Latest Kavanaugh Accuser’s “Story” as Dubious as First

Posted by Tina

In the big game called, “You Too Can Sink the Conservative Candidate,” Democrats have found a new gal. Her name is Julie Swetnick…isn;t she cute? She thinks she has a story that will sink the Kavanaugh nomination…what do you think?

Mediaite is the site that serves up this “rape train” accuser who admits she was “incapacitated,” possibly from “Quaaludes or something,” as set up for a gang rape. She thinks it happened in “approximately 1982.” Under these dubious recollections she’s certain that both Kavanaugh and Judge were there and stood in line for their sloppy turn:

I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their “turn” with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”

Supposedly there were ten parties where this happened but no other women were named and no other “rapists” standing in line were named…what, based on this flimsy accusation, could the FBI investigate?

Michael Avenatti of Stormy fame is the lawyer who apparently found and is now promoting this woman’s story. She works for the government…where has she been over the past several months? Surely she’s been at least mildly aware of the accusations leveled against Kavanaugh. I would think she would have been eager to offer support to Christine Ford as she floudered and demured and found excuses not to testify. Ford needed help…she needed someone to come forward on her behalf.

Who is Julie Swetnick? What do you want to bet she’s an activist…possibly an deep stater…certainly a radical feminist or one of their dupes.

A Senate panel is reviewing and investigating this new allegation of “graphic sexual misconduct.”

As Rush asked…”Why didn’t anyone call the cops?” And later, “If ten such parties went on why would any woman attend after the story got out?” In high school this kind of thing spreads like wild fire. The gossip value alone is worth the reveal. The opportunity to become the “victim” would be huge! (You remember high school!)

Step back. Imagine a future moment when another Democrat nominee to the court is sitting in the hot seat. An ugly precedent has been set by Democrats…Kavanaugh has become the last straw. So far, after several examples of character assassination of Republican canddates by Democrats, Republicans have never stooped to such sordid, ugly extremes. But I wouldn’t put it past a determined vindictive personality or two on the sidelines to put forth the notion that the candidate prostituted herself in College. There are examples of women admitting to putting themselves through college by such means. Or simply accusations of a “train” of males willing to attest to the loose morals of a candidate…offering herself for free to the train!

Innocent until proven guilty! Nope, sorry, we don’t do things that way anymore. Instead we make scurrilous accusations and then stand back and laugh as the woman tries to defend herself. Who wants to live in such a world? Who wants to tolerate such shenanigans by any political party?

The biased hypocritical Democrats who are pushing this ugliness are scum. It is they, who lack any sense of moral and ethical decency, that deserve to be rejected and removed from office.

Kavanaugh has been approved to sit on the court by Congress already several times! The FBI has investigated him six times. Republicans should stop tolerating their “colleagues'” game playing and put Brett Kavanaugh on the court NOW!

I’ve had it, can you tell?

This entry was posted in Morals and Ethics. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Latest Kavanaugh Accuser’s “Story” as Dubious as First

  1. Libby says:

    “Republicans have never stooped to such sordid, ugly extremes ….”

    Please. You all just about slathered yourselves in Bubba semen. We’re supposed to have forgotten?

    You want to stop all this ugliness. Get Kavanaugh to withdraw. He is manifestly unsuitable, and I hear that the number two, Thomas Hardiman, is a good guy.

    • Tina says:

      ” You all just about slathered yourselves in Bubba semen”

      You propose that Bubba, “I did not have sex with that woman, not a single time, never!”, was totally innocent of the multiple cases that followed him from London, to Arkansas to DC?

      You propose there was no eye witness testimony to his long years of gawdawful behavior in Arkansas?

      Okay…go ahead…list the dubious accusations against Bubba. Do explain how a woman with actual wounds, witnessed by someone right after her attack, is the same brand of accuser as these women with their last minute foggy, sketchy, ridiculous allegations? Justify his complete innocence in the face of the little blue semen stained dress!

      And let’s not forget that you and your party have covered for every Democrat miscreant in your party from the Kennedy bro’s to Keith Ellison…and that list is long. Has Keith Ellison’s recent spousal abuse even hit the airwaves as scandal?

      Let’s not forget that radical fems offered to joyfully fall on their knees and blow Bubba as long as he kept abortion legal.

      My evaluation stands…hypocritical…lying…morally bereft…scum!

    • Pie Guevara says:

      If you were to simply drop dead Lippy, all of your ugliness would be out of our lives and yours.

    • Pie Guevara says:

      The impeachment of Bubba was not about the blue dress, Lippy. No doubt you are so stupid and ignorant that you don’t even know what it was about. Now, be a good little feminist pig and go chew some Bubba gum.

  2. J. Soden says:

    There just aren’t enough nasty words in the dictionary to describe Avenatti. Gonna have to create some new ones just for him!

    • Tina says:

      It is frustrating, J, and quite a challenge for those of us attempting to express ourselves.

      It’s also disturbing to think that so many members of the generations that followed the WWII generation have sunk to such levels of depravity.

  3. RHT447 says:

    10 Red Flags About Sexual Assault Claims,
    From An Employment Lawyer
    _________________________

    https://thefederalist.com/2018/09/25/10-red-flags-sexual-assault-claims-employment-lawyer/

    11th red flag—Lippy.

  4. Tina says:

    Can you spell credibility, radfems? Your latest candidate to accuse kavanaugh has quite a history of her own.

    According to Politico her ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her:

    According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

    “Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. “I know a lot about her.”

    “She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”

    The <a href="According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

    “Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”

    The Daily Mail reports money and tax problems.

    All three of these women refuse to give testimony under oath.

    Sundance at Conservative Treehouse writes:

    According to the New York Times, Swetnick graduated “from Gaithersburg High School in 1980 before attending college at the University of Maryland.” Brett Kavanaugh graduated from High School in 1983.

    According to the claims, Ms. Swetnick graduated High School in 1980. In 1982, as a college student, she was attending high-school parties where heavy drinking, drug use and gang rapes were occurring with regularity. Ms. Swetnick went to the rape-parties at least ten times. She is reporting this today, through creepy porn lawyer, 37 years later.

    Creepy is right.

  5. Tina says:

    Yet another accuser has come forward claiming a “drunken rape” by Kavanaugh and Judge on a docked boat…

    Kevin McCarthy nails the hypocrisy of media in his latest at National Review, “Beto O’Roark Won’t Get Kavanaugh Treatment.”

    O’Roark is running against Ted Cruz.

  6. J. Soden says:

    Gonna follow the Kavanaugh “testimony” (IF she shows up) by listening to the TV coverage and reading comments from the 150 folks I follow on Twitter.
    Did that during the presidential debates and never laughed so hard in my life!
    Keep popcorn handy . . . . . . . .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.