Federal Judge: Hillary Must Answer Two Questions Under Oath

Posted by Tina

Judicial Watch reports that a U.S. District Court Judge, Emmet G. Sullivan, has ruled that Hillary must answer the following two questions, under oath, within thirty days. She has not as yet been subjected to questioning under oath, a reality that should throw red flags resembling a fourth of July pyrotechnic celebration!

1. Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.

2. During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the States system’ and “if they wanted to see them, they certainly would have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This ruling is related to a JW Freedom of Information lawsuit about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin to engage in outside employment while employed by the Department of State. The case was reopened because of revelations about the private email system. The court also granted discovery to JW to help determine if and how Clinton’s email thwarted the FOIA.

This entry was posted in Constitution and Law. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Federal Judge: Hillary Must Answer Two Questions Under Oath

  1. J. Soden says:

    Anyone else wanna bet that $hrilLIARy will trot out her famous “I don’t recall . . .” excuse?????

    • Libby says:

      How come it’s wicked when she does it … but peachy-keen when Donny Jr. and Jeff Sessions do it?

      Such hypocrisy invites derision … and how CAN you let that feeble little man lead you around by the nose like this? … up there in Pleasure, CA.

      • Tina says:

        Libby, who here has commented on either Sessions or Don Jr refusing to answer questions? There are no “peachy keen” comments to be found.

        Also, please explain why any person should be allowed the legal courtesies extended to Hillary when accused? Why has she been coddled and protected and why do you, apparently, condone it?


        After years of holding herself above the law, telling lie after lie, and months of flat-out obstruction, HIllary Clinton has finally produced to the FBI her server and three thumb drives. Apparently, the server has been professionally wiped clean of any useable information, and the thumb drives contain only what she selectively culled. Myriad criminal offenses apply to this conduct.

        Anyone with knowledge of government workings has known from inception that Hillary’s communications necessarily would contain classified and national security related information. Thanks to the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community, it is now beyond dispute that she had ultra-Top Secret information and more that should never have left the State Department.

        Equal to Ms. Clinton’s outrageous misconduct is that of the entire federal law enforcement community. It has long chosen to be deliberately blind to these flagrant infractions of laws designed to protect national security—laws for which other people, even reporters, have endured atrocious investigations, prosecutions, and some served years in prison for comparatively minor infractions.

        Comey actually read what was an indictment and then, without benefit of legal process, declared she was not culpable…he had to alter the language he used to justify the injustice!

        There is no comparison even had we commented.

  2. Tina says:

    Or…she might reprise her snarky, What difference does it make.” But I’m with you, Hillary is sooooooo competent and smart and yet, when asked, she can’t recall a thing and “you” are an idiot for deining to hold her accountable.

    Expect another circus performance.

  3. J. Soden says:

    Off Topic – but correct: Today’s ER Editorial regarding Paradise rebuilding.

  4. Libby says:

    Hmmmm. Should you be bringing up private email indiscretions … just now? … when yet another bit of Republican hypocrisy has hit the fan.

    I mean … WE could spend the next two years hounding Ivanka. But WE have better things to do.

    • Joe says:

      Yes, you have better things to do. Such as join the Poop Patrol in your socialist paradise of San Francrisco and pick up feces.

      It’s no laughing matter — SF forming Poop Patrol to keep sidewalks clean

    • Tina says:

      Why not bring them up? If laws are broken, no matter by whom, they must be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence proves damning.

      One possible difference, and it’s major, is she insists through her legal team, that she “”sometimes used her personal account, almost always for logistics and scheduling concerning her family.” She maintains she never sent classified information.

      We know Hillary not only sent and received classified information, she also lied about it under oath, and did everything in her power to destroy evidence while playing dumb with Congress and the press. (We also know President Obama used her private email to communicate so he was well aware of her activity.)

      Perhaps it is you, indeed your entire party including media, that have no respect for the law and partisan politics drives your adherence/corruption regarding same.

  5. Joe says:

    They should have been doing this in 2017. It’s going to be harder now that the Demorats control the House.

    I hope they confer with Charles Ortel. He has proven beyond doubt that the Clinton Foundation was the largest charity fraud of all time.

    They’d better get going. There is serious talk that Hitlery will run in 2020. Do you want to live through 8 years of this?


  6. Tina says:

    Somewhat related: The Conservative Treehouse reports, “Dan Bongino Presentation of “Spygate”…” See the video and chart…read the commentary.

Leave a Reply to Tina Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *