It’s a Society Problem… duh-uh

Posted by Jack

Notice the flag in the background… this is Israel 2017….

Where Teachers Carry CAR-15’s ..

Where it’s mandatory that young people serve in the Military … and they are armed 24/7 ..

Where they eat right and don’t overmedicate …

Where the murder rate for the whole country is a fraction of what Nashville, TN is …

Where Parents teach respect and values instead of letting Disney and X-Box raise their children …

Where they Stand for their flag and would defend it with their lives!!

WE DON’T HAVE A GUN PROBLEM WE HAVE A SOCIETY PROBLEM

This entry was posted in Gun rights and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to It’s a Society Problem… duh-uh

  1. Libby says:

    You wanna live like that … I’m sure Israel would be only too glad to make use of your three pension checks. You wanna stay here? … the AR-15 had better be locked up in the house, when not at the range, or we’re taking the thing away from you!

    • RHT447 says:

      “… or we’re taking the thing away from you!”

      Ok. Come on over. I’ll wait.

    • Peggy says:

      Libby is the poster child for Dems.

      Which side of the fence?

      If you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

      If a Republican doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
      If a Democrat doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
      ============================== =
      If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.
      If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.
      ============================== =
      If a Republican is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
      If a Democrat is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.
      ==============================
      If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
      If a Democrat is down-and-out he wonders who is going to take care of him.
      ============================== =
      If a Republican doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
      A Democrat demands that those they don’t like be shut down.
      ============================== =
      If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.
      A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.
      ============================== =
      If a Republican decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
      If a Democrat decides he needs health care, he demands that the rest of us pay for his.
      ===============================
      If a Republican is unhappy with an election, he grumbles and goes to work the next day.
      If a Democrat is unhappy with an election, he burns down a Starbucks, throws rocks at cops and takes two-weeks off for therapy, mandates a special council be staffed with biased members against the president, spend millions of dollars based on no evidence of a crime in an attempt to have the winner driven out of office and unable to perform his duties.
      ============================== =
      If a Republican reads this, he’ll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
      A Democrat will delete it because he’s “offended.”

  2. Tina says:

    Jack Libby will continue to yammer on about guns, failing to address the quintessential difference cited of shared morals and values in their society, until the hoards start firing on her neighborhood with almost daily regularity.

    A dolt just can’t fathom the point of your article much less stop with the control freak threats!

  3. Tina says:

    Excellent, by the way.

  4. Tina says:

    “…we have a society problem”

    Yes we do. Folks like Libby believe they can create a perfect “social organism” but they only create tyrannical control:

    Zerohedge:

    Brave New World Revisited is one of the few books I’ve read in my life that I continue to think about on a regular basis.

    In terms of understanding where humanity stands at present and what we need to do to get out of the mess we’ve created, it’s one of the more important pieces of non-fiction you can find.

    I recently felt the need to reread the book for some unknown reason, and I’m glad I did. The choices we make as a species about how we reorganize human affairs in the decades to come will determine the future of human freedom on this planet. Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World Revisited offers an abundance of wisdom for us to consider as we move forward.

    Huxley was deeply concerned with the importance of individual human freedom and the forces relentlessly trying to stifle it. (continues with quote from Huxley’s Beave New World)

    • J. Soden says:

      What Libby the Lib and others of her ilk fail to acknowledge is that criminals or terrorists just aren’t gonna suddenly decide to follow any new gun law restrictions. No matter how much they bray otherwise.

      The rest of us DO understand that! And will be keeping our weapons.

  5. RHT447 says:

    “You wanna live like that…”

    Why yes, yes I do.

    Where there is honor

    Where there is a code

    Where I can stand shoulder to shoulder with my fellow citizens, where they have my back, and I have theirs.

    I want to live in the arena.

    “It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

    Theodore Roosevelt
    “Citizenship in a Republic,”
    Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, April 23, 1910

    I suspect that if you asked the young ladies in the photo about the nearest ‘safe space’, they would point out the nearest cover from which to return fire.

    • RHT447 says:

      More reasons why—

      Gun control is not about the guns. It is about control. Why? Because tyrants do not fear the guns. They fear the gun owners.

      Well said—

      “The difference between individual rights and collective responsibility may be illustrated with this example: imagine a group of half-dozen people which includes you. Every person in that group has a basic table utensils, a spoon, a knife and a fork. Everyone except you, unprovoked, tries to stab another person with the fork. Collective responsibility principle would require everyone to be relieved of the utensils. Individual rights approach would punish those who tried to stab others without cause, but would leave you personally unmolested because you’ve done nothing wrong. It doesn’t matter who does what wrong, the punishment should not extend to the innocent.

      The collective responsibility side would claim that taking of your property isn’t a punishment but “prevention”. Individual rights perspective disagrees, taking of property is an offense in itself.

      What makes this argument even more interesting is that in the case of weapons, the first taking of property also leaves the victim open to all future takings of other property, liberty and life. That raises the stakes sky-high.

      A person robbed of property might want to replace it. So such takings not only require banning of trade in a progressively wider list of close substitutes, but also the suppression of knowledge of manufacturing. Since modern weapons may be manufactured with the 1890s technology base, they require a rollback of the society at large that far…or a very pervasive and intrusive police state keeping all modern and primitive production under constant surveillance, along with motivating informants. Something half-way between the current China and current North Korea…is that the model on which we’d want to base the new “safe” America?”

      From here–

      http://blog.olegvolk.net/2018/04/06/individual-or-collective/

  6. Harold says:

    Libby post’s “the AR-15 had better be locked up in the house, when not at the range, or we’re taking the thing away from you”

    Libby has exposed the real truth behind gun control rhetoric from the Left. And her watered down term of “locked up” is just more BS from the left.

    I recall her post’s early on where she mimicked Literals chant “we’re (the Liberals) are not coming for your guns”, and quite often she used that in rebuttal to Jacks concerns about gun confiscation, and how Literals in California are slowly chipping away at responsible gun owners rights.

    News flash Libby, responsible gun owners do lock up their guns, it is the deranged and criminals that your ilk of anti gun control liars need to focus on.

    So with her two sided hydra like speak, which are you to believe?, I don’t trust either to be factual or honest, just concocted PC BS for liberal goals in the moment.

    Those ladies in the picture where taught the importance of freedom and the importance you may need to go to preserve it.

    Jack’s term of “inductive reasoning/learning” really hit’s home in Israel’s situation, as they will not let the atrocities of a past government’s ideology with guns, imprison and destroy those who they took guns from.

    1836 when it was said “God created man and Sam Colt made them equal” applies in today’s world as it did then.

  7. RHT447 says:

    Rock on, sir. I’d be pleased to hold your coat.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo_X53dNTS8

  8. Eric says:

    Those women served in the Israeli Defense Forces for at least two years mandatory service where they were trained how to use those weapons probably even under fire. They most likely are still serving in the Isreali Reserve until age forty.

    Maybe the USA should conscript all 18 year olds for two to three years service. Most would learn how to use those weapons in combat situations like a school mass shooting.

    • J. Soden says:

      Agreed with Robert A. Heinlein in “Starship Troopers” when that book first came out in 1959 and won the Hugo Award in 1960!
      Book required all members of society spending at least 2 years in the service of their country in order to be able to be a citizen and VOTE or hold political office!

  9. Libby says:

    “… whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, ….”

    And then I considered The Donald … and had a good chuckle … 71 years old, and still the quintessential rich kid.

  10. Post Scripts says:

    I can’t recall when I have read more profound wisdom, you guys did great.

  11. RHT447 says:

    BOHICA.

    “The proposed bill text, likely to be adopted soon, would create an entirely new class of highly-regulated items called “firearm precursor parts” that would include barrels, ammunition feeding devices (including magazines for semi-automatic firearms and “speed loaders” for revolvers), “unfinished receivers,” molded or shaped polymer frames or receivers, metallic castings, metallic forgings, receiver “flats” such as Kalashnikov style weapon systems, Browning-style receiver side plates, Kalashnikov style receiver “channels”, finished upper receivers for AR-15 and AR-10 style firearms, unfinished handgun frames, finished slides that are used to enclose handgun barrels, and trigger pack or fire control groups for Heckler and Koch or FN FAL style firearms.”

    https://www.firearmspolicy.org/breaking_amendments_to_calif_ghost_gun_bill_would_enact_staggering_new_firearms_parts_regulations

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *