Wikileaks Emails – Podesta and Dem Activist Target Catholics and Evangelicals

Posted by Tina

The ever tolerant and inclusive (phony) Clinton campaign and Democrat activists targeted Catholics (and evangelicals) with the goal of undermining the religions:

“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church,” Sandy Newman, president and founder of the progressive nonprofit Voices for Progress, writes to Podesta in an email titled “opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing.”

Just musing my Aunt Fannie!

This bunch of bigots and control freaks operate to destroy the very idea of religious liberty and free expression. They believe that government should control how you worship, what you hear, and how you MUST think…their way! Such arrogance is usually found in the most oppressive dictatorships. This is one example of the corruption I see that influences not only our elections and governing bodies but our schools, justice system, media and entertainment.

Somehow they fail to see that Sharia Law, the Islamic way, is the same kind of threat to the values of religious liberty, free expression, balance of power, the rule of law that has made America the most tolerant, inclusive and prosperous nation on earth.

America is not compatible with the corrupt, controlling authoritarians of Hillary’s campaign!

This entry was posted in Constitution and Law, Education, Religion. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Wikileaks Emails – Podesta and Dem Activist Target Catholics and Evangelicals

  1. Libby says:

    Will you take a pill, for pity’s sake.

    What is so subversive about Catholics in this country working toward a larger role for women in the church? I don’t think they’re gonna get far, but they can try.

    And it makes no sense to complain about that, and then vociferously demand that proponents of Islam get it done NOW !!!

    Your thinking is very muddled. Go find a pill to take.

    • Tina says:

      Sure Libby.

      I submit it is your thinking that’s muddled.

      Suggesting that Muslims might want to rethink THEIR religion is one thing.

      Its quite another to infiltrate and impose your will on a religion that you don’t practice or respect.

      But that’s how you progressives think…like control freaks, arrogant control freaks.

  2. Jim says:

    Be aware that many of these emails leaked by Russian hackers have been shown to be either edited or fraudulent.

    Which raises the question of why the Russians are supporting Trump?

    • Deplorable J Soden says:

      Edited? Fraudulent? So far, nobody has been able to make that claim credible.

      • Tina says:

        Indeed Deplorable J!

        It doesn’t occur to our friends on the left that Putin might prefer Trump because he’s seen what the progressive left in America have done to the world and he doesn’t like it.


        In a wide-ranging interview with French TV this evening, Russian President Vladimir Putin took a swing at former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, responding particularly to remarks she made earlier this year in which she compared Russia’s tactics to Adolf Hitler’s in the 1930s.

        “It’s better not to argue with women,” Putin said, taking specific aim at Clinton’s gender. “But Ms. Clinton has never been too graceful in her statements.”

        Putin does say the two might be able to laugh together at a good joke “someday,” but that for now he’s not impressed by her “extreme” statements.

        “When people push boundaries too far, it’s not because they are strong but because they are weak,” he added. “But maybe weakness is not the quality for a woman.”

        Accuracy in Media:

        Snowden sits in Russia, a guest of Putin, and Assange has acted like an agent of Russia. Trevor Loudon’s report on Assange documents his service to Moscow and associations with a number of Marxist or pro-Russian groups. Snowden is probably personally involved in the leak and could easily get to the bottom of why it happened.

        “This has the appearance of a foreign power directly interfering in an American election, and that’s not something to take lightly,” Noah Rothman writes in Commentary. He goes on, “Rather than applaud and leverage this development, as he has, Donald Trump would be much better served by condemning it. If the Russians are set on undermining the Democratic Party in this election, it won’t be long before the public is asked to consider why that might be.”

        Rothman has a point, but the more important issue is why the DNC and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used private or unsecure servers that were open to these foreign adversaries. One can argue that Mrs. Clinton, in particular, invited this foreign meddling in the election. Who knows what the Russians still have in their bag of tricks? The point is that Mrs. Clinton is a security risk and the Russians may still have emails to use against her.

        Pro-Putin commentator Don Hank reported back in June, “I was invited to participate in a conversation among a group of friends who are hoping that the Kremlin will turn over their cache of Hillary emails obtained via the Romanian hacker ‘Guccifer’ just in time to smear her prior to the November election.”

        Even earlier, Catherine Herridge of Fox News reported back in May that the Romanian hacker known as “Guccifer” had claimed he easily—and repeatedly—breached former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s personal email server in early 2013. The Clinton campaign denied the charge, but Herridge reported that “Guccifer” said “he first compromised Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal’s AOL account, in March 2013, and used that as a stepping stone to the Clinton server.”

        When it comes to real corruption in this election all roads lead back to Hillary.

  3. Tina says:

    Will you quit ordering people around for pity’s sake!

    Libby you are well schooled in the art of spinning the meat of a story.

    Since when do Americans support the idea that political activist insert themselves into the doctrine of a church? It’s positively backwards!

    Our nation was founded on the principle of religious freedom…freedom from oppression by political forces.

    “…it makes no sense to complain about that, and then vociferously demand that proponents of Islam get it done NOW !!!”

