Sgt. Bowie Bergdahl Hero or Deserter?

by Jack

In the Kohst Province of Aghanistan, U.S. Special Forces stood by as Taliban leaders released Sgt. Bowie Bergdahl.  At the same time five high ranking Al Qaeda/Taliban leaders were released in Qatar.

Bergdahl was quickly wisked away in an Army helicopter.

Many people are now convinced that on June 30, 2009 Sgt. Bergdahl walked off his Army base in civilian clothing and  without his weapon.   If true, that’s an act of desertion.

Bergdahl was only in Afghanistan for a few months when emails began being sent to his family back in Idaho that suggested he was disillusioned with America’s mission in Afghanistan, that he had lost faith in the U.S. Army’s mission there and he was considering desertion.  Bergdahl told his parents he was “ashamed to even be American.” Bergdahl, who mailed home boxes containing his uniform, wrote: “The future is too good to waste on lies. And life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong.” CBS sourced material.

Bergdahl was last seen in a video the Taliban released in December.

At this year’s Grammys, airhead  celebrities were photographed wearing Bowe bracelets. In the past two years, billboards with Bergdahl’s face have popped up in major cities. One shows a smiling Bergdahl, in an Army uniform, with the message: “He fought for us. … Let’s fight for him!”  If the above report from CBS and others is correct, then Bergdahl never fought us…in fact he was ashamed of us!  Liberals quick to defend him should remember Barack Obama was President at the time he wrote this, so it seems Bergdahl must have been talking trash about the president, which is forbidden in the military.

A transcript of radio intercepts, publicly released through Wikileaks, indicates that Bergdahl, then 23, was captured while sitting in a makeshift latrine.

“We were attacking the post he was sitting,” according to a radio intercept of a conversation among insurgents. “He had no gun with him. … They have all (the) Americans, ANA (Afghan National Army), helicopters, the planes are looking for him. Can you guys make a video of him and announce it all over Afghanistan that we have one of the Americans?”

The Army has been uncharacteristically tight-lipped regarding exactly how Bergdahl fell into enemy hands. However, they have never said he was “missing in action.” They have also never said he was on any sort of mission at the time of his capture. This glaring omission tends to lend credence to the story that Bergdahl simply deserted. If so, he is far from being the hero his family and many supporters claim him to be. If true, he would be the only deserter during the entire Afghanistan campaign.

The videos Bergdahl made after his capture, although likely made under some duress, was used by the enemy for their propaganda purposes. His presence among the Taliban has resulted in the unprecedented action taken by Barrack Obama to negotiate directly with terrorists and to circumvent the law by not advising Congress of his intention to release five high level terrorists in exchange for Bergdahl. The United States has long held that we do not negotiate for the release of hostages. This policy was in order to deter terrorists from seizing Americans for leverage. When Obama took his action without legal authority he placed all Americans at greater risk for kidnapping. Our allies have until now followed our lead and agreed not to negotiate with terrorists, but this prisoner exchange changes everything and makes us look like weak hypocrites. This is why I strongly believe that President Obama’s actions have compromised our national security and put us all at greater risk.

The fact that Ambassador Susan Rice has give us strong assurances today that the five Taliban leaders will not go right back to killing Americans carries little weight with most of us. As you may recall it was Rice that previously assured Americans a video made in America caused a random mob to attack our U.S. embassy in Benghazi, Libya.

If Bergdahl is charged with desertion it’s going to reflect very poorly on the President’s decision to make this prisoner swap. If that’s the case, then the chances are good the White House will put pressure on the Army to make this all go away as quietly as possible. The true story about Bergdahl’s capture may not come our for a very long time.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Sgt. Bowie Bergdahl Hero or Deserter?

  1. Tina says:

    He and his Dad are both questionable as loyal Americans in my estimation:

    In return, thanks to the president’s negotiations with the terrorists, we receive U.S. Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl—who, according to several of his fellow soldiers, walked off his post in 2009 before being captured by the Taliban. (For more on this, see Greg Pollowitz’s post at The Feed.) This was shortly after Sgt. Bergdahl reportedly emailed his parents that “The US army is the biggest joke the world has to laugh at”; that he was “ashamed to even be an American”; and that “The horror that is America is disgusting.”

    Sgt. Bergdahl’s father, Robert, was by Mr. Obama’s side during Saturday’s Rose Garden press conference, at which the president announced Sgt. Bergdahl’s return but carefully avoiding mention of the jihadi-windfall the Taliban received in exchange. Mr. Bergdahl is an antiwar activist campaigning for the release of all jihadists detained at Guantanamo Bay. His Twitter account, @bobbergdahl, has apparently now deleted a tweet from four days ago, in which he said, in echoes of Islamic supremacist rhetoric, “@ABalkhi I am still working to free all Guantanamo prisoners. God will repay for the death of every Afghan child, ameen!”

    Acorn doesn’t fall far from the tree.

    What the hell was this guy doing in an all volunteer army?

    • Post Scripts says:

      I knew that father was a piece of sh—. I think ne has Stockholm syndrome via his son’s capture and he is a rabid moron to boot.

  2. Tina says:

    The weekly Standard profiles the terrorists Obama has just set free. a few highlights:

    Mullah Mohammad Fazl (Taliban army chief of staff): Fazl is “wanted by the UN for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiites.” Fazl “was associated with terrorist groups currently opposing U.S. and Coalition forces including al Qaeda, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin (HIG), and an Anti-Coalition Militia group known as Harakat-i-Inqilab-i-Islami.” …

    Mullah Norullah Noori (senior Taliban military commander): Like Fazl, Noori is “wanted by the United Nations (UN) for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiite Muslims.” …

    Abdul Haq Wasiq (Taliban deputy minister of intelligence): Wasiq arranged for al Qaeda members to provide crucial intelligence training prior to 9/11. The training was headed by Hamza Zubayr, an al Qaeda instructor who was killed during the same September 2002 raid that netted Ramzi Binalshibh, the point man for the 9/11 operation. …

    Khairullah Khairkhwa (Taliban governor of the Herat province and former interior minister): Khairkhwa was the governor of Afghanistan’s westernmost province prior to 9/11. In that capacity, he executed sensitive missions for Mullah Omar, including helping to broker a secret deal with the Iranians. …

    Mohammed Nabi (senior Taliban figure and security official): Nabi “was a senior Taliban official who served in multiple leadership roles.” Nabi “had strong operational ties to Anti-Coalition Militia (ACM) groups including al Qaeda, the Taliban, the Haqqani Network, and the Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin (HIG), some of whom remain active in ACM activities.”

    Such a deal for America and our troops, huh?

  3. Crazy Pie Gurvara says:

    Off Topic

    Check out these wonderful dancers —

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pcgZZvM_Vw

  4. Tina says:

    Information on Dad worth noting from Breitbart Big Peace

  5. Crazy Pie Gurvara says:

    This is who Obama traded five terrorists for, — “I am ashamed to be an American. And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools. I am sorry for everything. The horror that is America is disgusting.”

    The message? Extort USA! I am appalled.

  6. Peggy says:

    #3 Pie, Thanks for the trip down memory lane. I grew up watching my parents, aunts and uncles dancing the Boogie, Swing and Lindy in our living room and out at dance parties.

    They all grew up in LA where my mom was the Lindy queen and one uncle appeared in several 1940-1950 big band movies. The most famous, “It’s a Wonderful Life” the dance floor that opens to a pool.

    It’s great hearing 20-30 year olds are taking classes, having competitions and enjoying it as much as we and my parent’s generation did.

  7. Peggy says:

    There is just something not right with the Bergdahl release. He doesn’t look that sick that giving Congress the 30 day notification would have been fatal to him.

    Susan Rice on the Sunday talk shows yesterday said they’d been working on his release for three years. If that is true it brings up the question even more why didn’t the administration work with Congress?

    • Post Scripts says:

      Peggy, there’s something really NOT right in my opinion too. When a liberal media, and conservative members of Congress can agree with their liberal colleagues that Obama broke the law when he took it upon himself to free Bergdahl in a prisoner swap. Further they agree he took a huge risk and blundered when he broke a 100 year standing rule not to negotiate with terrorists for the release of a hostage. There’s something really wrong here, but who will stand up to Obama and impeach him? The likely answer is nobody, he’ll get away with it just like he always has.

  8. Chris says:

    This is yet another reason why Guantanamo should not even exist. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it’s my understanding that the president can’t just release any prisoners he wants to; it’s the murky legal status of Guantanamo that gives him this power. If the five alleged terrorists had been tried and convicted under our constitutional process, Obama never would have had the authority to make this kind of trade in the first place. Kind of goes with the old conservative adage, “what the federal government giveth, the federal government can taketh away.”

    • Post Scripts says:

      Chris, it’s my understand that Obama made this release in defiance of the law, thus another abuse of his presidential powers. Even though we are dealing with this detainee status at Guantanamo experts agree that he had no Constitutional authority to do what he did. “Like President George W. Bush before him, President Obama has stretched the limits of his authority by swapping five Taliban terrorism suspects for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl — ignoring a law that dictates he must give Congress a 30-day warning before transferring Guantanamo detainees to another country.” NYTimes article-1.1813553#ixzz33VJYvBY2

  9. Peggy says:

    Jack, I couldn’t believe I was hearing and reading progressives and liberal agree with conservatives and Republicans on the five terrorist should not have been released and that Obama broke the law by not notifying Congress 30 days before.

    Obama’s handlers blew this one. They thought everyone would be jumping for joy at getting this guy released. Instead people are actually questioning what he did and why.

    It’s nice having both sides thinking and hopefully working together to stop this idiot who thinks he’s king from destroying our country.

Leave a Reply to Chris Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.