby Progressive Liberals who consistently say one thing, but lack the follow to do so when that one thing challenges their ideology.

    Clearly of late, Progressives constantly make defensive excuses for their reactionary methods that they would otherwise describe as fascist when applying it to a ideology movement opposite of theirs.

    Hypocritical would be a clear and apt definition of their actions toward free speech at Berkley, while all the time their own elected leaders assuring the country that they haven’t changed in the slightest.

    • Bryan H. says:

      Harold, you are right and I can’t believe the protesters who rioted are that stupid that they don’t see how they are helping Milo here. I can’t stand the guy but these protests just draw more attention to him, which is all he wants.

  5. RHT447 says:

    Yes, the main topic here is guns. Skip that if you wish. Watch the whole video—it’s only three and a half minutes. This guy gets it.

    http://weaponsman.com/?p=38842

  6. Libby says:

    Oh … I’m so embarrassed.

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2017/02/03/germany_switzerland_denmark_belgium_and_portugal_join_the_netherlands_in.html

    Actually, I’m delighted. I mean, they’ve all got the man’s rhetorical style down pat.

    Germany takes the prize, though:

    “Germany hosted two world wars in the last 100 years,” the video explains. “They were the best world wars in the world, and we won both of them big league, anyone who says anything else is fake news—period.”

    Funny, funny.

  7. Peggy says:

    Off topic. This is wonderful. Really worth hearing.

    Applause Erupts During U.S. Senate Chaplain’s Powerful Message About Prayer — and Watch How Trump Reacts:

    Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2017/02/02/applause-erupts-during-u-s-senate-chaplains-powerful-message-about-prayer-and-watch-how-trump-reacts/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

  8. Peggy says:

    Remember back in the early 2000s when colleges and universities tried to stop military recruiters from their campuses? The case went all of the way to the SC, which ruled against the colleges and universities. If they accepted federal funds then the recruiters would be allowed.

    The last two paragraphs are the most powerful and relevant to Trump’s statement of cutting off funds.

    “From the Chronicle of Higher Education, March 6, 2006 U.S. Supreme Court:

    Upholds Law Requiring Colleges to Provide Equal Access to Military Recruiters By
    KELLY FIELD Washington

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously this morning that the federal government can withhold federal funds from colleges that bar or restrict military recruiting on their campuses.

    In a 21-page opinion written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., the court rejected arguments that colleges have a First Amendment right to exclude recruiters whose hiring practices conflict with their own antidiscrimination policies.

    The court’s ruling was a victory for the Department of Defense, which had argued that recruiting restrictions hamper its ability to bring talented lawyers into the Judge Advocate General’s Corps, which handles legal affairs for the military.

    The Supreme Court rejected that argument, finding that the law had been written to ensure military recruiters the same access as employers who comply with a law school’s nondiscrimination policy.

    The case has attracted the attention of Congress, which passed the Solomon amendment in 1994 — its chief sponsor was the late Rep. Gerald B.H. Solomon of New York — and has expanded its reach several times since then.

    Some lawmakers had worried that if the Solomon amendment had been struck down, Congress could lose its ability to attach conditions to federal funds — the sacred “power of the purse.” One of the amendment’s original sponsors, Rep. Richard Pombo, a Republican from California, filed a brief supporting the Pentagon’s position through the Mountain States Legal Foundation.

    The ruling’s unanimity was one of its most remarkable feature, given that the free-speech and nondiscrimination arguments made by the law schools were considered likely to appeal to the court’s moreliberal members. Perhaps in part, the outcome reflects the court’s general deference to the military’s views of its needs, especially during a time of war.”

    http://careers.ucsc.edu/student/CareerEvents/Fairs/solomon.html

  9. Tina says:

    Turns out one of the thugs in Berkley that beat up on a man during the rioting is a staff member at Berserkley:

    Dabney Miller, a staff member at the UC Berkeley, bragged about how he beat conservatives. He posted images of one man he knocked to the ground and pummeled with his fists before someone pulled him away.

    Dabney Miller draws a paycheck from the UC Berkeley administration.

    Will he be fired?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.