America Stabbed in the Back With… Rare Metals?

by Jack Lee

What does yttrium, thorium, neodymium, boron and samarium have in common with you? Don’t know? Well, don’t feel too bad, it’s likely that 98% of us have never heard of these rare earth compounds before. They’re found in the periodic table of elements under lanthanides and we use these lanthanides in cell phones, computers and cars and that’s just for starters. The Toyota Prius uses more rare earth than any other car in the world. We’re absolutely dependant on these metals for so many critical things and one country controls 90% of the rare earth exports and its not us, it’s China.

3676-Triangle-Pyrite-thumb-350x309-3675.jpg

There was a time when we produced about 10% of the worlds supply of rare earth metals and we had plenty on hand for our own home use. That was until about a decade ago when we felt it would be better to [outsource] the production. Mining is a dirty business and refineries are not very popular either, just look at all the regulations we impose on both of them! So, this business was a great candidate for outsourcing, its just too bad we had to turn to China. But, they produced the needed metals cheaper for a time and they had over-abundance of the stuff, in theory a win-win. So by dropping out we let China become the world’s sole suppliers of rare earth metals and all was well until our politics clatshed with theirs. Now China has decided to roll back production, allegedly until they have a chance to review some environmental concerns (choke).

This has made the rare earth metals, well, er,… rare (and expensive)! The lanthanides have been jokingly called unobtainium thanks to China’s penury production of the stuff. Japan has been cut off due to a territorial dispute and to flex their muscle a bit further, the Chinese have decided to boycott shipments to U.S. until we come around to their way of thinking on certain trade policies currently in dispute.

The U.S. does have lanthanides and we can mine them, albeit not in the quantity of China. To ramp up our mining and refinery production will take at least two more years and possibly three, maybe longer if the EPA gets involved. Meanwhile China controls the market and to some extent….us. We are virtually at their mercy for the present time. You know it’s going to cost us dearly to get the Chinese to resume exporting to us…I wonder what concessions we’ll have to make?

Now this is bad, I admit, but you haven’t heard the worst yet. So fasten your seat belts, because this next bit of news is going to send you into orbit and cause you to speak in rapid fire expletives.

There is a source of these “unobtanium metals” beyond China and the US…they’ve been recently discovered in Afghanistan! Lucky for us right? Hang on…so the Afghanistan government under the control of our dearest, best friend, Mohamed Karzai has negotiated a deal with Americ…, no, actually that would be with the Chinese government for [exclusive] rights to mine rare earth for processing back in China. Yes, exclusive rights and we’re completely shut out.

In effect NATO forces and that means our own U.S. soldiers are protecting the Chinese mining interests in Afghanistan. We’re fighting and dying only to be screwed over by an ungrateful Afghan government. This happened on President Obama’s watch and virtually right under our collective noses, yet it’s completely ignored by our government as if it really never happened! Until today even our own fast-asleep watchdog media missed this one. The BBC broke this story and we picked it up before anyone else in the mainstream media, but lets give it a few days to simmer and see what happens.

I think Obama owes us some answers on this deal, don’t you?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to America Stabbed in the Back With… Rare Metals?

  1. asking says:

    Didn’t Karzai work for Unocal?
    How did Karzai become head of Afghanistan?

  2. Tina says:

    “I think Obama owes us some answers on this deal, don’t you?”

    I think the list for answers will be longer than we can imagine when all is said and done. Is it possible for any human being to be so wrong about so many things…’fraid so!

  3. Post Scripts says:

    ASKING: We put this corrupt psycho Karzai in as the interim leader. After that we see he has continually subverted the election process to keep his leadership role. I think the man has no scruples and to sell out to the Chinese while we’re protecting him is the ultimate in gall and disrespect.

  4. Tina says:

    America gets to “work with” the leaders the are in place or that emerge, sometimes we install them but that too has failed. That’s the way of the world.

    Jack I’d be interested in what you think about this article by Stephen Biddle on Americas handling of Karzai. Biddle is a senior fellow for defense policy at the Council on Foreign Relations. He asserts that neither Bushs all carrots no sticks approach, nor Obama’s all sticks no carrots approach will work in counterinsurgency operations. I think he has an excellent point but since I’m not a military person….

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/09/AR2010050902444.html

    We certainly are experiencing tumultuous times. Countries seeking to bring down the West is a common thread. This rare metals manoeuver is one finger in a Chinese fist. Liberals had better look for ways to make America strong again…or just get out of the way!

  5. Post Scripts says:

    Tina as an aside note…you know as well as I if a huge strike of rare earth metals were discovered in Butte county our liberals would out in force protesting mining operations, California and Federal regulators would be all over it, we might just as well try to build a nuclear power plant next to the Sierra Nevada brewery. And that is truly our world. As for Karzai, the man is mentally unstable of that I have no doubt now. Sure, he has his lucid moments and we try to make predictions off that – then he has his insane moments and who can predict what follows? Dealing with the Chinese…it just blows me away after all that we have done to put this man in power!

    PS I think you meant Bush’s was all sticks and no carrots…not the other way around, unless you meant Bush was beating them over the head with the carrots?

  6. Tina says:

    Jack, I was quoting Biddle with the sticks and carrots. Heres an excerpt that might make the question make more sense:

    Local partners are almost never adequate at the outset — this is why they face insurgencies in the first place. Almost by definition, counterinsurgency implies a problematic host government. If the local leadership were effective already, there would be no insurgency to fight. ** Nor is the leader the problem. Americans often want to “fix” things by replacing the leader. As recently as 2006, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki was the subject of a similar debate: Was Maliki a suitable partner or so flawed a personality as to require replacement? In Vietnam, the United States decided that Ngo Dinh Diem was too erratic and quietly allowed a coup to remove him. Yet Maliki presided over a major reduction in violence, whereas new management hardly improved the war effort in Vietnam. ** The real issue is not whether Karzai is an adequate partner but, rather, how to make his government into one. The answer is to change its incentives. ** U.S. policy since 2001 has oscillated between schizophrenic extremes. The Bush administration saw Hamid Karzai as a hero. From 2001-08, it provided aid but made few demands while President George W. Bush built a personal relationship based on admiration of Karzai’s bravery in standing up to the Taliban in 2001. This all-carrot-and-no-stick policy failed, and Afghan governance got worse. ** The Obama administration entered office determined to overturn their predecessor’s mistakes. This produced stern public demands for reform coupled with threats of withheld benefits and a commitment to early U.S. withdrawal. The attempted public coercion instead caused Karzai to dig in his heels. This was only partly attributable to Karzai’s mercurial personality. Afghan politics would push any incumbent to resist such strong-arm tactics; any president who gave in to such ultimatums would look like a puppet of foreign interests. And in a country with Afghanistan’s xenophobic political culture, a U.S. policy of public pressure is very likely to increase local resistance to change, whoever is in charge. This policy approximated an all-stick, no-carrot approach that fared little better than the Bush administration’s opposite extreme. ** The Obama administration is trying to mend its relationship with Karzai. But a return to carrots without sticks would merely replicate past failures.

  7. Tina says:

    Jack: “…if a huge strike of rare earth metals were discovered in Butte county our liberals would out in force protesting mining operations, California and Federal regulators would be all over it…”

    In a heartbeat!

    “we might just as well try to build a nuclear power plant next to the Sierra Nevada brewery.”

    Maybe if we promised to build a massive solar project over the top? We could call it SolAir…a pie in the sky energy project!

Comments are closed.