Kavanaugh and the Party of False Moral Outrage and Hypocrisy

by Jack

I was going to stay out of this one because I didn’t think it was going to derail Kavanaugh, but now it looks like it might. Liberals have frequently cited psychiatric reports that claim the human brain is not fully matured until around age 27. This is quite frequently brought up in the defense of a teenage killer.   The bleeding heart liberals can’t show enough compassion and empathy when it suits their agenda.

In Kavanaugh’s case, which as alleged was far from a homicide, they want to lynch a highly qualified, time tested jurist for the alleged act of an intoxicated 15 year old that on the face of does not rise farther than a sexual battery.   Unlawful touching of breasts would be a sexual battery.

But, here we have the democrats acting like he’s Jack the Ripper and the crime as stated would not even rise to the level of a felony.   But, even if it had, the statute of limitations would have expired over 3 decades ago!  Now 32 years later, we are asked to revisit the events of July or August, 1985 and render a verdict guilty based on the nothing more than the memory of a 15 year girl who as an adult has a possible political motive?    Heck, it’s been so long ago nobody can quite remember the exact date, but one person claims to have remembered and is just now coming forward and two others say it never happened.  What jury would convict on such thin evidence?

Kavanaugh’s legal career as a Supreme Court Justice hangs in the balance and he’s being smeared as if he has been found guilty of a horrendous sex crime.

The Court of Public Opinion must decide the truth based on what amounts to “he said she said testimony.”   Cripes, if it happened then it happened in high school!  It happened 32 years ago before his college years, before he was married, before he had children, before he was judge and we’re supposed to say, well sure, that seems fair? We’re supposed to think it’s absolutely fine for democrats to hold him to a high moral standard now as an adult because the democrats are famous for their high moral standards, right?

But, if they truly mean it, then great, but I have serious reservations about their true agenda!   Especially when I think, what about the Chairman of Democratic Party?  He stands accused of frequently doing a beat down on his former girlfriend? That wasn’t 32 years ago, it was this year and he’s also a sitting Congressman.  I think that one makes it more relevant to investigate than Kavanaugh’s alleged incident.  If the Congressman’s case is true, then we have a chargeable offense, domestic violence.  Where’s the moral outrage on that?

I’m sure not hearing much from the lynch-Kavanaugh-mob about that. However, this happens all the time in the Party of Hypocrisy and False Moral Outrage.

This entry was posted in Morals and Ethics, politics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Kavanaugh and the Party of False Moral Outrage and Hypocrisy

  1. Peggy says:

    Turns out Ford’s attorney works for a Soros funded group. No surprise there. And was also involved with Anita Hill against Justice Thomas

    Christine Ford’s Lawyer Is Vice Chair of Soros Funded Group!:


    Wonder what this is about?

    Joe diGenova’s Christine Ford & PGA Golfers Comment Causes Confusion:


  2. J. Soden says:

    The current Kavanaugh brouhaha is just a warm-up for the Demwits should TheDonald get to replace a THIRD Supreme Court Justice.
    Fair-minded folks are being turned off by the hysteria from the Loonie Left. Interestingly, I’ve been asking questions of those planning to vote in November, and can’t find ANYONE who will admit to wanting to vote “D.”

  3. Libby says:

    “I was going to stay out of this one because I didn’t think it was going to derail Kavanaugh, but now it looks like it might.”

    Don’t be absurd. Have you seen the papers this morning? The old boys are on a tear, and I’ve never heard quite so much such ugly.

  4. Tina says:

    Jack this travesty circus is not about sexual assault or attempted rape, we all know that. It’s about abortion. Democrats propose trashing a basic tenet of the law, innocent until proven guilty, in their quest to deny Kavnaugh a place on the court. Democrats have the unreasonable expectation that Kavanaugh can address accusations made against him BEFORE knowing what they are! Democrats are willing to ruin an innocent man’s reputation without knowing the facts or seeing evidence…there is no reasonable doubt in this Feminazi kangaroo court…SHAME!

    Who would want to live in such a world? Forget the Supreme Court…who would want to live in this tyrannical, dark ages world? Lawyers are promoting this crap! They know how our legal system works and the purpose of it. If they are willing to do this in this case they would do it in other instances.

    UGLY is a bunch of elitist radical feminists and their billionaire George Soros funded lawyers working against the legal and congressional processes of the United States…undermining the will of the American people and attempting to destroy our republic…SHAME!!!

    It isn’t just men who are “on a tear,” so are women, including Ruth Bader Ginsberg! She is very unhappy with this, contrasting it to the way Republicans treated her.

    Per Wikipedia: “…Ginsburg did answer questions about some potentially controversial issues. For instance, she affirmed her belief in a constitutional right to privacy and explained at some length her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality. … The United States Senate confirmed her by a vote of 96 to 3 in 1993. Democrats held the majority 57-43.

    Feminists and their male Democrat lap dogs should be ashamed…clearly they have no shame.

    • Peggy says:

      Because of Democrats every man and boy will be forced to live like VP Mike Pence and not be alone with a woman/girl who is not his wife or mother.

      EVERY parent of a male child should be very concerned that their son could be charged by a female and automatically be assumed guilty without any evidence to substantiate the accusation.

      Parents and grandparents had better speak up or their children will pay for their silence. I have a wonderful grandson and I’ll be damned if I’ll let the lunatic left ruin his life for their political power and control.

      • Tina says:

        Peggy you need to read an article by Sarah Hoyt at PJ Media, “When Every Boy is Guilty, Every Girl Becomes A Monster”

        It’s much worse than we thought. I wouldn’t put my kid in public school today for anything…the feminist cult has taken the place of the environmental scare…both vehicles for destroying a nation.

        No wonder kids are afraid of their own genders, wanting to be an “it,” and freaking out!

        Slime…the radical left is slime!

        • Peggy says:

          There’s no way I’d put my kids in public education either, if I had any at this time. God help my grandkids who are.

          The democrats and the progressive movement are destroying this country from the inside. If Trump, with our support, isn’t able to stop them they will succeed.

          Very scary times. I thought the 2016 election was the most important of my lifetime, but this election is even more important. The radical left has to be stopped once again. Hoping the polls are wrong because once again it’s the silent majority who will speak in the voting booth and not to pollsters.

  5. Tina says:

    The latest information is that the delaying tactics are about running out the clock. If Republicans in the Senate allow this to go on for another week Kavanaugh is out per Senate rules. Maybe that’s why McConnell ran for the microphones today to say that Kavanaugh would be sitting on the Supreme Court soon.

    • Peggy says:

      On Monday or whatever day they agree on, I want to see the 60 women supporting Judge Kav sitting behind him, And sitting in the front row on the Dems side I want to see Juanita Broadwich, the other women Bill Clinton sexually attacked and raped, and the ex-girlfriend of Keith Ellison, who just won his election as Minnesota’s attorney general. All should be holding signs saying they support Kav.

      Dems had their Soros paid protesters at all of the previous hearings, it’s time the Judge has his supports.

    • Peggy says:

      Also heard, but have not verified, that SC justice candidates do not have to have committee approval prior to a vote on the senate floor. That must be what McConnell was talking about when he said Kav. would be our next SC Justice.

      “At the close of confirmation hearings, the Committee votes on whether the nomination should go to the full Senate with a positive, negative or neutral report.[3]”


      • Peggy says:

        From the Judiciary Committee’s website. No mention of committee approval.

        “When a vacancy occurs on the Supreme Court, the President of the United States is given the authority, under Article II of the United States Constitution, to nominate a person to fill the vacancy. The nomination is referred to the United States Senate, where the Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing where the nominee provides testimony and responds to questions from members of the panel. Traditionally, the Committee refers the nomination to the full Senate for consideration.”


  6. J. Soden says:

    Thought “Demwits” was an accurate description of a certain political party when posting comments.
    Once again, I’ve had to revise my posting terminology to better reflect their value – or lack thereof. Now, it’s “Despicable Demwits” – and they’ve EARNED it with the Kavanaugh circus!

  7. Pie Guevara says:

    Republicans have a two clear choices: 1) Listen to any accusers and then 2) confirm Kavanaugh.

    The DamnRats can then try to have him impeached and removed from office. See how far that gets and how well that goes over. They will never be able to provide valid, prosecutable evidence that would stand up in any court of law nor even in a kangaroo court in Congress.

    Kavanaugh and Republicans need to hold fast and let the vile and vicious scum trying to destroy him and the judicial selection process self-destruct.

    “By a simple majority, the House can vote to impeach a federal official. This process is akin to an indictment in an ordinary criminal proceeding. Then, once the official is impeached, the Senate holds a trial to determine if the official should be convicted, in which case the official is removed from office.”

    I would love to see the Rats try and pull that one off. Feinstein’s head might actually explode in the process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *