The genius, Ramirez, strikes again! I’m still in giggle recovery.
-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- Art (88)
- Behavior and Psychology (20)
- Business, Industry and Finance (63)
- Constitution and Law (370)
- Consumer Affairs (4)
- Culture (17)
- Deep State (5)
- Economy (3)
- Education (238)
- Environment (74)
- Fraud Alert (8)
- Global Issues (1)
- Health and Medicine (149)
- History (8)
- Humour (94)
- Military (115)
- Morals and Ethics (149)
- News Media (11)
- Police, Crime, Security (215)
- Politics and Government (144)
- Religion (91)
- Science and Technology (19)
- Veterans' Issues (13)
- World (12)
Recent Comments
- ClayPidgeon on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Michael Davis on Life In Chico and Other Places Infected by Bums
- Patricia Lieder on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Dawn on Thaddeus Kerns Boy Aviator
- scott sproat on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
Recent NorCal Blogs Posts
As if on cue: “‘It’s Not That Crazy’ — Hillary Clinton Defends Offensive Comments About American Women”
Yes, this seems like something that you would find funny.
It’s something that you would not find funny.
I love Ramirez because his cartoons contain truths: Hillary has fallen more than once AND she won’t “shut up!”
Even members of her own party wants her to stop blaming and insulting others for her loss in 2016.
Saw a great response to $hrilLIARy’s claim that men told their women how to vote.
Was on Twitter, and the Tweet read: My husband didn’t tell me why I shouldn’t vote for you
Yours did.
And the Ramirez cartoon has more truth than Demwits would like.
J I agree…that was a terrific response.
Hillary has some nerve. She doesn’t know the women who chose not to vote for her from Adam.
Hillary’s expectations for an automatic vote because of her gender was offensive enough to lose my vote but I had countless other reasons to reject her. Hillary ruined her chances all by herself over many moons.
And how does this comport with your article yesterday decrying the “body shaming’ of Trump?
The answer, of course, is that it doesn’t…because you have no principles.
Actually it comports quite well!
In both instances an artist portrayed a public figure in unflattering ways that various people found hilarious, probably along political lines.
In both cases I commented on what others did or said and expressed my own amusement or lack thereof. In the case of naked Trump my main point was surprise that a publication like The New Yorker would publish it. In comments I made a comparison to another rendition of Hillary in the semi-nude. At no time did I make my own disparaging remarks, at least not in my opinion.
I think your accusation, that I have no principles, is erroneous. In this instance I have provided equal time and freedom of expression…what else do you want from this conservative blog?
Chris wants you to confess your immoral hypocrisy and ethical crimes. Which is really quite funny in itself. No one expects The InPissition! Get out the dish rack, the soft cushions and the comfy chair!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf_Y4MbUCLY
Tina,
That is a fair and honest defense. I withdraw my comment.
I appreciate that, Chris.
Chris withdraws his comment but offers no apology for his crass and specious slur aimed at Tina. Typical Rat coward. No honor, no shame, no conscience, no manhood.
The issue has been settled between Tina and I, Pie. I haven’t seen you apologize for your terrible and immature behavior once, even after being called out for it by Tina. Nor do I demand that you apologize; I’m beyond caring about the way you act. It reflects entirely on you and says nothing about me.
Still no apology Chris. I knew you were incapable. We all knew.
I have nothing to apologize for (except maybe to Tina or Jack for treating you the same way you treat them and others in these pages). I especially have nothing to apologize for to a specious, turd tossing scum like you.
I am pleased to see that you be beyond caring. The next step for you is to drop dead. Can you do that too?
Tina: “Let’s face it, you guys are not just viscous (sometimes criminal) liars, you are also crude and unimaginably unkind (nasty).
“Trump just mirrors everything you’ve been up to for decades. He’s exposing your nastiness and beating you at your own game and you don’t like it…bless your little heart!”
Please … the only nastiness Trump exposes is his own, on a near-daily basis. Why you are forever with the tit-for-tat? I mean, is this supposed to be an example of kindly political cartooning? … and then blowing your asserted virtue right out of the water with your own unkindnesses? Boggles me mind.
As to the TA’s accomplishments, this makes an entertaining read:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/kris-kobach-is-a-loser.html
“Why you are forever with the tit-for-tat? ”
Short answer? You would prefer I shut up.
Sorry Dearie that isn’t how the game is played.
Your party set the rules. For many decades we played nice and won zero respect (or votes) while you defeated us again and again with a constant barrage of false, negative and nefarious attacks.
You want civility you’re going to have to rein in your comrades.
As for me, I won’t back down!
But you just posted a cartoon asserting Hillary should back down. You not make sense.
No, I posted a cartoon poking fun at Hillary and her Circus of Blame.
Any thoughts that she will actually “shut up” are completely delusional…doncha think? I certainly haven’t entertained such.
Must you be such a weasel, rhetorically speaking? You did what you did. It means what it means, your weaselly denials notwithstanding.
To object to unkindly cartoon, and then to post unkindly cartoon, would be act of moron or hypocrite, take you pick.
I’m sure you enjoyed it thoroughly, Libby.
Dropping the commission does demonstrate Trumps abilities rather nicely, though. He’s willing to let go of an idea, and it’s cost, when he see’s it’s not working. After being advised of the difficulties, legal issues, and democrat unwillingness to participate, he dropped the commission. I think that’s commendable:
Trump is interested in things that work. He’s not afraid, or too narcissistic or partisan, to drop plans that aren’t working, to shift gears…unlike certain leaders that refuse to address the outlandish, unworkable problems and costs associated with government controlled healthcare plans, bullet trains and the like.
Tit for tat!
Trump’s a businessman not a politician…they do things like that.
The Russia collusion investigation isn’t the first mess the incompetent and outrageously ridiculous Mueller has created. Mueller as head of the FBI rose to his level of incompetence 17 years ago.
Botching Investigations Since The Anthrax Attacks
Great find Pie! Unbelievable information on Meuller’s history.
A must read for sure!
Turns out there’s lots more about Mueller’s past. Note the articles go all of the way back to 2002 and includes the liberal HuffPo, which should satisfy our liberal naysayer/s.
Questions Still Surround Robert Mueller’s Boston Past”
“Mueller’s involvement in one of the FBI’s most embarrassing cases”
https://saraacarter.com/questions-still-surround-robert-muellers-boston-past/
No, Robert Mueller And James Comey Aren’t Heroes:
“The former FBI directors have acceded to numerous wrongful abuses of power in the post-9/11 era.”
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/conflicts-of-interest-and-ethics-robert-mueller-and_us_5936a148e4b033940169cdc8
Trial Ending for Boston F.B.I. Agent Accused of Mob Ties:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/24/us/trial-ending-for-boston-fbi-agent-accused-of-mob-ties.html
Yes Tina that was a must read, and thank you Pie for bringing it to our attention.
This conclusion at the end of the story line is most telling about the direction Mueller has headed in this Russian investigation, as he ignored Al-Qaida, he also is ignoring Clintons key role.
“The investigation was an unmitigated disaster for America. Mueller didn’t go after al-Qaida for the anthrax letters because he couldn’t find a direct link. But then he targeted American citizens without showing a direct link.”
And as Trump notes, this has turned into nothing less than “A Witch Hunt”
I seriously doubt Mueller had the skills to color between the lines as a kindergartener
Again … do you have to be such easy marks?
If The Federalist told you that the Austin bombings were AQ, ISIS and The Taliban combined, you’d go for it.
Thanks for posting the conclusion, Harold. I found it compelling too but without the background information about his failures to follow up I wasn’t sure it would have much impact. The double set of rules, the protectionism for certain deep staters, it’s all got to come out. Trumps right, there are those in our government who serve themselves, or those in other nations, rather than Americans and America. Mueller may have skills but I’m not sure they are the skills that make America great. We can’t be great if we can;t trust our government and its legal/defense systems.
Libby: “Must you be such a weasel, rhetorically speaking?”
Libby I did not object to the cartoon in the New Yorker. I am not a person who thinks speech must be controlled, unlike those in your party who do.
I posted incredulity that the New Yorker would put it on their cover and then pointed out and commented on the phony ways you and your ilk describe yourselves:
So…get what I actually had to say before you go imagining that I’ve written something that I clearly did not write.
This may be at the core of your disconnect with us. You read often your own bigotry and nasty attitudes into the things we write.
(What is that about a haughty spirit….?)
“This is an example of the phony posture of left elitists who claim the mantle of inclusiveness, tolerance, decency and kindness.”
Tina, you are one of the great obfuscators of all time. What has this you wrote here got to do with the harsh depiction of Trump in a cartoon? Nothing. You’re taking a broad swipe at the opposition philosophy when that is NOT what we are talking about.
If some contingent of the population believes Trump to be, in all his nakedness, exclusive, intolerant, indecent and spectacularly unkind … they may not draw a picture that says so? It’s you who fail to take meaning from what you read, or see, or hear, or anything, I swear.
And you ARE objecting to the cartoon. You ARE asserting that it’s wicked for us to be unkind, but just peachy-keen for you to do the same. You not make no sense.
Libby please try to keep up. Your comrades are free to continue posting such images forever as far as I’m concerned. What I’m suggesting is that you drop the phony claims that you are the tolerant inclusive party as well as claims that we are the intolerant daemons from hell. I’m suggesting that you are free to continue but you can expect a lot of push back now.
“You’re taking a broad swipe at the opposition philosophy when that is NOT what we are talking about.”
We are talking about that and a lot more.
“…they may not draw a picture that says so?”
Of course they can. This is a free country with free speech rights.
Am I not allowed to express surprise, incredulity, given the reputation of The New Yorker?
“And you ARE objecting to the cartoon. You ARE asserting that it’s wicked for us to be unkind, but just peachy-keen for you to do the same.”
Nothing of the sort, but thanks for being true to your progressive controlling self. Might as well have written, You will be as I say you are, dammit!
Breathe…bask in the wonderfulness of freedom!
Let’s hope Libby donates her brain to science. Might be interesting – if not entertaining – to see the incredible way her mind works. Or misfires.
One more thought about this:
“You ARE asserting that it’s wicked for us to be unkind, but just peachy-keen for you to do the same.”
Let’s take this discussion out of this particular post for a moment.
I’ve posted several times that we humans all have the same capacity for good and evil. I firmly believe this, so your assertion just doesn’t fit.
“I’ve posted several times that we humans all have the same capacity for good and evil. I firmly believe this, so your assertion just doesn’t fit.”
Then why do you spend most of your time on this blog doing some highly partisan grousing about stuff your side does as well. Or are you, yet again, going to assert that there was something particularly heinous about the naked Trump?
And I suppose I am bullying, but it’s high time you developed some intellectual detachment here.
You not make no sense.
You not make Libby no happy. Libby mad. Libby inclusive. Libby tolerant. Libby decent. Libby kind. Libby gooooood. Tina baaaaaad. Trump baaaaad. Hillary smart. Libby smart. Trump stupid. Tina stupid. Libby good posture, no not phony. Libby draw any picture she like, bully Tina no stop Libby draw.
Someday you, Pie, are going to develop styles of your own to play with (that do not feature potty words), and that too, will floor me.
Heh. “Mongo just pawn in game of life.”
That’s definitely another way to put it, Pie. 🙂
More gut busting—
http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/2018/03/cnn-headlines-hillarys-bold-now-fashion.html
Bubbles. Tiny bubbles.
As if on cue….
A story in the news today illustrates my point that the hard left progressives is intolerant of others to the point of nastiness. <a href="The Daily wire reports on a response to a book about a bunny, by Mike Pence’s daughter:
A portion of the proceeds fro the book will go to a charity “dedicated to stopping sex trafficking.”
“Last Week Tonight” host John Oliver tried to demean her effort by launching an attack by spoofing the book:
Charlotte’s response was to welcome the idea of another book “two books about bunnies” that would raise money for charity.