« September 2006 | Main | November 2006 »

October 30, 2006

Dumb criminal stories are always entertaining

A story that just came across the AP wire:

Robber dies after accidentally shooting himself
OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — A suspected robber died after accidentally shooting himself in the leg while he and another man held up a Pinole liquor store, authorities said.
Police found the body of Sharffeequa Williams, 24, on a West Oakland street a few minutes after the holdup Saturday morning.
Security cameras recorded footage of Williams shooting himself at the liquor store counter while returning a gun to his waistband, according to Oakland police.
Williams and the other suspect then fled in a dark-colored American vehicle similar to a Ford Crown Victoria, Pinole police said.
Officers found a trail of blood and recovered a handgun dropped at the scene. Authorities believe Williams bled to death after shooting himself in a major artery.
Police were still looking for the accomplice.

That's natural selection for you, right there, folks.

God bless YouTube

Basically the greatest video ever. Although I do feel a little sorry for the dude. Poor kid can never show his face anywhere ever again.

This next clip is pretty much the reason that I hate people. This woman would fit right in with all the people who call "Tell it to the E-R" with their inane complaints. People just need to get over stuff. Seriously. But at least this makes for something funny to listen to.

NaNoWriMo … try saying that 5x fast

bannerLogo.gifbannerLogoType.gif
November is coming upon us faster than I thought possible. It's still feeling to me like summer just ended a couple weeks ago, but that is quickly changing as I bust out my hoodie sweatshirts and swap out my Rainbow flip flops for more rain-appropriate shoes.

But November doesn't just signify a change in weather and leaves turning color and littering my front lawn. November is also National Novel Writing Month — or for those in the know, NaNoWriMo.

This Web site was created several years ago, and every year in November, thousands sign up in the hopes of writing at least a 50,000 word novel in 30 days. Ambitious, eh?

I signed up last year and pretty much flunked out right away. I wrote about 2,000 words and then I got lazy and couldn't find time or decided I'd rather go out to the bars or go to bed than stay up late and hit my word count for the day. Bad writer am I!

I've always been a little lacking in the motivation area, but maybe my shame in failing so early on last year will help me get my butt into high gear this year. I started my second novel more than a year ago, and since then I've been meaning to keep going, because it's a story I feel pretty strongly about. But it keeps turning into one of those "one day" scenarios.

Hopefully, Nov. 1 will be that one day where I dust off the old laptop and crank out thousands of words a day like I know I can.

I've got several friends who have attempted/are attempting this project. A couple have even finished. On the NaNoWriMo Web site you can add people as friends and track their word counts. There's also tons of forum discussions where you can get input on plot, characters, setting, or just ask random questions of others that might make your novel better. It's really a pretty cool thing.

Throughout the month, you plug in your word count. Of course you can lie and say that you've written more, but by the end of the month, you send the whole thing in to them and they verify the word count. I think it's really more about personal glory than anything else.

Last year, almost 60,000 people participated, with nearly 10,000 of them finishing.

I've written a novel before. When I was in high school. Er, well technically I finished it on Valentine's Day of my freshman year of college. That sucker went through about 200 rewrites, countless character changes and endless frustrations.

But the day I could write "The End" on it was honestly one of the greatest days I've ever had. I've never felt more accomplished in my life. Of course, the thing took me three years to write and when I reread it now I can definitely tell that it came from the mind of a 16-year-old. But it doesn't matter, because dude, I wrote a novel. What about you?

And I've always wanted to write another one, and I've especially always wanted one published.

The NaNoWriMo crew basically puts into words why I think this project is such a great idea on their Web site:

There are three reasons.(to do NaNoWriMo)

1) If you don't do it now, you probably never will. Novel writing is mostly a "one day" event. As in "One day, I'd like to write a novel." Here's the truth: 99% of us, if left to our own devices, would never make the time to write a novel. It's just so far outside our normal lives that it constantly slips down to the bottom of our to-do lists. The structure of NaNoWriMo forces you to put away all those self-defeating worries and START. Once you have the first five chapters under your belt, the rest will come easily. Or painfully. But it will come. And you'll have friends to help you see it through to 50k.

2) Aiming low is the best way to succeed. With entry-level novel writing, shooting for the moon is the surest way to get nowhere. With high expectations, everything you write will sound cheesy and awkward. Once you start evaluating your story in terms of word count, you take that pressure off yourself. And you'll start surprising yourself with a great bit of dialogue here and a ingenious plot twist there. Characters will start doing things you never expected, taking the story places you'd never imagined. There will be much execrable prose, yes. But amidst the crap, there will be beauty. A lot of it.

3) Art for art's sake does wonderful things to you. It makes you laugh. It makes you cry. It makes you want to take naps and go places wearing funny pants. Doing something just for the hell of it is a wonderful antidote to all the chores and "must-dos" of daily life. Writing a novel in a month is both exhilarating and stupid, and we would all do well to invite a little more spontaneous stupidity into our lives.

So, I'll track my progress throughout the month on here. Assuming I last past the first five days, that is. At any rate, I'm excited to get back into writing, because it's truly one of the only things that gives me pure joy, and I don't seem to do it nearly enough.

I encourage anyone with a passion for writing to give it a try. If you want to add me as a friend on there, my username is purplecrayon01.

October 19, 2006

He's gay … so what?

george.jpg So T.R. Knight, aka Dr. George O'Malley on ABC's "Grey's Anatomy" said in a statement to People magazine today that he is gay.

This was news to me. I usually have a sense about these kinds of things, but never picked up on anything with him. Anyway, Knight's statement says, "I guess there have been a few questions about my sexuality, and I’d like to quiet any unnecessary rumors that may be out there. While I prefer to keep my personal life private, I hope the fact that I’m gay isn’t the most interesting part of me."

Way to go, George! I think it's cool he came right out and addressed it, and it's even cooler that he states a really great point of view in just a simple sentence — "I hope the fact that I'm gay isn't the most interesting part of me." Hallelujah!

I really hate how it always turns into such a big thing when a star comes out. Um, anyone remember Lance Bass' big "I'M GAY" cover of People? Ridiculous. I mean, who cares? I guess it's somewhat interesting to know, but to put it on the cover of a magazine and dissect the clues and signs for days is just stupid.

So I hope T.R. Knight's comments will keep people from going overboard about this on message boards or entertainment talk shows. Because really, it just doesn't matter. He's still loveable George. He's still totally hot. And he'll still be awesome on the show.

But now that the news is out, I just hope it doesn't turn into a big deal. Being gay isn't someone's sole identity. I don't want to see him be labeled as "the gay guy from Grey's Anatomy." He's so much more than that.

October 16, 2006

Censorship is the true evil

harry potter book cover.jpg Been awhile since my last blog. Sorry 'bout that. I've been having some creative issues. I'm a writer by nature, but every once in awhile I just get mad writer's block and writing is basically the last thing I feel like doing.

But I've had a topic that has been weighing heavily on my mind in the last week, so I'll more than make up for it with this lengthy rant.

I alluded to it in my column from last week — the whole Harry Potter debacle. Read about crazy Georgia lady here.

I know this is not the first time someone has tried to get the book banned from schools or libraries. I know it will probably not be the last. But this is a real hot-button issue with me. Censorship in any form has never been something I could tolerate, no matter the reasoning behind it.

My status is: If you don't like the content of a book, a song, a movie, a TV show, an Internet site, etc … guess what? You reserve the right to NOT read it, listen to it, watch it, view it. No one is FORCING anyone to read Harry Potter. Sure, I strongly cajole as many people as I can to give it a look, but no one is saying you must read it or die.

So why do people get so uppity about this kind of stuff? To this lady in Georgia who needs to get off her high horse: Look, your kids are probably getting exposed to more evil stuff than Harry Potter by just walking to school in the morning. You and your husband have probably said worse words in front of them than Harry Potter ever uses.

Another thing that kills me is that supposedly it's really important to get our kids to read. You know, get them off the computer or away from the TV and just plop a book in their hands. So why is it when our kids find something they WANT to read, people are so quick to try and take it away? It's hypocritical.

Also, we should be encouraging our kids' imagination. So Harry Potter has a magic wand and does some spells. I seem to recall the fairy godmother in Cinderella doing much the same thing. Uh-oh, guess we better burn all copies of that Disney masterpiece! Heaven forbid the kids see such wickedness! The horrors! And Merlin from Sword and the Stone, I KNEW he was trying to lure me into his evil cult. We can't let him win!

