Barbara Boxer – Private or Public “Wealth” Investment?

4878-Barbara-Boxer.jpg

by Tina Grazier

Barbara Boxer took to a podium recently to trot out the usual Democrat class envy shtick. She claims the old, the poor, and the young will suffer and die if those eeeevil Republicans fail to raise taxes on the rich. She says that Republicans have been calling “the rich” America’s “job creators” and she knows that’s wrong. (see video below) Flanked by a giggling Chuckie Schumer, she dons her clown hat to boldly proclaim she’s “checked it out” and it’s really small business owners that create most of the jobs in America…not the rich.

Where on earth has this woman been?

Republicans have only been harping on that very thing for a number of decades now. So okay, she’s finally on board about small business but, is that it? Is that the sum total of what makes business and a strong economy possible? I mean, is the woman too dumb to realize that money left in the private sector is important too? Is she too dumb to figure out that when government is greedy and oppressive it hurts all business? Does she not realize that when government threatens to make energy expensive it hurts small business as well as big business? Is she blind to the fact that small businesses need customers?

Thanks to the absolute idiocy of big government spending, high energy prices, draconian EPA regulations, another big government entitlement program, and constant uncertainty about higher taxes Americans aren’t much in the mood to play customer. Is Barbara Boxer too ignorant to realize that we already know she and her big government colleagues will let the Bush tax cuts expire making everyone’s tax burden (including the rich) significantly higher…or that the new taxes in Obamacare are set to kick in starting in January 2012? I’m afraid folks she just may be that dumb:

The real problem for Boxer and her Democrat buddies is they own the failed recovery.

They own the failing economy, the high debt, the unreasonable and unmanageable deficit, the terrible job numbers, the rising prices on goods and services, the sluggish (near dead) housing market…and, because they own it they would do anything to get Republicans to cave on taxes and make a deal with the White House. That way, they reason, the economy and all of the associated problems will be shared by both parties equally come election time next year.

2972-elephant2.jpg

Republicans would be happy to share the responsibility for turning this failure around.

But only on terms that won’t take us down the same old big government, big spending, big class envy path…we’ve tried it that way for years now and it’s still not working! In fact, Republicans are well aware of the very real ongoing economic probems that must be addressed. Since the 1990’s they have been warning about the un-sustainability of the entitlement programs that Democrats created and championed! Republicans are, and have been, ready to make reforms that would work for all Americans and that create incentive for personal responsibility. All that is needed is a genuine willingness on the part of Democrats to participate in the process and adequate political pressure from the electorate. Sadly, democrats prefer politics and power! I have more confidence in the electorate.

In the past two years Republicans in Congress are the only ones that have been willing to address this nation’s economic problems.

They have submitted a reasonable budget. They have submitted a plan to resolve our debt problems AND reform Medicare AND pay down our debt. They are ready to discuss reform to social security and to make both of these big government entitlement plans sustainable in the short term and transform them to work in the future. They have passed a debt-ceiling proposal and sent it to the Senate…where it was declared dead on arrival by a “do nothing” Democrat controlled Senate.

Democrats, by contrast, spent months creating and ramming through an expensive healthcare bill while the country languished and suffered through a failed recovery.

Democrats didn’t bother to submit a budget, which is required by law, in either of the 2 years that they held a super majority in Congress. The President submitted a laundry list this year and, acting like he’d accomplished something, called it his “budget proposal”…the CBO laughed at the absurdity of the Obama budget saying, “We don’t estimate speeches”.

Barbara Boxer is out making speeches because class envy is the only thing the Democrats have left in their little bag of tricks.

4880-Scroogechristmas_LG.jpg

Boxers speech is a lame attempt to convince the American people that the rich hide all of their money in a secret vault and are just too stingy to share it! The very idea is simply preposterous! Barbara Boxer doesn’t get the absurdity, but Americans are smarter than Barbara Boxer. They know that most of the money belonging to “the rich” is invested or saved and as such is put to work in the economy. This represents real investment that is the fuel that ignites the engine of our economy.

Scrooge is a beastly characature who adds lots of lovely drama to make a wonderful story; he does not represent reality.

The rich will always be with us, as will the poor. The beauty of the American ayatem is that the poor have a chance to move out of poverty when opportunities are not stifled by too much government. Opportunity can take a poor man from rags to riches; we in America should be doing a better job of teaching him how.

Those who are old enough to recall the movie, “Brewster’s Millions” will remember how difficult it was for the main character to rid himself of wealth. The lesson, of course, is that money creates opportunity, wealth and abundance. Wealth left in the private sector is put to work creating opportunity and innovation. When government takes too much from the private sector, or threatens to take too much, this vital economic vehicle begins to stall.

A few more years of political dominanace by Obama and Democrats and America’s vehicle will be operating at a dead stop.

Wealth in the private sector, as savings, investment, and charitable giving, becomes funding for the next big idea, the next medical cure, or treatment for those suffering terrible diseases. It helps to build schools and other projects in the form of municipal bonds. It becomes a baseball stadium or a new wing at the college or museum. It expands the local hospital, shelter or daycare center. It funds a science lab, a research facility, a marine aquarium. It builds housing developments. It helps to fund growth and expansion projects for companies both large and small. It becomes a loan opportunity for those in the lower and middle classes to buy houses, cars, boats, college educations, or to start a small business. And all of this activity translates into jobs, not temporary shovel ready jobs but lasting permanent jobs. And all of that activity spells confidence about the future for the American people who then begin to feel comnfortable as consumers again.

But is it fair that the wealthy have so much?

Well, no…quite frankly, it is not fair. But people know that life is never fair, we know it is useless to wallow in petty covetousness, and we know that a real opportunity to live life as best we can is more valuable than an envious attitude or pipe dream. The rich do get to spend a great deal of money on luxury items for themselves. But we can easily see that even this money trickles into the pockets of those who work at the hotels, salons, restaurants, golf courses, and stores that the rich frequent. It trickles into the pockets of those who build or sell luxury homes, boats, cars, furs, jewelry, furniture, make up, and clothing. It moves into the pockets of advisors, lawyers, insurance agents and even into the coffers of the TAX COLLECTOR! Yes it flows to government too!!!

And here’s some good news that even the simple minded Barbara Boxer and her wealthy “tax the rich” friends can appreciate. There is an alternative approach to getting money for government from the rich. It’s a voluntary program. Barbara should know that rich people (anybody really) can
send cash gifts to the government whenever they want…year, after year, after year! No…Really!!

Financial gifts can be made by check or money order payable to the United States Treasury and mailed to the address below:

Gifts to the United States
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Credit Accounting Branch
3700 East-West Highway, Room 622D
Hyattsville, MD 20782

4881-donate.jpg

They even accept credit cards:

Got a few extra bucks for Uncle Sam? Since 1961, the U.S. government has accepted donations in cash or check from private citizens who wish to help pay down the national debt, currently at $13 trillion. (old news)

Now the U.S. Treasury has made it easier to donate–via credit card. In January, the department’s Bureau of the Public Debt began to accept payments via Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover at: Pay*gov – Treasury Direct

When asked whether encouraging Americans to use credit–taking on personal debt to pay national debt–sent the wrong message, a Treasury spokesperson tells NEWSWEEK, “We make it as easy as possible to donate.” She adds, “There are many people who pay their credit cards off every month,” but had no further comment.

Well all righty then! Ms Boxer can take off the silly clown hat and relax.

All she has to do is notify her rich friends about this donation option and everybody wins. They certainly don’t seem to mind donating big bucks to fill Democrat campaign coffers; why wouldn’t they be equally willing to send more cash to government? In fact…if this has been an option since 1961 why haven’t all those blowhard rich Democrats donated extra bucks to our government? Why haven’t Tom Hanks, Barbara Streisand, Steven Spielberg, John Kerry, Bill Clinton, or Warren Buffet made extra donations every single year? It’s a good question…I’ll bet their accountants and lawyers would tell them it’s a boondoggle way to invest their money.

If you’re still thinking Barbara Boxer is on to something with her silly pitch about taxing the rich ask yourself a few simple questions:

1. Have the trillions of dollars spent since Obama was elected helped to make America stronger?

2. Have problems in housing and real estate improved?

3. Are there more job opportunities…or
fewer job opportunities now and how is that confidence level doing?

Are we better off overall when money is spent by government or is money put to better use when spent, saved, and invested in the private sector?

This is the question Barbara Boxer, Barack Obama, and the rest of the Congressional Democrats (and probably a few Rhino Republicans) don’t want you to ask, much less answer, because awareness in the voting public will lead to BIG LOSSES for the tax and spend crowd in 2012.

It doesn’t matter where the money comes from, the rich, the middle class or our grandchildrens pockets…big government just doesn’t work. Private investment does.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Barbara Boxer – Private or Public “Wealth” Investment?

  1. Laughing says:

    By God!
    You’re absolutely right!!!!
    The rich are rich because they earned it!
    The rich NEVER get laws passed in their favor to give them advantage over their fellows. The rich are good and decent! The rich make the jobs. Maybe not here in the US, but that is the fault of those democrats and all the laws they got passed when they were in the minority between 2001 and 2007.

  2. Post Scripts says:

    Kevin, Laughing, whatever….alright lets say that in many cases the rich are rich because they were born into wealthy families who made a fortune early on in our history. So their children got a tremendous head start in school and in business. They were privileged because of their wealth, but at some point in almost all cases they had a relative who started it all by their work ethic, their initiative, some luck and of course opportunity and they won big. So what? This is still part of the American dream too, but this stupid wealth shifting and class warfare isn’t what built America.

    The opportunity to succeed is still here despite all the roadblocks the democrats have thrown at us! Just ask any new arrival, they see what you don’t. The rich in this country haven’t locked up all the wealth and closed all the doors to success.

    I think too many leftwingers are so acclimated to our country’s opportunities so much they don’t appreciate them.

    So yes Mr. Laughing (Kevin, etc) the system isn’t perfect and the rich DO try to protect what they have – that’s what you would do, isn’t it? In a republic that sort of thing can be kept to a manageable minimum and life goes on…so, don’t be too jealous of them. It’s a fools errand to dwell on ways to take away their power and wealth and give it to the poor. It doesn’t work – it’s never worked – think of something else that you can do that will really help us.

  3. Tina says:

    Laughing you are like many people in America who, perhaps because they watch too much TV, are ignorant about the attitudes and work habits of the wealthy. In fact aproximately 10% of America’s wealthy inherited their money…the other 90% EARNED THEIR WEALTH!!!

    http://www.onmoneymaking.com/347.html

    Only 19 percent of millionaires received any income or wealth of any kind from a trust fund or an estate. Fewer than 10 percent of millionaires inherited 10 percent or more of their wealth.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/05/29/the-new-rich-self-made-or-family-made/

    the Chicago-based Spectrem Group found that only 2% to 4% of the fortune of todays millionaires was inherited. Russ Alan Prince found that only about 10% of todays rich ($10 million or more) inherited their money. And a recent article in Smart Money quotes the Harrison Group as saying that 70% of the nations big family fortunes are less than 13 years old and the people who amassed them are, first and foremost, entrepreneurs risk takers for whom wealth is a byproduct of pursuing their passion.

    Most of these wealthy entrepreneurs have a very generous attitude. Analysis of the “Bank of America Study of High Net-worth Philanthropy”:

    http://forum.belmont.edu/cornwall/archives/006129.html

    The Entrepreneurial Mind Dr Jeff Cornwall, Belmont University

    Most entrepreneurs I know who have had financial success still pinch themselves once in a while to make sure their successes really happened to them. They often use words like “blessed”, “lucky”, and “fortunate” to describe their success. The days of sweating payroll are still fresh in their minds. They remember how many times they came within days of failure. They remember all of those sleepless nights.

    Most entrepreneurs I know understand that they did not make their business a success in a vacuum. It took the hard work of employees who also took a risk by joining their fledgling business. It took investors who took a risk in their idea. It took bankers who believed in their cash flow and their character. And many see God’s hand at work in their fortune, understanding that they are but stewards of what they have been given.

    Most entrepreneurs I know viewed success, from the very beginning of their business, to mean much more than profit, a paycheck and “the big payday.” Many talk about the ability to give back if they (are) able to be successful. I do an exercise with aspiring entrepreneurs in which I ask them what they would do if they won the lottery tomorrow. For many, philanthropy is at the top of their list.

    Enviousness, covetousness, and negativity are not among the character traits of entrepreneurs.

    Entrepreneurs…America’s wealthy…are more likely to be risk takers with a positive can-do spirit. They hire people, they work hard, they manage their money carefully and…THEY GIVE BACK TO THE COMMUNITY.

    http://www.inc.com/news/articles/200611/charity.html

    When it comes to charitable giving, self-made entrepreneurs are more than twice as generous as millionaires who acquired their wealth through inheritance, according to a new study. ** Yet, beyond the dollars, researchers also discovered a strong correlation between the size of donations and the amount of time a donor spends volunteering for a cause. ** Rather than seeking tax shelters, more than 86 percent of respondents said they were motivated to give by the opportunity of “meeting critical needs” in society, while 82.6 percent said they were moved by a “feeling that those who have more should give to those with less,” the study said. Whatever their motivation, wealthy households gave an estimated $126 billion out of national total of $260 billion last year in contribution to the non-profit sector, according to Patrick Rooney, the center’s director.

    What you can take from this little exercize is that people are people, some are genrous and some are not BUT if you buy into the Democrat Party’s class envy ploy YOU ARE BEING USED!

  4. anonymous says:

    Mont Blanc Pencils – Extractor utes Yellow metal,Mont blanc Meisterstuck
    As soon as just one feels connected with remarkable variety pencils Mont Blanc is usually undoubtedly on the list of primary models of which pertains to intellect. Is it doesn’t almost all wanted, on the list of almost all ancients far too: this Meisterstuck is usually by far the most well known just one although this A language like german compose supplier possesses manufactured, nonetheless helps make, several products. There are lots of hobbyists.

    As soon as a engineer, some sort of report machine as well as a banker by Hamburg write about identical appreciation intended for publishing,Stylos Mont Blanc, many people invent some sort of ballpoint compose of which blends with a reservoir. The corporation is referred to as to begin with Simplo Filler Compose Company, but also in 1909 the item had taken within the label in their flagship type: Mont Blanc. This reservoir seemed to be some sort of technological movement with the time period along with the put in writing seemed to be promptly effective. This intellectual high level promptly undertake that compose,Stylos Montblanc pas cher, famously proclaimed by means of some sort of light celeb brand. With 1924 this popular Meisterstuck compose is generated. The item gets to be this symbol on the current pencils. Possibly with 1935 pencils Mont Blanc usually are connected with a really excellent of which shoppers be handed a life-time manufacturer’s warranty!

    Currently this model is usually section of the Richmont Collection, consisting of models like Dunhill,Montblanc Meisterstuck, Cartier, Jaeger LeCoultre in addition to Lancel. Some sort of Mont Blanc compose is always imperative with the large numbers exactly who go on to write down while using the pen while using the older nib. To help diversify it is deliver, this company added in this younger-minded varies Bohme, Scenium in addition to Starwalker,Mont blanc Pens, with markers, pencils in addition to pencils. Even so the most interesting intended for hobbyists are classified as the confined editions of which Mont Blanc lets out on a yearly basis. Commonly committed to internet writers, clients or maybe painters most of these extraordinary portions have noticed the prices explode most of these past 35 a long time.

    With June the year just gone some sort of esteemed The french language compose financial institution auctioned many exceptional portions. In one payemnt he / she fit intended for retail 60 portions which often many had sell outs. Among those were being a variety of Bohme products, various Solitaire pencils,Montblanc stylo prix, Writers editions like seeing that Voltaire in addition to Jules Verne, commemorative editions connected with clients like Piermont Morgan in addition to Henry Tate products likewise.

    Individuals who obtained this portions learn beyond doubt that when people ask around the most pencils Mont Blanc is usually what exactly 60% connected with hobbyists remedy. Most of these sought after materials is likely to view the importance surge yearly a long time in addition to keep on being having a positive investment decision.

Comments are closed.