The Great Compromise

It is a question that will come up at some time for everyone. It can inspire happiness and joy —

… but also dread, for the answers to this question can call up frustration, rage, confusion, or a dark swirling vortex of all three.

Sometimes it will be asked out of the blue. Sometimes it will engender conversations so nonsensical and fruitless that 30 minutes will go by without anything meaningful said. Sometimes one person will see it coming, and to avoid the oncoming froth of violence will hang his/her head in resignation and sigh, “Whatever you want,” but inwardly seethe with resentment.

But know this: At some point, this question will be asked. Maybe HUNDREDS of times. And the situation gets worse the more people are involved in answering it.

It is (of course):

“Where should we eat tonight?”

Usually, Bjorn and I are on the same food wavelength, which is to say we like everything and will eat (almost) anything.

Recently, however, we found ourselves spiraling down that eaters’ enigma. We were in the unenviable positions of feeling peckish close to closing time for many restaurants. We jumped in the car and started throwing around options.
“Vietnamese?” I queried.
“Naw, I’m not hungry enough to enjoy that,” Bjorn said.
“Mexican?” Bjorn asked.
“No, I’ve been eating that alot recently,” I said.

On and on it went, through various countries and cultures, each one discarded based on taste, feeling, cost and/or geography.

By then, we were perilously close to having to settle for an all-night diner, so we decided to park in downtown Chico, hop out and let the remaining open restaurants be our guide.

I couldn’t stomach the thought of a big burger so the Bear and Burgers & Brews were out. I finally caved to Mexican so we headed to Aca Taco but it was closed for a private party. A bar had fish tacos, but the going price was two for $9 (Seriously? What, are they laced with gold?) The open Chinese place had no one in it. Hot dog stands got a no (but smelled lovely). And while we both love Pita Pit, we just weren’t feeling up to it that night.

“Bleh! Urgh! Arrgh!” When I’m feeling hungry and frustrated, sometimes only non-words will do. Bjorn understood exactly what I meant.
“Let’s go to Celestinos,” he said.

Finally, something that made sense. How can anyone say no to cheese and carbs, the two wrongs that just taste so right?

Pizza. It’s something everyone can agree on.

6833-bjornpizza-thumb-450x647-6832.jpg

Bjorn with the great pacifier.

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in La vida Chico | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Dollar Makes You Holler: Gel cling stickers

6827-console-thumb-450x337-6826.jpg

Alas my poor car! It has served me well. It’s been with me a while and age and hardship are beginning to show. Take my center console: once the picture of perfectly smooth vinyl, years of bodyweighted-forearm leans have caused two rips in its top. Not one to go down without a fight, the ripped vinyl has rough edges that now scrape and scratch the aforementioned forearms. I thought about using duct tape to make repairs, but as a student of MTV’s “Pimp My Ride,” I know duct tape is an evil harbinger of destruction and doom. To use duct tape for repairs is to be two steps away from dangling side mirrors and different-colored paint patches.

Enter the gel cling stickers.

6824-stickers-thumb-450x337-6823.jpg

Here’s another reason why I love the dollar store. Many items can be repurposed. In fact, the items are only limited by your imagination. And if your imagination sucks, well it only took you a dollar to find out.

As it turns out, the gel cling stickers were a good buy. My forearm now rests in squishy comfort and I have new cutie-patootie decor in the car. They are the bees knees, if I do say so myself.

6830-beesknees-thumb-450x337-6829.jpg

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in Dollar Makes You Holler | Tagged , | 4 Comments

In Hindsight: The Power of Words

6801-words-thumb-450x337-6800.jpg

Why yes, it is a picture of the words you are reading on a screen within the screen of the words you are reading right now. Yay for cheap shots at pseudointellectual depth!

I was reminded of the power of words recently. This statement might seem odd seeing as I work with words everyday as a journalist, but familiarity can breed, well not contempt, but a certain feeling of “meh.”

But recently a colleague joked that working on my computer would crash it; sure enough, it did (although this is not new; our work computers are very old and I’m sure the mice running in their wheels need a break every now and then.)

That moment in turn reminded me of another instance when words turned out all too prescient: the first time Bjorn and I hung out.

We were hanging out with a group of familiar and not-so-familiar faces in Hollywood. A movie was seen, food was consumed, a band was heard, food was consumed again (although someone ditched the group to search for pizza), new friendships were formed and in general, there was laughter and gaiety all around.

Then we headed back to our cars. We had met in one place to carpool around town, but it being L.A., of course we had all driven to that spot separately. On our way to my car, about 2 minutes away from where it was parked, Bjorn called out, with no small amount of snark, “I bet you got towed.”

Two minutes later, we found out he was right.

As you might imagine, this put a strain on our burgeoning friendship.

However, he really was contrite when the towing was confirmed, and drove me to the tow yard, and stayed until I got my car back. But what if this was how life really worked? Now I’m not here shilling for “The Secret” (I believe things like, I don’t know, hard work and determination have a greater say in how things get done) but what if everything you said came true?

What percentage of your words would you use to benefit yourself versus others (if at all?) What would be your first words knowing you had this power?

I imagine it would change conversation greatly. I imagine a lot of good could come from it. People might be more careful with what they said.

But on the other hand, I imagine it would be a lot harder to guilt Bjorn into buying me cookies again.

Posted in In Hindsight | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

I doughnut know why

6761-doughnut-thumb-450x337-6760.jpg

Photo by Jamie Stodola via Facebook
Bjorn (center) and I (left) had the strenuous task of eating doughnuts at Voodoo Doughnuts in Portland, Ore. while D.J. Patton (right) looks on with incredulous wonder.

I recently went to Portland, Ore. for a wedding (this seems to be the start of the wedding season for me; two more wedding are coming up in short succession. Maybe everyone was “falling” in love. Haaaa.)

But this post is not about the wedding. Nor is it about Portland (although it was my first time there and it is indeed a lovely city with extremely friendly customer service and post-grunge neo-hippies galore. The dream of the ’90s is indeed alive in Portland. )

No, this post, of course, is about the food I ate there.

More specifically, Voodoo Doughnuts. Voodoo Doughnuts is billed as “world famous,” and the line at least 40 people deep at 8 in the morning, on a Sunday no less, seems testament to its popularity (shocking, I know, but I will get up early for doughnuts.)

The doughnuts were chaotically colorful, like Captain My Captain (raised yeast with vanilla frosting and Captain Crunch cereal), skated on the wild taste side (bacon maple) and had inventive names like triple chocolate penetration (chocolate cake doughnut with chocolate frosting and coco-puffs.)

As all good eaters know, variety is the name of the game. So my husband and I chose the Mango Tango (raised yeast doughnut filled with mango jelly and topped with vanilla frosting and tang); the Dirt doughnut (raised yeast doughnut with vanilla frosting and Oreos); Memphis Mafia (fried dough with banana chunks and cinnamon sugar covered in a glaze with chocolate frosting, peanut butter, peanuts and chocolate chips on top); and Old Dirty Bastard (raised yeast doughnut with chocolate frosting, Oreo’s and peanut butter).

The tagline of the place is “The Magic is in the Hole,” and sadly, that was true. Something was missing. They looked beautiful. They sounded wonderful. But they weren’t I-will-gladly-get-up-at-a-freakishly-early-hour-on-the-weekend-to-stand-in-line-behind-40-people good.

They were a little too sweet for me (which is saying a lot as I am Filipino (we put sugar in our spaghetti) and diabetes does not run in our family for nothing). They were too dense for me, too (read: tasted a little old, which is odd considering how early in the morning we were there). Plus, all the topping were just too much (I know! Coming from me, whose middle name should be “Give me more”!)

Maybe I just have plebian tastes, but give me a Krispy Kreme lemon-filled (with a chocolate iced creme filled and original glazed on the side, natch) any day.

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in Food | Tagged , , | Comments Off on I doughnut know why

Dollar Makes You Holler – Manchego cheese

6709-manchego-thumb-450x327-6706.jpg

Sometimes when there is less risk, people tend to be more adventurous. How is this possible, you might ask? Consider: One dollar doesn’t seem like a lot of money, ergo I will buy things I normally wouldn’t, thinking that the cost is not too great.

But sometimes it is, oh sometimes it is.

I love cheese. I think that has been made plain in the numerous blog posts simultaneously mentioning it and the word “awesome.”
So when my man saw “Manchego cheese” in the 99 cent store,we said, “Why not?”

Here’s why not:

According to wikipedia.com, “Manchego has a firm and compact consistency and a buttery texture, and often contains small, unevenly-distributed air pockets. The colour of the cheese varies from white to ivory-yellow, and the inedible rind from yellow to brownish beige. The cheese has a distinctive flavour, well developed but not too strong, creamy with a slight piquancy, and leaves an aftertaste that is characteristic of sheep’s milk.”

