Bidwell Park is Being Trashed – Chico Progressives Break Their Promise

by Jack

It was announced in the local newspaper about a week ago, that the local democratic socialist club of Chico was going to take care of the trash left behind by their favorite people, bums and junkies.

Well that lasted about a day.  Picking up trash proved to be too much work for them.

If Annie Bidwell could only see what the filthy four on our city council have done to her grand gift to the people…. Bidwell Park.  The bums camping, the drugs, the needles, the trash and the ever present stolen bike parts.  What a mess.

I bet if John Bidwell were alive today he would have formed up a posse and run the scum out of Chico in 24 hours.  The Bidwell’s would not tolerate all these freeloaders!  All the stealing,  the illegal drugs, the overdoses, vandalisms.  The bums think they can do anything they want here.

NEXT:

Well, poor ol Shubert’s Ice Cream Parlor was attacked again, the same plate glass window was broken out once more.   What’s that make now, 3 or 4 times in the last 2 months?  (Mrs. Shubert shown left-just kidding)

Based on everything I know about this crime and other similar hate crimes in our recent past,  I would strongly suspect that a hardcore group of radical progressives are behind it.

They are the most hateful group in Chico.  They’re irrational, vindictive and highly organized.  But, that’s just my humble opinion.  Shubert’s is owned  by Casey Reynolds a conservative on the city council.  She opposes the filthy four.  That’s all the motive hateful radicals would need to do some damage to Shubert’s.  But, come Nov. I think the local people will have had enough and vote to unseat 2 or 3 of these terrible council people and restore some sanity to our city council.

The really sad part is, even if the bad guy/s were caught in the act, the local police would be forced to turn em loose with a citation at the very most.  They’re pressured by the gang of four to go easy on bums and junkies…because they just nice homeless folks down on their luck.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Bidwell Park is Being Trashed – Chico Progressives Break Their Promise

  1. Peggy says:

    Election for our city council and governor can’t come soon enough.

    California Sheriff: I’m Not Enforcing Lockdown, We’re Too Busy ‘Re-Arresting’ Criminals:

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/california-sheriff-im-not-enforcing-lockdown-were-too-busy-re-arresting-criminals

  2. Peggy says:

    FYI – Hidden in Pelosi’s bill is a bailout for lobbyist, that no one for either party is talking about. If it wasn’t for Tucker mentioning it the other night I wouldn’t have gone looking for the below info. If I remember right Tucker said Pelosi had put in more money for the lobbyist than she did for small businesses.

    Tucker Carlson and Saagar hilariously mock Dem lobbyist bailout bill:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNh0t5tRxA0

    Saagar Enjeti: Pelosi LITERALLY wants to bailout lobbyists in next stimulus package:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRcQfYN6KpU

    BREAKING: House Democrats’ new CARES Act proposal would expand PPP loan eligibility to *all* 501(c)(4) and (c)(6) groups with under 500 employees. Our research shows it would cover 99.9% of c6 trade groups.:
    https://twitter.com/DemPolicy/status/1260255282652987398

  3. J Soden says:

    Other businesses in Taxifornia, please take note and file your own lawsuits!!!!!
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/16/ventura-county-pivots-in-face-of-lawsuit-orders-gun-stores-reopened/
    Could be time for a ballot initiative change to the Taxifornia Constitution to prevent this type of overreach in the future!

  4. Joe says:

    Do the liberals who infest this blog still want to argue that Biden isn’t corrupt?

    Phone Calls Between Biden And Ukraine’s Poroshenko Leaked; Details $1 Billion “Quid Pro Quo” To Fire Burisma Prosecutor
    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/phone-calls-between-quid-pro-joe-biden-and-ukraines-poroshenko-leak-explicitly-details

    • Chris says:

      Yes, because your entire conspiracy theory requires not just Biden, but the entire EU and the IMF being wrong about Shokin as well. Everyone wanted him out because Shokin was not investigating corruption. This wasn’t just Biden asking for a personal favor (as Trump did in his call to the Ukraine), it was part of a major worldwide push to end corruption in Ukraine. How exactly would that benefit Hunter Biden, if he really was implicated in any corruption within Burisma, to replace Shokin with a less corrupt and more aggressive prosecutor? It wouldn’t. And if you follow the chain of events, there’s no evidence of Biden himself convincing Obama and all our allies to get rid of Shokin; Biden was simply enforcing US policy that was already widely popular. Joe had neither the motive nor the ability to pull off the scheme you’re alleging.

      Every fact-checker in the world has pointed these facts out to you, but you still prefer to follow the distortions from Russian propaganda pushers like Zero Hedge.

      • Tina says:

        Would Chris bother to consider Biden’s alleged crime? Of course not, even when there’s video of him bragging about How his threat to withhold $ worked!!!

        The issues are separate in any case It’s possible that an overall investigation of corruption was present even as Biden used his power to keep hidden any role his son Hunter may have played in the corruption.

        Go ahead, Avery your eyes. The truth will out!

        • Chris says:

          Would Chris bother to consider Biden’s alleged crime? Of course not, even when there’s video of him bragging about How his threat to withhold $ worked!!!

          Tina. I’ve already addressed this. I’ve addressed it on this blog lkiterally dozens of times. Every single fact-checker in the world has also addressed this.

          For the hundredth time: the video shows Biden bragging that he threatened to withhold money if Ukraine did not fire Shokin. This is completely undisputed. The dispute is over his motivation and whether this threat was corrupt. I have already proven to you–as has every single fact-checker in the world–that Biden’s threat was 1) backed up by the president and all of our allies, 2) done for a legitimate foreign policy purpose to remove a corrupt prosecutor, and 3) could not possibly have been done out of a personal motive, since Shokin was not investigating Biden’s son’s company at the time, and replacing Shokin with a more aggressive prosecutor would have been bad for his son if he were actually involved in any corruption.

          Neither you nor anyone on this site has ever rebutted any of these three facts, nor have you explained how they comport with your corruption theory.

          The issues are separate in any case It’s possible that an overall investigation of corruption was present even as Biden used his power to keep hidden any role his son Hunter may have played in the corruption.

          This isn’t even a meaningful sentence.

          I’m sorry you aren’t at full capacity right now and I’m praying for healing for you. But if you don’t have the ability to support wild, unfounded accusations, you shouldn’t be making them.

    • Chris says:


      Analysis / Bias

      In a quote from the above New Yorker article they summarize the political stance of the blog, which Lokey told Bloomberg is: “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry= dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft.”

      Zero Hedge’s content has been classified as “alt-right” and has been criticized for presenting conspiracy theories.

      In review, Zero Hedge publishes pro-right wing/Trump articles such as Pat Buchanan: “Trump Calls Off Cold War II.” As well as fake news stories regarding liberals: Anti-Trump Protesters Bused Into Austin, Chicago.

      Editorial content is written under the pseudonym Tyler Durden and usually focuses on conspiracies related to economic collapse. Zero Hedge sources to factually mixed think tanks such as the The Mises Institute, which promotes Austrian (Anarcho-Capitalism) economics.

      A factual search reveals a terrible track record with IFCN fact checkers. Below is just a small sample of the numerous failed fact checks by Zero Hedge.

      Says China “stole Coronavirus from Canada and weaponized it into a Bioweapon.” – False
      Is a Craigslist ad proof that counterprotesters at a white nationalist rally were “paid to make chaos”? – False
      It’s now against the law in California to shower and do laundry on the same day. – Mostly False
      A “newly uncovered” photograph reveals Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was crying over an empty parking lot, not detained migrant children, at a protest in Texas. – False
      “The Ukrainian government just indicted the Burisma gas company & named Hunter Biden for accepting millions of dollars from a slush fund.” – False
      Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left. (8/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 1/29/2020)

      https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/

      • Joe says:

        So why did young Hunter Biden make a boat load of money from Burisma?

        Was it his vast knowledge and experience in the oil and gas indusrty? Was it because of his vast knowledge and experience of Ukraine and eastern Europe?

        Why can’t you admit that the Bidens are corrupt as hell?

        • Chris says:

          So why did young Hunter Biden make a boat load of money from Burisma?

          Because he was a board member.

          Was it his vast knowledge and experience in the oil and gas indusrty? Was it because of his vast knowledge and experience of Ukraine and eastern Europe?

          No, it was because he had experience being on a board of directors; President Bush had previously appointed him to the board of Amtrak. Serving on a board doesn’t necessarily require someone to be an expert in a certain industry, and it is very normal for people to serve on boards of companies that they have no real expertise in.

          It’s quite possible Burisma hired Hunter to get special favors from Joe Biden. But there is no evidence that any such favors were granted. As I’ve shown you, the firing of Shokin, a corrupt prosecutor who everyone wanted gone because he was *refusing* to investigate corruption, was not and could not have been such a favor. If you have evidence of any actual benefit Burisma got from Biden or the Obama administration, please present it. But firing a corrupt prosecutor who the whole world wants gone so that a more aggressive prosecutor can take his place isn’t it.

          Why can’t you admit that the Bidens are corrupt as hell?

          Because you haven’t presented any evidence of corruption. Notice how you moved from the disproven idea that Biden’s threat to Ukraine was meant to protect Burisma and Hunter from investigation, to the more general claim that Hunter working there at all is evidence of corruption. That you think Hunter was unqualified can’t bother you that much; unless you think Jared Kushner has expertise in the fields of epidemiology and Middle East policy, why have you never once complained about the current president placing his son-in-law in so many government positions that he is totally unqualified for, such as the coronavirus response and Middle East peace? Doesn’t that have a much greater impact on our country than a vice president’s son getting a job at a Ukrainian oil company? Isn’t that more evidence of corruption than anything that has been presented against the Bidens?

        • Joe says:

          So you admit drug addict Hunter doesn’t know Jack Squat about oil, gas or Eastern Europe or even the operations of Burisma’s business yet you’re OK with him making boat loads of money for doing nothing because his daddy was VP. How do I get a job like that?

          It’s corruption as usual and because you’re such a partisan hack you have now problem with that corruption.

          • Chris says:

            So you admit drug addict Hunter doesn’t know Jack Squat about oil, gas or Eastern Europe or even the operations of Burisma’s business yet you’re OK with him making boat loads of money for doing nothing because his daddy was VP. How do I get a job like that?

            I don’t know; maybe have George W. Bush appoint you to Amtrak’s board of directors first? Do you think President Bush appointed Hunter because he was Biden’s son, even though Biden was not yet VP? Was he in on the corruption too?

            If Hunter was hired only because of his father, that’s bad; we agree on that. It also doesn’t reflect on Joe Biden at all unless you can show that Joe pressured Burisma to hire him, or gave them any special treatment in response. You have not shown this. You are literally pushing a conspiracy theory based partially on a fact that involves Joe Biden doing the exact opposite: again, getting Shokin, who was refusing to investigate corruption, removed from the Burisma investigation would have been bad for Burisma if they were really corrupt; he was replaced with a more aggressive prosecutor, so if they really were as shady as you claim, how would getting rid of Shokin help them? You still can’t answer that.

            Nor did you address the obvious corruption of our current president. Jared Kushner being put in charge of our coronavirus response and Middle East peace policy has a way greater effect on our country than Hunter working for some foreign oil company, but you say nothing about that, and you continue to support the president who put his unqualified son-in-law in charge of these things while condemning Joe Biden for a far lesser offense that you can’t even prove. This is pure hypocrisy, and you are projecting your partisanship onto me.

      • Tina says:

        What evidence is given to label the stories false?

        Concensus among leftists. So much for integrity in journalism or freedom of expression. The desire is to shame and silence, a common left wing tactic that Chris plays all the time.

        What is their fear? Loss of control! Why do they need that tight grip? They believe the opposition intends to do great harm.

        I know, so many people have been imprisoned and tortured since Trump won…denied jobs…stoned in the streets. Really bad things have happened to the environment. Hatred abounds

        NOT.

        • Chris says:

          What evidence is given to label the stories false?

          You can easily click the link I provided, then click the link to the fact checks they provide.

          But you probably won’t.

      • Joe says:

        “Why did the Obama Admin use opposition research, funded by a political organization and filled with foreign dirt to SPY ON MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN?”
        “Why was Lt. Gen. Micahel Flynn UNMASKED by Obama’s Chief of Staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others?”
        “Why was Flynn’s identity leaked – A CRIMINAL ACT – to the press?”
        “Why did the DOJ learn about the FBI’s interest in Flynn’s conversations with the Russian Amb. from a CONVERSATION WITH OBAMA in the Oval Office?”

        • Chris says:

          “Why did the Obama Admin use opposition research, funded by a political organization and filled with foreign dirt to SPY ON MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN?”

          They didn’t. Carter Page was spied on after he left the Trump campaign. (He was also spied on in 2014, long before he ever worked for Trump, which weakens the argument that the only reason he was spied on in 2016 was because of Trump.)

          “Why was Lt. Gen. Micahel Flynn UNMASKED by Obama’s Chief of Staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others?”

          Because he was having suspicious conversations with foreign governments about undermining US policy and the government rightfully wanted to know who was doing that. (Remember, they wouldn’t have known it was Flynn before they unmasked him–otherwise they wouldn’t have needed to unmask him!)

          “Why was Flynn’s identity leaked – A CRIMINAL ACT – to the press?”

          Possibly because the Trump administration is the leakiest of all time, because Trump is a terrible manager who inspires loyalty in almost no one.

          “Why did the DOJ learn about the FBI’s interest in Flynn’s conversations with the Russian Amb. from a CONVERSATION WITH OBAMA in the Oval Office?”

          I don’t even know what this refers to, so a link to a reliable source would be helpful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *