Thanks go to Pie for telling us about this website…
This vicious criminal drug dealer beat up a little 2 year old child so bad he broke her arms and legs… Wait. Let’s politically correctize that. “Undocumented immigrant undocumented pharmacist set free in measure to protect civil rights.” This is life under the sanctuary state in a sanctuary nation.
A California toddler fighting for her life Thursday after a brutal beating at the hands of an illegal immigrant with a long criminal record is the latest case to rile California sheriffs and police against a U.S. immigration policy they say is forcing them to release dangerous criminals out on the street.
Francisco Javier Chavez, the live-in boyfriend of the unidentified two-year-old’s mother, is out on bail after being charged in the late July attack, which left the San Luis Obispo County girl with two broken arms, a broken femur, a compressed spine, a urinary tract infection and a fever of 107 degrees. Chavez’s criminal record includes assault and drug convictions and arrests for violent acts including kidnapping, car jacking and cruelty to a child.
A disgusted San Luis Obispo Sheriff Ian Parkinson told FoxNews.com Chavez should have been locked away or deported long before he had the chance to inflict “horrific injuries” on the little girl, but said conflicting federal policies leave his department handcuffed. Instead, Chavez is now free, awaiting a court date for which he may not even show up.
Maybe Macy’s can give him a job. Chavez should have been deported long ago. But Obama lies when he claims that his illegal alien amnesty keeps families together while deporting criminals.
If that poor baby had a urinary tract infection that SOB raped her in some way too.
He spent less than 24 hours in jail before being set free while that little girl’s life has been ruined.
According to another article he came up with $100k bail. Where did he come up with that much money? Drug cartel?
He’s already in Mexico where he’ll lay low for a couple of months before crossing our border again to find his next victim.
“By Friday evening Chavez was no longer in custody, jail records show. Winter said he was told Chavez posted the $100,000 bail.
“I was also told that a (U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service) hold was placed on him because he was a previous criminal deportee … and our County Jail declined to serve it because they don’t do that here,” Winter said. “So he has made bail and is now gone.”
Child abuse suspect fails to appear in court:
Thanks Obama for putting another child’s life at risk.
Oh, but she wasn’t your child so it really doesn’t matter. Move along.
I don’t understand–I thought violent crimes warranted an automatic deportation, even in sactiuary cities? I also don’t understand why he wasn’t denied bail for this instance of child abuse.
Chris, many of us are asking that very question.
Re #3 Post Scripts : The answer is quite simple. Under the Obama administration deportation laws are ignored and not applied. Under sanctuary cities illegal immigrants are given special status and child abuse laws are ignored.
Evidently for Mexicans, child abuse is a cultural family thing —
“There’s a cultural acceptance of child rape in Latino culture that doesn’t exist in even the most dysfunctional American ghettoes. When it comes to child rape, the whole family gets involved. (They are family-oriented!)”
Chris, the catch-22 is the sheriff will violate state law if they comply with federal law. Remember Calif’s TRUST Act? It mandates sheriffs to NOT comply with federal immigration laws. Every city and county, except for two, in Calif. are in violation of federal law.
The loophole is the immigrant has to be convicted of the crime to be deported. They are being let loose before they go to trial, because being charged of a crime doesn’t not meet the conviction requirement.
The other loophole is pleading down felony charges to misdemeanors. Since they haven’t been convicted of a felony the illegal immigrants no longer meets the mandatory deportation requirement and are set free on our streets. That’s what happened with these two animals and the one in SF who shot the young woman walking on the pier with her father.
From the police chief in Santa Maria.
Police chief blames immigration, crime policies for Calif. woman’s murder:
“When a California woman died after an undocumented immigrant and another man allegedly sexually assaulted her and beat her with a hammer, a police chief wasted little time blaming top officials of his state and the United States.
“I think it starts in Washington, D.C., with this administration that we see and their policies. I think you can draw a direct line over to Sacramento with the policies of, I’m going to say, this governor and the Legislature,” Santa Maria Police Chief Ralph Martin told reporters. “And I am not remiss to say that from Washington, D.C., to Sacramento, there’s a blood trail into the bedroom of Marilyn Pharis.”
Calif. TRUST Act:
List of County/City Policies:
Yes, he does have guts and I give him full credit for telling the truth even if it does possibly put his job on the line.
We need more just like him who honor their oath and do what is lawful and right instead of bending to the lawless demands to keep his job.
Here you go Chris and Jack. Another man with guts just solved the bail problem.
Illegal Alien Murders A Man In Maryland. Guess What A Local Reporter Called Him?:
“According to this, an illegal immigrant named Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Gaona was arrested in Germantown, Maryland, and charged with the murder of William Palacios. Rodriguez-Gaona was denied bail because –
The judge decided Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Gaona is a flight risk because he is believed to be an illegal immigrant from Mexico.
You mean that illegal immigrants should be under greater scrutiny from the law, rather than coddled by the government and allowed to run wild because of some fluffy liberal crap about DREAMers? OH MY GOSH, someone figured it out finally!
San Francisco could take a cue or ten from Montgomery County, Maryland (dude shoulda gone to California. They’d have made him a city councilman).”
Ann Coulter: “There’s a cultural acceptance of child rape in Latino culture that doesn’t exist in even the most dysfunctional American ghettoes.”
My, what a claim! Too bad Coulter provides zero evidence to back it up. And yes, contrary to Coulter’s attempt to prematurely rebut this point, her examples are entirely anecdotal; I am certain I could find just as many similar crimes committed by whites, and that would not be enough to conclude that “There’s a culture of acceptance of child rape in white culture.” When she actually analyzes statistics and shows that more Latinos commit such crimes than other ethnicities, then she’ll have actually supported her claim. Until she does that, it’s just racism.
Peggy, thanks for the explanation.
I don’t know how accurate or recent the statistics here are for American children. It wouldn’t surprise me if they were fairly accurate. Destruction of the family unit has made this a serious problem in America. Some women may fear a boyfriend or spouse and some women are themselves the offender. . Generally speaking we don’t have a culture within America that would support, shelter and protect the abuser to the degree Coulter described. Our culture does not tolerate abusers. An American abuser, once arrested, is not going to escape legal consequences very often.
Child abuse is an international problem but Latin families have a very strong tradition of male dominance. Mothers often dote on their sons, in part because she might have to depend on him some day. With all of the violence, kidnappings, drug cartels, and corruption in government, if a spouse, girlfriend or family member is afraid there’s no one to turn to for help. In that sense the culture in Mexico Coulter describes is believable.
Our catch and release culture is another problem entirely. Good article.
Re #9 Chris : Idiot. Read the article.
I am tired of Media sensationalism and people complaining instead of addressing the issues and fighting for “Real Solutions”,
No one supports any criminal acts by any human. These criminals are not “Dreamers”
Why not discuss the loopholes in law between “States” and “Feds” and fix it?
Many state laws need to be fixed.
But I forgot everything in the world wrong is Obama’s Fault
Pie, I read the article, you illiterate jerk. That’s how I know Coulter provided no evidence for her claim that there is a culture of acceptance of child rape in Latino culture. She literally just provided seven anecdotes, then laughably said that this was more than anecdotal evidence, because she thinks her target audience is made up of racist idiots. In your case, she’s correct.
Pie and Chris….I’m pleased to see you two are talking a bit more respectful to each other. Eh, not much more, but hey, I acknowledge that you’re moving in the right direction. Kudo’s for your restraint!!!! ; )
You have a point, child rape and other abuses do happen in all races. I would argue that we are all guilty of acceptance because the penalties for this crime are still too lenient. A monster who rapes and assaults babies has no redeemable societal value in my opinion and should be executed without delay. The fact that this doesn’t happen does place guilt on all of us.
However, wouldn’t it seem logical that third world countries would have higher rates of child abuse and molestation? I would lay odds that, if data were available, Coulter isn’t that far off. At the very least, by calling people out with such an extreme accusation, perhaps Coulter will get said people to look at their culture and reflect on positive change.
If we save just one child from this fate by having such open dialogue (normally banned by the PC police), doesn’t that make it worth having?
The fact remains there would be one less victim if the illegal alien was not here to commit the crime. Yes, we have our bad citizens, and they come in all colors, but that doesn’t invalidate the first part.
Jack: “However, wouldn’t it seem logical that third world countries would have higher rates of child abuse and molestation?”
Possibly, but that’s not what Coulter said. She was talking about illegal immigrants in the United States. She also went even further and used this to condemn “Latino culture” in general, not just illegal immigrant Latinos. That makes her statements racist.
