Did Wasserman Schultz’s IT Guy Transfer Stolen Data to the Pakistan Government?

Posted by Tina

Finally there’s news about the IT guy, Imran Awan, who was paid by Debbie Wasserman Shultz even after the discovery that he and his family members had illegally accessed House servers. Turns out Awan may have transferred confidential and sensitive information to his father on a zip drive that was then handed over to official of the Pakistani government:

FAISALABAD, Pakistan — The father of Imran Awan — an IT aide to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz who investigators concluded made “unauthorized access” to House servers — transferred a USB drive to a Pakistani senator and former head of a Pakistani intelligence agency, the father’s ex-business partner, Rashid Minhas, alleged.

Minhas told The Daily Caller News Foundation that Imran Awan’s father, Haji Ashraf Awan, was giving data to Pakistani official Rehman Malik, and that Imran bragged he had the power to “change the U.S. president.”

Asked for how he knew this, he said that on one occasion in 2008 when a “USB [was] given to Rehman Malik by Imran’s father, my brother Abdul Razzaq was with his father.”

“After Imran’s father deliver (sic) USB to Rehman Malik, four Pakistani [government intelligence] agents were with his father 24-hour on duty to protect him,” he said. Minhas did not say what was on the USB. …

… Minhas is now in U.S. federal prison for additional fraud, and TheDCNF could not confirm whether Minhas’ claims about the USBs are true. But Minhas said the DOJ or FBI never interviewed him about the Awans, an indicator the potential for espionage may not have been explored extensively.

And then there’s this:

In the months before the election, the epicenter of the cyberbreach was the server of the House Democratic Caucus, a sister group of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Authorities said they believe Imran secretly moved all the data of more than a dozen House members’ offices onto the caucus server. … Imran and Hina have not been charged with unauthorized access to congressional data, despite an analysis of server logs by House investigators that determined that unauthorized access by Imran and Hina occurred. Three other suspects – Abid Awan, Jamal Awan and Rao Abbas – have faced no charges. … Congressmen have refused to publicly address the IG’s findings, and Wasserman Schultz’s brother is a prosecutor in the office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, which is handling the case.

Feeling vulnerable? You should. The Democrat Party leadership and it’s corrupted cronies in the Deep State put the lives and freedoms of Americans in danger every day. This is unacceptable.

This entry was posted in National Security, Political Intrigue. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Did Wasserman Schultz’s IT Guy Transfer Stolen Data to the Pakistan Government?

  1. Libby says:

    You guys are just … pathetically easy to manipulate. Mr. Awan is, as they say, in the system. The wheels they do grind slowly though.

    But the Daily Caller was looking around for something to distract you from current events … and … voila !

    • TruthTopower says:

      They always distract – bottom line Both parties have a wave of corruption like no other – every single bit of this is current and important. Republicans ignore their criminal activity and Democrats ifnore theirs.

      How about we Demand No criminal Activity.

      The Awan info and others it leads to was and IS a NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE.

      Who controls our ports? Where are containers scanned? #pakistan – Learn just how the privatization of this country has affected our own national Security.

      Now NJ port is also going to be leased to Guftainer another UAE related company

      Again look at who controls our major ports it is not the USA
      #EvrythingMatters

      • Tina says:

        A lease is a contract for a specified time. Control is limited to whatever business the company is engaged in and on American soil is subject to the business laws of the nation as well as state and local laws.

        Seaport governance is a different thing entirely:

        Constitutional Parameters: The U.S. Constitution does grant the federal government exclusive jurisdiction over the navigable waters of the United States, including its deepdraft channels and harbors–authority delegated primarily to the
        Coast Guard and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. But federal jurisdiction over harbors stops at the water’s edge. Port authorities in the United States are instrumentalities
        of state or local government established by enactment or grants
        of authority by the state legislature. Neither Congress nor any federal agency has the power, or even the right, to appoint or dismiss port commissioners or staff members, or to amend, alter or repeal a port authority charter. Certain
        port activities are, of course, subject to federal law and jurisdiction, particularly those pertaining to foreign and
        interstate commerce.

        Port vs Port Authority: It should be noted that there are numerous commercial ports where no public seaport agency exists – ports in which facilities are all privately owned and frequently operate as adjuncts to large industrial enterprise
        such as iron ore company or an electrical utility. Industrial ports of this type are particularly common on the Great Lakes. However, there are also privately owned and operated ports that provide services to the shipping public that are in most ways similar to those offered by public seaport terminals. Examples include the Port of Searsport, Maine, which is owned by the Bangor & Aroostook Railroad, New Haven, Connecticut, where all general cargo facilities are owned by private companies, and Benicia, California, where the port is owned by a private share-holder owned corporation, Benicia Port Holdings which has raised funds from the sale of stock on the London Exchange. It should also be noted that some port authorities may own facilities in two or more ports. The South Carolina State Ports Authority, for example, owns and operates marine terminal facilities in the ports of Charleston, Georgetown, and Port Royal. The basic distinction is that a port is a geo-economic entity whereas a port authority is a government entity.

        #educate yourself!

  2. Tina says:

    A bit of information about the corrupt Wasserman Schultz and her IT buds that has heretofore been ignored by your pals in the phony media is not a distraction, fool!

    Or are you unable to hold even two thoughts in your head at the same time?

  3. TruthTopower says:

    I told you about all this a year ago.

    There was more than 1 member of Awan family collecting a six figure paycheck from Congress. They were rarely ever seen. Remember the Break in to Dem offices in congress?

    Yes Awan Gang. And Why did DWS continue to pay Imran after they were all fired? Yes they were spies but just the tip of the iceberg.

    The Blackberries were doped and all synced to an Awan main server. These congressional phones went into intel meetings ect.

    Yes they were Pakistani. They were brought over here and all of a sudden were able to acquire several homes and assets. There was a Car Dealership and other businesses involved. RATLINES – car theft, and probably drugs ect.

    People have walked the halls of congress with all proven evidence we collected as a People. Mostly Republicans in congress were given the information. Grassley and Graham definitely acknowledged receipt of said info.

    The message in congress? They had been told not to speak of this but some was read into the record I think by graham. There is Video of him reading it into the record to an almost empty room as usual.

    Also they had Luke Rosiak testify in congress. Luke was not actually the first to investigate but did join in the investigation with many others. We all dug into this for months. Researchers and livestreams were abundant during this time. Many Journalists, Whistleblowers, and citizen journalists communicated and drilled down for months.

    There is an extreme amount of evidence there were spies in Congress and the Awan Family was in the middle of it.

    You ignored the info when I told you.

    Help to make this mainstream because it leads to much of the corruption. The tentacles never stop – we are past the awans and into DOJ and other agencies.

    The info is out there but if ya wait for Mainstream media you will always be way behind the 8 ball.

    Our gov is one big crime syndicate pick a topic.

    learn to drill down. many Many FOIA’s are being filed on many topics.

    neither party is beyond this corruption. Blackmail and cover ups = US Gov

    • Tina says:

      “I told you about all this a year ago. ”

      That’s okay, we knew about it anyway.

      “You ignored the info when I told you.”

      Nope.

      If you’re not going to remain a constant presence here please refrain from imagining what does or does not go on in your absence.

  4. Peggy says:

    Miss Debbie being held accountable for putting our nation’s security at risk will be tied to how Hillary’s crimes against our security turns out.

    Understand Hillary’s statute of limitations is 10 years and not the usual seven. So, get out and vote and make sure the Dems don’t gain a majority in either the House or Senate.

  5. Libby says:

    My heavens … look what you’ve done now! Seems the DNC has decided to use your own outrageous tactics against you.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/20/dnc-sue-trump-campaign-russia-plot-539521

    Chortle.

    • Tina says:

      Ha! That’s a laugh. The left never saw a courtroom they could avoid. You guys prefer the courts to the legislative process and love using them as a political hammer.

      Can’t wait to see the suit dismissed for to lack of evidence (or standing). Either that or the evidence that’s already been accumulated against Hillary, the DNC, bad actors at the DOJ and FBI will only work against them.

      Wake up and smell the coffee, Libby. It was Hillary and the DNC that were corrupt in the last election and the Russians wanted to create havoc but they didn’t take sides. Their ads targeted both Hillary and Trump.

      • Peggy says:

        The one who has standing is Bernie. Hum, wonder if all of his supporters can bring a class action suit against the DNC. There’s sure enough proof for a conviction.

        The DNC is just doing what they usually do. Deflection of their own wrong doings by accusing others as a distraction.

        Can’t wait to hear what capital police found on Miss Debbie’s computer the IT guy she hired hid in the phone booth just before he was arrested. Bet it’s full of damning evidence.

        • TruthToPower says:

          Hum there was a class action lawsuit against DNC Judge has it all in Idle mode –

          The trick they use is to keep it from discovery

          I dare either the DNC or GOP to make good on either DNC lawsuit filed or Trumps Threat Tweet to expose DNC’s Imran Awan scandal, Classified docs ect ect

          My guess is neither will let a case get to discovery – Both Parties will Blow up as well as many in gov and world leaders.

          I was not making this stuff up a year ago – It is Slowly bubbling to the top.

          This is 2 cabals in A War of The Roses

          we all win if the corruption seeps out I do not care which Dominoes falls first.

          • Tina says:

            “My guess is neither will let a case get to discovery”

            I wouldn’t bet on that. People are angry at what has transpired and continues to transpire.

      • TruthToPower says:

        Did you read the complaint yet Tina? Ridiculous – Also an attack against press publishing leaks –

        If it were not for the leaks we would not have had the Awan Case and where it led us. We have followed Gov crime into many subject matters all from the DNC IT Scam, DNC Election primary fraud – it crosses party lines all the time. Just a Normal day in DC.

