Posted by Jack, excerpted from Politico

Okay, we know those who report the news or comment in the news, rarely get it right, but check out these pundits, what a bunch of dufus’:

17. “By the end of 2019, the president of the United States will be Nancy Pelosi”

Predicted by: Stephen Kinzer, Boston Globe

16. “The Syria withdrawal probably won’t happen in anything more than a cosmetic sense”

by Jack

The democrats say they are going to ratchet up the impeachment process.  They will be seeking more charges to include in their impeachment papers, an action designed to force the Senate to accommodate the House with trial standards acceptable to them.

They argue there is no reason why Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Speaker,  should not provide rules that the House Speaker can accept as fair.

Nancy Pelosi has said Republican bias is obvious!  She wants is assurances the trial in the Senate will be conducted in an impartial as well as thorough manner before the House submits their findings of impeachment to the Senate.

Americans are all about fairness, so it seems like a reasonable request, until you hear Sen. McConnell’s side.   Remember the last president to get impeached, William Jefferson Clinton?  Did the democrats behave in an unbias way back then?  Was Nancy Pelosi demanding an unbiased and thorough trial then?   How about Sen. Schumer-D from NY, do you think he will be unbiased for Trump?   Can we say any Senate Democrat will be unbiased?

This is why Sen. McConnel says if the democrats really want balance, he will give it to them.  He will treat President Trump just like the democrats treated President Clinton.  Hey… fair is fair, right?

by Jack

Was anyone surprised that the democrats finally found a reason to impeach Trump?  No. This has been a charge in search of an offense from the day Trump beat Hillary.

Had there not been such a fevered attempt to reverse that election by any means necessary, the democrats would look a lot more credible now, but the fact is they didn’t and they don’t.  They cried wolf for way, way too long and the charge they bring before the public now is so thin you can see right thru it!

What Trump did was little different than what presidents have done throughout American history and they got away with it totally unscathed.   It was not a big deal.  At the very worst it was a little political arm twisting and it was far milder than what Vice President Biden actually did, extorting Ukraine to remove a prosecutor from a corruption case for the benefit of his son.

The democratic controlled House has cried, what Trump did threatened “national security!”  In a word… pffffft!   Overstating one’s case also undermines credibility.

The dems are looking disturbingly partisan and desperate.  So, at this point in time the democrats ironically find themselves on trial in the court of public opinion and the damage done is perhaps worse than what they hoped to do to Trump.   About the only thing saving the dems from further embarrassment is that the Senate has not been able to weigh in and expose this silliness for what it is.   And that is only because Pelosi is stalling and not  sending the impeachment papers over to the Senate.  I think I would be mulling over not sending this case to the Senate too…. as in….not ever!   First smart thing Nancy has done.

By Pie Guevara

Thanks to Joe for bringing this to my attention. Somehow this ran completely under my radar. Obviously I wasn’t paying attention at the time.

In 2017 California taxpayers paid for the elective genital mutilation surgery — aka in PC speak “sex-reassignment” — for convicted killer Shiloh “Heavenly” Quine.

But that wasn’t enough for the convicted first-degree murder, kidnapping and robbery for ransom criminal. An unnamed federal magistrate ruled that California provide “transgender” female inmates housed in men’s facilities with more female-oriented items like nightgowns, scarves and necklaces.

This answers the question I posed in the blog post  “Prison Inmates Entitled to Taxpayer Funded Transgender Surgery”. I asked… will men in prison who elect to get surgery to mutilate their genitalia into the form of a the woman’s sexual orifice and “identify” as women be then confined in a women’s prison?

You bet they won’t. The vile, gender bigoted state of California still treats them as if they were men! Moreover they will be provided “female oriented items” to complete their “trans-sex” role as the ultimate prison bitch for fellow male inmates.

THAT is the “liberal” left for you. High school girls are forced to allow boys who dress a girls to be granted free access to their locker room space because these boys “identify” as female but a male “sex-reassignment” criminal convicted of robbery, kidnapping and first degree murder who “identifies” as female is left to languish in a men’s prison.

Get it? It is truly impossible to satirize the left.

Read about it here.

By Pie Guevara

Just when you thought the loony radical left in this country could not possibly get more ridiculous along comes 2020 Democrat Party presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren.

In 2012 Warren said she didn’t think that funding transgender surgeries for criminals in jail was “a good use of taxpayer dollars.”

As one of a murder of 202o extreme left-wing lunatic Democrat candidates for president vying for attention from the extreme lunatic left Warren has reversed herself announcing, “that was a bad answer…everyone is entitled to medical care that they need.”

One might ask, since when was elective body mutilation surgery needed medical care? Is penis or vagina genital transformation surgery the same “needed care” as treating a brain tumor, removing a diseased pancreas or excising a burst appendix?

Is this the sort of “needed medical care” taxpayers should be expected to pay for?

Moreover, will men in prison who elect to get surgery to mutilate their genitalia into the form of a woman’s sexual orifice and “identify” as women be then confined in a women’s prison?

Since Fauxcahontas has raised this as an important presidential race political issue, inquiring minds would like to know.

For “trans-people” this could be a genital surgery bonanza. Commit a crime with low years punishment and get a taxpayer paid “sex change”.  Democrats have already supported elective “sex change” surgery for military personnel. Get in, have your genitals carved up for free, get out. Toss in some boobs and a lifetime of free hormone treatments as a veteran to consider and were talking some real dough. You don’t think this is possible or even probable? Think again.

by Jack

We all know the old joke about a chicken in every pot.  Politicians have a long history for exaggeration to work their crowds and I get it.  That’s tolerable.   However, it gets dangerous when exaggeration turns to deliberate lying, slander and libel.  This is especially true when it scares the public and causes unwarranted social tensions and racial division.

This is what I see happening today.   We’ve heard too many speeches/tweets incorporate fake anger and unfounded allegations, some so extreme that it promotes violence.  This is hate speech folks and we should not let them get away with it – it’s wrong.  I want to show you a video (see below) of exactly what I’m talking about.

Please take a moment to watch the following two videos and then you tell me if you think these politicians, namely Kamal Harris and Elizabeth Warrant  were guilty of lying and  inciting others to violence:

https://youtu.be/GVdFdTfsO4Q

When a politician’s lie exploits volatile issues and stirs up the passions of people to win votes, they have gone too far!   This ought to be where free speech ends and a crime begins, because it is so similar to “inciting a riot.”   I say this knowing Donald Trump has made a number in of angry inaccuracies in his speeches, but by far the worst examples are in speeches by democratic candidates for the presidency.  Look at these false collusion charges fabricated by the Democrats and in particular Hillary Clinton and this charade they call impeachment.

The lies have been so detrimental that they have caused unstable individuals to murder police officers and shoot republicans.   Yes, lives have been lost for the personal gain of certain  politicians and that has to stop.  The guilty politicians need to be held personally accountable…if that means a criminal indictment, then so be it.