Across the country and soon in Chico, Comcast is slowly lowering a digital boom over its customers as part of the cable company’s transition from analog to digital television services. While the company’s new digital cable adapters will add another gadget to the jumbled electronic menagerie inhabiting people’s living rooms, the change may remove one of the hurdles to many customers’ holy grail — being able to pick, and pay for, only the channels they want to watch.
First off, the idea that Comcast would offer most of its channels as a la carte selections is merely a dream — I haven’t seen any indication that the company would want to do so. I’m only asserting that digital TV makes it more practical than before.
We haven’t heard much about a la carte in several years, but the idea remains intriguing. Instead of paying for 80 channels and watching just four, customers could pick and pay for the four channels they actually watch.
When the customer choice debate was raging, the cable and satellite industry had several objections, including that it was technologically difficult to deliver just the channels a customer wanted. That’s understandable with analog cable — in my experience, it’s difficult for the cable company to block off channels that customers aren’t supposed to have access to.
That hurdle was removed with digital cable and it should become insignificant as Comcast forces its customers to go digital. Cable companies can more easily lock and unlock channels that a customer signs up for. I’ve experienced this several times with premium channels and pay-per-view on my digital cable box.
I haven’t dealt with the more simplistic digital adapter, but I imagine Comcast would still have greater control over what’s being delivered on its pipes than during the analog days. While billing for single channels may be a headache, the delivery system itself should be better suited for a la carte.
While the public desire for a la carte may have waned, I still think it’s worth giving it a shot. Access to individual episodes of shows has taken off through digital video recorders, download sites like iTunes Store and streaming sites like Hulu, but there are some downsides to the individual episode approach. Not all series are available in these different formats. It may be easier to have access to a whole network than buying shows piecemeal.
In addition to technological hurdles, a la carte pricing may not be cheaper than the current bundled rates, based on earlier studies.
The theoretical a la carte offerings may be slightly more expensive, but at least the customers would paying for the services they want and not necessarily what the operators want them to have.
The technical ability to offer a la carte has existed for a very long time… decades….
The “Big Dish” offered some degree of a la carte, and DISH Network offered a pick 10 for $10 (plus $5 billing fee) back in the late 1990’s.
Content owners are very opposed to the idea… Their contracts with Multichannel Video Programming
Distribution (MVPD) (EG: cable & satellite) either do not allow a la carte or make it economically infeasible.
It seems that the content providers (eg: channels) are horrified at the prospect of customer choice. Horrified that customers would choose who gets monthly subscriber revenue and who does not.
The content owners prefer to maneuver their way into packages, and then pull in their other owned channels through various “incentives”….
ESPN is a prime example of one today who demands coverage in the most basic package. Or YOU Mr. Satellite or Cable company will not get ESPN at all and they command the highest per subscriber per month price of somewhere around $3.50 from each carrier. FAR more than any other basic channel.
They get that monthly revenue whether or not the subscriber ever watches the channel.
Eventually, I hope that IP content delivery will break the log jam…. but, some of the same ole content owners are using the same tactics there….