Benghazi Revelation – Stinger Missiles

So here’s the REAL story. Amb. Stevens was sent to Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission.
Hillary brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Then some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan used against our own military.  It was July 25th, 2012 when a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of our own Stingers, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but had to land anyway.
An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA.  Obama and Hillary were now in full panic mode and Stevens was sent in to retrieve the rest of the Stingers.  This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams.
It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to our sworn enemies, because Petraeus wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he OK’d the BS talking points about a spontaneous uprising due to a Youtube video.
Obama and Hillary committed treason…and THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was because of a You Tube video, even though everyone knew it was not. Further…the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval when Boehner created the Select Cmte, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for the release of 5 Taliban Generals.
Bowe Bergdahl was just a pawn…everyone KNEW he was a traitor.
So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised…and a woman that is a serial liar, perjured herself multiple times at the Hearing whom is running for POTUS. Only the Dems, with their hands out, palms up, will support her. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft was called in…because the administration knew our enemies had Stingers:
Here’s a possible connected story from the Washington correspondent for the Daily Mail:Four hundred American surface-to-air missiles were ‘taken from Libya’ during the terror attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, a former U.S. Attorney who represents whistleblowers claimed on Monday. 
He added that the U.S. intelligence community is terrified they might be used to shoot down airliners.

Joe diGenova, whose wife Victoria Toensing – a former deputy assistant attorney general – also represents Benghazi witnesses and others with knowledge of the terror attack, told WMAL radio that the loss of those missiles is also one the reason the U.S. State Department shut down 19 embassies across the Middle East last week. 

‘A lot of people have come forward to share information with us,’ he said during the radio station’s ‘Mornings On The Mall’ program Monday morning.

‘We have learned that one of the reasons the administration is so deeply concerned’ is that ‘there were 400 surface-to-air missiles stolen, and that they are … in the hands of many people, and that the biggest fear in the U.S. intelligence community is that one of these missiles will be used to shoot down an airliner. 400 missiles, surface-to-air missiles, taken from Libya.’

Asked if the missiles are now ‘in the hands of al-Qaeda operatives,’ DiGenova replied, ‘That is what these people are telling us.’

Read more: 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Letter of Endorsement for Trump – A Must Read

By Sheldon Adelman

These are turbulent times.

More and more Americans express frustration and disillusionment today with the political institutions that govern the nation. They clamor for an alternative to the incestuous and pernicious atmosphere dominating the capital. They see a vast array of lobbyists, elected officials and entrenched interests manipulating the levers of power for their own enrichment at the expense of ordinary citizens.

The discontent isn’t confined by ideology or political philosophy. As Donald Trump confounded the pundit class in ignoring convention and protocol on his way to securing the Republican presidential nomination, a long-time socialist generated throngs of enthusiastic supporters on the left and almost derailed the Democratic coronation of Hillary Clinton.

“Change is in the air,” activist Marianne Williamson wrote, “as old patterns fall away and new energies are emerging.”  And so it is.

History tells us that agents for reform often generate fear and alarm among those intent on preserving their cushy sinecures. It’s hardly a shock, then, that the 2016 campaign has produced a barrage of unceasing vitriol directed toward Mr. Trump. But let us not be distracted by the social media sideshows and carnival clatter. Substantive issues are in play this November.

Our allies on the world stage watch nervously as America retreats from its position of strong leadership leaving strife and conflict rushing to fill the void. The past eight years have pushed us $20 trillion into debt, obligations that will burden our children and grandchildren. The nation’s economy sputters under the growing weight of federal edicts and regulations that smother growth and innovation. Obamacare threatens to crash and burn. The middle class struggles. An administration promising hope and unity instead brought division.

Yet Hillary Clinton promises to lead us down the same path. She’ll cuddle up to the ways and perks of Washington like she would to a cozy old blanket.

Mr. Trump instead brings a corporate sensibility and a steadfast determination to an ossified Beltway culture. He advocates for lower taxes and a simplified tax code, in contrast to his opponent’s plan to extract another $1 trillion from the private economy in order to enlarge the bureaucracy. Mr. Trump understands and appreciates the conditions that lead to prosperity and job creation and would be a friend to small business and entrepreneurship. Mrs. Clinton has spent most of her adult life on the public payroll.

Of particular importance is the U.S. Supreme Court. The next president may be charged with filling multiple vacancies, shaping the court’s direction for a generation. Mr. Trump prefers nominees who recognize the Constitution’s checks on federal authority as a bulwark against tyranny. Mrs. Clinton would be a disaster in this regard.

Protections enshrined in no fewer than five amendments in the Bill of Rights could be eliminated or diminished under a progressive high court. Mrs. Clinton has already expressed support for empowering censors to regulate political speech — and even ban movies and books — by rewriting the First Amendment under the guise of campaign finance reform. Count on this to be a litmus test for her high-court nominees.

Expect the Second Amendment to fare no better. The individual right to bear arms would be a likely casualty of a Clinton presidency. In addition, it’s not hard to envision a liberal court further eroding the Fifth Amendment’s restrictions on government confiscation of private property and simply pulling the plug on the Ninth and 10th amendments, which have long been on life support.

Make no mistake, a Hillary Clinton administration would indulge the worst instincts of the authoritarian left and continue to swell the bloated regulatory state while running the nation deeper into the red in pursuit of “free” college and health care.

Yes, Mr. Trump’s impulsiveness and overheated rhetoric alienate many voters. He has trouble dealing with critics and would be wise to discover the power of humility.

But neither candidate will ever be called to the dais to accept an award for moral probity and character. And we are already distressingly familiar with the Clinton way, which involves turning public service into an orgy of influence peddling and entitlement designed to line their own pockets — precisely what a disgruntled electorate now rises up to protest.

Mr. Trump represents neither the danger his critics claim nor the magic elixir many of his supporters crave. But he promises to be a source of disruption and discomfort to the privileged, back-scratching political elites for whom the nation’s strength and solvency have become subservient to power’s pursuit and preservation

Posted in Liberty, politics | Tagged | 7 Comments

Not for the Faint of Heart – Solar Storm Warning

by Jack

Perhaps I made a mistake watching a program on the History channel last night. I say that because ignorance is bliss and now I know just enough to be worried!  The program was part of a series about ten ways the world could suddenly end, yikes! Great subject for the Halloween season, eh?

Statistically 9 of the 10 possibilities were real long shots, but one…. well, not so much and that was the real disturbing part.

The odds are, this one event will actually happen and fairly soon, probably sometime in the next 100 years.  It’s called a solar storm and it wreaks havoc on anything electrical.  Power lines will fry, toasters will burn, TV sets could explode and all those big transformers will likely burn up, disrupting power transmission all over the globe.

This “solar storm” is really a massive electrically charged ejecta that comes from our sun. It happens on a smaller scale almost daily so we never notice. However, should a really large solar storm hit the earth as it did in 1859, it’s estimated that 9 out of 10 people will not survive. Got your attention now?

Solar storm” is a generic term used to describe a bunch of stuff the Sun hurls our way, including x-rays, charged particles, and magnetized plasma. A massive solar storm hasn’t hit the Earth since the mid-19th century, but space weather scientists are very worried about the possibility of another.

solar-flareIn 1859 about the only thing that was damaged by a massive solar storm (1) was the new telegraph wires because they were electrified and melted.   Many miles of copper wire virtually sizzled and burnt thru because they could not contain the sudden spike in high voltage. But, the rest of the world was virtually untouched and hardly noticed, other than a dazzling light display in the upper atmosphere.

Fortunately, in 1859 an electrical outage would never have been noticed, except for the telegraph. Food was abundant because family farms were built around population centers and provided all the food locally.  No need for refrigeration.  People used hand syphon pumps, no electrically powered water pumps.   They had homes with tall ceilings and lots of windows, because there was no air conditioning.  There was also no high rises with  electric elevators zipping up and down.

Hydro electric or steam was the most likely source of local power back then, but today we are almost 99% dependent on electricity for everything we do.  Imagine if it were suddenly shut off? You couldn’t even pump gas, transportation would grind to a halt. Grocery stores would be looted in the first week by panicked crowds.   Most of your fresh foods would spoil at home and where would you get your water?  Pumps wouldn’t work.

Our national emergency food stores have about a month worth of food, but how do you get it to people without fuel for trucks?

Communications would go down as soon as radio and TV stations exhausted their backup generator’s fuel. Hospitals and police departments would not be able to function. The military would be crippled within a month as fuel ran out and then comes anarchy. And we have not even begun to talk about what happens when many of the world’s 400 nuclear power plants go into meltdown because coolant water runs out, remember, this storm will melt exposed electrical lines!solar_panel_array

In the months following a massive solar storm the entire world’s population would be in search of food and clean water and doing whatever was necessary to survive.  Big cities would suddenly become death traps.  Lots people starving and no place to get food.

In America 75% of people have never hunted or foraged for their food…can you imagine the chaos that would follow because of starving, desperate, frightened armed groups trying to stay alive?  The world today has over 6 times the population that existed in the 1850’s.  That’s a lot of mouths to feed without modern technology.

Very cold climates and very hot climates would spell instant disaster for our elderly. Even our supply of natural gas would be disrupted and in the process there would be massive fires cause from short circuits because electrical lines and gas lines often touch.

We know this problem is real and the odds are highly likely of it occurring almost anytime from now through the next 100 years, but all is not lost. There is a fairly easy solution to preventing the horrific damage cause by a world wide power outage and reducing it to a manageable loss.   Instead of 90% casualties we would be looking around 8-10% of the world’s population.

We currently have an early warning system for an approaching solar storm.  That’s great. This will allow power companies to shut down generators and minimize their damage. But, we should begin hardening our power plants against electrical radiation and protecting key power lines.  Of course underground power lines would stand the best chance against melting, so that’s another way to protect ourselves.   Solar and wind powered generators unit’s will help a little.  They can keep the power on in many places, providing temporary survival points, but we are woefully short of having enough to supply our most minimal needs for 350 million people.

mobWe know what to do in a solar storm because Congress has held many hearings on this threat, but not surprisingly, we’ve poo-oo’d the problem and taken almost no precautionary steps.   First of all, the government can’t force the power companies to do anything because they are all privately owned.   Secondly, the costs of protecting our electrical system would add 10%-15% more to our monthly bill, so many people would object, just because of the costs or would they?   I’m thinking if people knew the threat they would be happy to pay a little more.

Lets hope a solar storm doesn’t hit until we wise up and take the steps to protect ourselves. Hope… [hope] seems to be what we’ve substituted for action. Will hope cut it for you? Let’s hope so. . . because the alternative says life is going to be very challenging IF a massive solar storm wipes out our world electrical systems.

1. On Sept. 2, 1859, an incredible storm of charged particles sent by the sun slammed into Earth’s atmosphere, overpowered it, and caused havoc on the ground. Telegraph wires, the high-tech stuff of the time, suddenly shorted out in the United States and Europe, igniting widespread fires. Colorful aurora, normally visible only in polar regions, were seen as far south as Cuba and Hawaii.

Click here for more information.

Posted in Education, Energy and Conservation | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Hillary’s Constitutional Vision ~ The People Lose

the-first-amendment-isPosted by Tina

Must read by Kevin D. Williamson at National Review.

Mr. Williamson nails Hillary regarding her remarks about the kind of people she would appoint to the Supreme Court:

During the final presidential debate, Hillary Rodham Clinton declared herself a totalitarian. She did not use that word, of course, but that was the substance of her remarks.
She began by arguing that the Supreme Court, and lesser federal courts, should be political partisans who take sides in disputes rather than adjudicate them according to the law. Many politicians — perhaps even most — believe that, or act in a way that suggests they do, but most of them feel at least the need to shamefacedly insist that judges are there to impartially apply the law. Not Mrs. Clinton. The Supreme Court that exists in her mind is the worst version of the highest judicial body, which is to say the American answer to Iran’s Guardian Council. The justices already wander into American-ayatollah territory too often, and it is only shame that constrains them. It is impossible to overstate the damage this is doing to our constitutional order, and to the legitimacy of the federal government itself.

What is worse — if something can in fact be worse — is that Mrs. Clinton seeks to unmoor the Supreme Court from the Constitution in order to pursue her own repressive and self-interested political program, namely the censorship of publications, organizations, and institutions that are critical of her.

Lost in all of the deeply stupid rhetoric (“Money isn’t speech!”) surrounding the Citizens United case is the fundamental issue that was at question, to wit whether the federal government can censor films of which it disapproves. The film in question was called Hillary: The Movie, and it was very critical of Mrs. Clinton while she was seeking the Democratic nomination in 2008. The government attempted to forbid the distribution of the film on the grounds that it was critical of a political figure, which was at the time impermissible, under what is cynically known as “campaign finance” law, unless done in strict compliance with narrow and restrictive federal regulations, and then only at certain times. The Supreme Court rightly threw the law behind that out as rankly unconstitutional censorship of political speech.

What those beef-witted partisans who abuse the word “liberal” fail to appreciate is that the principle behind the so-called campaign-finance laws they support is an open-ended power of federal censorship of all political speech, journalism, literature, films, television, radio, and other communication. Some of the more sinister forces on the left understand that perfectly well, and the glee with which Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders present the proposal of silencing their political critics is both astounding and horrifying. But, assuming that there are at least a few actual liberals left in the Democratic party, a few facts bear consideration….

Read on at: National Review and discover what is really behind the Citizens United hoopla and which of your freedoms hang in the balance if that woman, Hillary Clinton, is ever allowed to become the president of the United States.

Posted in Constitution & The Law, politics | 5 Comments

Reality: The Democrat Record of Challenging Election Results is Extensive!

Posted by Tina


Hillary smugly called his remarks, “horrifying!” Eeeeeeks!

Republican elites cringed and threw fits…(he’s staining our image). Double Eeeeeeks!

The media started throwing darts…he’s destroyed his chances now…he’s destroyed the long tradition of the election loser conceding and allowing for a “peaceful transition of power.”

Hmmm…is that true?

Surely Chris Wallace and other members of the outraged media recall the 2000 election with Al Gore refusing to accept the election outcome…and the weeks and weeks of a hanging chad comedy routine? They are the professionals…right?

What about the election involving Al Franken in Minnisota? Franken initially lost the election to the incumbent, Republican Sen. Norm Coleman in a close race. Guess what? Democrat Al Franken refused to accept the result and called for a recount…there were several:

….on the morning after the election, after 2.9 million people had voted, Coleman led Franken by 725 votes.

Franken and his Democratic allies dispatched an army of lawyers to challenge the results. After the first canvass, Coleman’s lead was down to 206 votes. That was followed by months of wrangling and litigation. In the end, Franken was declared the winner by 312 votes. He was sworn into office in July 2009, eight months after the election.

During the controversy, a conservative group called Minnesota Majority began to look into claims of voter fraud. Comparing criminal records with voting rolls, the group identified 1,099 felons — all ineligible to vote — who had voted in the Franken-Coleman race.

Al Franken’s successful and highly questionable victory gave the democrats the super majority they needed to shove Obamacare down our throats!

But that’s not all. Remember California Prop 8 on gay marriage? To qualify for the ballot, Proposition 8 needed 694,354 valid petition signatures. 1,120,801 signatures were collected. The amendment sought to preserve the established definition of marriage as between one man and one woman. THE PEOPLE voted in favor of the amendment with 52.24% of the votes and the left refused to accept the election result!

Remember the mess in 2011 in Wisconsin? Democrats refused to accept legislation, sighed by Republican Scott Walker:

In 2011, there were a series of demonstrations in Wisconsin, involving at its zenith as many as 100,000 protestors[9] opposing the 2011 Wisconsin Act 10, also called the “Wisconsin budget repair bill.” The legislation, passed by the Wisconsin Legislature on June 29, 2011, primarily impacted the following areas: collective bargaining, compensation, retirement, health insurance, and sick leave of the state’s public sector employees.

These protests became a major driving force of multiple recall elections, including state senators in 2011 and 2012, Governor Scott Walker in 2012 and a contentious Wisconsin Supreme Court election in 2011.

There are other examples all of which show the utter hypocrisy, and the always present phony rhetoric, of the conniving Democrat Party.

You know that if Trump wins it will be hysteria on the left…protests, hanging chads, whatever it takes to foil the will of the people.

Posted in Constitution & The Law, politics | 8 Comments

Homeless Problem – Finally the Truth

by Jack

(Homeless dumping or patient dumping is the practice of hospitals or other agencies  releasing homeless patients on the streets instead of placing them with a homeless shelter or retaining them, especially when they may require expensive medical care with minimal government reimbursement from Medicaid or Medicare. )

For several years local law enforcement has known that Chico is a dumping place for other state’s homeless, but you never heard the Police Chief admit it at our council meetings.   Surely, if his officers knew he knew, right?  And if the cops all knew it, then our local shelter operators and others involved in the Homeless Task Force must have known it too.   But, it seems this little secret was deliberately being kept from the general public in Chico for some reason.

Dumping explains why the job of our local street ambassadors, volunteers counselling homeless about the local rules, will never be finished.  Every few weeks we’re dealing with a whole new group of problem people from outside Chico.

6o minutes did a segment the practice dumping, as well as at least a half dozen major news agencies within California.  The conclusion was always the same, bums are getting a free bus ticket to California!

For some senders of homeless, California wasn’t nearly far enough, and now Hawaii is being overrun with bums and mental patients coming from all over the USA.  For the doubters of homeless dumping Hawaii is proof positive, because you just don’t hope a train to Oahu, they must arrive at the airport with one way tickets and where do bums get expensive tickets, hmmmm?

It should be illegal for government entities to ship their problem people to other states like California, but it’s not.  And California was so enticing, it was like this giant welfare magnet that implied we have more money than brains, so all you bums come and get it!

yes, dumping explains why we have an exploding population of bums and mentally disturbed people wandering our streets, parks and panhandling at every mall exit.   This is 180 out from what were led to believe by liberals who did polling about 2 years ago.

Hospital dumping of mental patients on skid row in many large cities has generated lawsuits, but the practice still continues.  For out of state hospitals, it’s either dump them elsewhere or go broke keeping them.  Sadly, for too many of the mentally ill its a situation of being just well enough to make a decision on their own to stay away from the help of a mental hospital.  The ACLU made sure they could not be forced into care, even when they were completely bonkers.

It’s become quite popular for some cities and counties to buy one way bus tickets to California for their chronic alcoholics, bums and criminals.

People who deal with these homeless types here prefer to deny that dumping exists.  They want to pass off this explosive jump in our homeless population as just local people in need.  See, to many of these workers homeless represent welfare and grant money.  Oh, and sure there are also the bleeding heart liberals who “love seeing the bums overrun Chico” so they can feel good feeding them.  They’re part of the problem too.

They are being enablers just like those who give money to the bums or the two big shelters that provide free food and a clean bed.  They all help to attract and keep the out of state bums here.    Lucky us, eh?

Click here for more information.






Posted in Homeless and Indigent, Life, Police | 10 Comments

What Have We Learned From The 2016 Presidential Election?

by Jack

As this presidential election comes to a close, what have we learned? Speaking only for myself now, but I’ve learned that the American voter is  disgusted and frustrated with Washington. It would be safe to say, the great middle of democrats, independents, greens, libertarians and republicans feel that Washington is corrupt and incompetent and serves themselves before us.

deplorables-mugIn the beginning many of us wanted to take a chance on a wild card candidate like Trump, than elect one more career politician.  We hoped it would send a message to the rest of them, that being, “Most Americans would sooner trust a used car salesman over a Congressman.”

Another thing I’ve learned in this election is, there’s no bar too low for Hillary’s democrat operatives.  They will lie, cheat and break the law in order to reach their goal.  nothing they do would surprise me now.