What this manchego cheese tasted like:
Soft. It had the conistency and texture of nacho cheese or Cheez Wiz, only thismuch firmer. And it tasted like them, too. When I read the above description on wikipedia, I threw up a little in my mouth.

Sometimes I think I get a little too much bang for my buck.

Manchego cheese found at the 99 Cent Store, 2560 Notre Dame Boulevard, Chico, Calif.

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in Food | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Why the Brits may be better than Americans

Please wait for the Storify to load below:

Why the Brits may be better than Americans

The Olympics, with its fanfare and grandeur, are gone from London, leaving only memories behind.The one thing I can’t seem to forget is the opening ceremony, which highlighted all of Britannia’s grand history, its literary genius, its musical prowess and blah diddy blah blah blah. If ever there was an event to tell the world, “We are better than you,” that was it. My sneaking suspicion? They may be right. You know how I know? They have ugly TV stars.

Storified by Jammie Karlman At Work · Thu, Aug 16 2012 02:03:34

Wikia
Martin Freeman, above,  stars as Dr. Watson in “Sherlock Homes.”
Rosie Cavaliero, below,  plays Marcus’s social worker in “Spy,” a British comedy. In the last episode of “Spy,” season1 , she whips off her shirt to reveal some serious bra overhang.
Sharetv
OK, ugly might be too strong a word. But “decidedly underwhelming” can be said. I’ve been watching more British shows lately, like “Spy,” “Sherlock Holmes,” “Party Animals” and “Luther.” While there are pretty people on these shows, there are d.u. people too, in starring roles.
Zimbio
Andrew Buchan, left, was the “hot guy” on “Party Animals.”
I thought it strange,  as I’m sure there is no shortage of good-looking people over there (Kate Beckinsale, Colin Firth, Kiera Knightley, Jude Law, Sienna Miller, Hugh Grant and the Beckhams, to name a few).
Beautiful-pics
Jude Law, above, and Kate Beckinsale, below, just a few of the prettier Brits.
Askmen
Yet, on most of their TV shows, little if any attention is paid to makeup. Bags, wrinkles, gray hairs and fat rolls are seen in wanton abandon (no one seems to be shy about showing their body, no matter what shape it is in.) It is highly doubtful if most of their TV actors have a gym membership or take any pains to refuse that second helping of pudding.
The TV show  “Luther”  is somewhat of an anomaly. When I first started watching it, I was amazed at the number of good-looking leads it has: Idris Elba, Indira Varma, Ruth Walker. But dude, the guest stars:
Sharetv
Rob Jarvis, above, and Linda Walker, below, guest starred in Season 1, Episode 6 of “Luther.”
Nicola-walker
In contrast, even the extras on American TV look good. Those making a guest appearance on a show, whether it be as a homeless hooker addicted to meth who’s also a thieving crack addict, still have perfect, straight white teeth. And for the stars themselves — heaven forbid they have one super shiny hair strand out of place or a splotch of uneven spray tan!

(Of course, Americans are not the only ones who set impossibly high standards for beauty in their TV shows. From what I’ve seen of South Korean and Mexican soap operas, the same holds true there: “poor” people are still fairly well-dressed and obviously have access to all things MAC.)

Why the shameless disregard of the Brits for painted-on beauty? Why the obvious lack of six-packs on their small screen? Could it be that the British value intriguing plot lines and intelligent dialogue? Could it be they care more about their actors’ ability to well, act, than how they look?

Are the Brits actually less shallow and superficial than Americans??

WordPress
The cast of “Serenity” was ridiculously attractive.
I would’ve said yes, but then I noticed another Brit TV show, “The Only Way is Essex.”
Cdnds
It has been described as “Britain’s answer to ‘The Hills’ and ‘Jersey Shore.'”

Sigh.

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in TV, Film and Radio | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Dollar Makes You Holler – Redhead Chewy Lemonhead and Friends

6595-redheads-thumb-450x261-6594.jpg

Everyone needs friends–and so do inanimate pieces of sugar, apparently. Besides, how could I resist a breakdancing cherry and watermelon? (Sidenote: Why were all the other pieces of fruit gifted with appendages and human faces, except for the raspberry? This might best be explored in a separate post, but it could take a while as this disturbs me a tad much.)

Tastewise, though, these friends are a bit disappointing. Although they do not have a “gross, medicinal taste” as my man predicted, they are a bit too sweet, which is odd considering they are “friends” with the “Lemonhead.” However, they do have a habit of jumping into your mouth once in hand (this seems to happen a lot between me and food. Food can be so aggressive sometimes).

Found at the Dollar Tree, 801 East Avenue, Chico.

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in Food | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Dollar Make You Holler! School supplies

6564-school-thumb-450x324-6563.jpg

I heart school supplies. Back to school pangs were lessened by the school-supply shopping trip. I loved picking out a shiny new lunchbox. I still love the sight of new crayons, all sharp and pointy. And every year, I always got a new backpack, a tradition that continued even throughout college (yeah, Mom!) So when I saw these school supplies, how could I resist? I mean, just look at how cutie-patootie these notebooks are! Erasers with removable parts! (I’m not even sure what that means but I can’t wait to find out.) Pencil sharpeners that look like computer mouses! (gotta love the ironic meeting of lo-tech and high-tech). And though I am not technically in “school” anymore, couldn’t it be said that life is one big lesson?

Well, who cares what you say. I’m gonna keep these all in my shiny red pencil box that is shaped like a dinosaur and already named “Trixie.” Nyah, nyah.*

*Well, no, not really. I’m planning on donating my surplus supplies. You should, too. This article by a Chico State grad provides a good starting point.

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in Dollar Makes You Holler | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dollar Make You Holler! School supplies

Olympics makes the small screen scene

6549-gymnastics-thumb-450x311-6548.jpg

Associated Press
U.S. gymnasts McKayla Maroney, Kyla Ross, Alexandra Raisman, Gabrielle Douglas and Jordyn Wieber (from right) celebrate during the medal ceremony of the Artistic Gymnastics women’s team final at the 2012 Summer Olympics on Tuesday in London. Another event I missed seeing.

I love me some summer Olympics. It’s easy to get excited about something that only comes around every four years (conservation of energy and all that.)

I like seeing the drama, the tears, the tantrums. I like hearing about the scandals, the personal triumph stories. The athleticism, competitiveness and humanity are something to behold.

But this year, I was reminded there’s something else that motivates the Olympics: money.

For this Olympics, I don’t have a TV. “Not a problem,” I thought. “Everything can be seen on a computer nowadays, anyway.”

Much to my dismay, I discovered you still must have an account with cable TV service in order to view the events online at NBC.com.

“If NBC made it easy for people to watch the Olympics without a subscription, people might drop their cable service, and NBC would get less in recurring fees in the long run,” stated an Associated Press article.

How diabolically clever. While seeming to take a step into the technological future, NBC is forcing viewers to hold hands with its past (Is there a lesson for newspapers here somewhere?)

True, there are video snippets available of events (I did have access to full-length video of table tennis and badminton preliminaries, and in light of this story, it might actually be worth checking out).

However, if, like me, you just want to watch gymnastics, the few clips available only served to frustrate rather than tantalize me into buying a cable subscription for my non-existent TV.

Aren’t ease and convenience the point of having such devices as smartphones, iPads and whatever-else-technologically-packed-small-screen-product-is-coming-down-the-pipe? If the benefits of technology include freedom and mobility, why chain us down to a monolithic TV, hmmm NBC?

Good thing the Olympics only come around once every four years.

Jammie Karlman is the entertainment editor for the Chico Enterprise-Record. Contact her at buzz@chicoer.com. Follow her on Twitter @JammieKarlman

Posted in World at large | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Olympics makes the small screen scene

#nbcfail: Complaints about NBC’s Olympics coverage reach new heights

NBC Live bug during Vancouver Games

During the Calgary Winter Games in 1988, I remember the announcer for ABC (I want to say Jim McKay) explaining to the audience watching at home how, even though the event was live, there could be brief seconds of delay as the feed is uplinked from Canada and downlinked from orbiting satellites to local stations. I believe the point was that ABC was making was that the coverage was as live as technically possible.

Contrast that with NBC’s coverage of the London Summer Games, where they’re largely sticking with their “If you haven’t seen it, it’s new to you!” mantra. That motto didn’t work for summer reruns in 1997 and it doesn’t work for covering animmense, live sporting event in an age of Facebook and Twitter.

With the London Games fully underway, an old sport of sorts has taken off online — complaining about NBC’s ever-lackluster presentation of the Olympics. As this Associated Press article indicates, critics and supporters alike will point out that this isn’t a new event, but the increasing use of social networking has bolstered criticisms and underscored NBC’s relatively poor broadcasting choices.

Social networking spoils NBC’s tape-delay plans because people around the world are sharing results as they happen. Unless people go out of their way to avoid the results, the results of key competitions are known hours before NBC gets around to broadcasting them over the air.

This was an issue during the Vancouver 2010 Games, but it seems like a much bigger issue today.

I’ve never been shy to criticize NBC’s broadcasting choices, especially those that force West Coast viewers to suffer tape delays for events happening in their time zone (like during Vancouver). In the past, the complaints just seemed to peter out after a while. Not so in London, where comments are shared and added to like flames of a fire.

Thus far, people watching the London Games have taken to using the #nbcfail tag on Twitter to help express their disdain of the coverage. The complaints have been wide-ranging, but have thus far focused on the delayed Opening Ceremonies on Friday and a 7- to 11-hour delay for Saturday’s 400 IM men’s swimming final featuring Ryan Lochte and Michael Phelps.

Sunday’s gripes seem to be less focused, with people carping about a bevy of events delayed into primetime and some tweeting about the reaction to #nbcfail. There’s also a Internet meme where people are jokingly tweeting about NBC’s tape-delayed coverage of historical events.

So what’s the solution? I think the Canadian model works well for a sports fan and a viewer — live coverage whenever possible and highlights when necessary. I’m not sure what current rightsholder CTV is doing, but the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation would only airhighlight packagesduring times when live coverage wasn’t feasible … but after airing the live coverage.

Looking at NBC’s position, theydid fork out the dough to air the Games, so they’re obviously in the driver’s seat about their decisions.Their arguments include the fact that they can reach a greater audience and earn more ad dollars by airing taped events in primetime. That seems to be borne out by the record ratings for the first two days of the London Games.

They’ve also made fun of the Canadian model. I remember during the Athens Games in 2004 reading about an NBC producer touting the higher American ratings than their Canadian counterparts.

NBC has also countered critics by saying all the events are streaming live online. I appreciate that effort — although I question how much of an effort it really is, considering thatOlympic Broadcasting Servicesprovides feeds of every event anyway. Still, it’s a step up from the Vancouver Games, where most events were kept offline until they aired on the Peacock.

The service was fairly comprehensive during the Beijing Games, but I’m shut out this time — people need to prove they’re paying for an expanded cable or satellite subscription before they can get access. People with rabbit ears on their televisions are shut out.

One final point about NBC that people rarely seem to consider is the fact that NBC isn’t a monolithic network — they have to keep their local affiliates happy. I have no doubt that local stations’ desires to garner the largest audiences is also a factor in NBC’s scheduling. That’s also why I believe local news and key syndicated shows are still shown, despite the huge amount of Olympics events available.

It’s hard to say what the ultimate impact of #NBCfail will be. For now, the ratings tend to support NBC’s decisions regarding the tape-delayed experience they offer television viewers. However, perhaps #NBCfail will continue to point out that this should be a golden era of sports broadcasting and that a significant number of people are aware of better, live offerings than what NBC is serving up.

Opening Ceremonies concerns:While I’m still making my way through an over-stuffed Opening Ceremonies, I have to dingNBC Olympicsfor its decision toair ads instead of showing the Olympic Oaths (prior to the caldron lighting). Amid all of the symbolism of the Opening Ceremonies, having athletes, coaches and officials swear to the true spirit of sportsmanship is a huge one.

The Age of Australia identified the oath takers as UK taewondo athlete Sarah Stevenson, boxing referee Mik Basi for officials and canoeing coach Eric Farrell.

Also, according to the International Olympic Committee’s guide to Opening Ceremonies (PDF), every ceremony is to include 11 elements. The oaths are three of the elements. NBC should have made time for at least the athletes’ oath.

For the record, the oath for athletes is — “In the name of all competitors I promise that we shall take part in these Olympic Games, respecting and abiding by the rules which govern them, committing ourselves to a sport without doping and without drugs, in the true spirit of sportsmanship, for the glory of sport and the honour of our teams.”

The network was also criticized for airing a pretaped interview instead of showing a portion of the ceremonies commemorating victims of terrorism (particularly the July 7, 2005, attacks in London).

Photo: “Live – NBC” Something West Coast viewers saw only briefly during the 2010 Vancouver Winter Games. For this year’s London games, seeing such a thing may almost be a mirage.

Posted in Sports and rec | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments