By Tina Grazier
People are being encourage, nudged…dare I say forced…to dwell in little boxes placed close together on postage stamp sized lots so as to prevent urban sprawl. Sprawl is apparently an ugly, innefecient use of the land. Breathing rand elbow room for humans is apparently no longer necessary for well being.
In the article, Stimulated Energy, by William Tucker in the American Spectator some very revealing facts about land use and alternative energy farms come to light:
** California has mandated that utilities get 20 percent of their electricity from “renewables” by next year and 33 percent by 2020. *** “We’re studying a 22,000-acre plot of state-owned land in New Mexico for a 2,500-megwatt thermal facility,” reported Charles Ricker, senior vice president of BrightSource Energy, a thermal solar company. “We’re also ready to go with a 420-MW plant on 3,500 acres just south of Las Vegas but the Bureau of Land Management has been very slow about issuing permits. That’s what’s holding us up right now.” *** Those 22,000 acres, in case you’re wondering, add up to 30 square miles. Two standard coal or nuclear plants generating 2,500 MW would occupy only two square miles. ** (bold emphasis mine)
Environmentalist should be screaming. Nowhere in the details of this article, or anywhere else, do I find the least bit of concern for the thousands of acres of land that alternatives like wind and solar will require in order to meet mandated energy provisions and laws…why is that? Why isn’t the vast acreage that’s required to build these alternatives considered contemptable as is urban “sprawl”? The answer, I suppose, is that something has become more important…but important to whom?
The best news in the article is the information about the nuclear option. It requires less land and It doesnt need government subsidies or handouts! The potential bad news for alternatives is summed up in a quote from the article:
“Alternate energy is going to be the next subprime mortgage meltdown.” Jesse Ausubel, director of the Center for the Human Environment at Rockefeller University
Hmmm…could be that “alternative sprawl” will turn out to be a complete waste of land, time…and energy!