OK, you get the point.

If someone could actually give me a sane and logical reason for wanting to ban Harry Potter books — I said, SANE AND LOGICAL — then I would do my best to understand. But so far all I've heard is a bunch of nonsense.

And this book banning doesn't just stop at Harry Potter. Real literary classics like Catcher in the Rye, Farenheit 451, and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn have all been the topic of such conversations. Dude, it turns out even the dictionary was banned in one school because of 39 "objectionable" words inside. Hand, meet my forehead as I smack it in disbelief.

Again I say, if you find the content of something questionable or reprehensible — you don't have to read it. And you don't have to let your kids read it. That's your prerogative as a parent. Bu no one should ever have the right to tell me, a responsible and mature adult, what I should find morally sound. Period.

Some parents are concerned about the content of books that are required reading by schools. OK, sure, I guess maybe your kid doesn't have a choice. I guess maybe they'll read a couple bad words. These words aren't put in these books to make them cool or awesome. Kids will hear much worse language on the playground or in action movies. At least if they're reading something literary, the bad content usually has some meaning and adds some depth to work.

I think people really just complain too much. Why is everyone so concerned with how everyone else spends their lives? (This could lead into a whole other argument about gay marriage and equality, but I just won't go there because it's not really in my blogosphere realm). Just butt out. You live your life the way you want, and I'll do the same.

October 09, 2006

Who the frak is Bob?!

Bobfm.gif
Bob has taken over yet another radio station. What used to be Colors 92.7 (a station, by the way, that I loathed with everything in me) is now Bob. And I'm afraid that's just not much better. Sure, maybe the music is better, and maybe they actually play more than 4 songs a day, but … they're still called BOB.

In my hometown of San Diego, Bob inflitrated a radio station there, too. I was just as perplexed then as I am now. Does anyone know why it's appropriate to use a man's name as a station name? Are we supposed to feel like we're friends with Bob? Mostly, I just want to wring Bob's neck.

I need to do a little more research about this Bob character and find out what's so cool about him that he gets all kinds of radio play.

If anyone has any answers, I'll be glad to hear them. For now, I'll just keep being radio-free. My iPod and me are much happier together, anyway.

Edit: I guess a little research goes a long way. According to Wikipedia, which is the coolest thing ever, BOB is all over the place in Canada and the U.S. It basically stands for "Best of the best." They're slogan seems to be "BOB FM — '80s...'90s...and Whatever." Catchy. Well, mystery somewhat solved. And damn, I was really hoping there was an actual Bob somewhere.

Hot child in the city

I spent this Friday night in Sacramento. My best friend moved there awhile back, so I've been a handful of times in the last year or so. Each time I go, I fall a little bit more in love with the place.

It is no secret to those who know me that I'm getting a little irritated with Chico night life. I've had one too many encounters with dumb drunk folks and frat boys who think they own the town. It's getting so that I don't even want to go out anymore. It's like I'm too old for this town now. I'm only 22, but I think once you graduate and aren't part of the "college scene" you instantly age about 10 years to the point where most nights you just want a warm bed and a remote.

However, to steal the words from my friend, Sacramento is like a 5-10 year older Chico. It's still got a young, hip vibe in the midtown area, but it's not so college-centric that people are getting out of control and crazy and generally annoying.

I discovered this first hand at the bar we spent the evening in — Old Ironsides. Of course there was a cover, and the drinks came in thimbles (I'm soooo spoiled living here in Chico). But the crowd is what really stood out to me.

I didn't witness slobbering drunk men hitting on everything in a skirt. Instead, most people milled around quietly in couples, or just casually chatted up their companions. There were no bar fights. The band playing actually had lots of fans, and it never got loud enough to need the earplugs that they were selling for $1. I didn't see gaggles of sorority girls hogging up half the bar as they order 10 shots and a pile of rum and diet cokes and give each other so many hugs that they don't realize about 20 people are waiting for them to motor out of the way.

It was just very chill. It felt so much more mature and relaxed. Definitely my kind of vibe. Even out in the streets, where on a Chico Friday night there'd be idiots darting in and out of traffic and then flipping ME off for daring to drive where they are walking, it was pretty calm.

Also? Sacramento guys are way better than Chico guys. I'm just saying. The typical Chico boy is just not my type anymore.

I guess this is growing up.

October 04, 2006

TV roundup

friday-chandler.jpg
I watched "Varsity Blues" "Friday Night Lights" last night. I wasn't sure if I was going to, but I kept seeing all these commercials saying it was the best pilot ever, and I really loved the song playing in the previews, so I gave it a shot.

I liked it. I also liked it back in high school when "Varsity Blues" came out. While it was well-written, well-acted, and made me tear up a bit at the end, I could see what was coming a mile away. OF COURSE the big shot quarterback was going to get majorly injured during the big game. OF COURSE the second-stringer who really doesn't seem to care too much about football is going to come in and save the day, only after he makes some ridiculous mistakes that are supposed to worry the crowd. I mean, they didn't even TRY to steer clear of the same plot used in "Varsity Blues." I never saw the movie version of the show, so I haven't a clue how well it matches up to that.

I think I'll watch it next week and see where it goes from there. I guess it has potential, I just feel like it's all been done before.

Heroes
This is one of my fave new shows of the season already. It has a definite "Lost" aspect to it, in that I'm going to find myself increasingly agitated when I don't know what the heck is going on for long periods of time. All I know is that there are pretty men, neat super powers and the cutest little Japanese guy who I just want to shrink and carry with me in my pocket.

I can tell there is a deep plot involved in this, one that won't be made clear too soon. I mean, I don't even know what Ali Larter's character's super power is yet. Seems like she just kills people and buries their bodies, all the while freaking out her super cute kid, who should probably demand more answers than he is.

I'm pleased to see Milo Ventimiglia (Peter Petrelli) on another show, because while I respect him as an actor, I hated his character Jess on "Gilmore Girls" and don't want him coming back.

Studio 60
Matthew Perry is a stud. He always was the best on "Friends" and now he is the best on this TV show. I could do without them showing the skits within the show. They don't add anything, and aren't even particularly funny. But you gotta love a show that unashamedly bashes Bush and mocks the Christian right's views on television. Probably this aspect turns a lot of people off of the show, but I find it clever and bold, and unlike anything I've seen on TV so far.

Ugly Betty
LOVE IT! America Ferrera is too awesome and has been ever since "Real Women with Curves" came out. And it's getting good ratings so far, so here's hoping it sticks around for the long haul.

I'm getting giddy for the premiere of "Lost" tonight. Like, super giddy. It's really unfortunate that I have to sit at work knowing everyone else gets to watch it before me. It's really hard to not go and read spoilers that are surely all over the Internet by now.

I'm trying very hard to be spoiler-free this year.

Yeah, I know, like that'll happen.

October 02, 2006

The race thing didn't really survive

Well, I got dreadfully behind on my "Survivor" watching this week. I can't help it — Thursday night is a big TV night, and frankly, I have bigger priorities than this reality show.

So finally this week we got see a lot more of Flicka. I've been hearing that people don't seem to like her all that much on the message boards, but I disagree. She is one of the more likable women on the show. She may not have the best strategy in the world i.e. she doesn't know what the heck she's doing. But at least she's not irritating or vapid like that Parvati girl who just flirts with all the buff guys on her tribe.

I was shocked to see the race thing was dropped so fast. What was even the point? Can someone explain why they even start out with four tribes to begin with at all? Back when I used to watch it, they started in two tribes and then just merged halfway. Now there's two merges, and I'm really not sure what the point of that is.

Are they really so desperate for ratings that they need these stupid gimmicks to draw people in? Would it have been a crazy idea to just find a bunch of different ethnicities and put them on the show and NOT made a big deal about it? And just integrated them all from the beginning?

Giving the tribes only a week being segregated by race for some supposedly awesome social experiment is dumb — plain and simple. There wasn't enough time to see how that made any difference at all.

But whatever, I guess it's just back to regular old Survivor now, and that's fine by me.

I really don't care for much of the cast this year. There is no real awesome personality that sticks out for me. They all seem kinda blah. So I guess I'm just rooting for Flicka, because I sorta feel like I have to.

Although part of me hopes she'll get booted soon, because I really don't think I can watch this all season unless the drama picks up big time.