NPR VIOLATING FCC RULES?

By Jack

If you are paying (taxes) to support a public facility of any kind would you mind if they took a particular political view?  And would you be bothered if that political view undermined your closely held view? How about if it encouraged people break the law?  Now please answer this honestly, without regard to whether this public facility falls on your side of politics or not, ok?   Take a purely neutral stance for fairness.

Today I was listening to the news on NPR, national public radio.  In theory they are supposed to prioritize news based on its national importance, right?  Yeah, in theory this is what is supposed to happen, but they’re blatantly slipping in commentary (leftwing) into much of their programming and in their national news reporting.  That’s wrong, if they are receiving tax dollars.

Take for instance they stunt they pulled today.  I’m not sure of the reporter, but I think it was Lu Lu Garcia-Navarro, anyway, the female reporter was saying ICE arrests are down and reminded people (illegals and people who shelter them) that if ICE shows up on their door, they do not have to let them in without a warrant.   She said if people felt intimidated by ICE agents, they should contact their local ACLU.  Then the reporter made the unsupportable statement that migrants are rarely lawbreakers…hey, if they came here illegally, they broke the law, duh.   She felt it was necessary to point out to illegals that many Churches serve as an overnight place (sanctuary) stay to avoid ICE deportation.

Here is your tax dollars at work on NPR giving advice thru a news story on what to do to avoid being deported and to thwart ICE.  This is like aiding and abetting in a crime and it ticked me off!

Whether or not I support hiding illegals or not does not matter!  What matters is this is a flagrant violation of the agreement between national public radio and the people who pay for them to operate (taxpayers).

This is not a freedom of speech issue either, this was a subversive editorial cloaked as a news story to undermine immigration law.  How could this not violate the contractual agreement of non-partisanship in order to receive taxpayer funding?

The FCC should be on this big time, because this is far from the first time the liberal dominated NPR has pulled this junk.   If the FCC are supposed to be our watchdogs, but they are doing a lousy job… in my opinion.   What do you think?

Tagged , , | 25 Comments

Jack Lee Art – Painting Titled, Birds of Prey (Stukas)

This is acrylic on canvas, depicting two early model Stuka dive bombers in attack mode.  The Stuka’s were obsolete by the time WWII began, but the German High Command liked them as a terror weapon, mostly because of the screaming siren in a dive mode.

The Stukas were built to take a pounding.  So, they were strong and very accurate with their payload, but they were not fast.  This made them an easy target for a British Hurricane or Spitfire fighter.   Ironically, despite their obsolescence, the German’s would not stop production of Stuka.  In fact, they were around right up to the end of the war, even though by then they were hopelessly outgunned and slower than everything else in the air except for a kite or a balloon.

The Stuka could carry one 500 lb. bomb or one 250 lb. bomb and two smaller bombs mounted under each wing.   Not an impressive bomb load, but remember, they were accurate and that scream they made in a dive made them a psychological weapon.

The colors scheme varied widely, depending on where they were deployed, the year and the squadron.  The sky blue belly was very common.  Notice the dive brake on the leading edge of the right wing?  Actually they would be on both wings but you can’t see much of the dive brake on the left wing because of the angle.

This bomber carried a machinegun and gunner in the rear seat facing backwards and a pilot.  The plane was strong enough to handle 6 g’s plus or minus…that’s a lot of g’s and most pilots would pass out if they tried it.  However, the Stuka’s had a safety feature that automatically leveled the plane, if the pilot blacked out while  pulling up from a steep dive, that was a handy gadget.

The fat wheel pants (fenders) were found most often on early 1936-39 versions, while the scoop on the cowling was found on newer versions.  I took a little artistic liberty and combined the two variants in my version.  Everything else is very authentic.

Few old war planes reflect the ugly, brutish and destructive side of war more than the infamous Stuka dive bomber.  That’s why I picked it.  I hope you will take a moment and just stare at the painting for 30 seconds.  Note the cold and warm colors, the contrast, the dizzying background, the ghostly look to the Stuka, its all designed to evoke strong emotion.  I think its one of my most powerful paintings to date.  But, what do think, that’s what matters….did I succeed?

All comments welcome.

Posted in Art | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Meanies on the Left Pick on 8 Year Old Girl

thanks go to Harold for this find…

Do it “for the children” is a favorite leftist pitch. As for what liberals do to the children, doxxing and death threats that have silenced a budding little social-media comedy star are a good example. The incident also again illustrates how intimidation, Brown Shirt-style, does effectively stifle dissent.

The victim is eight-year-old Ava Martinez, better known as “Mini-AOC,” who did spot-on satirical impressions of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). The young performer’s family deleted all her social-media accounts last Wednesday, alarming her 87,000 Twitter followers and sparking suspicions that Twitter had suspended her or someone had hacked her account. But the truth was even worse, as her stepfather, Salvatore Schachter, explained in the tweet below:

 

sickentirade

 

Schachter elaborated in an interview with the Gateway Pundit website. “We had to delete our accounts because the threats, harassment, negativity and hate directed at Ava and our family grew too much to bear,” he said. “The calls, texts, posts and emails from angry, hate-filled people were quite frankly, disturbing.”

Posted in Morals and Ethics | 20 Comments

Open Carry?

by Jack

As a gun owner I do believe in the 2nd ammendment and I realize with freedom of any sort, there will be risks associated.  There are a lot crazy people in this world that might get their hands on a gun…then watch out.  But, the freedom to drive a car results in 40,000 deaths a year and most of the drivers were far from crazy people.  Boating accidents accounted for 658 deaths and 2,629 injuries.  Even bicycling is not without risks, 777 dead and 400,000 injured in 2017.  But, one horrific incident with a gun and the liberals scream for gun control.

That said, when idiot gunowners go out of their way to abuse their 2nd amendment freedom in ways that make other people concerned and apprehensive, they do terrible harm to the 2nd amendment and bad things usually follow.

In the picture below you can see what I mean.   Only a fool would take a weapon like this into a coffee shop.  However, it could be that the person in the long coat wasn’t a supporter of gun rights at all.  It could be this was just a put up job by the anti-gun crowd; I wouldn’t doubt it.   But, in either case, if the abuse keeps up you, will see legislation passed to curtail open carry laws.  And that’s unfortunate response since most gun owners are far more responsible and safer than your average licensed driver.

The guy shown at the top is perfectly acceptable with his legal open carry weapon – the guy below him is not, although in most open carry states they are both 100% legal.

There is this kind of open carry…..

 

 

14 Comments

Bowling Alone – A Great Book to Read

In part by Jack…

In the book Bowling Alone, author Putnam, talks a great deal about the glue that holds a society together and allows it to thrive.   Those things are generalized in the term social capital, in the finance world this would be money.  But, what is it in a social setting?

Social capital refers to connections, networks, and relations among people, especially when those links are enriched by civic virtue and deepened by reciprocal obligation. None of these forms of capital appears out of the blue. Nor can they be taken for granted. It takes attention, effort, and commitment to provide, grow, and enhance them.

A society that expects to thrive can ill afford to be without sound social capital, for that resource fosters what Putnam calls “sturdy norms of reciprocity.” At the heart of those norms is a sense of mutual trust. Where such trust is found, people can count on each other for help, support, and commitment that encourage and create shared causes. Quoting baseball’s Yogi Berra, Putnam says that the reciprocal features of social capital he has in mind are largely summed up in the adage: “If you don’t go to somebody’s funeral, they won’t come to yours.”

Putnam’s analysis of social capital highlights three further points. First, social capital is not unequivocally good. Social networks, even reciprocal obligations, can serve causes that are unjust and destructive. Putnam wants to minimize the forms and functions of social capital that promote “sectarianism, ethnocentrism, corruption” and bolster those that encourage “mutual support, cooperation, trust, institutional effectiveness.” Trump’s 4th of July parade was designed to generate pride, trust and support.  Did it meet its goals?  If not, what would you suggest?

  1.  Ethnocentrism -  Sociology. the belief in the inherent superiority of one’s own ethnic group or culture.  a tendency to view alien groups or cultures from the perspective of one’s own.  Another word for tribalism.
  2.  Sectarianism – excessive attachment to a particular sect or party.  Another form of fanaticism.
24 Comments

Hope Your 4th was a Good One?

by jack

Sorry for the slow postings, I took the weekend off!  But, I am back because we have a lot too discuss.   Couple of things, first is the Iran situation and the border issues.  I’ve also been thinking about why we are so divided as a nation.

There was a book that came out about 2 years ago called, “Bowling Alone” and gives some great insight where we seem to be heading as a society.    The book illustrates how people are becoming socially isolated and we see this most in our kids today…that is scary.  Teen suicide is at record levels.

In Bowling Alone, Author Putnam, uses data from a wide variety of sources.  He shows that social capital and engagement have declined in areas such as organizational membership, attending religious services, attending club meetings, and interacting with others face-to-face in communities.

Putnam suggests several explanations for this decline and argues that generational succession accounts for about half of the overall change. He also examines what the deficit in social capital is doing to individuals, communities, and America. Finally, he discusses how America could reverse the trend and start revitalizing social capital.

I watched a group of high schoolers crossing the street a few months back and noticed something really odd.  90% were talking on their cell phone or playing a game on their phone.  If this is what’s meant by generational succession then that’s really sad.

More on this and other things…. later.  Yard work calls!    Anything you care discuss, please send me a comment.

2 Comments

God Bless the USA

15 Comments

Is the 4th of July a Political Event?

by Jack

I know that some ranking democrats are blasting Trump for trying to take over the 4th for his own personal gain and then do a military parade to let dems know who is in change!

This is unfortunate because they are completely wrong and I am not surprised.   The Fourth has never been apolitical or nonpartisan.   During the War of Independence, officials used the anniversary of Congress’s adoption of the Declaration of Independence as an opportunity to bolster anti-British sentiment. They rallied support for the Patriots’ cause with toasts, orations, militia drills and fireworks. In the postwar years, the day transformed into a civics lesson, with Americans extolling the benefits of republican government and, later, the Constitution.

Nothing has changed since 1776.  The 4th of July is the peoples day for sure, but it’s also about government and a reminder why we have the kind of government we do.  We all share the same lifeboat and the 4th should remind us of that.

We’re also long overdue for a military parade.  If I were a soldier I would be  honored to be included in such a parade before the people.  And the people should look upon our military with pride and happiness that we have such a force to defend us.  Trump was right to include the military in a 4th of July parade.  For too long we only trotted out our military when we were in trouble and then when it was over, we conveniently put them back in the box until the next time.  They deserve a victory parade and the 4th of July is a great time to do it.

I’m glad Trump saw fit to deliver!  It’s about damn time.   Wish I could be there to watch it in person.  This will be a day to remember.

 

18 Comments

Get Ready for the 4th

6 Comments

Signers of the Declaration of Independence

The Signers of The Declaration of Independence – They pledged their lives and their fortunes in order to create a new nation.

 

Name

State Rep.

Date of Birth

Birthplace

Age in 1776

Occupation

Number of Marriages

Number of Children

Date of Death

Age at Death

Adams, John

MA

10/30/1735

Quincy, MA

40

Lawyer

1

5

7/4/1826

90

Adams, Samuel

MA

9/27/1722

Boston, MA

53

Merchant

2

2

10/2/1803

81

Bartlett, Josiah

NH

11/21/1729

Amesbury,MA

46

Physician

1

12

5/19/1795

65

Braxton, Carter

VA

9/10/1736

Newington, VA

39

Plantation Owner

2

18

10/10/1797

61

Carroll, Charles of Carrollton

MD

9/19/1737

Annapolis, MD

38

Merchant, Plantation Owner

1

7

11/14/1832

95

Chase, Samuel

MD

4/17/1741

Somerset Co., MD

35

Lawyer

2

4

6/19/1811

70

Clark, Abraham

NJ

2/15/1726

Elizabethtown, NJ

50

Lawyer, Surveyer

1

10

9/15/1794

68

Clymer, George

PA

3/16/1739

Philadelphia, PA

37

Merchant

1

8

1/24/1813

73

Ellery, William

RI

12/22/1727

Newport, RI

48

Lawyer, Merchant

2

16

2/15/1820

92

Floyd, William

NJ

12/17/1734

Brookhaven, NY

41

Land Speculator

2

3

8/4/1821

86

Franklin, Benjamin

PA

1/17/1706

Boston, MA

70

Scientist, Printer

1

3

4/17/1790

84

Gerry, Elbridge

MA

7/17/1744

Marblehead, MA

32

Merchant

1

7

11/23/1814

70

Gwinnett, Button

GA

c. 1735

Gloucester, England

41

Merchant, Plantation Owner

1

3

5/15/1777

42

Hall, Lyman

GA

4/12/1724

Wallingford, CT

52

Physician, Minister

2

1

10/19/1790

66

Hancock, John

MA

1/12/1737

Quincy, MA

40

Merchant

1

2

10/8/1793

56

Harrison, Benjamin

VA

4/7/1726

Charles City Co., VA

50

Plantation Owner, Farmer

1

7

4/24/1791

65

Hart, John

NJ

c. 1711

Hunterdon Co., NJ

65

Land owner

1

13

5/11/1779

68

Hewes, Joseph

NC

1/23/1730

Kingston, NJ

46

Merchant

10/10/1779

49

Heyward Jr., Thomas

SC

7/28/1746

St. Helena Parish, SC

30

Lawyer, Plantation Owner

2

8

3/6/1809

62

Hooper, William

NC

6/17/1742

Boston, MA

34

Lawyer

1

3

10/14/1790

48

Hopkins, Stephen

RI

3/7/1707

Providence, RI

69

Merchant

2

7

4/13/1785

78

Hopkinson, Francis

NJ

10/2/1737

Philadelphia, PA

38

Lawyer, Musician

1

5

5/9/1791

53

Huntington, Samuel

CT

7/3/1731

Windham, CT

45

Lawyer

1

2

1/5/1796

64

Jefferson, Thomas

VA

4/13/1743

Albemarle Co., VA

33

Lawyer, Plantation Owner, Scientist

1

6

7/4/1826

83

Lee, Francis Lightfoot

VA

10/14/1734

Mt. Pleasant, VA

41

Plantation Owner

1

0

c. 1724

Ridley Township, PA

50

1

3

9/14/1788

48

Read, George

DE

9/18/1733

Northeast MD

42

Lawyer

1

5

9/21/1798

65

Rodney, Caesar

DE

10/7/1728

Dover, DE

47

Plantation Owner, Military Officer

0

0

6/29/1784

55

Ross, George

PA

5/10/1730

New Castle, DE

46

Lawyer

1

3

7/14/1779

49

Rush, Benjamin Dr.

PA

1/4/1746

Philadelphia, PA

30

Physician

1

13

4/19/1813

67

Rutledge, Edward

SC

11/23/1749

Christ Church Parish, SC

26

Lawyer, Plantation Owner

2

3

1/23/1800

50

Sherman, Roger

CT

4/19/1721

Newton, MA

55

Lawyer

2

15

7/23/1793

72

Smith, James

PA

c. 1719

Northern Ireland

57

Lawyer

1

5

7/11/1806

87

Stockton, Richard

NJ

10/1/1730

Princeton, NJ

45

Lawyer

1

6

2/28/1781

50

Stone, Thomas

MD

c. 1743

Charles Co., MD

33

Lawyer

1

3

10/5/1787

44

Taylor, George

PA

c. 1716

Ireland

60

Merchant

1

2

2/23/1781

65

Thornton, Matthew

NH

c. 1714

Ireland

62

Physician

1

5

6/24/1803

89

Walton, George

GA

c. 1741

Cumberland Co., VA

35

Lawyer

1

2

2/2/1804

63

Whipple, William

NH

1/14/1730

Kittery, ME

46

Merchant

1

0

11/28/1785

55

Williams, William

CT

4/18/1731

Lebannon, CT

45

Merchant

1

3

8/2/1811

80

Wilson, James

PA

9/14/1742

Carskerdo, Scotland

33

Lawyer

2

7

8/21/1798

55

Witherspoon, John

NJ

2/5/1723

Gifford, Scotland

53

Minister

2

12

11/15/1794

71

Wolcott, Oliver

CT

11/20/1726

Windsor, CT

49

Lawyer

1

4

12/1/1797

71

Wythe, George

VA

c. 1726

Elizabeth City Co., VA

50

Lawyer

2

1

6/8/1806

80

The Declaration of Independence wasn’t signed on July 4, 1776 – On July 1, 1776, the Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia, and on the following day 12 of the 13 colonies voted in favor of Richard Henry Lee’s motion for independence. The delegates then spent the next two days debating and revising the language of a statement drafted by Thomas Jefferson. On July 4, Congress officially adopted the Declaration of Independence, and as a result the date is celebrated as Independence Day.

Nearly a month would go by, however, before the actual signing of the document took place. First, New York’s delegates didn’t officially give their support until July 9 because their home assembly hadn’t yet authorized them to vote in favor of independence. Next, it took two weeks for the Declaration to be “engrossed”—written on parchment in a clear hand. Most of the delegates signed on August 2, but several—Elbridge Gerry, Oliver Wolcott, Lewis Morris, Thomas McKean and Matthew Thornton—signed on a later date. (Two others, John Dickinson and Robert R. Livingston, never signed at all.) The signed parchment copy now resides at the National Archives in the Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom, alongside the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The founders believed the Declaration of Independence would be just a footnote in history, the most memorable document would be Richard Lee’s resolution and motion to form a new nation.  Lee was asked to write the declaration, but he was already busy lobbying his resolution, so he deferred this task to his friend Thomas Jefferson.

Lee’s resolution was just three short lines, but it set in motion a series of events that would change the course of world history:

“Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

That it is expedient forthwith to take the most effectual measures for forming foreign Alliances.

That a plan of confederation be prepared and transmitted to the respective Colonies for their consideration and approbation.”

~Enjoy your 4th of July~

9 Comments