<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Uncomfortable Truth</title>
      <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/</link>
      <description>Opinion you won&apos;t find anywhere else</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:45:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.25</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title> Throwing The Bums Out </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A letter I wrote to the editor of my local paper was published this morning.<br />
In it, I wrote that elections are too corrupt to make any difference whatsoever in the situation in either Sacramento or Washington.  If we are to throw the bums out, we will need to do so literally.<br />
And make no mistake: the bums need throwing out.  Unless you enjoy the feeling of helplessness when you vote.<br />
One thing I would like to make clear is that I do not advocate an overthrow of the government.<br />
The government has already been overthrown.<br />
I advocate taking it back.<br />
We are supposed to live in a Democratic Republic.  That means simply that we have representatives that are supposed to carry out the will of the majority.<br />
Is the will of the majority the law of the land?<br />
Did a majority ask for the sales tax to be raised thirteen percent?<br />
Is a majority asking that California waste our money by having both a Department of Education and a Board of Education?  And then tell us there is not enough money for school programs?<br />
Did we ask that special little jobs be created for termed-out legislators so they can continue nursing at the public teat?<br />
Do a majority of Californians want our budget balanced?<br />
Can our current batch of legislators do the job?<br />
Then why the Hell are they still there?<br />
We all know the answer to that one.<br />
If elections do not work, what are we to do?<br />
Well, we can do one of two things.<br />
We can sit on our asses in front of our computers and pretend to be doing something about it.<br />
Or we can go to Sacramento and ask nicely for two things.<br />
First, an instant runoff election to replace the governor and legislators to be held within four weeks of the second request: their resignations.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/06/_throwing_the_bums_out.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/06/_throwing_the_bums_out.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:45:04 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Christ vs. The Bible  </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>You hear a lot of people beating up on Christians these days.  Well, you always hear of people beating up on Christians.  Some people go so far as to deny the existence of God, usually because they are fed up with the ridiculous claims made by Bible-thumping zealots.<br />
Unfortunately, zealotry can be defined as not listening to reason or common sense, so it is pretty damn hard to talk to those who see themselves, "in Christ."  Just this week I read yet another essay defending the practice of slavery.<br />
We all know you can defend any sin against any individual by using The Bible.  Normal folk know that to do so is utterly transparent and the mark of a true hypocrite--the ones we were warned of.  Yet, every day, someone posts some essay somewhere defending murder; or torture; or war; or any other base act that needs to be defended at the moment.  (It's a good thing there's forgiveness--even if some of these folks don't believe in it!)</p>

<p>The Bible was cobbled together in the fourth century under the direction of the world-famous hedonist, Constantine, emperor of Rome <br />
The early Christians, in a deal that was actually quite contrary to the teachings of The Master ("render unto Caesar what is Caesar's"), entered into what was essentially a power-sharing agreement with Rome.<br />
As part of that "New World Order," a book of rules was needed.  <br />
Voila!<br />
The Bible!<br />
1300 years later, King James put his own spin on it.<br />
And every single day, some simpleton lets some evil individual tell him those politically-motivated words are the ABSOLUTE WORD OF GOD! (Amen.)<br />
Good Lord.<br />
But, that is not to say that God is a myth.<br />
Nor His son.<br />
I am not sure I could prove the existence of God to anyone else's satisfaction, but I have witnessed too many "coincidences" to believe otherwise.<br />
And yes, I am educated as a scientist.<br />
But do I believe the Bible as the "Word of God?"<br />
Well . . . . . . . . .<br />
If you talk about what God has to say, wouldn't that mean what His Son, Jesus, has to say?  How about we just read the Gospels?<br />
"The authors of the books of the Bible were all inspired by God."<br />
Uh-huh.<br />
So, you think that politicians--guys like Barack Obama and George Bush--when they were having their little committee meetings to decide which writings would be included in their Bible, chose ONLY those books that were inspired by God?  And this was because they knew for certain that, say, Isaiah was inspired and Thomas the Apostle was not?<br />
