DiFi Blocked Senate Judiciary Committee Subpoenas – Commey, McCabe, Lynch

Posted by Tina

There probably won’t be much news from the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings looking into how the Clinton email investigation was managed. Fired former FBI director James Comey refused to appear, as did former Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Andrew McCabe, who was demoted and then chose to retire early from the FBI, did show up but pleaded the fifth rather than answering forthrightly to questioning. Comey’s lawyer told the Washington Times that his client was out “of the country.” But we know he was in Iowa yesterday, raising speculations of a run for the presidency in 2020, so we know his excuse is paper thin. But then, he’s also under investigation for alleged mishandling of classified information, too.

Why can these government officials, major players in the current scandals, get away with avoiding the responsibilities associated with their government service? They are answerable to the people! And the people want to get at the truth. The simple answer is politics…pure politics.

Turns out subpoenas were not issued, which would have compelled them to show, because the “ranking Democrat must agree with the chairman in order to issue a subpoena.”

Our very own Diane Feinstein is that chairman and she is not interested in truth or justice for the people. She is only concerned with Democrats being returned to power and ultimately getting rid of Trump. She, like most Democrats put party politics above even the law. She is a shining example of why Americans of all political stripes are fed up and angry with the swamp and swamp creatures like Di Fi, Comey, McCabe, Lynch

This entry was posted in Constitution and Law, Morals and Ethics. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to DiFi Blocked Senate Judiciary Committee Subpoenas – Commey, McCabe, Lynch

  1. Tina says:

    Semi-related: this weekend the Concord Management team filed a motion against the Mueller team’s protective order request to conceal all data related to their case. The Concord team states in their motion filed June 14th (emphasis added) –

    Having produced not one iota of discovery in this criminal case the unlawfully appointed Special Counsel requests a special and unprecedented blanket protective order covering tens of millions of pages of unclassified discovery. Having made this special request based on a secret submission to the Court and a hysterical dithyramb about the future of the American elections, one would think that the Special Counsel would cite to case holdings that support this remarkable request. But no, instead, the Special Counsel seeks to equate this make-believe electioneering case to others involving international terrorism and major drug trafficking, and relies only on irrelevant dicta from inappropriate, primarily out-of-circuit cases. In short, fake law, which is much more dangerous than fake news.

    Not a whisper in the legacy media that protection racket mob that shields the dems from journalistic oversight.

    Daily Wire, “BREAKING: Grassley Demands Investigation Of Comey’s Use Of Private Email Account”

  2. Tina says:

    Gateway Pundit, “BREAKING: Rep Mark Meadows Unmasks Two Unidentified Trump-Hating FBI Officials Referred For Investigation (VIDEO)”

    These FBI attorneys do not work in “counterintelligence” as the FBI previously claimed as an excuse to withhold their names from the public. … The unnamed FBI officials “Agent 1” and “Agent 5” were involved in the FBI Clinton investigation and were also engaged in a romantic relationship just like fellow FBI lovebirds Strzok and Page.

    One of the FBI lawyers is Sally Moyer, the other is Kevin Kleinsman (sp).

    Now Congress can question these two.

  3. Tina says:

    Gateway Pundit, “HOROWITZ DROPS BOMBSHELL: Hillary Clinton Was Not Formally Under FBI Investigation at Any Time in 2015-2016”

    House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) came out swinging Tuesday in a a joint hearing held by the House Oversight and House Judiciary Committees.

    Gowdy ripped into Comey in his opening statement, stating, “we can’t survive with a justice system we don’t trust.”

    Investigative journalist Paul Sperry reported Horowitz dropped a bombshell in his testimony.

    Horowitz revealed the FBI never named a target or even a subject in the Clinton email probe!

    So neither Hillary nor her top aides were formally under investigation by the FBI at any time in 2015-2016, tweeted Sperry.

    The entire ‘FBI investigation’ into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server was a complete sham.

    No subjects were named, immunity was handed out like candy and Hillary was exonerated before witnesses were interviewed, including Hillary Clinton herself.

    Hillary Clinton’s ‘interview’ with the FBI wasn’t even under oath.

    Even more egregious, Hillary discussed pregnancy and babies during the majority of the 2.5 hour FBI interview because one of her lawyers was pregnant at the time.

    What’s the penalty for lying repeatedly to the American people? (Some would call this treason)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.