Omarosa Secretly Recorded Chief of Staff

by Jack

Omarosa . . . 

“Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel on Sunday suggested former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman may face criminal charges for recording Chief of Staff John Kelly in the situation room. “Who in their right mind thinks it’s appropriate to secretly record the White House chief of staff in the Situation Room?” McDaniel asked in a tweet. “Secretly recording conversations in the Situation Room isn’t just wildly inappropriate, it’s a threat to our national security. If she broke federal law, she should be prosecuted,” she added in a subsequent tweet.”

I could not agree more! If Newman’s defense is to be ignorance, then that underscores the reasons she should have been fired, but it does not let her off the hook!    END

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Omarosa Secretly Recorded Chief of Staff

  1. Peggy says:

    Omarosa blew the multi chances Trump gave her. If he was such a racist would he have given her all of those chances and hired her to work in the WH? Of course not. I remember her singing his praises after Kelly fired her. What changed was she wrote a book in order to sell and for her to be booked on every TV show had to be an attack on Trump. Few would buy a positive book about Trump, earning her less money.

    Remember this? She wouldn’t have tried to beg Trump to not fire her if she really believed he was a raciest.

    Omarosa fired, ‘physically dragged’ from the White House:

    “But numerous reports from inside the ever-leaky 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. had the now-ex-director of communications for the Public Liaison Office going out in a hail of profanities as chief of staff John Kelly told her to pack her things.

    She then tried to storm into the president’s residence to appeal the decision to the commander-in-chief, according to a report.”

    https://nypost.com/2017/12/13/omarosa-is-leaving-the-white-house/

  2. Pie Guevara says:

    Omarosa claims she knew that Trump was a “racist” when she worked on “Celebrity Apprentice. So, knowing Trump is a “racist” she is desperately seeks and gets a job in “racist” Trump’s White House?

    I don’t believe a damn thing she says. Trump is no racist. He may have used the n-word but using the n-word does not make one a racist. (Except to the usual gang of morons.)

    Dana Perino gets it right —
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/08/13/dana-perino-omarosas-book-will-be-forgotten-her-despicable-behavior-will-not.html

  3. Pie Guevara says:

    In other news …

    A couple dozen white nationalists showed up for the Unite The Right 2 rally in Washington D.C. Thousands of violent antifa and other types of counter-protesters also showed up. The next time some left wing doofus claims that white supremacy is a big problem in this country should be slapped. Violence from the left is a big problem. White nationalists and supremacists are but a tiny fringe.

    The antifa crowd was, of course, 99% white. (Young, white, jobless American’s living in their parent’s basements.) This photo of a counter-protester flipping off black police for serving in crowd control duty in order to protect persons, property and the rights of white nationalists to speak by being part of crowd control says it all about the left —

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DkgsEbzUcAAEa5e.jpg:small

    CAPTION CHALLENGE! Caption the above photo expressing what you think the black officer is thinking.

    • Pie Guevara says:

      P.S. This is what one leftist and anti-racist demonstrator gathered in Charlottesville on the same day had to say about the police —

      “There’s a profound difference in this year and last year, and that is the heavy police presence,” said Lisa Woolfork, an associate professor of English at the University of Virginia and a local organizer with Black Lives Matter.
      Some people might be comforted by the police, Woolfork continued. “But for folks like me, black and brown folks, folks in Black Lives Matter, we don’t equate a heavy police presence with safety, so we see this as a perceived risk and increasing the possible harm that might occur to us.”

      Get that, an “associate professor of English?” Sound familiar? You just cannot make this stuff up. No doubt BLM, Antifawish and many English majors want NO police presence at their riots (er, “protests”).

      • Peggy says:

        Meanwhile the media is spinning that the real hate groups aren’t the Antifa and BLM, who ARE the ones spewing hate for everyone especially the cops, many of them black, who are their to protect them.

        Just more proof of how dumb the media thinks us common folk are. We can see the white faces wearing black bandanas yelling in the black cops’ faces, just inches away while they follow orders and stands there motionless and takes it. We have eyes and a brain capable of seeing and understanding the truth.

        • Tina says:

          Also the left has not really condemned Antifa or BLM.

          They make boiler plate remarks about not favoring violence. The double standard is obvious.

          Those white supremacists sure get a lot of support…less than twenty people…pathetic! Yet the left would have us all believe we on the right align with the scum.

          Seems to me it’s Democrats that support and provide cover for violent (racist) (bigoted) groups.

          • Peggy says:

            Democrats and the media. Without the media there wouldn’t have been thousands of violent racist bigots to confront 20 idiots who at least had enough sense to leave early.

            Out of 320 million citizens, not counting the millions of illegals, they could only come up with 20? LOL That has to be somewhere around .0000002% of our population.

    • RHT447 says:

      “We’re not in Selma anymore, Toto.”

      What many others are thinking—

      Antifa = Brownshirts

      The broken windows of the USMC recruiting office = Kristallnacht

      The censoring of Alex Jones = digital book burning.

      • Pie Guevara says:

        While imho, Alex Jones is a fruit-loop who occasionally gets a story straight, I thought his being banned from big social media wrong and a cowardly punk act.

        But now that Noam Chomsky has come out to defend him, I am thinking twice about it. Chomsky defends Jones’ right to be offensive, which is something Chomsky is an expert in.

        At one time I encouraged Post Scripts to ban Chris because he is such an offensive and obnoxious jerk who, like Lippy, does little more than personally attack and insult Jack, Tina and anyone else who crosses his path. This he thinks qualifies as “debate.” I have since thought better of it. Let the left be the left. The left is an ass, let them demonstrate it over and over and over and over…

        • RHT447 says:

          Indeed. We citizens have the right to free speech (quick, name the other four enumerated in the 1st). No one has a right to an audience. Let the left get their own blog.

          • Libby says:

            No, R, we gotta take a stand here. Mr. Jones could have his free speech (screeching fire in a crowded political theater) were it not, now, apparent that 1) the country is plagued with large numbers of people stupid enough to believe him, and 2) the White House is occupied by a man so morally bereft as to make use of such stupidity (to repeat Jones’s lunacies) and keep “the base” in line.

            The situation is becoming truly dangerous. The “Big Liar” gets shut down.

          • RHT447 says:

            Well, there you have it. The socialist left in a nutshell—

            “1) the country is plagued with large numbers of people stupid enough to believe him, …”

            Gotta do something about those “stupid” people. But who gets to decide between those who are “stupid” and those who are not? Lippy? Me? Jack? Tina? Just who should we give the power to chose who gets loaded into the cattle car and who does not?

          • Libby says:

            R, it’s the Big Liars who make with the cattle cars … which is why this one’s been shut down.

            As to the stupid people … all we have to do is wait.

          • Tina says:

            (assembly, press, religion, petition)

    • Tina says:

      I could only come up with, “When will this ignorant fool grow up?”

  4. Libby says:

    Hmmm, … you all have spent many weeks ignoring the doings in that soap opera which is the TA. This was not the place to quit.

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/14/politics/donald-trump-omarosa/index.html

    Colbert’s writers nailed it: Kelly and Omarosa may have very different pasts, but they have an identical future. There is no rubbing off the Trump stink.

    Oh, yeah.

  5. Tina says:

    The stink on DC has been there since well before Trump arrived. Omarosa was part of it.

    Political Insider, “FLASHBACK: That Time Omarosa Was Fired from the Clinton White House”:

    She worked in the Clinton Administration under Vice President Al Gore. As Al Gore’s former office administrator Mary Margaret Overbey said at the time, Omarosa “was the worst hire (the Office of the Vice President) ever made.”

    People magazine reported in 2004, she was “banished from four jobs in two years with the Clinton administration.” The White House personnel office transferred her to the Commerce Department briefly. At her last short-lived administration role, Cheryl Shavers, the former Under Secretary for Technology at the Clinton Commerce Department, opined, “She was asked to leave as quickly as possible, she was so disruptive. One woman wanted to slug her.” Omarosa only lasted in that final role for several weeks.

    Another Clinton administration official reported she was fired “because she couldn’t get along with people.” Another former Gore staffer noted, “she didn’t do her job, and it got everyone in trouble.”

    She has been busted for exaggerating her roles in the Clinton administration, too. As Omarosa told an audience in Washington, D.C. on March 19, 2004, at a panel discussion on “Wearing the Pants: A Woman’s Experience in a Man’s World”:

    “I have done logistics and advance and event planning for the White House under the Gore staff. … At 23, I got appointed to the White House. That was not a place to learn how to be a young professional. That’s a very difficult environment, because they don’t believe in training. They just kind of throw you in the fire.”

    The problem? Anonymous Gore staffers confirmed Omarosa never was involved in advance work or logistics. Her job was “to respond to invitations.”

    When asked about her employment history, Omarosa falsely claimed the shifting was due to her marriage to Aaron Stallworth. They have since divorced, and Omarosa married John Newman in 2017.

    A liar, a difficult person to work with, an opportunist…what’s not to like?

    Trump gave this loser another chance and she didn’t have the good sense to make good use of it. I’m with Dana Perino, her book will go nowhere and her reputation is permanently trashed…except perhaps in the radical left circles that are equally despicable.

  6. Libby says:

    “Trump gave this loser another chance and she didn’t have the good sense to make good use of it.”

    I dunno. As predators go, I think she and Trump are dead on par … her and her little pen-recorder … truly a hoot.

    And I expect the book will sell well enough.

  7. Pie Guevara says:

    Re RHT447 “No one has a right to an audience. Let the left get their own blog.”

    I have never been invited to a Chris or Lippy blog. Gee, I wonder why?

    Post Scripts is true to their word, this is a political bog and all are welcome to express an opinion.

    I loved it when the arrogant and silly Joe Shaw came on this blog to tell us what conservatives were all about. After I made fun of him for his pompous post he ran away, mad, because someone saw him for what he is, a prejudiced, presumptive, self aggrandizing simpleton. A Chris doppelganger of sorts. It was Chris who took up the reigns from the hideous Quentin Colgan and ran with it.

    Chris hardly posts anymore and I kind of miss him, even though he was once banned for libel and slander against my person (something I expected to happen sooner or later). After his last lame attempt to insult me I guess he took to heart my retort, “Amazing, you really don’t have a life, do you?”

    As one may gather, I flip-flop back and forth on the “who is invited to the table” thing. Post Scripts has always been rock solid on the policy that everyone is, and I admire them for it.

    If Lippy wishes to use Post Scripts to make an ass out of herself (not really necessary, she already is one) then let her flail away.

  8. Peggy says:

    Second attempt to post.

    Looks like Omarosa earned being called a dog and one that bit the hand that has fed her for the past 15 years. Her prior friend spoke up and exposed Omarosa’s lies.

    OMAROSA’S CLOSE FRIEND JUST BLEW A GAPING HOLE IN HER CLAIM THAT TRUMP USED THE N-WORD:

    “Patton’s full letter:

    White House leadership, both past and present, can confirm that I was the closest confidante & friend to Ms. Manigault-Newman during her tenure at the White House, Transition and Campaign – texting and speaking multiple times per day.

    To that end, Omarosa attempted to contact me just two days ago, but I refused to accept her call.

    Like Ms. Manigault-Newman, I have also known and worked for both the President and his family for over a decade and am confident that they would collectively confirm that I know them far better than she.

    To be clear, at no time did I participate in a conference call with Katrina Pierson advising me, Jason Miller and Omarosa Manigault-Newman that Frank Luntz had heard President Donald J. Trump use a derogatory racial term – a claim that Luntz himself has also denied.

    What I can confirm is the following:

    On December 12, 2017, at approximately 11:30PM (EST) – a date I now know to be the evening Omarosa was relieved of her official duties by General Kelly – I received a telephone call from her informing me that she had personally heard a second-hand recording of President Trump using the “N-word” in a derogatory fashion.

    She proceeded to tell me the full name of the individual who played this second-hand tape for her, from whom the primary audio tape had originated, as well as the specific context of the President’s usage of this term and to whom the derogatory term was allegedly directed.

    Omarosa also proceeded to inform me that she had officially submitted her resignation to General Kelly and that I should promptly do the same before the audio surfaced.

    The next morning, I immediately notified senior communications officials and a Trump family member of the same, only to discover the true nature of her departure was termination.

    Today, the individual who Omarosa confirmed to me as having played the second-hand audio recording to her last year confirmed that they have no tape, never had possession of a tape, never claimed to have possession of a tape and never played such a tape for Ms. Manigault-Newman.

    Tonight, on the MSNBC program, Hardball, Omarosa revealed to the general public what she had told me last December: That former Apprentice producer, Bill Pruitt, was the original source of the “N-word” tape.

    Bill Pruitt is a mutual friend.

    I just spoke to Bill Pruitt tonight before releasing this statement.

    He confirmed to me (before Hardball had even gone off the air) that he does NOT have an audio tape of President Trump using the “N-word” and has NEVER had an audio tape of President Trump using the “N-word.” Period.

    Suffice it to say that the past few weeks have been wrought with disappointment, immense sadness, anger and outright disgust.

    Based upon her conflicting accounts and the newfound information revealed in my statement, it should be abundantly clear to everyone that not only is her book a complete work of fiction, but that the existence of this elusive “N-word” tape is a figment of her imagination and merely a destructive tool of manipulation applied only when it best serves her interests.

    Like countless other minorities and women, the President has given me the opportunity of a lifetime to rise up through the ranks of The Trump Organization and now proudly serve this country.

    Therefore, unless directed otherwise, this will be my only statement on this baseless accusation and imaginary audio tape, as falsely claimed by a former friend.

    My primary and sole focus remains the low-income and public housing residents of New York & New Jersey, as the President would expect it to be — and as the President has hired me to do.”
    http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/15/omarosas-close-friend-just-blew-a-gaping-hole-in-her-claim-that-trump-used-the-n-word/

    Looks like Omarosa is getting what she justly deserves, exposure and a multi-million dollar lawsuit from the Trump Campaign for violating the NDA. Those who bought her book should return them and get their money back since it was sold as non-fiction instead of fiction. And the publisher should recall every copy.

    • Libby says:

      Alas, Peggy, Simon & Schuster have been in the business for some little while … and their lawyers have been up, down, in and out of Ms. Omarosa’s manuscript, sources, and the Trump Campaign NDA … and The Donald is cooked … legally fried.

  9. Libby says:

    I am so loving this. Trump’s own creation bites him on the butt, hugely.

    Apparently, Ms. Omarosa has been playing “Reality TV Star in the White House” from day one. I mean, how much tape does she have?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *