Homeless Problem – San Jose Shuts Down “The Jungle”

Posted by Tina

Chico folks with concerns about the homeless problem should be on the lookout for transients coming from the south. San Jose has finally decided it’s had it with transients that have created a 68 acres encampment along a creek bed. This morning the authorities began the messy job of clean-up after spending $4 million to relocate the 150 people that had been living in the “Shanty Town.” They managed to find housing for all but about fifty of them. The area has an estimated 7600 others who sleep under freeways, in parks, and in doorways.

During the depression encampments like these were referred to as Hooverville. Maybe it’s time to start calling encampments today Obamaville. It would certainly be apropos!

Read more in the L.A.Times

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Homeless Problem – San Jose Shuts Down “The Jungle”

  1. Peggy says:

    Obamavilles has a nice ring and reflective of his legacy.

    I too wonder how many of them are headed this way and if our new city council members will address the hobo problem soon before it grows to the size of San Jose’s.

  2. J. Soden says:

    Great name suggestion! One should be remembered for their accomplishments, and creating homeless folks has been about the only successful accomplishment this prez has.

  3. Libby says:

    No, I think Shrubtown would be more suitable.

    And please to remember that it was WWII that finally pulled us out. The impending parallels are scarifying.

  4. Tina says:

    Nice try Libby but:

    1. You cannot point to a Bush policy that caused the crash,

    2. There are numerous examples of Shrub stern warnings and pleas from President Bush for Congress to do something about the lending situation,

    3. His warnings were met with arrogant resistance from powerful and Democrats like barney frank of Ways and Means,

    4. The recession ended in the Spring of 2009,

    5. As the economy began to improve Democrats adopted job and economy killing policies and regulations, and,

    6. Democrats laid the foundation for failure of the banking/lending industry when they passed legislation under Clinton demanding that responsible lending standards be ignored and through Fanny Mae created the bundled loan fiasco to securitize and hide bad loans.

    History shows us that the same type of policies that made the Great Depression last ten long years have worked once again to create miserable conditions for the middle and lower classes.

    I agree that we can add to the failures of this President the greater likelihood of world war. His policies have made the US weak, strengthened the influence and power of our enemies and failed to uplift economies here and abroad! His bumbling state Department under first Hillary and now Kerry has pretty much assured that evil characters will have the capability to bring a nuclear package to West as well as Israel.

    And this morning I read that, according to probable presidential candidate Hillary Clinton we need more empathy for our enemies?

    She obviously doesn’t understand the nature of our enemies any better than she and democrats in general understand what makes an economy work for everyone.

    Hands down, Obamaville works because the President is the most radical progressive to run the country into the ground that we’ve had in decades!

  5. Tina says:

    Maybe if we all pray for rain it will cause them to head south instead!

  6. RHT447 says:

    Heh. Would love to hear a Paul Shanklin parody of Jimmy Buffett’s “Magaritaville”.

  7. Libby says:

    “1. You cannot point to a Bush policy that caused the crash.”

    Oh, I think the BushCo decision to let Lehman go belly-up qualifies.

  8. Post Scripts says:

    WWII did in fact pull us out, but only because FDR’s socialist policies kept dragging out the depression for far longer than need be. America was ready to get going, but it was democrats that held us back.

  9. Post Scripts says:

    I’ll bet we get some of San Jose’s homeless. Obama has sure left this country in a fine mess!

  10. Post Scripts says:

    Homeless, debt, sub-prime loans, low wages on hold, record number on welfare… and now China has passed us as the worlds largest economy. And they did most of this in the last 14 years.

  11. Chris says:

    Jack: “WWII did in fact pull us out, but only because FDR’s socialist policies kept dragging out the depression for far longer than need be.”

    Good God–Libby, these people believe lies that have been debunked for decades. There is no way we can expect them to understand the real causes of the most recent financial crisis when they still can’t admit the real causes of the Great Depression.

  12. Peggy says:

    Obama put us in second place behind China’s economy. We’ve been in first place since U.S. Grant was president. And his driven our debt to over $18 TRILLION.

    Total US Debt Rises Over $18 Trillion; Up 70% Under Barack Obama:

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-01/total-us-debt-rises-over-18-trillion

    Libby, you are just toooooo funny. “Bush’s fault.” Thanks for the laugh. You really can be funny when you try to lay blame on a man who hasn’t been in office for six years.

  13. Tina says:

    Peggy IBD reports:

    Inequality: The most liberal states in the country are the worst run and have the widest gaps between rich and poor. Could it be that spread-the-wealth policies make things worse?

    The list of worst-run states — compiled by the news site 24/7 Wall St. using things like pension funding, credit ratings, unemployment, poverty, crime and high school graduation rates — shows that three of the bottom five are liberal. Illinois ranks dead last, followed by New Mexico, with Rhode Island coming in at No. 5.

    At the other end of the spectrum, only one of the top 5 best-run states — Minnesota — is liberal. North Dakota comes in first, followed by Wyoming, Nebraska and Iowa.

    Liberal states also show up, amazingly enough, as having the greatest levels of income inequality. That’s according to another 24/7 Wall St. list, which based its ranking on state-level income inequality data from the Census Bureau.

    IBD also has another take on China at #1:

    Yes, using a calculation called “purchasing power parity,” it looks as if China has passed America. But that calculation is a statistically manufactured one, which supposedly makes up for different costs of living in the two countries.

    In short, it doesn’t measure anything that’s real, but a concept that some economists — and certainly not all — believe is important. It’s a phony comparison using a made-up number.

    So what do the numbers show when you compare real apples to real apples?

    Real U.S. GDP this year will be about $16.27 trillion, adjusted for inflation, according to data from the U.S. government, World Bank and IMF.

    China? It will be less than half that, about $8.06 trillion.

    Not only has China not passed the U.S., but it’s quite possible it never will. China’s population growth is heading for a dramatic Japan-style collapse, which will slash economic growth dramatically in coming years. Growth has already slowed from 10% a year in the 1990s and 2000s to 7% — and it’s likely to fall further from there.

    That’s not all. The real measure of a nation’s standard of living, productivity and, ultimately, the size of its economy is GDP per capita. What does that tell us about the difference between the U.S. and China?

    This year, America will have per person output of $50,979 in real terms, China $5,947.

    Also of note, the economies of Europe, China, and India are all headed for or in recession. Falling oil prices are killing Russia and Venezuela. The Saudis are tolerating low oil prices as a means to harming terrorists (since American power has declined and is useless). All of this is helping make our economy look good by comparison but we are still in for a bumpy ride in the middle and lower classes.

    And Peggy that $18 Trillion in debt, up 70% under Obama is really bad, to quote him:

    “The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion dollars for the first 42 presidents — number 43 added $4 trillion dollars by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion dollars of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child.”

    The truth about our rising debt is that much of it has come from unsustainable government programs like SS, MCare, and now Ocare. We’ve been able to borrow at very low interest rates over the last six years. Imagine how high it will go as interest rates are allowed to rise and the huge baby boomer generation continues to retire creating greater demand!

    Imagine the amount of SS and MCare deposits that have not been made with so many people out of work for so long…that hasn’t helped the situation either.

    The kid that keeps yelling, “Lies” is in for a real shock one day if reality ever permeates that safe little space he inhabits!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.