    Go back and read for comprehension! I wrote, “Somehow they fail to see that Sharia Law, the Islamic way, is the same kind of threat to the values of religious liberty, free expression, balance of power, the rule of law that has made America the most tolerant, inclusive and prosperous nation on earth. ”

    Duh! Your radical leaders target Catholics and Evangelicals while pretending that a much larger threat poses no threat at all and anyone who dares to point it out is called names and shamed. The bigotry and bias is profound and the intolerance is conflicting, backwards and phony. It just goes to show everything about your party’s communications is corrupt, controlling and intended to increase power over the people.

    I have no intention to change Islamic doctrine. Islamic leaders may, at some point in the future, choose to do this

    • Libby says:

      You said: “… is the same kind of threat ….”

      How can the non-inclusion of women (in Islam) be the same threat as the inclusion of women (in Catholicism)? Do you see now why it makes no sense to crab about both?

      Or are you just bouncing the phrase “religious liberty” around for it’s dog whistle value, having no firm understanding yourself of the meaning?

      “Since when do Americans support the idea that political activist insert themselves into the doctrine of a church?”

      Uh, since the founding. What do you think the Protestant Reformation was? … and haven’t we been embroidering on it since the founding? How many versions of Protestantism do you suppose have premises in this country? Quite a few, I’ll wager. Now, as I said, I don’t think these reforming Catholics are going to get very far, but for you to object to the attempt is downright unAmerican.

      • Pie Guevara says:

        Re: “How can the non-inclusion of women (in Islam) be the same threat as the inclusion of women (in Catholicism)?”

        It isn’t you lunatic. Go have your genitals mutilated and get back to us.

        • Libby says:

          Again, one sick puppy.

          Come on, Tina … tell us how he didn’t say what he just said

          • Pie Guevara says:

            So, Libby, your defense of Islam’s treatment of girls and women by suggesting an equivalency between Catholic and Islam treatment of women will not be explored by you voluntarily mutilating your own genitals as required by Islam?

            Why am I not surprised?

      • Tina says:

        “How can the non-inclusion of women (in Islam) be the same threat as the inclusion of women (in Catholicism)?”

        A. See my comment above.

        B. Women are included in Catholicism. Their men are not waging war and threatening to kill the infidel.

        Are you capable of making these very simple distinctions? (It would appear not)

        “What do you think the Protestant Reformation was?”

        Not in America, that’s what! It’s the “Roman Catholic Church.” The church and the state were intertwined. some of those who attempted to reform the church broke away (Luther, Calvin) to form separate protestant churches. Those who came to America sought religious freedom and eventually created a secular governing body…a republic.

        Your party leadership is talking about using a political ideology (progressivism/socialism/humanism/secularism) to reform a religion they do not belong to nor respect!

        Geez, you are dim.

        The Catholic Church is standing in the way of their plans for ultimate control and power…they must be dealt with, to use a controlling term you would understand.

        Bunch of power hungry control freaks!

  4. Rick Clements says:



    “Who is Donald Trump?” The better question may be, “What is Donald Trump?”

    The answer? A giant middle finger from average Americans to the political and media establishment.

    Trump supporters have simply had it with the Demo-socialists and the “Republicans In Name Only.” They knew there wasn’t a dime’s worth of difference between Hillary Rodham and Jeb Bush, and only a few cents worth between Rodham and the other GOP candidates.

    Ben Carson was not an “establishment” candidate, but the Clinton machine would pulverize Carson; and the somewhat rebellious Ted Cruz who (justifiably so) would have been tied up with natural born citizen lawsuits (as might Marco Rubio).

    The Trump supporters figure they may as well have some fun tossing Molotov cocktails at Wall Street and Georgetown while they watch the nation collapse. Besides – lightning might strike, Trump might get elected, and he might actually fix a few things. Stranger things have happened; (the nation elected an
    [islamo-]Marxist in 2008 and Bruce Jenner now wears designer dresses.)

    Millions of conservatives are justifiably furious. They gave the Republicans control of the House in 2010 and control of the Senate in 2014, and have seen them govern no differently than Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Yet those same voters are supposed to trust the GOP in 2016? Why?

    Trump did not come from out of nowhere. His candidacy was created by the last six years of Republican failures.

    No reasonable person can believe that any of the establishment candidates [dems or reps] would have slashed federal spending, rein in the Federal Reserve, cut burdensome business regulations, reform the tax code, or eliminate useless federal departments (the Departments of Education, Housing and Urban Development, Energy, etc.).

    Even Ronald Reagan was unable to eliminate the Department of Education. (Of course, getting shot at tends to make a person less of a risk-taker.) No reasonable person can believe that any of the nation’s major problems will be solved by Rodham as she is simply the third verse of Obama’s waning swan song.

    Many Americans, and especially Trump supporters, have had it with:

    · Anyone named Bush

    · Anyone named Clinton

    · Anyone who’s held political office

    · Political correctness

    · Illegal immigration

    · Massive unemployment

    Our out of control federal spending

    Our National Debt that exceeds our GDP (Can you say Greece?