Wow!  These were really prescient politicians!  So different than the ones we have now.</p>

<p>Seriously, though.<br />
The most important thing anyone needs from the Bible is Matthew, chapters five through seven.<br />
If one is too busy persecuting another to sit down and read three chapters, one can save time by remembering this one line that comes from them:<br />
"Do unto others as you would have it done unto you."<br />
I challenge anyone who claims to be a Christian to say how there is anything more to being a Christian than abiding by that simple dictate.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/06/_christ_vs_the_bible.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/06/_christ_vs_the_bible.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:48:05 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Wednesday Sermon </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, another blog here at NorCal Blogs posted an essay decrying homosexuality as a sin.  Note I did not say homosexual behavior.  No, these folks--who say they follow Christ--say that what you <em>are</em> is a sin.  And, of course, they would know.  They got it from the Bible, don't you know.<br />
They offer up several Bible references, but not one from Christ.  They try to say that Christ didn't mention rape, incest, or pedophilia either, and since these are wrong, being a homosexual is wrong.<br />
I know, I know.  Don't try to follow the logic, you will only hurt yourself. <br />
Jesus did mention those other affronts to others though, when He told us to be nice to each other.<br />
Jeez!!<br />
Anyway, while these clowns--and thousands of other clowns across the country--are having hissy fits because some woman has her tongue on another woman's vagina, real sin gets ignored.<br />
If you search the internet for blogs written in April about the "sin" of homosexuality, you will find thousands!<br />
I wrote last time that charging interest on a loan was just as forbidden as a man laying with another man.<br />
Yet a similar search for blogs on the "sin" of usury or interest reveals but a very small fraction of that number.<br />
Hmmmmm.<br />
How many lives were destroyed in the month of April because two men--or two women--slept together?  What was the crime?<br />
According to Bloomberg, 342,038 homes were foreclosed on in April.<br />
Over half a million people displaced.<br />
Since the beginning of this mess, tens of millions of jobs have been lost and scores of millions of people put into dire straits.<br />
How many times in the recent past has a guy killed his entire family, and then himself because there was homosexuality in the world?<br />
Excuse me?<br />
You want me to believe WHAT is the sin?<br />
There are some who think the way through the narrow gate is to be of a narrow mind.<br />
I disagree.<br />
I think the way through is to open up, look around for real problems and work to fix those.<br />
We might start with the Federal Reserve.<br />
If all of those "Christians" out there joined with us and contacted Congress, this will be the last downturn in American history.<br />
Talk about a blessing!<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/05/_wednesday_sermon.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/05/_wednesday_sermon.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:35:28 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Ancient Economics </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I have been going over some ancient Judaic texts lately.  Specifically, the first five books of the Bible, known collectively as The Pentateuch, or Torah.<br />
Some people believe these books to be the absolute word of God.<br />
I am not one of them.<br />
These books contain--along with an early history of the Jews--613 commandments, or mitzvot which describe how the ancients were to live every aspect of their lives.<br />
I got this list from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_Mitzvot">Wiki</a>.<br />
(I suppose the most famous mitzvot--other than the Ten Commandments--is Leviticus 18:22.  That's the one that "Christians" use to condemn homosexuality; the subject of a future essay.)<br />
Some make a lot of sense when you get right down to it.<br />
Some examples:<br />
Anybody who knows evidence must testify in court.<br />
Judges must not accept bribes.<br />
Testimony is not to be taken from a single witness.<br />
Judges must not accept testimony unless both parties are present.<br />
All soldiers should have a shovel.<br />
Latrines should be dug outside of the camp.<br />
Don't overwork your slave.<br />
Consider the rules of Kashrut, or 'keeping kosher.'  Most of them are common-sense rules about cleanliness.  Good thing, the USDA wasn't around thirty-five centuries ago.<br />
Even the rite of circumcision on the eighth day is based on common sense.  Blood did not clot reliably before a child was eight days old.<br />
One of the more interesting mitzvot says not to charge interest of your countrymen. (Deuteronomy 23:20)<br />
This makes, perhaps, the most sense of all.<br />
