“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up poop by the clean end.”
-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- Art (88)
- Behavior and Psychology (20)
- Business, Industry and Finance (63)
- Constitution and Law (370)
- Consumer Affairs (4)
- Culture (17)
- Deep State (5)
- Economy (3)
- Education (238)
- Environment (74)
- Fraud Alert (8)
- Global Issues (1)
- Health and Medicine (149)
- History (8)
- Humour (94)
- Military (115)
- Morals and Ethics (149)
- News Media (11)
- Police, Crime, Security (215)
- Politics and Government (144)
- Religion (91)
- Science and Technology (19)
- Veterans' Issues (13)
- World (12)
Recent Comments
- ClayPidgeon on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Michael Davis on Life In Chico and Other Places Infected by Bums
- Patricia Lieder on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Dawn on Thaddeus Kerns Boy Aviator
- scott sproat on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
Recent NorCal Blogs Posts
Or be “easily washed off” downtown business store fronts and into the watershed.
Sanitary insanity in a sea of excrement?
That is what a principle member of the Chico City Council “Sustainability Task Force” said. The same CSU faculty jerk who called Anthony Watts a “Koch whore” on his Facebook page.
These are the people we are dealing with.
I noticed the administration was out creating news with a phony bologna warming scare report this morning.
My engineer husband did some calculating last night and estimated that to raise the ocean 12 feet it would take 7000 trillion cubic feet of melt.
The summer season simply isn’t that long, darling!
(I’m watching “The Women,” 1939).
The greenie left extremists are not only crazy, they are extremely unethical (Liars).
I imagine the guy at CSU can’t stand the world wide recognition and following that Anthony Watts and WWWT has.
Makes me smile real big!
There is no “clean end” to the racist xenophobia prevalent on this blog. Political correctness will never come into it.
Why would you think it could ever be so?
Tina: “I noticed the administration was out creating news with a phony bologna warming scare report this morning.”
I notice you received your dishonest right-wing talking points this morning.
The administration was not “creating news.” The body behind the climate report you refer to is LEGALLY OBLIGATED to release a report every four years due to a mandate that was passed by Congress under the first President Bush.
The “phony bologna warming scare” is a report compiled by over 200 climate scientists.
Forgive me if I trust their conclusions over the meteorologist Anthony Watts, who is paid by the Heartland Institute to lie about climate change in the same way they’ve paid others to lie about second-hand smoke, and your engineer husband.
What you fail to notice could fill a library. Keep smilin’.
it couldn’t possibly be true that these so called scientists have perpetrated scare tactics to get government grants, to create business investment opportunities, to manipulate policy and law within nations, and to move the nations toward the new world order the radical progressives have dreamed of for decades (total control). Naw…they wouldn’t purposely manipulate data so as to make their scarey arguments seem true…that would be UNETHICAL. They wouldn’t attempt manipulate and change the meaning behind the scientific method or smear the reputation of the science community in pursuit of progressive total control.
It isn’t Anthony Watts you should fear, Chris. It is all of the real scientist who know what they are talking about who refute not only the phony science but the political scare tactics that drive the entire movement. Pathetic!
The body may be compelled by law to report…they are not compelled by law to LIE.
The President likewise is not compelled to hide behind their lies and create scarey headlines or to try to change the narrative so that the failures of his party vanish from the pages of the news prior to the next election.
Dewey can the crap or we’ll send you back to your tree.
Libby: “There is no “clean end” to the racist xenophobia prevalent on this blog. Political correctness will never come into it.”
But Libby, you contradict yourself. Political correctness, by its current definition, means calling out racism and xenophobia. It is much better and more civil to let these tendencies go unchecked, because accusing someone of racism is the absolute worst thing you can do, far worse than actually saying or doing racist things. Unless someone is wearing a white hood and riding horseback throwing molotov cocktails through Harlem, then you shouldn’t accuse them of racism.
El Stupido strikes again!
Tina: “it couldn’t possibly be true that these so called scientists have perpetrated scare tactics to get government grants, to create business investment opportunities, to manipulate policy and law within nations, and to move the nations toward the new world order the radical progressives have dreamed of for decades (total control). Naw…they wouldn’t purposely manipulate data so as to make their scarey arguments seem true…that would be UNETHICAL. They wouldn’t attempt manipulate and change the meaning behind the scientific method or smear the reputation of the science community in pursuit of progressive total control.”
Well, certainly, it’s possible.
But that has nothing to do with your false claim that the president was “creating news” by releasing the report, which they are legally required to do.
“It isn’t Anthony Watts you should fear, Chris.”
I do not fear him.
“It is all of the real scientist who know what they are talking about who refute not only the phony science but the political scare tactics that drive the entire movement. Pathetic!”
And…which scientists would those be, exactly? If they are so worthy of being feared, I’d like to know their names.
“The body may be compelled by law to report…they are not compelled by law to LIE.”
Well, neither are you, and yet you still feel the need to do it all the time.
You’ve shown zero evidence that anyone involved in the report has lied about anything.
“The President likewise is not compelled to hide behind their lies and create scarey headlines”
Again, this is nonsense. The president didn’t “create headlines” by releasing a report that he is legally mandated to release.
It’s one thing that you said this the first time; you could hide behind ignorance then. But now that you are repeating it, after the truth has already been delivered to you on a silver platter, you are proving that you are not merely ignorant, but dishonest.
Dewey, I hope it was clear to you that my comments regarding racism and political correctness were satirical.
Re El Stupido’s “If someone makes blatant racist statements it is a citizens right to comment, call them out, but not wise to be as blatantly ignorant back to them.
See the disgusting negro burner racist Chris’ comment “I’ll be the first to hold Obama’s feet to the fire.”
Granted, Chris left out burning and lynching. I suppose we all should be thankful for that.
http://www.norcalblogs.com/postscripts/2014/04/29/newly-released-email-ties-white-house-benghazi-talking-points/
Dewey a debate might be fun if you could stick to one subject and were willing to use facts. I’m afraid your manic mind couldn’t do either.
Chris: “But that has nothing to do with your false claim that the president was “creating news” by releasing the report, which they are legally required to do.”
The President isn’t legally required to comment. It was my opinion, which I believe I am still allowed.
“If they are so worthy of being feared, I’d like to know their names.”
Not at all surprised you have forgotten the world renowned, award winning PHD who is one of the many signatories to the letter that opposes false theories passed off as fact in their names (My words not his).
Wikipedia has a list of names with various positions:
Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer explains why the Polar Vortex has nothing to do with C02 in the atmosphere. Scroll down for links to two other pertinent articles:
Prominent Scientist Happer Tells Congress: Earth in ‘CO2 Famine’ – ‘The increase of CO2 is not a cause for alarm and will be good for mankind’
Princeton U. Physicist Dr. William Happer and NASA Moonwalker & Geologist Dr. Harrison H. Schmitt wrote on May 8, 2013 in the Wall Street Journal: “Thanks to the single-minded demonization of this natural and essential atmospheric gas by advocates of government control of energy production, the conventional wisdom about carbon dioxide is that it is a dangerous pollutant. That’s simply not the case.”
Dismissing these distinguished scientists as “climate deniers” is really stupid but indicative of the lefts adolescent attitude when challenged.
Gotta run…back later
Pie, you are not an idiot. Who does it benefit for you to pretend to be?
Tina: “The President isn’t legally required to comment. It was my opinion, which I believe I am still allowed.”
It wasn’t at all clear from your writing that you were criticizing the president for commenting on the report. Now that I understand that is what you were saying, can you explain to me what exactly was wrong with the president’s comments? You seem to be arguing that the president was wrong to comment at all, which is absurd.
“Not at all surprised you have forgotten the world renowned, award winning PHD who is one of the many signatories to the letter that opposes false theories passed off as fact in their names (My words not his).”
I think we’ve misunderstood each other at some point; I meant to ask you to name scientists whom you believe are guilty of lying in order to support the AGW theory. You’ve made many accusations against climate scientists here, and I would like to know which scientists in particular you think are in on this vast conspiracy.
Re #19 Chris : “Pie, you are not an idiot. Who does it benefit for you to pretend to be?”
Chris, you are a vile racist idiot, who does it benefit for you to pretend not to be?
Hi, Chris …
I was actually trying to reclaim the term for our side. (Though there’s no doing a thing like that around here in two sentences.)
We should not let them use PC as a pejorative, deriding those who dare to call them on their savagery. To be PC is to uphold the highest standards of public decorum and a civil society.
And a bigot is a bigot.
And we must not let them cloud these issues.
Chris The Liar “Anthony Watts, who is paid by the Heartland Institute to lie about climate change”
A bald faced lie from the bald faced liar scum bag Chris. What a despicable creep you are Chris.
Chris: “You seem to be arguing that the president was wrong to comment at all, which is absurd.”
You argued that “they” were “legally required to release the report.”
I simply said the President is not legally required to comment on it. His doing so, in my opinion, is an election cycle move to use the bully pulpit to create news and try to change the news narrative to what he believes (wrongly) will be a winner for Democrats.
“I meant to ask you to name scientists whom you believe are guilty of lying in order to support the AGW theory. You’ve made many accusations against climate scientists here, and I would like to know which scientists in particular you think are in on this vast conspiracy.”
So now your side is calling it a theory? For years it’s been sold as “settled science”. That alone constituted a huge fraud.
Science is NEVER settled in circles where scientists with integrity practice in their chosen fields. Scientists have the ultimate in inquiring minds. Remember, the atom was once thought to be the smallest particle. Now we have seen smaller quarks that move in and out of reality…now you see em, now you don’t.
The so called “truth” that has been perpetrated on the public, that evil mankind and especially those connected to oil, were killing the planet was political from the start. Any scientist that bought into it, helped to promote it, and/or benefited from it are suspect in my mind. Einsteins they are not!
Chris we have posted reports that found the hockey stick on which climate models were based was created by falsifying the data to produce the graph. But even before that was exposed claiming “concensus” agreement was fraudulent.
You are either interested in the truth or you aren’t. I’ll post a few articles that name names or at least show the warming “science” is not supported by all, or even most, scientist but other than that I don’t keep a list in my pocket.
This scientist demonstrates that its about politics rather than science…scientists love to argue about their evidence and theories:
NPR, “Climate Scientist Admits To Lying, Leaking Documents”
Forbes, “Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate”
Forbes article, February 2013, “Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis”
Web Today, “UN Global Warming Claims Discredited by True Scientific Evidence”
The New American:
Libby: “To be PC is to uphold the highest standards of public decorum and a civil society.”
If only that were true.
To be PC is to uphold a set of rules that require dishonest and preferential treatment, speech and behaviors. These rules can change at the drop of a hat when a new “offense” is imagined or a new “cause” is created. To be PC one must become a bigot because it relies heavily on division rather than the false narrative of “inclusion”.
Good manners were once the method used to “uphold the highest standards of public decorum and a civil society.” They applied to everyone and when breached were recognized instantly.
The PC crowd tossed good manners out in the halls of Berkley in the sixties. the so-called psychology majors of the time eventually pushed them out further with the theory that children should be “free to express themselves however they wished and not disciplined because it would destroy their natural creativity. Later that evolved into destroying right and wrong and personal responsibility with the notion of “being appropriate”. Ironically this was probably borrowed from the Buddhists without the requisite epiphany of consciousness.
“And a bigot is a bigot.”
And every leftist that plays the class and race warfare game is one! Nothing “cloudy” about that.
“To be PC is to uphold a set of rules that require dishonest and preferential treatment, speech and behaviors.”
Examples?
Tell us what you mean.
I didn’t expect any examples from you, though I can think of lots.
You may honestly believe that “greaser” is a legitimate component of civil discourse, but us PCers, we just ain’t havin’ it.
“Forbes article, February 2013, “Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis””
Tina, this is at least the fourth time you have cited this dishonest article, which lies in the headline and continues to lie throughout the entire piece. The survey did NOT find that a “majority of scientists” were “skeptical of [the] global warming crisis;” in fact, according to the authors of the study as well as basic common sense, the survey could not possibly have found that, because they only polled a small sampling of engineers from Alberta, and polled zero climate scientists.
I will not waste my time by once again recounting all of the lies told by James Taylor, another paid Heartland hitman. You can simply revisit my responses to your previous attempts to spread this lie here:
http://www.norcalblogs.com/postscripts/2013/08/18/ofa-targets-climate-denier-republicans-fails-miserably/
And here:
http://www.norcalblogs.com/postscripts/2013/09/23/ccss-common-core-marxist-propaganda-program-indoctrinate-americas-children/
Or you can simply read the comments underneath the article, where several commenters, including the authors of the survey themselves, call out James Taylor for blatantly misrepresenting their work.
I should also point out that in none of our previous discussions have you ever acknowledged that Taylor lied in his article, even though you have been presented with indisputable proof that he did. One does not have to be even remotely scientifically literate to understand how James Taylor’s summary of the survey is in no way close to what the survey actually found. I asked you repeatedly to engage with the points raised by the authors of the survey that Taylor misrepresented, and you not only refused, you called me an “arrogant” “authoritarian” and a “tyrant” for asking you to address the accuracy of the misleading article that you posted in order to provide evidence for your position. As if that was an unreasonable demand.
Since then you have repeatedly pushed the same article, with no seeming awareness that it has already been proven to be a steaming pile of lies.
Because you have shown that you lack even a rudimentary understanding of how to read and understand scientific data–and you reject all attempts by others to help you understand even the basic, most obvious points, such as the clear misrepresentation in Taylor’s article–your opinions on the topic of climate change are worth nothing. You claim that the hockey stick data was forged, but you literally have no way of knowing that. You believe it because you want to, and because people you trust tell you to believe it. But given that you trust people like James Taylor, a proven liar as I have repeatedly demonstrated, and as the scientists he claimed agreed with him have also shown, your judgment on this issue is obviously terrible, and nothing you say about this topic should be taken seriously by anyone who even wants to understand basic science.
When you can acknowledge the proven fact that Taylor lied in his piece, and promise not to cite that dishonest article again, we will discuss this issue further.
“Pie Guevara: Chris The Liar “Anthony Watts, who is paid by the Heartland Institute to lie about climate change”
A bald faced lie from the bald faced liar scum bag Chris. What a despicable creep you are Chris.”
1) Get help with your Tourettes and 2) you’re wrong.
“The Heartland Institute published Watts’ preliminary report on weather station data, titled Is the U.S. Surface Temperature Record Reliable?.[12] Watts has been featured as a speaker at Heartland Institute’s International Conference on Climate Change, for which he acknowledges receiving payment.[55]
Documents obtained from the Heartland Institute and made public in February 2012 reveal that the Institute had agreed to help Watts raise $88,000 to set up a website, “devoted to accessing the new temperature data from NOAA’s web site and converting them into easy-to-understand graphs that can be easily found and understood by weathermen and the general interested public.”[56][57][58] The documents state that $44,000 had already been pledged by an anonymous donor, and the Institute would seek to raise the rest.[55] Watts explained the funding by stating, “Heartland simply helped me find a donor for funding a special project having to do with presenting some new NOAA surface data in a public friendly graphical form, something NOAA themselves is not doing, but should be. I approached them in the fall of 2011 asking for help, on this project not the other way around.”[59][60] and added, “They do not regularly fund me nor my WUWT website, I take no salary from them of any kind.”[59][61]”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Watts_(blogger)#cite_note-Gascoyne-55
I accept your apology, and we can still be friends.
And there’s new news just today. Antarctica is melting, faster than we thought, and there’s no stopping it either. Any long-range planning should not include Miami.