Voter Fraud Encouraged in New Hampshire?

Posted by Tina

Here we go again. Video by James O’ Keeffe’s Project Veritas Action shows poll workers advising non-residents “how to skirt the rules in order to vote as non-residents.” Daily Caller:

The damning video also shows Bernie Sanders campaign staffers encouraging undercover journalists to claim false addresses in order to vote in the primary.

The video is posted at Daily Caller. The troubling thing in all of this is the attitude and lack of character of the people involved at the precincts. Consider this exchange:

In one instance, a PVA journalist talking with a Sanders campaign staffer named Peyor Gugal floats the idea of claiming an address that was not her own in order to vote.

“You should,” Gugal responded.

“The only thing is like I don’t know what address to use,” the journalist says. “Oh can I use yours?”

“You can if you want,” Gugal responds.

Sanders staffers appeared unconcerned with flouting state law by using fake addresses. And in one case, staffer Donna Waterman acknowledged that doing so could be voter fraud. Nevertheless, she bragged how “incredibly easy” it was for out-of-state campaign workers to skirt the law.

“Like, I think in many ways New Hampshire is incredibly proud of their first in the nation primary, and for that reason they make all of these really lax laws, surrounding voting, so people can, like, take advantage of it,” Waterman tells a PVA journalist.

“Why doesn’t just every volunteer, like, ever in the office, just…,” the journalist begins to ask.

“I think they all have honestly,” says Waterman. “And like, all of our paid canvassers have done it. It’s very, very easy.”

Slime…pure ignorance and slime. These people have no sense of the importance of social integrity. They might as well be running a Bingo game, eh Dewey?

This entry was posted in Constitution and Law. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Voter Fraud Encouraged in New Hampshire?

  1. J. Soden says:

    And to top it off even though Bernie thrashed $hrilLIARy, she still winds up with more delegates due to a quirk in the NH rules!
    http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/10/hillary-earns-more-new-hampshire-delegates-than-sanders-after-loss/
    And now Bloomberg is thinking about tossing his hat in. That would split the Demwit vote, ’cause I don’t know a single member of the GOP that is dumb enough to vote for him after his performance as NannyMayor in NY.

  2. Chris says:

    Why would anyone trust a video from James O’Keefe at this point? The expectation should be that the clips are out of context and misleading, just like every other video O’Keefe has ever produced. Seriously: Name one video of his that wasn’t roundly rejected and discredited by both conservatives and liberals, just one, and I’ll take this new one seriously.

  3. Tina says:

    I knew you’d have a hissy fit over this, Chris. After all, everyone knows Democrats are incapable of doing anything as heinous as instructing people how to vote fraudulently. (Or making sure Hillary wins six out of six) You are the good guys…the angels…the saviors of the world.

    So, produce evidence that these video’s have been altered in any way or that the remarks made by these poll workers are not just as they were stated. We’ll wait…dum dum dum dum, dum dum dum, dum dum dum dum dum-da da da da da da….

  4. Tina says:

    His undercover work is controversial and has at times gotten him into legal troubles. But it has also resulted at times in people being separated from their job for poor performance. In some cases the video’s were used to make changes in training procedures. Not everything in those video’s was a lie!

    Debunk is one of your favorite words, Chris. Too bad you don’t apply it to your own party or the fawning left media that supports it.

    As for Mr. O’Keefe, I found it curious that the man describes himself as, “‘progressive radical’,[27] although media coverage and his own activities consistently paint him as a conservative.[5][28][29] He refers to himself as a muckraker.[30] O’Keefe has expressed admiration for the philosophy of G.K. Chesterton and for a free press.”

    Go figure.

    Somehow I think he is representative of those citizens that are fed up in general with the political class and the media.

  5. RHT447 says:

    Bernie Sanders, The Bum Who Wants Your Money
    _____________________________

    2016: Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders said Monday his parents would never have thought their son would end up in the Senate and running for president. No kidding. He was a ne’er-do-well into his late 30s.

    “It’s certainly something that I don’t think they ever believed would’ve happened,” the unabashed socialist remarked during CNN’s Democratic town hall forum, as polls show him taking the lead in Iowa and New Hampshire.

    He explained his family couldn’t imagine his “success,” because “my brother and I and Mom and Dad grew up in a three-and-a-half-room rent-controlled apartment in Brooklyn, and we never had a whole lot of money.”

    It wasn’t as bad as he says. His family managed to send him to the University of Chicago. Despite a prestigious degree, however, Sanders failed to earn a living, even as an adult. It took him 40 years to collect his first steady paycheck — and it was a government check.

    “I never had any money my entire life,” Sanders told Vermont public TV in 1985, after settling into his first real job as mayor of Burlington.

    Sanders spent most of his life as an angry radical and agitator who never accomplished much of anything. And yet now he thinks he deserves the power to run your life and your finances — “We will raise taxes;” he confirmed Monday, “yes, we will.”

    One of his first jobs was registering people for food stamps, and it was all downhill from there.

    Sanders took his first bride to live in a maple sugar shack with a dirt floor, and she soon left him. Penniless, he went on unemployment. Then he had a child out of wedlock. Desperate, he tried carpentry but could barely sink a nail. “He was a shi**y carpenter,” a friend told Politico Magazine. “His carpentry was not going to support him, and didn’t.”

    Then he tried his hand freelancing for leftist rags, writing about “masturbation and rape” and other crudities for $50 a story. He drove around in a rusted-out, Bondo-covered VW bug with no working windshield wipers. Friends said he was “always poor” and his “electricity was turned off a lot.” They described him as a slob who kept a messy apartment — and this is what his friends had to say about him.

    The only thing he was good at was talking … non-stop … about socialism and how the rich were ripping everybody off. “The whole quality of life in America is based on greed,” the bitter layabout said. “I believe in the redistribution of wealth in this nation.”

    So he tried politics, starting his own socialist party. Four times he ran for Vermont public office, and four times he lost — badly. He never attracted more than single-digit support — even in the People’s Republic of Vermont. In his 1971 bid for U.S. Senate, the local press said the 30-year-old “Sanders describes himself as a carpenter who has worked with ‘disturbed children.’ ” In other words, a real winner.

    He finally wormed his way into the Senate in 2006, where he still ranks as one of the poorest members of Congress. Save for a municipal pension, Sanders lists no assets in his name. All the assets provided in his financial disclosure form are his second wife’s. He does, however, have as much as $65,000 in credit-card debt.

    Sure, Sanders may not be a hypocrite, but this is nothing to brag about. His worthless background contrasts sharply with the successful careers of other “outsiders” in the race for the White House, including a billionaire developer, a world-renowned neurosurgeon and a Fortune 500 CEO.

    The choice in this election is shaping up to be a very clear one. It will likely boil down to a battle between those who create and produce wealth, and those who take it and redistribute it.
    _________________________________
    Link—

    http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/bernie-sanders-the-bum-who-wants-your-money/

  6. Tina says:

    Wow, what a resume!

    The Dem race is shaping up to be between a loser and a crook. Either way it’s always other people money they’re after.

  7. Dewster says:

    LOL More propaganda

    You sign a affidavit with false information you are liable for a fed crime. This is just the campaign to take away voting rights. What garbage!

    It hard enough to get people to vote so now millions will flock to cheat? yea right.

    Here is the father of the conservative party speaking on voting .

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.