Clinton Scandal Continues Hillary Ordered to Answer Questions Under Oath ~ Abedin’s Multiple Jobs Under Scrutiny ~ Abedin’s Mom’s Controversial Book

hillary-clinton-huma-abedinSubmited by J Soden

A judge granted Judicial Watch further discovery, limited to 25 questions, in the Clinton email probe. She has been given until September 29th to respond, under oath. A sampling of the questions follows:

Describe the creation of the system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.

Describe the creation of your email account, including who decided to create it, when it was created, why it was created, and, if you did not set up the account yourself, who set it up for you.

When did you decide to use a email account to conduct official State Department business and whom did you consult in making this decision?

Identify all communications in which you participated concerning or relating to your decision to use a email account to conduct official State Department business and, for each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.

In a 60 Minutes interview aired on July 24, 2016, you stated that it was “recommended” you use a personal email account to conduct official State Department business. What recommendations were you given about using or not using a personal email account to conduct official State Department business, who made any such recommendations, and when were any such recommendations made?

Follow the link to read all twenty five questions. The original lawsuit brought by JW involved inquiry into Hillary’s aid Huma Abidin. The case was reopened when Hillary’s private server was discovered.

In related news Bloomberg reports on the multiple jobs Abedin held while serving under Hillary Clinton at State…or was it the foundation…or…

…Abedin stepped down from her post as deputy chief of staff at the State Department and Hillary Clinton’s ever-present personal assistant on June 3, 2012. Only she didn’t really leave.

Instead, in a reverse twist on a program intended to bring talented outsiders into government, Abedin was immediately rehired as a “special government employee.” She also took paying jobs with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a consulting firm with international clients that was co-founded by a foundation official who also was Bill Clinton’s long-time personal aide.

Abedin’s multitasking in the final eight months of Hillary Clinton’s time as the top U.S. diplomat — and her role as intermediary for some of the same players before that — are drawing renewed scrutiny after a conservative watchdog group’s release last week of a new batch of e-mails to and from Clinton aides. Abedin has become the personification of an election-year debate over whether the nonprofit foundation will create conflicts of interest if Clinton wins the White House.

Abedin’s arrangement as a “special government employee” has been challenged since 2013 by Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who has questioned whether she was overpaid and wrote her that “you allegedly sent or received approximately 7,300 emails on your official Department of State address that involved Mr. Douglas Band,” the Bill Clinton aide and Clinton Foundation official who co-founded Teneo.

Abedin has also faced criticism recently because of her mothers controversial book:

As secretary of state, women’s-rights champ Hillary Clinton not only spoke at a Saudi girls school run by her top aide Huma Abedin’s ­anti-feminist mother, but Clinton invited the elder Abedin to participate in a State Department event for “leading thinkers” on women’s issues.

This happened despite ­evidence at the time that Saleha M. Abedin had explored the religious merits of sexual submissiveness, child marriage, lashings and stonings for adulterous women, and even the ­circumcision of girls.

The elder Abedin, whose daughter helps run Clinton’s presidential campaign, did take a pro-gender-equality stance on at least one issue: Muslim women’s right to participate in violent jihad alongside men.

As The Post first reported, Huma’s mom edits the Journal of Muslim Minority ­Affairs, which has suggested that America had 9/11 coming to it, because of “sanctions” and “injustices” the US allegedly imposed on the Muslim world.

The journal also opposed women’s rights as un-Islamic, arguing that “ ’empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit.”

There’s more here than meets the eye. The people have a right to know the truth.

It would be an horrendous mistake to put these two in the White House with so much hanging in the air and with the obvious carelessness and dubious activity in their record. I have no doubt that Hillary will find a way to avoid answering these questions by the deadline. (We’ll leave Weiner out of it- Huma seems to have moved on)

This entry was posted in Constitution and Law. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Clinton Scandal Continues Hillary Ordered to Answer Questions Under Oath ~ Abedin’s Multiple Jobs Under Scrutiny ~ Abedin’s Mom’s Controversial Book

  1. Pie Guevara says:

    Jackie Gleason: Humina, Humina, Humina …

  2. Pie Guevara says:

    Off topic — Thatcher’s victory Sound familiar?

    Duncan Smith refused to disown her, as Campbell points out, but practically every other prominent Tory, respectable person, and important organization did so in extravagant terms — small-minded, xenophobic, Little Englander, etc., etc. It was made clear that Britain’s membership in the EU was an unchangeable reality of Britain’s future, support for it an establishment

  3. Pie Guevara says:

    Yes, these to should be struck down from political power forever. If the FBI and the DOJ actually did the jobs they are paid to do, this would be a dead issue. But they are whores for the Democrat machine.

  4. Libby says:

    They need to change their name: “The Society to Enumerate Hillary’s Emails”, a cottage industry serving a niche market.

    We must hope it remains niche, and will find out in November.

  5. Tina says:

    Why would we hope it remains “niche,” as if it actually were?

    The woman is a corrupt, self-serving (unindicted) criminal. The emails have already indicated as much regardless her lies and deflections.

    Next up Pelosi’s emails.

    The document casts the controversy surrounding Benghazi as “Legitimate outrage over the deaths of American diplomats mixed with partisanship.” The document also admits that then Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice “gave incorrect information on television” in the immediate aftermath of the attack.

    The document’s central talking points revolve around ignoring the facts revealed by congressional investigations, and instead on rhetorical flourishes that emphasize patriotism.

    The first talking point focuses solely on the importance of having diplomats in dangerous places, and makes no mention of the specific circumstances of Benghazi.

    How can we fool them today?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.