Intimidation – The Obama-Holder Plan

Posted by Tina

As national leaders like Nancy Pelosi flail around for a scandal or cause that connects with the people, Barack Obama and Eric Holder, with the financial backing of George Soros, have been working in the background at the state level to turn the country blue state by state. They have a lot of financial support from the usual suspects, too, that’s to be expected. But what they’re doing is just politics, right? It is, but it’s politics of a character that goes against American principles of fair play and open and honest dealing.

The plan involves working at the state level to take control of legislatures and the courts. That’s not unusual, Republicans have done the same. It’s just state level politics, right? Well it is a political competitions. Some of the the tactics they use, however, are similar to what we’ve seen happening at the upper levels of the FBI and DOJ. The use of intimidation to oppress support for republican candidates and ideas is not honest dealing. It’s a totalitarian tactic! Consider:

At the same time those supporting the Obama-Holder led counter-offensive are working to suppress political donations by corporations and their executives to Republican causes and candidates. The Soros funded Center for Political Accountability’s Hicklin Index is used by progressive left activists to paralyze and silence pro-business interests. The group works closely with the Coalition for Accountability in Political Spending (CAPS) which aims “to direct corporate America to change its ways,” promising to “inflict economic damage on offending companies.” CAPS partners with activists and unions to submit proxy resolutions at shareholder meetings, not in hopes of passing a resolution, but rather getting the attention of the C-Suite and silencing a company’s efforts in public discourse and political participation. The fear alone of becoming a CAPS target is reducing contributions to pro-business political organizations and boosting corporate giving to Democratic and “Social Justice” causes working against free enterprise and even the existence of shareholder owned corporations.

Counter offensive? It’s this bunch of totalitarians that are “offensive” and “counter” to everything that makes America great.

The Democrat Party can no longer claim to be an American political party. It is a progressive socialist party that kicks American values to the curb, that has no respect for the rule of law, and that will use any dirty underhanded means to achieve absolute power and control!

Venezuela is an example of what the Democrats have to offer. Human Rights Watch described conditions in Venezuela thusly:

Under the leadership of President Hugo Chávez and President Nicolás Maduro, the accumulation of power in the executive branch and erosion of human rights guarantees have enabled the government to intimidate, censor, and punish its critics. Severe shortages of medicines, medical supplies, and food have intensified since 2014, and weak government responses have undermined Venezuelans’ rights to health and food. Security forces have arbitrarily detained and tortured protesters, and raids in low-income communities have led to widespread allegations of abuse. Other persistent concerns include poor prison conditions and impunity for human rights abuses.

Long before these horid conditions became the norm, Venezuelans experienced gradual decline…and waited too long to save themselves from complete tyranny. Economic malaise became economic crisis but it took several years.

Obama ran this nation for eight years as a tin pot dictator to similar effect. We had reached the point of economic malaise but with no signs of real “progress” toward improvement…until the people rose up to elect Trump, a true blue America loving businessman.

This year American corporations, indeed every American, must decide whether they want to live in a nation run by the dishonest, corrupt, power hungry criminals in control of the Democrat Party or a nation that thrives under the rule of law, high moral standards, and freedom.

Time to pay attention to state and local elections…KEEP AMERICA GREAT!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Intimidation – The Obama-Holder Plan

  1. J. Soden says:

    In the “It’s About Time” department –
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/19/report-fbi-agent-peter-strzok-escorted-out-of-headquarters/

    5:11pm, Tuesday 19JUN – Bill O’Reilly just tweeted that Peter Strzok has been fired by the FBI.

    • Tina says:

      Uh…maybe…his lawyer claims he is still employed. The FBI wouldn’t comment on “personal matters” if the employees. Per CNBC

      But FOX News reports:

      Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed Tuesday that he is investigating whether FBI official Peter Strzok’s anti-Trump bias factored into the launch of the bureau’s Russia probe.

      During a joint hearing before the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, Horowitz testified that his office was reviewing Strzok’s anti-Trump text messages as part of a separate probe related to the Russia investigation.

      “It clearly shows a biased state of mind,” Horowitz said, referring to text messages written as the FBI probe of Hillary Clinton’s private email use was wrapping up and the Russia probe was getting underway.

      Maybe his computer and files were being secured…but why not a midnight raid with guns drawn and a lot of yelled orders? (maybe the lefties are too delicate)

  2. RHT447 says:

    A reminder. Never give up…

    Kris Tanto Paronto tells the story of Benghazi.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8p8-_IHiBg

    • Tina says:

      Good man…and absolutely correct, “Never give up!”

      • Libby says:

        Give up what? Your quest for revenge?

        Never forget! … is more civilized. You know, nobody is arguing that it was a disaster, and entirely preventable.

        But your insistence on malicious intent is, I’m sorry, paranoid.

        • Tina says:

          Never give up, in this case, pushing back against the underhanded, lying, often criminal activities of your party.

          We didn’t stut-ut-utter!

          “But your insistence on malicious intent is, I’m sorry, paranoid.”

          Okay. I get it. You have a point of view that get’s in the way of connecting the dots, expanding your own awareness and knowledge of the facts. You are welcome to it.

  3. Libby says:

    “The use of intimidation to oppress support for republican candidates and ideas is not honest dealing.”

    We have to have a talk about awareness, self-awareness. Think. You say nothing at all in this post about the process, the means, of this intimidation … except … of course … the part where you assert the origin in two black men.

  4. Tina says:

    You are the only one who invoked the race of the two men. Obsessed as you are it’s understandable. George Soros is a white man.

    Why not address the content of the article?

    Is the use of intimidation acceptable to you? Do you think threatening your opponents, sending angry mobs to intimidate opponents to prevent them from speaking, is a “democratic” idea?

    Personally I see it as the same thing the Nazi’s did to silence opposition to their authority…you avoid the premise by screaming racism…you are such a phony!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.