    · Phony “official” unemployment and inflation figures

    · Welfare waste and fraud

    Money being spent on Illegal immigrants

    · People faking disabilities to go on the dole

    · VA waiting lists

    · TSA airport groping

    · ObamaCare

    · The Federal Reserve’s money-printing schemes

    · Wall Street crooks like Jon Corzine

    · Michelle Obama’s vacations

    · Michelle Obama’s food police

    · Barack Obama’s golf

    · Barack Obama’s arrogant and condescending lectures

    · Barack Obama’s criticism/hatred of America

    · Valerie Jarrett

    · ” Holiday trees”

    . Hollywood hypocrites

    · Cop killers while Black Lives Matter

    · Gun confiscation threats

    · Stagnant wages

    · Boys in girls’ bathrooms

    .Whiny, spoiled college students who can’t even place the Civil War in the correct century…

    And that’s just the short list…..

    Trump supporters believe that no Democrat wants to address these issues, and that few Republicans have the courage to address these issues. They know that Trump is their way of saying, “Screw you, Hillary Rodham and all the Do Nothing Republicans!”

    The more the talking head political pundits insult the Trump supporters, the more supporters he gains. (The only pundits who seem to understand what is going on are Democrats Doug Schoen and Pat Caddell and Republican John LeBoutillier.

    But America does not need a tune-up at the same old garage. It needs a new engine installed by experts – and Hillary Rodham is not a mechanic; she merely manages a garage her philandering husband abandoned.

    Trump is also not a mechanic, but he knows where to find the best ones to work in his garage. He won’t hire his brother-in-law or someone to whom he owes a favor; he will hire someone who lives and breathes cars.

    “How dare they revolt!” the “elites” are bellowing:

    Well, the citizens are daring to revolt, and the RINOs had better get used to it.

    “But Trump will hand the election to Clinton !” That is what the Karl Rove-types want people to believe, just as the leftist media eagerly shoved “Maverick” McCain down GOP throats in 2008 – knowing he would lose to Obama.

    But even if Trump loses and Rodham wins, she would be nothing more than a caretaker, not working to restore America ‘s greatness but merely presiding over the collapse of a massively in-debt nation. A nation can perhaps survive open borders; a nation can perhaps survive a generous welfare system.

    But no nation can survive both – and there is little evidence that Hillary Rodham understands that. The United States cannot forever continue on the path it is on. At some point it will be destroyed by its debt.

    Yes, Trump speaks like a bull wander[ing] through a china shop, but the truth is that the borders do need to be sealed; we cannot afford to feed, house, and clothe 200,000 Syrian immigrants for decades (even if we get inordinately lucky and none of them are ISIS infiltrators or Syed Farook wannabes); the world is at war with radical Islamists; and we cannot continue trying to spend our way out of debt.

    Is Trump the perfect candidate? Of course not. Neither was Ronald Reagan. But unless we close our borders and restrict immigration, all the other issues are irrelevant. One terrorist blowing up a bridge or a tunnel could kill thousands.

    One jihadist poisoning a city’s water supply could kill tens of thousands. One electromagnetic pulse attack from a single Iranian nuclear device could kill tens of millions.

    Faced with those possibilities, most Americans probably don’t care that Trump relied on eminent domain to grab up a final quarter acre of property for a hotel, or that he boils the blood of the Muslim Brotherhood thugs running the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

    While Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s greatest fear is someone giving a Muslim a dirty look, most Americans are more worried about being gunned down at a shopping mall by a crazed [islamic] lunatic who treats his prayer mat better than his three wives and who is fool enough to think that 72 virgins are waiting for him in paradise.

    The establishment is frightened to death that Trump will win, but not because they believe he will harm the nation. They are afraid he will upset their taxpayer-subsidized apple carts. While Obama threatens to veto legislation that spends too little, they worry that Trump will veto legislation that spends too much.

    You can be certain that if Hillary wins in November 2016 … [her] cabinet positions will be filled with the same people we’ve seen before. The washed-up has-beens of the Clinton and Obama administrations will be back in charge. The hacks from Goldman Sachs will continue to call the shots.

    And America will continue her continuing decline as other great democracies in history.

    If the establishment wins, America loses.

  5. Pie Guevara says:

    Re: “And America will continue her continuing decline as other great democracies in history.”

    There has never ever been a democracy like the USA. The has never been a Democratic Republic like the USA. We are unique and our uniqueness inspired others to adventure down the road of freedom and equality. We are the shining city despite how much the Democratic Party seeks to turn us into a hellhole sewer.

  6. Dewster says:

    Separation of Church and State

    Politics should not involve religion.

    And the extremist’s from these religions need to get out of elections. Voting should not happen in churches as it does down south here.

    When a Church is a Mega million dollar business who engages in politics ? They need to pay taxes.

    I have no problem with that email. That is how both parties operate and these extremists are constantly playing on the political field.

    I agree with her campaign on that. You know darn well they are not talking about average citizens but the Church political machines. keep it real!

    Still not a Hillary supporter

    • Pie Guevara says:

      Dewey, a man of the sewer if there ever was one. According to this sewer rat, people who follow a religion are second class citizens who should not be allowed a political voice.

      May I respond bluntly? Go f**k yourself, Dewey.

Leave a Reply to Pie Guevara Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.