I have written in this space that I am no economist.  However, I do know a few things about money.<br />
Think about this for a moment.<br />
What is the "value" of interest?<br />
How much concrete is poured; how many nails are driven by the money spent on interest?<br />
Conversely, how much money isn't spent on real products because it has to go for interest if enough money isn't printed to cover the price of the interest?  (What happens to inflation when enough money is printed to cover interest?) How many people are working simply to pay interest?<br />
With no absolute value to it, interest will eventually destroy an economy.<br />
The ancients knew that 3,500 years ago.<br />
We are discovering that right now.<br />
Maybe we should have listened to them . . . . . . . </p>

<p>I am not suggesting that we could run a worldwide economy without charging people interest.  But, until the 1920s, America was pretty much a cash-and-carry society.<br />
Why?<br />
Christian values were part of it!  Usury--interest--was a sin!<br />
Of course, in 1913, congress violated the Constitution and created the Federal Reserve.  The resulting need for more money for the bankers created a massive PR drive to borrow, borrow, borrow!  To indebt yourself to the bank.  To indebt your children to the bank.<br />
For years, California had the nation's lowest interest rates--12%.  When I first started voting in the 70s, every damned election, there was a proposition to end California's "antiquated" laws regarding usury.  It finally passed, of course.  Why people voted to short themselves was beyond me then, but I see it often enough now.  After all, by not calling for an end to the Federal Reserve, we still short ourselves. </p>

<p>For centuries, interest has led to the downfall of civilizations.<br />
The Federal Reserve system is leading to the downfall of the United States.<br />
It is time we took that threat seriously.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/05/ancient_economics.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/05/ancient_economics.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:53:12 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Who Would Jesus Torture?  </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I couldn’t stop laughing as I stumbled across this little factoid today.<br />
It seems that the more you go to church, the more likely you are to condone torture.<br />
I am not making this up, although the sample size—742—was pretty small, the more devout you are, the more likely you are to be OK with torture.<br />
According to <strong><a href="http://rawstory.com/08/blog/2009/04/30/support-for-torture-from-an-unlikely-group/">RawStory.com</a></strong> <br />
<b>“White evangelical Protestants were the religious group most likely to say torture is often or sometimes justified — more than 6 in 10 supported it. People unaffiliated with any religious organization were least likely to back it. Only 4 in 10 of them did.”</b><br />
I have read most  of The New Testament—even taught some of it—and I am unable to find where Jesus condoned torture.<br />
I have to wonder how  six out of ten White Evangelicals can.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/05/_who_would_jesus_torture.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/05/_who_would_jesus_torture.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Attack Of The Tinfoil Racists  </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>My recent change in employment allows me to listen to the radio a lot lately.<br />
Some days it’s oldies.<br />
Some days it’s hate.<br />
Seriously, I used to find it amusing that there are people out there dumb enough to buy this crap.<br />
I am unable to get another perspective on my radio except for PBS. (The monotonic droning tends to incapacitate me, however.)<br />
Now, I am not laughing as much.<br />
One day last week I was listening to hate and I heard the Fat Bastard say that “If America is attacked, it will be on Obama.”<br />
I couldn’t believe my ears.  Later, I checked a transcript, and sure enough, I had heard correctly.<br />
The next day I chose another station.<br />
Tuesday, I was listening to The Bully.  (He’s the toady of that foreigner, Rupert Murdoch.)  Sure enough, Hannity said the same thing.<br />
This is dangerous.  This borders on treason.<br />
These purveyors of hate are not stupid.  They carefully craft their statements to later absolve themselves from any responsibility, but the implication is clear: They want their fans to attack us so it will look like it was done by “our enemies” with the blame placed squarely on Obama.  <br />
I say they want to because they know many of their fans are stupid enough to do it.  After all, if their fans weren’t bereft of gray matter, they wouldn’t have fans.  They know it will happen.<br />
I don’t really worry about the fools in the tinfoil hats like the ones I saw last week at the tea party is Sacramento.  No, what worries me are the ones who wear the little white pointy hats who can’t stand the fact we have a Black President.<br />
Is it any wonder the director of Homeland Security says we should be wary of these characters?  (For the record:  since I support States Rights, I am pro-life, pro-gun, AND I voted for Ron Paul, I am at the top of that list.)<br />
What do you bet, we don’t have a grand kleagle or some other white-robed klukker arrested real soon.  Or maybe just some good ol’ boy wannabe.  Whatever.  It won’t be good.<br />
Today, it was announced that The President's popularity is soaring--the Haters will be spewing even more of their bile today.  I honestly worry how much violence they will incite.<br />
We ought to have the Fat Bastard and The Bully arrested for treason.  Until we can shut them up, prudence demands we treat their fans as armed and dangerous.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/04/_attack_of_the_tinfoil_racists.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/04/_attack_of_the_tinfoil_racists.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:18:05 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>  Cost vs. Price--Let&apos;s Be Honest  </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I tried to talk sense recently to someone whose mind has been poisoned by those who hate America.  As I pointed out his errors in another subject, he changed the topic to health care.<br />
This is a good time for that discussion as Obama wants to “socialize” medicine.  However it has got to be an honest discussion.  Thanks to foreign-owned media, an honest discussion is yet to be found.<br />
An honest discussion of health care would differentiate between cost and price.  <br />
The “cost” of health care is but a miniscule fraction of the “price.”<br />
Go into a drug store a buy box of syringes.  It’s fair to say that would be your “cost” for the syringes.  A hospital will charge you twenty to thirty times as much.<br />
Why?<br />
Any discussion of health care needs to ask: are we going to subsidize profits?<br />
Are we going to subsidize greed?<br />
Before someone asks if I equate profits and greed, I will say that in my view it is not Christian to profit off the pain and suffering of others.  However, in practical terms, what is wrong with a straight 15%?<br />
My favorite example of medical greed is Levamisole.<br />
Levamisole is a drug for intestinal worms.  It’s takes a penny a produce a dose.  That is, to get one dose to the consumer costs one cent.  The price used to be about six cents a dose.  Years ago, some curious individual wondered if it might work on colon cancer.  After some taxpayer-funded research, the maker discovered it did.  It still takes a penny to produce, but now the price is around six dollars per dose.  Or 600 times the cost.<br />
So, when we talk about paying for health care, we argue over who should pay the six bucks.  Shouldn’t we be talking about one penny instead?<br />
A friend of mine needed a breast biopsy a few years ago.  The price was either 400, 800, 1700, or 3800 dollars depending on who was paying for it.  The cost was obviously less.<br />
We are constantly hammered on the evils of “socialized” medicine.  Indeed, Canada and the UK tax everybody to cover the prices—not the costs.  This blatant transference of wealth is where the evil lies.  I can’t help but notice that the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world are all located in “socialized” countries.<br />
It stands to reason that we could help 600 times as many people or we could subsidize the profit of one company.<br />
For the record:  I am happy to be taxed to help people that suffer.  I am not happy to be taxed to pay for private jets.<br />
It has been oft-quoted that up to one-third the costs of health care go to insurance and administration.  An honest overhaul of Health Care will cut costs immediately by one-third—that’s obvious.  Take out the Godless profits and we could cut the costs by another third--easy.<br />
Whatever happens, I “Hope” we can keep the discussion honest.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/04/_cost_vs_pricelets_be_honest.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/04/_cost_vs_pricelets_be_honest.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:41:36 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Tax Protest Sabotaged by FAUX News </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I went to the tea party tax protest down at the state capitol in Sacramento today.  A friend asked if the old MPD was kicking in again.  I assured him It was not, I was going to keep it non-partisan; as I heard it was supposed to be.  I was going to make sure the right wing kooks did not take over.<br />
I failed.<br />
It could have been a glorious day.<br />
It could have been a day when our legislators might have listened to us.<br />
It took me a while, but on the drive home, I realized:</p>

<p><font size=5>The protest was meant to fail.</font></p>

<p>I can explain easier by illustrating a similar political move.<br />
Many years ago, here in California, there were no less than five competing initiative measures regarding auto insurance on the ballot.  The most practical proposal; the one that would have saved Californians the most money—no-fault insurance—went down in flames.<br />
Why?<br />
It was sponsored by the Auto Insurance industry.<br />
You see, for years, the industry has fought no-fault insurance.  They—and the trial lawyers—make less money.  (But ask anyone who lives in one of the twelve states where they have it how much they love it.)  Well, one year they finally got smart.  When it looked like California was going to adopt no-fault, they had their toadies in the legislature introduce a couple of measures and they introduced their own measure as well.  As I said, there were five measures on the ballot.<br />
Pretty damned confusing.<br />
I worked hard for that measure.<br />
Do you have any idea how hard it was to convince people to vote for the “enemy’s” idea??!!<br />
Looking back, I have to give props for the brilliant political move it truly was.  Evil, but brilliant.</p>

<p><br />
I saw the most amazing things today.<br />
I saw several people, who have been drawing social security for decades, carryings signs denouncing socialism!<br />
I talked to an otherwise normal young man—about my sons age—who said an argument could be made that Saddam had WMDs because of the “Tons of yellowcake” found.  I asked if he knew how many (none) WMDs could be made from “All that yellowcake.”  He did not know.  I asked why Hannity didn’t tell him.<br />
I was telling one fellow about my tax plan—it’s a simple seven-and-a-half percent sales tax that is STRICTLY OPTIONAL, yet it raises more than our current system does—for details click <a href="http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2007/04/">HERE</a>.  He told me, “Yeah, well, taxes ain’t the problem, SPENDING is.”<br />
Oh.<br />
The eleven thousand billion dollars that we didn’t have but were spent by Ronny Raygun and Bushies I & II don’t matter. <br />
Our REAL problem is the 870 billion dollars of Obama’s stimulus plan.<br />
Oh.<br />
You see, in the eighty-five days of Obama’s presidency it has all-of-a-sudden become the number-one problem facing America.<br />
Oh.<br />
The crowd was chanting “THROW THEM ALL OUT,” but when a guy who has been a politician for the last twenty-seven years gets up to exhort the crowd, they cheer and go wild!!!<br />
FOX news was handing out tea bags for the event.  Not one person saw the dichotomy in a news organization promoting a protest against an incumbent president—which is EXACTLY what it was.<br />
Why?<br />
WHY would people act with such clear disregard for common sense?<br />
OK, they’re scared.  They ought to be.  I’m a little scared, too.<br />
But they are being led by evil people.<br />
They do not realize they are being made to look like fools.<br />
What FOX news does realize is how much they would lose if a fair tax actually became law!  They would actually have to start paying taxes—it could cost Rupert Murdoch serious money.<br />
So, like the Auto Insurance folks before them, they finally got smart.<br />
What started as a grass-roots movement got taken over by the FOX News Corporation.  <br />
Now, when the average American looks in to see what happened they will see a bunch of folks who swear loyalty to a minor-league network—with lower ratings than Congress—acting like . . . . . . .  <br />
Kooks!,<br />
Guess what happens to tax reform?<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/04/tax_protest_sabotaged_by_faux.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/04/tax_protest_sabotaged_by_faux.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> The National Debt--All 53 Trillion Dollars Of It--Explained  </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This was sent to me by old friend and alert reader, Drew M.<br />
The following movie will take thirty minutes of your time.  When you are done watching, you will know as much about our economy as the talking heads on TV.  You will know more than what those talking heads want you to know.<br />
You will realize that talk of bailouts and bonuses and deficits are merely the tip of the iceberg.<br />
The movie is non-partisan.  It simply explains--it does not blame.</p>

<p></p>

<p><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/Adb1EJDaNg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="405" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed> </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/03/_the_national_debtall_52_trill.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/03/_the_national_debtall_52_trill.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Thank You, Frank   </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="calvinandhobbes I.jpg" src="http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/calvin/calvinandhobbes%20I.jpg" width="443" height="204" /><br />
<img alt="calvinandhobbes II.jpg" src="http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/calvin/calvinandhobbes%20II.jpg" width="450" height="210" /><br />
<img alt="calvinandhobbes III.jpg" src="http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/calvin/calvinandhobbes%20III.jpg" width="436" height="197" /><br />
<img alt="calvinandhobbes IV.jpg" src="http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/calvin/calvinandhobbes%20IV.jpg" width="438" height="201" /><br />
<img alt="calvinandhobbes V.jpg" src="http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/calvin/calvinandhobbes%20V.jpg" width="442" height="203" /><br />
<img alt="calvinandhobbes VI.jpg" src="http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/calvin/calvinandhobbes%20VI.jpg" width="452" height="214" /><br />
My old friend--and loyal reader--Frank G. sent me this.<br />
Frank and I frequently take opposite sides on issues.<br />
I imagine we would have differing opinions of who is being skewered by Mr. Watterston.  <br />
Regardless.<br />
It proves that some things will never change . . . . </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/02/_thank_you_frank.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/02/_thank_you_frank.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:11:05 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Foolish Glee </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>An anonymous commenter to another, so-called conservative blog here at NorCalBlogs noted that I have been full of glee lately.<br />
Well, when I am not cycling through emotional lows, I admit to a certain feeling of glee.<br />
Especially when I think about how foolish so-called conservatives are getting these days!<br />
In older times the king kept a fool around for that very reason—to cheer himself up.  Reading what the conservatives are vomiting all over the internet makes me smile—for a while.<br />
For example, a while back the Air Force bought some jets from a foreign country—France, I believe.  Well, the conservatives had a field day pitching a bitch.  Just this week, they were bitching about the “Buy American” provisions in the stimulus bill!<br />
You see, those of us who live in the real world are clued to the glaring hypocrisy evidenced here.  So, we laugh.  Call it glee, if you will.<br />
Just this morning, the fools are blaming Obama for not showing up for an ice storm!  Except, if he did, they would bitch because he wasn’t focusing somewhere else.  <br />
The truth is so-called conservatives<br />
GOT NUTHIN’!<br />
A leading so-called conservative voice here in Northern California—who also pens a weekly article for the aforementioned blog—could not bring himself to vote for John McCain, as McCain had no conservative cred.  So, he votes for McCain because he likes Palin!<br />
I was unaware that spending six week’s pay on a suit jacket was a conservative value.  I did not know that five semesters at Moose Community College made one fit for the highest office in the land!  Who would have guessed that parading the father of your bastard grandchild around for the world was just what the “conservatives” needed to see to vote for the ticket!</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p>Sorry, I had to pause for a laughing fit!</p>

<p><br />
OK<br />
The so-called conservatives are going to call themselves the loyal opposition in exile or some such nonsense.  But as I said earlier, they don’t have any alternatives.<br />
In the Wall Street Journal, I read of an alternative stimulus plan authored by none other than the king of BS, Rush Limbaugh.  Rush reminds us that Bush’s tax cuts stimulated the economy.  True to his style, Rush leaves out the fact that we have borrowed two TRILLION dollars from Social Security to cover the losses from those cuts.<br />
Sorry kids, borrowing yourself into a hole is NOT a conservative value!<br />
Indeed, what ARE conservative values?<br />
I would love for any of the so-called conservatives out there to enlighten me on what it is they want.<br />
Foreign entanglements?<br />
Fiat money?<br />
Usury?<br />
Abandonment of Christian principles?<br />
I look forward to the day when the so-called conservatives can explain themselves without making me laugh.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/02/font_colormagentafont_size5_fo.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/02/font_colormagentafont_size5_fo.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:20:14 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Litmus Test II </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I promised my girlfriend I would not badmouth our new president until he at least took office.  It’s almost a week now.<br />
I did not vote for the man.  <br />
I do not trust the man.<br />
But m’honey, the always-lovely Keitha Mashaw, is swooning over the guy!<br />
So, to keep the peace . . . . . . <br />
Well, notice that I have not written too many essays since November.</p>

<p>As I have written here before, the same team that gave us George H. W. Bush brought Obama to you.  He is a package.<br />
An incredibly well-produced package that the majority of voters bought into.<br />
Plus, coming up through Chicago politics practically defines him as a gangster.<br />
But you can’t tell that to m’honey!  You can’t tell that to many people.  We have a rock star for a president.<br />
I told my girlfriend that Obama is going to reveal his true colors ere long.<br />
Today I read a story that might give us a peek sooner rather than later.<br />