Yo Chris, that wasn’t me…I didn’t say “wouldn’t it seem logical that third world countries would have higher rates of child abuse and molestation.”
Good ol’ “if one life could be saved” Chris who conditionally applies that philosophy only to his progressive favorite victims class.
Re : “That’s how I know Coulter provided no evidence for her claim that there is a culture of acceptance of child rape in Latino culture.”
Coulter did not claim it was part and parcel of Latino culture. She asserted that child abuse was a family thing in Latino families that abuse children and provided evidence to support that claim.
As usual, the progressive jack*** Chris reads into his mentally dysfunctional progressive mind set. He believes only what he wants to believe.
Re Steve : Pie and Chris….I’m pleased to see you two are talking a bit more respectful to each other.
Butt out. I do not post here for your pleasure.
Sanctuary Cities Are Illegal – It’s Anarchy – They Must Be Stopped!
Post Scripts 6 July 2015
#35 Chris : “I’m only going to respond to one thing above, and then I don’t plan on engaging with or talking about Pie Guevara again.”
Stick to your plan you progressive clown wanker.
I agree, sanctuary cities are proposing anarchy. It’s a real bad example of letting bleeding heart racism interfere with sound judgement and the rule of law.
Pie: “Coulter did not claim it was part and parcel of Latino culture.”
You are illiterate. She says exactly that in her very first sentence:
““There’s a cultural acceptance of child rape in Latino culture that doesn’t exist in even the most dysfunctional American ghettoes.”
The plan has changed.
Sorry, Jack. (Weirdly, both Pie and I seem to have mistook your and Steve’s posts for each other. What happened?)
Sheriff looses case in Appeals Court. Next step the Supreme Court.
Coulter is nothing if not a thorough researcher. I would bet she has extensive data to back up her claim.
“Fixing loopholes’ in state and federal law requires a desire to do so on the part of leadership.
Obama not only doesn’t want to “fix it,” he actively supports the chaos. Liberal governors and mayors actively support the “loopholes” and embrace the chaos
We have a choice next year. If we want things to change we need to elect the most conservative people we can find…then we need to do it again and again, tossing out the ones who fail us, until the job is done. Then vigilance will be required to hold back the always rising tide of progressivism in ll it’s rotten forms.
Tina: “Coulter is nothing if not a thorough researcher.”
You are wrong. Coulter’s research is terrible, and she frequently makes ludicrous claims based on poor or misrepresented research.
For instance, there was her laughable assertion that the U.S. has taken in nearly 1/4 of Mexico’s population. As numerous experts on both the left and right pointed out, Coulter got this number by counting every single American of “Mexican descent” as a Mexican immigrant. I am sure you understand why that doesn’t make any sense.
She also claimed that Gov. Nikki Haley is an immigrant, that Blue Shield completely pulled out of California, and that “No doctors who went to an American medical school will be accepting Obamacare.” All of these statements are false. So much for “thorough research.”
And that’s not even counting her long list of offensive and bigoted statements. Coulter is not a “thorough researcher.” She’s a flamethrower. She makes a living off of saying the most outrageous things possible to appeal to an angry and ignorant audience. Denying this is simply absurd at this point. This is her entire shtick.
“I would bet she has extensive data to back up her claim.”
You are far too trusting when it suits you. Generally, when people have “extensive data” that proves the central thesis of their article, they actually provide some. Coulter provided no evidence that “there is a cultural acceptance of child rape in Latino culture.” None. Nada. Zip. Zilch. All she did was provide seven anecdotes, and then claimed that her evidence wasn’t anecdotal. I am 100% I could find seven similar instances of such crimes happening and being covered up by white families. That would not amount to a shred of evidence that “there is a cultural acceptance of child rape in Latino culture.”
Simply saying, “Oh, I’m sure she has lots of evidence for the horrible thing she just said, she just forgot to show it!” is not a convincing argument. You’ve used it before, especially to defend absurd claims made by certain doctors and lawyers about Obamacare. Remember when Dr. Jill Vecchio said that Obamacare bans mammograms for certain women, and you refused to admit she was wrong for nearly 80 comments, on the grounds that as a doctor she might have special knowledge of the law that no one else knows? This is the worst type of appeal to authority, and you only use it when the “experts” agree with you. It exposes an incredible deficit when it comes to your logical skills.
Actually Ann Coulter’s books are very well researched but anyone can make a mistake. That progressives like Chris hate Ann so much sends a thrill up my leg. When the progressive English major booby prize winner loser gets a book on the NYT best seller list (no, he does not have to rule the top like Coulter has so many times) I may start paying attention to what this clown has to say.
No one can accuse Chris (or Dewey for that matter!) of being very bright. When Coulter writes “There’s a cultural acceptance of child rape in Latino culture that doesn’t exist in even the most dysfunctional American ghettoes.” she is being accurate and backs it up with evidence. Real evidence. Factual evidence.
“Where child rape occurs “They are family-oriented!”
Coulter is mocking the progressive and liberal canard that Latino culture is wonderfully “family-oriented.” This is the equivalent of the 18th century anthropological canard of “the noble savage.”
The more specious fellows like Chris hate and denigrate Ann Coulter, the more I like it.
Pie: “When Coulter writes “There’s a cultural acceptance of child rape in Latino culture that doesn’t exist in even the most dysfunctional American ghettoes.” she is being accurate and backs it up with evidence. Real evidence. Factual evidence.”
Where? Seriously–show me. Other than the seven anecdotes Coulter provides–which cannot seriously be considered evidence of a cultural problem–what evidence does Coulter provide? And don’t just say “read the article,” because I’ve read it over several times. Explain yourself with logic. Use your big boy words.
Do you understand that when making a judgment about an entire culture, you need more than anecdotes? Do you understand that “Latino culture” is an extremely broad statement and actually includes multiple cultures? Do you understand that contrary to Coulter’s assertion, just because a crime is “bizarre” does not mean it’s not anecdotal? Do you understand that anyone could find seven examples of similar crimes committed and covered up by whites, or any other ethnic group? Do you understand that this would not be evidence that white culture has a cultural acceptance of rape? Do you understand that “actual evidence” for Coulter’s assertion would, by necessity, include comparisons of actual statistical data regarding rape within Latino culture vs. other cultures?
I can’t accept that you don’t understand these things. You can’t be that stupid. Then again, your suggestion that people who haven’t written best selling books shouldn’t criticize Coulter would seem to be enough to prove me wrong. By that logic, Two and a Half Men is the height of comedic brilliance.
“Actually Ann Coulter’s books are very well researched but anyone can make a mistake.”
No intelligent, decent person would make the mistake of claiming that we’ve taken in 1/4 of Mexico’s population based on wrongly counting all Mexican Americans as immigrants, unless that person’s goal was to make people afraid of Mexicans. That’s not just a mistake–that is deliberately working backwards from bigoted stereotypes to find the most tenuous evidence to prove that one’s bigoted beliefs are true.
That Coulter is now baselessly accusing the Latino community of having a cultural acceptance of child rape–with no data to back this claim up whatsoever–proves that this is her goal: to make people afraid of Latinos. That she has claimed that Mexican immigration amounts to a white “genocide” proves that this is her goal. That she has said “If you don’t want to be killed by ISIS, don’t go to Syria. If you don’t want to be killed by a Mexican, I don’t have anything to tell you” proves that this is her goal.
Coulter is not just anti-illegal-immigration. She isn’t even just anti-immigration. She is anti-Latino, period.
Coulter is a racist bully. If you admire these qualities, that’s fine. But be honest about why you admire her. Do not pretend that her hatred is based on facts or evidence when you can’t even state what that evidence is. Just admit that you admire her for being a racist bully.
Gallup, “Child Abuse Underreported in Latin America”
Amricans for Legal Immigration:
US Illegal Aliens
The information is out there. Chris dismisses real problems that we face. He cannot discuss the issue because he despises the messenger. It seems he prefers demeaning the opposition to solving our nations problems.
Tina, I skimmed your quotes, saw the word “VDARE,” and decided it wasn’t worth my time to read in full. Why do you and others here so frequently rely on the words of actual, unapologetic white supremacist sources? Why is the relationship between white supremacists and the conservative blogosphere apparently so strong?
When the messengers are this bad of course people aren’t going to listen. And you don’t get to complain about “demeaning the opposition” when you are a fan of Coulter, who has literally said that all liberals are guilty of treason.