I’m generally enjoying the Vancouver Games as it enters the seventh day of competition, but some things are sticking in my mind. Please share your “grievances” in the comments.
The fence around the Olympic Flame: I think the organizers were caught flatfooted by the fact that people may want to be close to the beautiful outdoor Olympic Cauldron. At the very least, the image of a chainlink fence in front of a symbol of peaceful competition is disconcerting.
Kudos for the organizers for making changes and creating more viewing opportunities (according to this CBC News article). However, I didn’t necessarily care for one of the organizers’ excuses:
Organizers said the cauldron is far closer to the public than Olympic
flames of past Games, where they’ve usually been located in or atop
The cauldron at the 1996 Atlanta Games was outside Centennial Olympic Stadium and it was generally accessible to the public (at the very least it wasn’t blocked by a massive fence). I remember having lunch and taking photos mere yards from that Olympic Flame along with many spectators and families.
The Lack of Curling on NBC: This is a minor gripe at most, but it is sad when FOX has more curling on a 30-minute episode of “The Simpsons” than NBC will have in two weeks on its main network. Yes, curling is available on cable channels (that I don’t have) and is streaming live online (which I don’t have access to because I don’t have the right cable package). In recent years, curling almost always gets praised as a pleasant surprise of the Games. Maybe it’s not a primetime event, but it’s lame that NBC couldn’t find time to at least air the gold metal match on broadcast (like in the afternoon).
Shoddy online coverage: There’s a huge difference between the online coverage of the 2008 Beijing Games and in Vancouver. Just two years ago, many non-marquee events were streamed live and in their entirety. Now, it’s mostly hockey and curling aired live (with other events posted after NBC has aired them in primetime). Hockey and curling are both fine sports, but the offerings are like night and day.
Tape Delay: It’s a gripe as old as NBC’s coverage of the Games. It is certainly frustrating that NBC insists on starting its primetime program right at 8 p.m. (7 p.m. Central) even though there are live events taking place at 5 p.m. Vancouver time. And, of course, Vancouver time is the same time as Chico and the entire West Coast which just compounds the silliness.
NBC didn’t have to do this. It could have emulated a model from Canada that I thought could work fairly well here. In previous games, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation would air its primetime program live nationwide. After the end of that broadcast, the CBC would offer a special West Coast-only highlight package to help round out the night. I don’t know what the current Canadian broadcaster, CTV, is doing.
Media coverage of “the glitches”: I’m sure some of the criticism
of the Vancouver organizing committee’s operation of the Games is
justified, but the howling has seemed ferocious at times. The situation
has drawn many comparisons to the Atlanta Games in 1996 when the media
lambasted ACOG’s miscues, particularly regarding transportation (as this 1996 New York Times article details).
disconcerting thing about the Atlanta criticism and the Vancouver
gripes is that these woes somehow become part of the “legacy” of the
Games. I was in Atlanta for the Games, and the woes weren’t my
“highlight” of those Olympics. Yes, it wasn’t pleasant at times — I
had to brave the crushing crowds on MARTA and I once had to give
directions and a map to a bus driver so we could get to our
destination. However, it pales in comparison to witnessing the opening
ceremonies, watching track stars break world records and enjoying some
of the finest art and music in my life.
Bruce Arthur of the National Post offers a nice perspective on the criticism.
While acknowledging that Vancouver has been far from perfect, Arthur
points out how there are at least three different views of the Games:
There is the Olympics that we in the media experience, the one the
athletes experiences, and the one the public experiences. But only one
of us write the verdict on the Olympics in question.
For another take on the Olympics’ legacy on host cities, The Independent looked at how cities capitalized on the infrastructure changes made for the Games. Atlanta seemed to fare much better on that score and I hope Vancouver does too.