
My absentee ballot for next months special election has arrived in the mail and I have made it abundantly clear that I intend to vote NO on all propositions. Now, please understand, I have no aversion to paying my fair share of taxes. I know taxes are needed to pay for the services we expect. Police, fire, schools, etc.
I just dont want the taxes that I DO pay to be spent by lawmakers taking junkets around the world all in the name of doing the states business when I know good and well those junkets are for monkey business. (How do I know? Im a recovering news reporter!)
I dont want the taxes that I DO pay to be used to continue the salaries of termed out lawmakers by appointing them to cockamamie boards and commissions that only meet once a month, twice a month or once a year.yet pay six figure salaries for doing nothing. The governor has recommended getting rid of boards and commissions thatre duplicative of effort but democrat lawmakers object. (They want those board seats to be available when they get termed out or fail to win reelection.)
In 2004, a 275 member task force recommended eliminating 20 boards and commissions and eliminating 220 board and commission directors and their staffs. How much tax money could be saved? The head of Californias Labor and Workforce Development Agency, Victoria Bradshaw says It could be upwards of several hundred MILLIONS as well as BILLIONS going out in future fiscal years. But Democrat lawmakers object.
I dont want the taxes that I DO pay to be used by lawmakers to hire their wives, husbands, aunts, uncles (and girlfriends and other lovers) and refer to them as consultants on the states payrolls. I dont want the taxes that I DO pay to be used to secretly payoff victims who have filed sexual harassment lawsuits against lawmakers they work for.
So you see? There ARE cuts to be made which could solve this states fiscal crisis but lawmakers would rather take more money out of YOUR pocket to pay for their frivolity. They would rather threaten to cut police, sheriffs, highway patrol, fire protection, and education if we fail to agree to continue being ripped off. Thats what proposition 1A thru 1F is all about.
Leadership begins at the top. The necessary cuts should START at the top, but so far the leadership in Sacramento has been guilty of dereliction of duty. They would rather cut services for senior citizens, the blind, disabled, school kids –then threaten the rest of us if we fail to vote in favor of 1A thru 1F. According to the Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Walters, if the propositions fail, lawmakers will have few options beyond wholesale spending cuts in EDUCATION, HEALTH AND WELFARE SERVICES, and even PRISONS..to close the gap.
Few options? The governor knows better. The democrats controlling our state legislature know better—AND I KNOW BETTER!
Before I fill out my ballot, Ill wait to see if there is anyone in our state legislature with the guts to go public and admit THE CUTS SHOULD and WILL START AT THE TOP. When I see that happening, then and only then will I vote in favor of the propositions. Until then, its NO on 1A thru 1F.