Ok smarty pants, you got the last one, so what are these creatures?
1. You are more likely to encounter them in the night.
2. They like you a lot.
3. Every home has them, no exceptions.
Continue reading “<font color=blue>They’re Coming After You!” »
1. click comments link
2. compose and hit send (preview)
3 It then goes to preview
4. Hit send (post) and wait 7 seconds, thats it.
“a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our republic, our religion and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity.” FDR
Posted by Tina
Oliver North has written a wonderful tribute to brave men of the past, and of the present, as he recalls the importance of D-Day. I hope you enjoy, D-Day in Context, by Oliver North TownHall.com as you pay tribute on this day, June 6, 2008, the sixty-fourth anniversary of the D-Day invasion.
WASHINGTON — Sixty-four years ago this week, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt came on the radio and implored Americans to “devote themselves in a continuance of prayer invoking thy help to our efforts.” The “effort” of which he spoke was Operation Overlord, the D-Day landing of 150,000 American and Allied troops at Normandy. The risks were so great that Winston Churchill told the people of Britain: “The invasion has been launched. The result is with God.” FDR described it as “a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our republic, our religion and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity.” ** Since then, those who fought their way ashore June 6, 1944, and successfully breached Hitler’s Atlantic Wall have been honored justifiably for their participation in the momentous event. On the 40th anniversary of the operation, Ronald Reagan stood on that “lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France” and spoke of that “giant undertaking unparalleled in human history” and praised “the boys of Pointe du Hoc the heroes who helped end a war.” ** But that was then; and this is now. This year, the anniversary of their achievement received little notice in the so-called mainstream media. Perhaps that’s because it would draw uncomfortable parallels between those who stormed the coast of France in 1944 and those who are fighting now — and winning — a war against radical Islam. Unlike those who braved their way into Hitler’s Fortress Europe, the young Americans fighting today’s battles reap few accolades from the potentates of the press or the liberal “leadership” in Washington.
We at Post Scripts solute them one and all on this day and every day.
Do you think Hillary will be offered the VP spot?
Dick Morris says no way. Mrs. O can’t stand her and Mr. O isn’t far behind. The thought of spending the next 4 to 8 years with the Clintons in the White House has to give them serious pause! The polls show there are about 8% of Hillary voters that will refuse to support Obama without her, but by Nov. that number could be much smaller, especially if Hillary campaigns for Obama. But, what other choice does she have? She must support her party and that means supporting Obama. Their party couldn’t be any stronger, which brings up a dichotomy of sorts. Obama is in many ways a weak candidate, he’s got more than one albatross hung around his neck…he’s stuck with Rev. Wright, Bernadette Dorhne and her pal Bill Ayers, the black liberation theology with Rev. Michael Pfleger screaming racist comments in Obama’s former church, the Trinity Church of Christ… but his party is strong. On the other hand McCain is a strong candidate reaching across the big middle of his party and deep into blue dog democrat camps for votes, but his party is weak.
At first glance you might think well if that’s the case then this is going to be a close race, strong and weak candidates, weak and strong partys, it all works out, but I don’t think so! Come October I think one or the other candidate is going to have major traction with voters and I’m betting on McCain. A critical deciding factor between these candidates could be racism. That should have nothing to do with it, but it will because of fear about this idiotic black liberation philosophy that is divisive, anti-white, and rhetoric on a scale that would make Joseph Goebbels proud! Michelle Obama could well play a major role promulgating the oppositions fears about black liberation, but we’ll see how her handlers control her speech. Rev. Wright, Father Pfleger and his pal Luis Farrakhan, they won’t be sitting by idle during this election, no handlers for them…so watch out, here comes the radicals again.
By Tina Grazier
It’s a little frightening to imagine four or more years with Hillary Clinton in the number two spot:
BRISTOL, Va. Senator Barack Obama moved forcefully into the general election on Thursday, placing his stamp on the Democratic Party apparatus and holding a private nighttime meeting with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton in an effort to unify Democrats. – The New York Times, by Jeff Zeleny and Adam Nagourney
Hmmm…Hillary has a forcefull approach…Michelle Obama doesn’t exactly hold back either. Cat fights in the Oval Office anyone? I don’t think it will happen but it’s fun to think about!
Posted by Tina
The Review and Outlook section of the Wall Street Journal features an outstanding list of points that make the case for continuing our efforts in Iraq. If youre one who instead agrees with Barack Obamas quick withdrawal stance, but youre brave enough to consider an alternate point of view read the entire piece. Its very good:
This spring, the Iraqi army routed insurgents in three of their most important urban strongholds. These gains follow the success of the surge in crushing al Qaeda in the Sunni triangle, meaning that we are at last on the verge of winning in Iraq and securing a strategic victory in the Middle East. Question: Is this emerging victory achieved at a cost of more than 4,000 American lives something we are prepared to abandon after November? ** We are winning in Iraq. Indeed, we can now say with certainty that we will win, as long as we don’t repeat our earlier mistakes and seek to draw down too soon. This is the improving Iraq that the next U.S. President will inherit, and it is the heart of the Iraq debate Americans should have in November. (emphasis mine)
Click on the link below to read the surprising answer.
1. It is not man made, it is natural.
2. It is not a plant
3. It makes something you need and frequently use.
4. It has a skeleton made of silica like sand.
Continue reading “<font color=black>Does Anyone Know What This Is?” »
Posted by Tina
Military shoots down missile in test off Hawaii, by Audrey McAvoy
Honolulu – The U.S. military intercepted a ballistic missile Thursday in the first such sea-based test since a Navy cruiser shot down an errant satellite earlier this year. The military fired the target, a Scud-like missile with a range of a few hundred miles, from a decommissioned amphibious assault ship near Hawaii’s island of Kauai. The USS Lake Erie, based at Pearl Harbor, fired two interceptor missiles that shot down the target in its final seconds of flight about 12 miles above the Pacific Ocean.
President Bush said we would fight in many ways and on many fronts. This is yet another anti-terrorist war front success!
Posted by Tina
Assembly Speaker proposes $6.4 billion in taxes, by Samantha Young – Associated Press Writer
Assembly Speaker Karen Bass is proposing to raise $6.4 billion in taxes to balance the state budget. Bass told the Sacramento Press Club on Wednesday she wants to close tax loopholes and eliminate tax breaks on wealthy Californians. She declined to say which taxes Assembly Democrats want to raise.
The state is facing a $15.2 billion deficit in the next fiscal year as tax revenues in the slowing economy fall short of state spending. It’s not clear how far the Democrats’ plan will get, though. Republicans have repeatedly said they won’t support raising taxes, and Democrats need their support to do it.
This dem blonde needs to learn what makes revenues dropshe could go ask some of those wealthy people they have proven they know how to make a buck. I’ll bet they could provide a few tips on spending and money management too.
Hint: “open loop” doesn’t work!
Posted by Tina
Washington – A Senate debate over a bill to combat global warming came to a halt Wednesday after Republicans demanded a reading of the 492-page document because of a partisan dispute over judicial nominations. The partisan squabble spilled over to a disagreement over how many amendments should be allowed, threatening to cut short likely consideration of the legislation once it gets back on track.
Have they finally gotten the message…grown a spine?