The evidence is out here now,  thanks to leaked emails and Project Veritas.  Democratic operatives paid people to start fights at the scene of Trump’s speeches and then use those incident to blame Trump’s rhetoric.   Clever,  except this is voter intimidation!  It undermines our democracy and it’s absolutely wrong – wonder why these democrats couldn’t see this?

These same operators now help register illegal Hispanics to vote for Hillary.   There’s millions of them here – so the temptation was too great to resist for these ethically challenged people.  Their sales line is, voting for Hillary will help them stay in America and get citizenship.  Meanwhile, they are calling Trump an evil racists who would throw illegals in jail and deport them, even if it meant leaving their children behind.

I’ve learned only recently why it was absolutely necessary for Hillary to have a private email server, something the FBI was unable to do after thousands of hours of tedious investigation!   This is a complicated story, but I’ll try to give you enough to make some sense of it.   Hillary needed a private server to do her dirty deals outside the government system that she was violating.

Why couldn’t the FBI figure this out? Well, they probably did, but because most of the evidence was destroyed right after Congress issued a non-destruct order to preserve it they didn’t have enough to prove their theory.  But, now we’re getting the leaded emails and they tell it all and even implicate the FBI is one deal with Hillary operative, Patrick Kennedy.

The Clinton team didn’t know is their server was hacked by the Russians and they had copies of everything, even the missing 32,000 emails!  So, they were unprepared for the revelations of guilt!

Of course Russia couldn’t come forward and admit to this cyber crime, so they had to use a third party to reveal it, Wiki-leaks.   Those leaked emails show that Hillary used her position in the State Dept., to sell access and sometimes to sell favors, while also using the Clinton Charitable Foundation.   Thus, the Clinton foundation received millions of dollars from unfriendly sources in quid pro quo deals.   lies54

The Clinton’s personally profited in ways most of us couldn’t understand because their accounting is tricky, complex and devious, but the short explanation is money equals power, power equals money and they received both in boat loads.  Hillary and Bill have accrued over 100 million dollars since he left the White House, and after claiming he and Hillary  were basically broke.  Yes, Hillary leveraged off her Secretary of State position to garner the maximum dollars and power that she could.  I came in  campaign donations, in-kind contributions, speaker fees or directly to Clinton’s non-profit charity contributions.  Her fingerprints are all over the money.  This dirty money and usurped power has filtered back into her bid for the Presidency and she is ready to become our next president.

In the race to the White House Hillary and Bill coerced the Attorney General of the United States into giving Hillary a pass on lying to congress, destroying evidence, corruption in office, and extortion.

Somehow the Clinton’s managed to manipulate the Director of the FBI, James Comey too. He took a dive when he failed to request a complaint against Hillary, and this was after he admitted to the American public that Hillary had indeed lied about her handling of classified emails, lied about the destruction of evidence and lied the email server and Hillary-Clinton-Dem-Debate-4-14-2016-e1461277091393multiple cell phones she used in her diabolical plan to skirt the government’s secure system.    However, we were never told why Director Comey would not seek a complaint, he just didn’t. There seems no fathomable reason why and that makes me think bribery or extortion.  This was especially suspicious in the wake of the Petraeus conviction for a single count of mishandling classified material just a year earlier.

I could write a few more pages detailing more of Hillary’s transgressions, but if you don’t get it by now, chances are you will never get it.

Donald Trump was no Saint either. But, Trump has been his own worst enemy  in this race.  I know he’s not going to be president.  Sadly, any of the GOP primary candidates could have beaten Hillary by this point.   So, what’s the point of beating up Donald? There is no point.  But, at least what you see is what you get. As flawed as he may be that much he has going for him.   He speaks exactly what is on his mind, even if it gave ammunition to the Clinton campaign and it sure did.  I’ve never seen a race like this one, the Donald made so many blunders it would have been comical if it were not so sad for America.

The Donald said the media was conspiring against him and many of us laughed at him. But, in a peer poll it was found the out of 450 news anchors, all but 50 were democrats and most had given to the Clinton campaign.   Still laughing?   Read on:  “The New York Times’ media columnist, Jim Rutenberg, penned a recent piece suggesting that biased news coverage of Donald Trump, at the Times and among other mainstream media, is justified and rarely observed in the context of other partisan or ideological issues.

Rutenberg’s claim is that because Trump says things that are rude, politically incorrect, or debatable, and “conducting his campaign in ways we’ve not normally seen,” there is no need for news reporters to treat him to objective reporting.”

Is this absolute proof the mainstream media was against Trump? Nah, but I’ve witnessed how they reported.  Trump got the worst of it and Hillary’s corruption often got a pass.  So no need to convince me the media was biased.  You may feel otherwise, but that’s how I saw it.

This has been in many ways the worst election of a president in modern history.   It’s been divisive, it’s been racially charged, filled with lies and dirty tricks.  If we thought America was in trouble before, there is no doubt anymore.  We’re in serious trouble.  To make it worse, the Republican Party has virtually no spine left.  They have capitulated to the Democrats on every important issue.   They have let down their voter base once too often and they have destroyed the GOP because of their own timidity and ineptness.

This is what I have learned… how about you?

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | 12 Comments

Final Debate

Posted by Tina

The two on stage looked as thought they’d rather be anywhere but there. Hillary with her practiced responses and plastic smile and Trump with his frowning. There was an effort to make it a real debate but it crumbled and crashed at the end.

The candidates reflect the mood of the people and the people are tired and disgusted. We are warn out! Many of us are tuning out. Many of us are wondering how OUR LIVES will work when this is over and whether America will survive. It’s difficult to get a clear picture with all the garbage floating around. Our nation hasn’t been this divided and contentious since the civil war. Our nation has never been so weakened internally.

From my perspective poor leadership, straying from Constitutional principles, corruption, scandals, and an elitist sense of self-importance in DC have brought us to this. Hello! Do they even know we are here?

Set DT and HC aside…

Who in their camps would you trust to watch your children or your home for a month? Who among their advisors and staff would you trust to be in charge?

It may be that it comes down to picking the team rather than the individual running for President.

I watched the debate but I’m dog tired tonight. Your thoughts?

Posted in politics | 17 Comments

Corruption, Assault, Abuse of Power…Sleaze!

Posted by Tina

We’re coming down to the wire in this election so it makes sense that the news is filled with sensational stories. It’s up to the people to decide, of course, but the evidence against the Democrat Party and many of its leaders and activists is so bad it’s hard to believe this could be happening in America. This is the stuff of third world countries and communist dictatorships. A few of today’s revelations follow.

Breitbart, “EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time”:

NEW YORK — Speaking publicly for the first time in a Breitbart News video exclusive interview, a former local television news reporter from Arkansas claims she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton on three separate occasions in 1980.

Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax.

After these alleged sexual assaults, Millwee claims, Clinton showed up at her apartment and knocked on her door for several minutes while trying to talk his way inside.  She says that Clinton departed after she purportedly refused to respond.

Millwee says she was thinking about coming out publicly around 1998, when the Monica Lewinsky scandal began to dominate the national conversation.  But at the time, she says she decided to remain quiet, in part fearing for her children after watching the way other Clinton sex accusers were treated by the Clintons and the news media.

The Enquirer splashed headlines today suggesting Hillary Clinton had trysts arranged for her with both men and women in Hollywood. Her alleged “hitman” links her to Vince Foster, the bribery of Clintons hookers, bribing reporters and more. This is a tabloid paper…but it’s the tabloid that broke the Lewinski scandal and the John Edwards scandals.

Daily Caller, “Soros-Connected Company Provides Voting Machines In 16 States”:

Smartmatic, a U.K.-based voting technology company with deep ties to George Soros, has control over voting machines in 16 states including battleground zones like Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Other jurisdictions affected are California, District of Columbia, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, New Jersey, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin.
Its website includes a flow-chart that describes how the company has contributed to elections in the U.S. from 2006-2015 with “57,000 voting and counting machines deployed” and “35 million voters assisted.”

In 2005, Smartmatic bought-out California-based Sequoia Voting Systems and entered the world of U.S. elections.
According to Smarmatic’s website, “In less than one year Smartmatic tripled Sequoia’s market share” and “has offered technology and support services to the Electoral Commissions of 307 counties in 16 States.”

Among the “case studies” that Smartmatic lists on its website as examples of its work are Venezuela, where it has been facilitating elections since 2004 when it “won a bid to provide Venezuela with a reliable voting system.”

Last but not least. Sharyl Attkisson has written a scathing report on journalists and media bias, “Newsgate 2016.” Read it…the lady has integrity and she actually does the investigative work.


Voter Fraud Exists, We Need to Know How Wide Spread It Is

Posted by Tina

We at Post Scripts have posted articles again and again about voter fraud and resistance within Democrat circles to do something about it. But Wikileaks emails, undercover sting video, IRS intimidation, voting machine concerns, and self-reporting by fraudulent voters are upending left-wing accusations that voter fraud is a myth. The Washington Times reports on ten cases:

1. Dead people voting in Colorado.

2. Illegals found voting in Virginia; only discovered after they self-reported.

3. Some Pennsylvania citizens voting twice.

4. Illegal voters uncovered in Philadelphia; half had previously voted.

5. Voter rigging triggers probe in Texas.

6. Indiana voter fraud investigation grows to 56 counties.

7. Three under investigation in Oklahoma for voting twice in the presidential primary.

8. Election fraud in Kentucky.

9. Underage voters found voting in Wisconsin’s presidential primary.

10. Voter registration cards sent to illegals in Pennsylvania.

Back in 2008 intimidation by the New Black Panthers at a local polling place in Philadelphia resulted in a federal case in which they were convicted but never sentenced after Obama took office. It was deemed the worst case of voter intimidation since the sixties. The IRS overtly acted to block participation in the election process by conservatives when applications by conservative groups for 501c4 status were intentionally targeted and delayed.

The Gateway Pundit posts on a FOX report:

Elections expert J. Christian Adams told FOX and Friends on Tuesday morning there are 4 million dead people on US voter rolls. (according to the Pew Charitable Trust)

Adams, who was the Voting Section Attorney at the US Department of Justice, filed six suits in the past year against Philadelphia and Broward County, Florida where the voter rolls are corrupted.

Adams said he had one case in Texas where the person died in 1944.

Far left groups continually sue to keep the voter rolls the way they are. The Obama administration has no desire to clean up these voter rolls.

Manipulation of voting machines is another concern. It’s notable that in the primaries of 2016 Hillary Clinton did best against Bernie Sanders in districts where voting machines flunked hacking tests.An article in The Hill, citing a Stanford study, indicates a rigged system:

A recent study by Stanford University proved that Hillary Clinton’s campaign rigged the system to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders.

What was done to Bernie Sanders in Wisconsin is stunning.

Why would the Clintons not cheat again?

The issue here is both voter fraud, which is limited but does happen, and election theft through the manipulation of the computerized voting machines, particularly the DIEBOLD/PES voting machines in wide usage in most states.

The Democrat Party is corrupt from leadership on down to the activist organizations behind it. The vast entangled web of organizations and agitators that work to intimidate and undermine the opposition in elections and to undermine our constitutional rights and freedoms has been cultivated over decades. 187 Soros funded organizations make up many of them. Unfortunately, members of the media also participate in this organized effort to transform America at the most fundamental levels. There are Republican elites that have aligned with this party against the people. Whether this is done consciously or unconsciously, it is deplorable.

How can we counter such an onslaught of corruption in the election? We the people are our nations only hope. We must come out to vote and we must vote smart. Donald Trump may be a bull in a china shop but he is the only candidate (that can win) who is unconnected to the corrupt machine that has been operating against the people for decades. Donald Trump has vowed to uncover, expose, and disrupt evil attempts to undermine our republic.

More information on this subject at The Federalist.

Posted in Constitution & The Law, Liberty, politics | 11 Comments