It seems that an offshore wind farm—with the potential to power hundreds of thousands of homes--has been planned within sight of the Kennedy compound in Hyannis Port, Massachusetts.  Ted Kennedy does not want this spoiling his view.  It has been planned for a long time, but with Bush as president, any plans to take profits away from energy companies were not actively pursued.<br />
Now the calculus has changed.<br />
Here comes President Obama, talking big about alternative energy.<br />
Here is his big chance to prove it.<br />
Will he walk the walk?<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/01/_litmus_test_ii.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/01/_litmus_test_ii.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:36:33 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Our Long National Nightmare Is Over!!! </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, an essay only needs a title.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/01/_our_long_national_nightmare_i.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2009/01/_our_long_national_nightmare_i.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> Toyota </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Toyota announced today its first operating loss in fifty-eight years.<br />
The people who assemble Toyota vehicles are not represented by a union.<br />
If anyone still believes that the problems in Detroit are caused by unions,<br />
Please think for yourself.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2008/12/_toyota.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2008/12/_toyota.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:04:25 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title> To Bail Or Not To Bail?  </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>That  is the question.<br />
I think it has already been answered.<br />
I believe that Detroit will get our tax dollars.  It is certainly not the first time.<br />
I hope the government then gets out of the automobile business forever.<br />
The Right is saying that government should not dictate to private enterprise.  That is wrong for two reasons.<br />
First: if you run your business into the ground and come to me for a loan, you’d better believe I want some say in your new business plan!  <br />
Second: the government has dictated to the automakers for years—after a fashion.  The government and Detroit have actually been in collusion for years.  It’s just good business, y’know?<br />
Remember the Honda 600?<br />
It came out in the 70s, cost about 1200 bucks, and got phenomenal gas mileage.<br />
If you got in an accident though, you would most probably die.  I’m sure that was obvious to anyone who saw one.  I saw four guys pick one up—like that Mentos commercial—of course they weren’t safe!<br />
Detroit saw the future.<br />
Rather than trim the fat then and compete on a level playing ground, they just called their friends in government.  What’s a few bucks in “campaign contributions” anyway?<br />
Suddenly, the safety standards that Detroit had fought for years were of paramount importance.  The “committee” that was formed by the government to set safety standards was peopled by the executives of the Big 3!<br />
Remember the 5-MPH bumper?<br />
That big, heavy monstrosity that was now required by law would be too heavy for those little Japanese engines to pull them around, not to mention the overall stresses on the frame and brakes, etc.  It set the Japanese back a few years—it had nothing to do with our safety.<br />
This example simply illustrates the way Detroit does business—without ethics.  For that reason alone, I oppose the bailout.  <br />
On the other hand, if they stopped producing cars, the ripple effects through the economy would be tremendous—though recoverable, eventually.<br />
On yet another hand, They need some money to take care of their employees, past and present.  But let’s not get the folks actually building the cars confused with the folks pushing papers in the offices.  <br />
Building the cars is horrendous work.  Check out the turnover rates at the assembly plants throughout history.  The guys that stuck it out, did so for one reason: the retirement benefits.  To snub them now is just immoral.  Let the government  take care of their medical needs through Medicare or something.<br />
Do the guys who actually broke their bodies in some cases have to get screwed because automakers have no morals?  Are we to act the same and deprive them of what they were promised?<br />
Let’s not forget too that the actual (blue-collar) labor costs of assembly are one-ninth of what they were thirty years ago.<br />
If someone tells you it is labor costs that are driving this crisis, smile and tell them they have been lied to!<br />
The best plan of all is to let free-market capitalism sort out the fates of the Big 3.<br />
Let us bail out the workers.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2008/12/_to_bail_or_not_to_bail.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.norcalblogs.com/uncomfortabletruth/2008/12/_to_bail_or_not_to_bail.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
