A Double Standard

by Jack

Kamala Harris owns a gun, but she justifies it because it’s only for personal protection.

So why is she so hot to trot to take away our weapons that are highly suitable for personal protection?

Under her watch thousands of law abiding Californians were prevented from purchasing any number of rifles and pistols for the most absurd reasons.   Even some of the pre-existing (before the law changed) weapons have been deemed illegal for the most arbitrary reasons you could imagine.

What do I mean by arbitrary?  Okay, for example if your old semi-auto rifle has a bayonet lug on it…it’s an assault weapon.   I suppose this is to stop the bayoneting going on around the state, but if not, then it was an arbitrary law passed for the sole purpose of taking away your gun using a scare tactic.

But, did it accomplish it’s mission of reducing gun violence?  Nah, but never mind that.  This was always about seizing guns and any excuse was good enough.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to A Double Standard

  1. J Soden says:

    As soon as all the politicians and celebrity types have their security guards go weaponless, THEN we can perhaps discuss gun control.
    Until then, the hypocrisy of those clowns is on display for all to see!
    And I’ll keep mine locked and loaded.

    • Chris says:

      “As soon as all the politicians and celebrity types have their security guards go weaponless, THEN we can perhaps discuss gun control.”

      That doesn’t even make sense. “Gun control” =/= “weaponless.” If it did…the politicians and celebrities could not have their security guards hold weapons.

      Are all the conservative commenters here trapped in the same building wherein there is a gas leak lately? I’m trying to be generous here.

  2. Libby says:

    You’re not an idiot, Jack. You know the physical, emotional, societal, and political difference between a hand gun and an assault rifle.

    I’m sorry that you now own illegal weaponry, but whose fault is that? Your fellow nut-bunnies’, who go on strafing sprees, that’s who. Conservatives are always howling about impingments on their freedom. Well, the grown up fact is … you don’t have all that much, even here in our grand old republic. All your freedoms are contingent upon a number of factors, including the bad behavior of your fellow nut-bunnies.

    Get over it.

  3. Chris says:

    I’m not understanding how this is a double standard. Does Harris own the type of gun that she has suggested banning?

    Here’s a double standard for you:

    President Donald Trump told Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan he would grant McAleenan a pardon if he were sent to jail for having border agents block asylum seekers from entering the US in defiance of US law, senior administration officials tell CNN.

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/12/politics/trump-cbp-commissioner-pardon/index.html

    When the president says people should follow the law, what he really means is that people he doesn’t like–in this case, immigrants–should follow the law. But it’s totally cool if people break the law in order to hurt immigrants. (See also Trump’s pardon of Joe Arpaio, who also broke numerous laws, including faking a death threat against himself.)

    Do the immigration hardliners on the right agree with him?

  4. Pie Guevara says:

    Harris is a horrid hypocrite, which is boilerplate behavior for any member of the Democrat party.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *