Posted by Tina
In a day and age when a swat on the butt in Wall-Mart can cause a Mom to receive a citation for child endangerment wouldn’t you say this is a bit more over the top? And the explanation…incredible! Did this girl have a mother…or father…was she educated in our public school system?
Keep in mind these are the people who murder babies by the train load, so what is the big deal about offing a little girl?
Quentin Colgan said:
“By your logic, anything that happens to the child would be her fault–because she placed the child in what you believe to be a dangerous situation.”
YES, dumb #$%K. The child is 4 years old. Four. She is not the mother. She did not wake up that day and decided to go sit on train tracks. The mother came up with this crap. The FOUR year old is being used in this case. It is the mother’s responsibility. Don’t you know the nanny state you blindly support defines “child endangerment” in order to protect children? No? Or do you not support that?
Quentin Colgan said:
“And this is why that mother is not responsible for what happens to her child any more than you would be responsible for whatever happened to you.”
So who is responsible? Nobody? The train engineer??? Your logic is boils down to: no one is responsible for anything happening to you. Well, maybe in your fantasy world. So, is it your responsibility or not to pay your internet bill so you can post mindless crap on websites like these?
Quentin, the idiot said:
“Your writings put you in what some believe to be a dangerous situation. If something bad where to happen to you, would you accept reponsibility?”
Are you threatening Toby? What are you implying? That Toby is putting themselves in danger just by posting an OPINION on the internet? So, if Toby were a girl (or guy) and they wore provocative clothing, would it be ok to rape them? Didn’t they put themselves in a position of danger by wearing provocative clothing, so according to your logic it would be ok, right? So, do you often blame the victim? The child in the news story is the victim. Who is responsible for putting the child in a dangerous situation? Who woke up the child that morning, dressed them, and took them to the train tracks? Who needs to accept responsibility for the child on the tracks? In your world, the mom is not culpable for the child’s safety. Do you have kids? That’s a rhetorical question, because I don’t give a rat’s a$$.
Q: “If she had held her child in front of a fascist with a can of pepper spray, I am sure you would not blame the fascist!”
And you would? Remember those sprayed with pepper spray were warned before the spraying commenced. Any mother that would subject her child to that would be to blame…as bad as the terrorists that blow their kids up for the cause! Good grief Q, is there nothing you would excuse!
And your definition of a “fascist” is an officer doing what is expected of him after receiving an order from the woman in charge…including isssuing a warning so that those who preferred NOT TO BE SPRAYED could get out of the way and move on?
You must be one of those people who thinks he can do whatever he wants and then blame everyone one else for his troubles. Infants can learn faster than this!
“Your writings put you in what some believe to be a dangerous situation. If something bad where to happen to you, would you accept reponsibility?”
First of all the comparison is ludicrous. In the case of the woman child endangerment is a very real legal charge and any decision about her responsibility would be for a court to decide. She could lose custody. it would be ridiculous to hold the engineer of the train responsible or Wall Street! I imagine that is what you must be assuming…that we should blame WS if the child was hurt or killed instead of the ignorant mother.
But in my case, I already have taken responsibility by taking the risk to write on this blog. Silly little screeds from characters like you just run off my back…and I’m still responsible since I am so often able to turn that knee jerk little crank of yours. However, should you, for instance, choose to respond to my words by doing something violent then you would be responsible and might face criminal charges…a consequence of your ignorant choice. I hope this isn’t a veiled threat Mr. Colgan…you are already on record as being suspect in this area.
Also, please don’t confuse responsibility and blame, they are not exactly the same. Responsibility means that we acknowledge our cause in a situation. Guilt, blame, shame are all feelings. it’s nearly impossible for anyone to take responsibility when they are stuck in their feelings. This is why addictions, rage, misplaced anger, feeling sorry for oneself (or others) is so difficult to overcome so that change can take place.
Toby I can’t wait for the feedback on that one. I don’t expect some will appreciate the humor or the irony!
Nothing says “Merry Christmas” like a personalized threat of violence from the occutard! It is past time to permanently ban that walking pile of dog $#@t from posting here.
There once was a luny named Quentin
Who craved negative attention
With his crude hateful rants
He takes a threatening stance
That might put him back in detention
Let us bring this right down to concrete reality.
One question:
We know how this mother will treat her daughter. Given Don Q’s response, how will Quentin Colgan treat his daughter?
Eh, Don Q? Extend the logic. Answer that. Explain it to her mother. In detail, please.
I don’t believe anyone has said it was “OK” to shoot the kids at Kent State. It was a stupid and terrible tragedy.
Youthful inexperience, confusion, chaos and a number of idiot young kids yelling pig and other niceties at the guardsmen created a volatile environment ripe for such a tragedy. The hippies, like you, had a problem seeing their own “cause” in the situation. But there is no doubt whatsoever that they did share in the responsibility for those deaths.
The sixties era protesters didn’t mind trampling on the rights (and wallets) of others and believed wearing love beads and tossing their bodies around like refugees from a loonie bin while repeating silly mantras was an adult way to express themselves. The drugs were a nice touch too. The violently radical element was an even better touch. That’s the problem with blame game nutballs..they just can’t take responsibility.
Time to put the infants back in the playpen. They definitely need monitoring.
Why should the guy driving the train have to deal with this? Why did the cops allow this to happen? Why did the mayor allow this to happen? Why did Jerry Brown allow this to happen. Why do they allow it to continue? I believe it is allowed to continue because they want blood to spill. If that blood belongs to an innocent child all the better. These people thrive on confrontation,confusion and violence. Had the train not stopped and the child been killed the MSM would have been screaming bloody murder and demanding justice! Their “rage” would have been directed at the guy driving the train, the tea party, big oil, George Bush etc. The illegal and stupid acts perpetrated by the occutards and encouraged by the authorities would be overlooked by the MSM in their quest for “justice”.
I hope we hear from Libby, or Chris on this matter, I have the feeling we wont. The only reason we heard from occutard is because any credibility he ever had was lost long, long ago.
If the mom would have let the kid get hit by a train THEN there would have been a story. This video is just Faux News Propaganda to rally the middle class trash against the poor.
And why not, Rex? Liberals have been turning the poor against the middle class who supports them for years now.
From the occutard point of view it is an inconvenient news story to be sure but it is a real news story.
Too funny. Not.
1) Some Occutards try to stop train traffic and one endangers her baby.
2) They get the attention they were seeking.
3) Then a local Occutard idiot tries to pass it off as “just Faux News Propaganda”?
You cannot make this stuff up, kids.