        In the class action against the DNC their lawyer stated in court on the record – they can pick their candidate in a smoke filled dark room if they want.-

        Pretty much admitted they are a totalitarian party for the donors – Of course you did not hear that reported by FOX, CNN, or MSNBC – because they fight but will not rock the donor boats.

      • TruthToPower says:

        Did you read the complaint yet Tina? Ridiculous – Also an attack against press publishing leaks –

        https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/the-dncs-lawsuit-against-the-russian-government-trump-campaign-and-wikileaks/2302/

        If it were not for the leaks we would not have had the Awan Case and where it led us. We have followed Gov crime into many subject matters all from the DNC IT Scam, DNC Election primary fraud – it crosses party lines all the time. Just a Normal day in DC.

        In the class action against the DNC their lawyer stated in court on the record – they can pick their candidate in a smoke filled dark room if they want.-

        Pretty much admitted they are a totalitarian party for the donors – Of course you did not hear that reported by FOX, CNN, or MSNBC – because they fight but will not rock the donor boats.

      • J. Soden says:

        The DNC “law$uit” is all about fundrai$ing, $ince they’re broke.
        And Roger Stone has already notified the DNC that he’ll be coming after their servers.
        Discovery is certainly gonna be interesting!

    • J. Soden says:

      Discovery is gonna be VERY interesting.
      And Demwit donors are already upset about it!
      http://www.americanewsdaily.org/2018/04/20/dnc-files-massive-lawsuit-trump-russia-wikileaks-winds-egg-faces

  6. Tina says:

    Trump campaign’s response to DNC lawsuit:

    Today, the Democratic National Committee filed a wide-ranging, partisan civil lawsuit in federal court against the Trump Campaign, WikiLeaks, and the Russian Government. In response, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. notes that this frivolous lawsuit is a last-ditch effort to substantiate the baseless Russian collusion allegations by a nearly-bankrupt Democratic Party still trying to counter the will of the people in the 2016 presidential election. This civil lawsuit is completely without merit and will be dismissed in due time.

    “This is a sham lawsuit about a bogus Russian collusion claim filed by a desperate, dysfunctional, and nearly insolvent Democratic Party,” said Brad Parscale, Campaign Manager of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. “With the Democrats’ conspiracy theories against the President’s campaign evaporating as quickly as the failing DNC’s fundraising, they’ve sunk to a new low to raise money, especially among small donors who have abandoned them. There is a great deal the American public wants to know about the corruption of the Democrats, their collusion to influence the 2016 presidential election, and their role in prompting a scam investigation of the Trump Campaign. While this lawsuit is frivolous and will be dismissed, if the case goes forward, the DNC has created an opportunity for us to take aggressive discovery into their claims of ‘damages’ and uncover their acts of corruption for the American people,” he concluded.

    If this lawsuit proceeds, the Trump Campaign will be prepared to leverage the discovery process and explore the DNC’s now-secret records about the actual corruption they perpetrated to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Everything will be on the table, including:

    • How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.

    • Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.

    • How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.

    • How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.

    • Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more.

    If they are allowed to proceed they will rue the day, as they say!

  7. TruthToPower says:

    BTW Clinton is still Siphoning funds off from DNC. They just paid big bucks to a Hillary pac for a so called list. LOL a list that was started one yr before? yea right and have a recurring payment for some other bull.

    The DNC has no Money – Obama left them broke. That is how Hillary Pretty much bought it.

    The DNC was bankrupt and Hillary made a deal to keep party propped up and she got 100% control of all finances ect. Ran the party out of Brooklyn.

    Circumvented Donor laws by having excess money donated to the states – the state party’s got some money but had to wire it back a couple days latter.

    The Bush/Clinton Cabal are expert Money launderers –

    trumps Money laundering was not quite up to par with that gang

  8. Pie Guevara says:

    If Post Scripts can continue to rattle the cages of Libby and Dewey, you kids are definitely doing something right. Kudos to Post Scripts and to their two pre-eminient sophomoric nitwit foils.

    Congrats to Lippy for her never ending battle to poo-poo any Rat scum ineptitude and misdeeds with her patented juvenile “you are dumb, I am smart” attempts at deflection, e.g. “You guys are just … pathetically easy to manipulate… the Daily Caller was looking around for something to distract you from current events.” Lippy never met a corrupt Rat she wouldn’t try to deflect any critical examination of with snotty and asinine comments.

    Congrats to the all knowing conspiracy monger Dewey for the “The Bush/Clinton Cabal are expert Money launderers” and “look at who controls our major ports it is not the USA.”

    Dang Dewey, haven’t you figured out that the The Bush/Clinton Cabal” controls our ports??? Get with it, dude. Yer slipping.

    Speaking of sophomoric nitwits, where is Chris on this? Has he decided that he really does have a life outside of making personal attacks on Post Scripts? I miss his incessant stream of unconscious fallacious nonsense. The guy never met a fallacy he wouldn’t own, and then deny it like an alcoholic denying he has a drinking problem.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *